TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker shares their experience with a vaccine safety specialist who advised them to submit vaccine injury reports. However, when the speaker sent in six reports, public health denied them and claimed there was no evidence of harm. The speaker also mentions that after they wrote a letter to a doctor, the College of Physicians warned doctors not to contradict the public health narrative or they would be investigated and disciplined. This warning has led to doctors staying silent and not questioning the narrative. The speaker submitted 14 vaccine injury reports, but all were denied by public health, who claimed they were coincidences and not vaccine injuries. The speaker concludes that reporting vaccine injuries is impossible as public health censors them to maintain the belief that side effects are rare.

No successful coronavirus vaccine has been made. Gene-based vaccines were tested on animals, leading to sickness and death. Despite concerns about safety and lack of long-term data, Canada continued vaccine rollout. A doctor raised safety concerns, was reprimanded for causing vaccine hesitancy, and saw neurological issues in patients post-vaccination. Questions to health authorities went unanswered, leading to a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.

Medical authorities are denying the existence of vaccine-related cancers, leaving patients without proper research or treatment options. Doctors are being threatened and silenced, with some losing their positions and labs for speaking out. Only a few doctors are raising the alarm, while the medical establishment ignores the issue. This denial extends to other vaccine injuries, such as myocarditis, which can lead to sudden cardiac arrest. The denial prevents the development of new treatments and solutions. The medical authorities' refusal to acknowledge vaccine injuries is causing harm and preventing the advancement of medical knowledge and care.

Speaker 0 frames the issue as 'the corruption of science' and the 'capture of the agencies' by pharmaceutical industries, stating the goal is to restore integrity and credibility to science. Speaker 1 cites a CDC internal study: 'black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two hundred and sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited.' He adds that 'The chief chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior said vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact.' Finally, he asserts, 'So, you know that story. And you know of hundreds of stories like that. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies, and we're gonna change that right now.'

In my practice, we have administered around three to four thousand vaccinations. Initially, we didn't see many side effects, but they gradually increased throughout the year. More and more people started experiencing post-vaccination symptoms such as heart rhythm disorders, extreme fatigue, persistent muscle pain, and nerve inflammation. We formed groups of doctors who also administer vaccines, and they observed the same issues in their patients. However, discussing these concerns was difficult, as it was dismissed as a psychological overreaction. It was shocking to find that scientific discourse on the matter was not allowed. The increasing number of patients created an internal conflict for me and many other doctors who genuinely want the best for their patients. One case that stood out was a sixteen-year-old boy who developed nausea and chest pain forty-eight hours after the second dose. His EKG showed significant abnormalities, and he was diagnosed with severe myocarditis and heart swelling. Thankfully, he recovered, but this made me pause and reflect, especially when other people, including parents, expressed uncertainty and entrusted their lives to us. This trust carries a tremendous responsibility to be honest. Whether we have seen a particular case once or ten times, the connection to the vaccine remains uncertain. Until proven otherwise, we must inform people about what we observe and the experiences we have. This right belongs to individuals when they decide to undergo any form of physical intervention, no matter how small. It became an internal conflict for me because there was immense societal pressure to vaccinate as many people as possible across all age groups, while my personal experience as a doctor showed that it is not without side effects. That was the moment when I realized I couldn't continue vaccinating because I had to stay true to the truth and honor that trust. We have had around three to four hundred people come to us with post-vaccination symptoms. I have seen approximately sixty to eighty EKGs that showed clear abnormalities or rhythm disorders in previously young and healthy individuals. I have also seen a similar number of imaging results.

Everything they said about the vaccine was wrong and has harmed many people. I wonder why more doctors aren't speaking up and admitting they were wrong, like I did when I endorsed the Iraq war. I've felt bad about it for 20 years and have apologized whenever I could, not to please others but to maintain my dignity. It's important to apologize if you unintentionally hurt someone. I wouldn't trust doctors who still lie about COVID, as they are dangerous and immoral.

Some people who raised concerns about vaccine side effects were silenced to prevent vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines are crucial for older individuals but may not be as critical for younger people. While vaccines have saved lives, some individuals have experienced significant side effects. It is important to acknowledge these issues despite the benefits vaccines provide.

Vaccines eradicated smallpox and polio. The speaker was taught that vaccines are safe, effective, and necessary, and there's no reason to question it. Medical school rotations reinforced that vaccines are safe and effective, and the speaker was told to ignore the inserts because that's lawyer jargon. Medical school provided no education about vaccine contents, safety records, informed consent, or the vaccine injury compensation program. The speaker assumed the science was settled and didn't question vaccines.

I apologize for not paying attention to warnings about misinformation. Trust in vaccinations is eroded when scientific processes are not followed. A peer-reviewed article on COVID-19 vaccinations was demonetized on YouTube despite being scientifically sound. As a physician, I aim to have evidence-based discussions. The article highlighted potential risks of vaccinations, such as an increase in autoimmune disorders and spike proteins found in cardiac tissues. It is crucial to learn from past mistakes and have transparent discussions to build trust in emergency use authorizations. Translation: The speaker acknowledges not heeding warnings about misinformation and emphasizes the importance of following scientific processes for maintaining trust in vaccinations. They discuss a peer-reviewed article on COVID-19 vaccinations that was demonetized on YouTube despite being scientifically valid. As a physician, they advocate for evidence-based discussions and highlight potential risks associated with vaccinations, such as an increase in autoimmune disorders and the presence of spike proteins in cardiac tissues. Learning from past mistakes and fostering transparent discussions are crucial for building trust in emergency use authorizations.

"Roll back in the time machine to August 2014, that is when Bill Thompson made the admission that the CDC had lied and hid the fact that the MMR vaccine was associated with autism." "Doctor Thompson freely admitted that he had covered it up and his associates at the CDC also covered it up." "Thimerosal causes autism like features and that's the way I would say it." "I'm completely ashamed of what I did." "Colleen is the center director. Frank is the director of immunization safety, and Marshall is the branch chief." "Doctor Julie Gerberding was head of the CDC at the time. Coincidentally, she went on to a lucrative career at Merck, the manufacturer of the MMR vaccine." "I'm like, oh my god. I cannot believe we did what we did. But we did."

World governments have harmed millions without apology. Vaccines are linked to autism, ADHD, and other health issues. The more shots kids get, the more likely they are to have these conditions. The truth is often silenced in mainstream media.

Doctors are generally educated and capable of understanding evidence, yet many have made incorrect statements about vaccines, causing harm. It's surprising that most American doctors haven't acknowledged their mistakes. Personally, I wouldn't trust a doctor who continues to misrepresent COVID information. One doctor I know treated me after I experienced vaccine-related issues. She recognized early on that something was wrong and treated her patients with steroids when others wouldn't, leading to better outcomes. Unfortunately, many people lack access to compassionate and knowledgeable doctors like her. It's hard to overlook the lack of accountability from many in the medical field, as credibility hinges on acknowledging past errors and the reasoning behind them.

An analysis of clinical trial data showed that for every eight hundred people vaccinated, one suffers a serious adverse event. The goal is to end the silence for the one in eight hundred. It is time to stop politicizing vaccine injuries and start building meaningful recognition, research, competent care, and fair and just compensation.

My friends, including doctors, who initially supported vaccines are now skeptical due to the COVID vaccine propaganda, adverse effects like strokes and heart attacks, athletes collapsing, and increased all-cause mortality post-vaccination. Some even got pacemakers. People are hesitant to admit they were wrong and may have harmed others.

There have been repeated attempts to mandate coercion without accepting natural immunity, which is claimed to be equally effective at preventing infection and more effective at preventing severe disease and death. There was no real questioning of an emergency use authorized product, and informed consent was not prioritized. When doctors make mistakes, they should acknowledge the mistake and harm, apologize, and institute measures to prevent recurrence. This hasn't happened at a public health scale, and the medical establishment needs to acknowledge the problem. The speaker believes the product in question should never have been approved for a single human. At the very least, there should be acknowledgement of unintended harms, apologies, efforts to help the vaccine-injured, and structures for greater transparency in medicine. Regulators should not receive 86% of their funding from big pharma and then claim to be independent.

The speaker witnessed severe vaccine injuries in patients who received mRNA injections, including rapid multi-organ failure, seizures, blood clots, strokes, and spinal gangrene. Despite doctors not connecting the symptoms to the vaccines, the speaker recognized the potential vaccine injuries. They vowed never to take any vaccination again, no matter the circumstances.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

A doctor named William Thompson contacts someone and expresses shame about a fraudulent MMR study conducted by the CDC. The study allegedly covered up the link between vaccines and autism. A parent shares their experience of their child's adverse reaction to vaccines, resulting in loss of motor skills and behavioral changes. Thompson plotted data that showed a separation between MMR and autism diagnoses at 15 months, indicating a potential risk. The CDC is accused of knowing about this risk but continuing vaccinations unchanged. The consequences of this cover-up are described as grievous harm to children and a predicted increase in autism cases.

There are concerns about the credibility of certain individuals who are involved in distorting the narrative. The evidence of a lab leak and the gain of function emails from Fauci to other scientists raise alarming questions. It is unsettling that these are the people we trust with our lives. For parents whose children may have suffered vaccine injuries, the fear of myocarditis and shortened lifespans is terrifying. It is even more troubling that the vaccine was pushed for children despite knowing it wasn't deadly for them and didn't prevent transmission. The truth was concealed.

There is a discussion about how public trust in vaccination has changed since the pandemic. The speaker notes that years ago there were “five people in the world who were prepared to talk about the thorny issue of vaccination.” Post COVID, however, “half the adult population of the world are now saying, hold on, we don't trust you. You lied to us. It's not what you told us, safe and effective.” This skepticism extends to vaccines given to children, with the question, “Does this apply to all the other vaccines you're putting into my kids?” The speaker then asserts that “safety studies haven't been done,” suggesting that important research behind vaccines is incomplete or lacking. This leads to the claim that “they've created this mess for themselves.” Despite the frustration, the speaker emphasizes the moral weight of deception, stating, “it's really tough to lie. I mean, lying gets you into real trouble.”

The COVID story reveals corruption in science, journalism, and universities, with tangible consequences like injuries. This corruption warrants a complete reboot of the system, but the system refuses to learn. Many doctors who were previously vaccine advocates are now skeptics after investigating adjuvants and the mRNA platform, realizing their previous understanding was incorrect.

There was a lack of transparency about vaccine side effects, leading to underreporting. Mandating vaccines was a mistake; personal choice should have been allowed since they don't prevent infection and have side effects. Translation: Lack of transparency and underreporting of side effects, along with mandating vaccines, were mistakes. Personal choice should have been allowed due to the vaccines not preventing infection and having side effects.

Doctors and politicians have promoted vaccines, but refuse to acknowledge potential harm. Many Americans who received the vaccine may face unknown risks. The truth must be revealed to prevent future harm from the mRNA platform.

Doctors report receiving minimal training on vaccines during their medical education. They were taught that vaccines are safe, effective, and have saved millions of lives, with emphasis on adhering to the vaccination schedule. Doctors say they did not learn the specific components of vaccines and assumed they contained saline water and bits of viruses. Without independent investigation, doctors presume vaccines are beneficial and essential for all children to receive on schedule. Since doctors may lack in-depth knowledge about vaccines due to limited training, parents should be trusted and listened to.

The speaker finds it difficult to find someone who hasn't been damaged by the vaccine, and even senior consultant colleagues haven't connected their ailments to the vaccine. The speaker claims the vaccine causes autoimmune diseases, of which there are 131 types, all reportedly linked to the vaccine. Individually, these appear as coincidences, but collectively, a high percentage of vaccinated people suffer from one or more autoimmune conditions. The speaker is annoyed by their GP practice constantly pushing boosters, even knowing their views, suggesting they are incentivized by payment. The speaker believes that if the practice adhered to "first do no harm," they would refuse to administer the vaccines.