TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker denies interacting with their son, brothers, and business associates in relation to the impeachment inquiry, stating that it is all lies.

I have never discussed my son's overseas business dealings or any business matters with him. It is not something we talk about. I have always focused on doing my job and have never discussed anything related to Ukraine or any other business with my son, daughter, or anyone else in our family.

The press asks about Hunter Biden attending the state dinner and whether the president would have invited someone with legal issues. The spokesperson avoids discussing the topic, stating that it is common for family members to attend White House events. When pressed further, the spokesperson deflects the questions and refers to the White House counsel and the Department of Justice for more information. The press continues to inquire about the president's involvement and the spokesperson reiterates that nothing has changed and directs them to the White House counsel for any further statements. The spokesperson does not confirm whether the president was present with his son on a specific date and refers all questions to the White House counsel.

The White House was asked if the president still stands by his statement that he has never been involved in his son's affairs or spoken to him about it. The response was that the president has never been in business with his son, and there is nothing more to add.

The president is not concerned about Hunter Biden's legal challenges distracting from the White House. This situation is a personal matter involving a private citizen. The investigation is led by a Trump-appointed prosecutor, and the Department of Justice operates independently. There will be no further comments on the specifics or characterization of the situation.

Have you ruled out a pardon for yourself or family members? Yes, I have. What would I pardon myself for? I have no intention of pardoning myself because I didn't do anything wrong. Could you comment on Meta's decision to...

Not much has changed since yesterday, and this is a personal matter. Regarding the possibility of the president pardoning his son, the answer is no. I already addressed that. Please continue.

The speaker states that they have not interfered with the Hunter Biden investigation, and there has been no political interference. They cannot comment on whether Joe Biden is being investigated or if the Department of Justice (DOJ) said he is off-limits. The speaker refers to the ongoing investigation led by special counsel Weiss and mentions a long-standing policy. They emphasize the FBI's responsibility to remain non-partisan and deny opening an investigation into the attorney general. The speaker avoids discussing whether the FBI tipped off Hunter Biden's lawyer before executing a search warrant on a storage unit. They conclude by stating that the FBI is not accountable to Congress or the American people.

Speaker 0 asks about the crimes committed by the president's son while in office. Speaker 1 responds by saying they cannot discuss certain things, such as Hunter Biden hiring hookers, smoking crack with Parmesan cheese, putting M&M's on his penis for his deceased brother's wife, or his alleged inappropriate behavior with his niece. Speaker 1 also mentions that they cannot talk about the alleged bribes Joe and Hunter Biden received from China, Russia, and Ukraine, or the suggestion that they should be in jail for treason.

I refuse to answer questions on legal advice. Objection, invoking privilege against self-incrimination. Same response to questions about breaking laws, violating rights, misusing funds, and ethics violations while investigating Trump and working at the Manhattan DA's office.

There is no evidence of a link between Hunter Biden and the president regarding business dealings. The hearing did not provide any proof of wrongdoing by the president. The speaker wanted to address a question but was interrupted by Mr. Bobolinski. Translation: There is no evidence connecting Hunter Biden and the president in terms of business dealings. The hearing failed to show any wrongdoing by the president. The speaker tried to respond to a question but was interrupted by Mr. Bobolinski.

During the interview, they discussed an email mentioning "10 held by H for the big guy." They inferred that the "big guy" referred to President Biden. The AUSA interjected and said she didn't want to ask about the "big guy" or dad, implying that Joe Biden may be involved in Hunter Biden's transactions.

Speaker 0 denies any knowledge or discussion about his business or his family's business with his son or anyone else. Speaker 1 reveals that Stephanie, who was vice president, approved a response to a 2015 story about Hunter Biden's connection to Burisma Energy Company. It is also mentioned that Biden's family received less than $1,000,000 from a Chinese firm.

The question of whether the president will pardon or commute his son Hunter's sentence if convicted has been addressed multiple times. The answer remains clear: no. Despite inquiries about any potential changes in the next six months, the stance is consistent. The president has firmly stated that he will not grant a pardon or commutation to his son. This position is definitive and will not change. The answer is still a no, and there is nothing further to add on this matter.

The speaker was asked about polling data that suggests a majority of Americans, including some Democrats, believe they acted illegally or unethically regarding their family's business interests. The speaker refused to comment and denied any interaction with their son and brother's foreign business associates, calling it a bunch of lies.

Hunter Biden and the Biden family's private citizen status means their work does not reflect administration endorsement. The State Department has no concerns about Hunter Biden's involvement with a Ukrainian gas company. Biden has stated he will not work for foreign companies if his father becomes president. The President's son's investments are being unwound, and any further questions should be directed to his representatives. The President's policy remains that his family will not have business relationships with foreign entities. The focus should be on investigating Trump. Hunter Biden's alleged overseas business dealings are not to be discussed from the podium.

I objected to obtaining flight records as it invades privacy. I am not the one on trial; those trying to steal the 2020 election are. My question remains. Translation: I opposed accessing flight records as it invades privacy. I am not the one being tried; those attempting to steal the 2020 election are. My question still stands.

The president's statements contradict the fact that he has spoken to Hunter Biden's business associates. However, Speaker 1 argues that the president never claimed to have never spoken to anyone. He simply stated that he had no involvement in Hunter Biden's business dealings. Speaker 1 finds it unreasonable to expect a father not to greet people his son is dining with. This is the only evidence presented. Additionally, it is mentioned that Hunter Biden used this as a party trick to impress others.

The President's reaction to the recent legal developments regarding Hunter Biden remains unchanged. This is a personal matter for Hunter, handled independently by the Department of Justice under a Trump-appointed prosecutor. There will be no further comments beyond what was stated previously. The President and First Lady love and support their son as he works to rebuild his life.

President Biden denies discussing business matters with his son or family members. He claims to have never spoken to his son about it and avoids any knowledge or involvement in their business dealings. When asked if he stands by his statement of not discussing his son's overseas affairs, he affirms his stance.

I have addressed this question multiple times, and my stance remains unchanged. We will not comment further on this matter. It is an independent investigation led by a Trump-appointed prosecutor and the Department of Justice. Therefore, we will refrain from making any additional remarks.

Vice President denies ever discussing his son's overseas business dealings, emphasizing a clear separation between personal and government matters. He stands by his statement and claims to have been unaware of his son's involvement in a particular company. The Vice President asserts that he has never discussed his own business or his children's business, specifically mentioning Ukraine.

I won't engage in business with those who support the president-elect. My priority is to ensure a safe environment for myself, my staff, and my family.

I will not comment on allegations regarding my family's business dealings. The claims are false. I did not interact with their business associates. There are many questions.

Mister Bernal declined to answer questions by invoking his Fifth Amendment rights. He declined to answer whether he advised President Biden to pardon Hunter Biden. He declined to answer whether President Biden was fit to execute the duties of president. He declined to answer whether any unelected official or family member of President Biden executed the duties of the presidency. He declined to answer whether President Biden ever instructed him to lie regarding his health, including in his testimony to Congress. It was stated that it was his intention to decline to answer all questions put to him by the committee based on his Fifth Amendment rights.