reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: United Nations agenda 21, sustainable development. It is the inventory and control plan. Inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the agenda for the twenty first century. And so many of us around the world think that a sustainable development just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas. It's constructed of non governmental organizations, corporations, and government in order to dictate and what it is that happens around the world. Regionalization is the stepping stone to globalization and globalization is the standardization of all systems. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all. And the goal of agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit. The principles are public private partnerships, which is fascism. And this is how it's implement it on the ground is through this joining together between corporations, nongovernmental organizations, and governments in order to cut out the actual individual, your voter, and instead to take that to a level where we literally cannot penetrate. This is a corporatocracy. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world while we are moving towards the endgame. We are not there. And this is the opportunity that all of us have now to stand up, to speak out. We are free, and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight.

The 15 minute cities plan by c40 cities will ban petrol and diesel cars, implement calorie-controlled food systems, and freeze bank accounts for non-compliance. The WEF and London mayor are pushing this globally. It's seen as a form of control, leading to a future where work is limited to within these cities. This plan is concerning and not widely discussed.

Agenda 21 is a UN plan for total collectivism, aiming to make people dependent on the state by restricting private property and living in state-provided high-rise apartments. The goal is to control individuals by removing their independence, especially those living in rural areas with their own resources. The plan involves moving people to cities, making them reliant on the state for all necessities like food, shelter, and utilities. This is to ensure control over the population and prevent any threats to the collectivist society.

The United Nations Habitat one plan aims to relocate humans from rural areas to cities to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. Single-family homes will be phased out in favor of apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. The ideology of smart growth or new urbanism promotes living with only the necessary space. The goal is to make it financially and otherwise inconvenient to live in private homes and convince people that it is unsustainable. High-rise stack and pack dwelling units with smart meters and surveillance systems will ensure energy efficiency and monitoring. Those with gardens or single-family residences using excessive water will be removed. Agenda 21 seeks to remove self-sufficient individuals from rural areas and have corporations control food production. The aim is for everyone to walk or bike, leading to a healthier lifestyle, although genetically modified foods will still be consumed.

They are creating mini cities called districts with mixed-use buildings in Toronto. These buildings have residences, offices, and retail spaces but limited parking. The goal is for residents to live, work, and shop within the same building, resembling lockdown conditions during COVID. The concept, known as the 15-minute city, aims to keep people within a 5-kilometer radius of their homes if they do not have a car.

Agenda 21, a United Nations plan launched in 1992, aims to address global environmental issues but has been criticized for its potential to dominate all aspects of human life. Under the banner of social equity, wealth redistribution has rendered many American activities unsustainable and targeted for elimination by 2030. These include single-family homes, suburban communities, crop irrigation, pesticides, livestock production, privately owned automobiles, fossil fuels, mineral extraction, and timber harvesting. The plan also envisions reducing the global population to under 1 billion people, concentrating them in easily surveilled mega cities for greater control.

United Nations Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to inventory and control various aspects of the world, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings. Contrary to popular belief, Sustainable Development is not just about recycling and creative reuse. It involves moving populations into concentrated city centers to regulate global activities. The ultimate goal is to establish a 1 World Government and achieve total control from a central unit. This is implemented through public-private partnerships and the use of chips. It is important for us to be aware of this development and stand up for our freedom.

Agenda 21 is a United Nations plan to establish a collectivist society by eliminating people's independence. The goal is to make everyone dependent on the state for everything, including housing. The plan discourages individuals from living in rural areas and owning land, as they are seen as a threat to the collectivist agenda. The aim is to control mankind by concentrating them in large cities and making them reliant on the state for their basic needs. This is the hidden objective of Agenda 21.

City administration is presenting its plan to accommodate a population of 2,000,000 people through 15-minute cities. The 50 new district plans and bylaws will replace 54 existing planning documents. The goal is to accommodate 600,000 new residents in redeveloped areas, with 50% of new home units added through infill. The plan calls for half of all future travel to be done by transit and for residents to access daily needs within 15 minutes. One resident believes this means staying within their district to meet city climate plan objectives and feels Edmontonians can't afford this experiment. Another speaker feels the district plan has been derailed by 15-minute city conspiracy theories and states that it is about land use.

City administration presents a plan for 2 million people living in 15-minute cities, aiming to accommodate 600,000 new residents through infill development. The plan includes half of all new homes built through infill, half of travel by transit, and access to daily needs within 15 minutes. Some residents are concerned about staying within their district and the speed of the renovation. Others believe conspiracy theories are derailing the district plans, emphasizing the importance of land use.

The transcript discusses the United Nations Habitat I Plan from the 1976 Vancouver Convention, which it says relocates people from farms and rural “wild lands” to cities or human settlements. The goal, it claims, is to concentrate populations in specific zones to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage, so people stay in their homes and may work there, minimizing car use, energy consumption, and water use. It asserts that the UN, being opposed to property rights, will first phase out single-family homes, pushing We the People into apartments and condos in mega cities near railroad tracks. The envisioned living would involve high-rise, “stack and pack” dwelling units built to UN-specified building codes, with guidance from Ickley, COGS, the ADA, and various NGOs aligned with sustainable development. The narrative contrasts this with “animals” roaming continental corridors, while humans live in transit villages and smart cities. Smart growth or new urbanism is described as ideology that questions the need for excess space, suggesting that a two-person couple in a three-bedroom house doesn’t need that extra space. The speakers claim there is a coordinated effort to make private transportation and home ownership as miserable as possible, portraying it as the duty of individuals to exist as global citizens with minimal private life. The plan is depicted as featuring high-rise, stacked living with smart meters and smart heating, enabling energy use to be tightly controlled. If energy use is high, “the energy police,” aided by neighbors and street surveillance, will intervene. A speaker emphasizes that concentrating people in a thousand-person buildings makes monitoring their behavior, location, and thoughts easier than in rural or suburban settings, with smart meters measuring all life activities via smart appliances. Water usage is targeted, with statements that those maintaining gardens or single-family homes—consuming more than a minimal daily water allowance—are unsustainable and should be removed from single-family residences. A participant argues that people with a couple of acres and their own water supply who can grow their own food are a threat to a collectivist society, implying that they will not rely on politicians for basic needs. The transcript ties these ideas to Agenda 21, claiming the plan aims to remove people from the country so corporations can grow all food, while simultaneously denying private living. It concludes by describing human settlements and food sheds as modern-day concentration camps, suggesting that with no cars or parking, all will walk and bike, becoming fit and healthy only insofar as the GM foods they are compelled to eat allow.

Agenda 21 is a United Nations plan from 1992 that aims to control and inventory everything, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings. It focuses on moving populations into concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. The plan involves non-governmental organizations, corporations, and governments working together to regulate and dictate global affairs. The ultimate goal is to establish a one-world government with total control. This implementation is done through public-private partnerships, which is essentially fascism. It's important for us to be aware of this development and stand up for our freedom.

Agenda 21 is a UN plan for total collectivism, aiming to make people dependent on the state by eliminating private property and forcing them into high-rise apartments provided by the government. The goal is to control individuals by making them rely on the state for everything, discouraging independence. The plan involves moving people from rural areas to cities, where they can be easily controlled. This strategy seeks to ensure that individuals are reliant on the government for food, shelter, water, and power.

Agenda 21 is a real plan to remove humans from rural and suburban areas. It has been implemented in the US and supported by every president. It is a global plan implemented locally in every city and town. It aims to control all aspects of life, including land, water, plants, animals, and human beings. The plan is called communitarianism, which balances individual rights with the rights of the community. The individual always loses in this philosophy. Agenda 21 is a stealth plan happening in plain sight. It includes smart growth and wildlands, which restrict mobility and shift land ownership from private to public. This is a takeover of our nation and an administrative coup d'etat. It is sold as an economic driver but is designed to fail.

The United Nations Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to control all means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings worldwide. Contrary to popular belief, sustainable development is not just about recycling and creating resources for all. It involves relocating populations to concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. Agenda 21 is implemented through public-private partnerships, which is a form of fascism. It seeks to establish a one-world government and total control from a central unit. This corporatocracy is currently being developed globally, but there is still an opportunity to stand up and fight for freedom.

The United Nations Habitat 1 plan aims to relocate people from rural areas to cities, known as human settlements, in order to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. Single-family homes will be phased out in favor of apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. The concept of smart growth or new urbanism suggests that people should only have the space they need. The goal is to make private transportation and homeownership unsustainable, while promoting high-rise living with smart meters for energy management. The stack and pack approach allows for easier monitoring and control of residents. Those with gardens or single-family residences using excessive water or resources are deemed unsustainable and need to be removed. The ultimate objective of Agenda 21 is to have people living in urban areas while corporations control food production.

Speaker 0 presents a critical view of “fifteen minute cities,” arguing the goal is to corral people into an area where they can be easily surveilled and controlled. The speaker contends the central interest is how a small, ruling elite can govern the many forever without the many ever being able to complain or act. The result, they claim, is a global governance project that uses big tech and mass surveillance to create a new way of life and system of living, with a particular aim of reducing the share of wealth or resources held by the many—the 99 or so. The speaker connects these ideas to the COVID era, suggesting that groups like the World Economic Forum (WEF) popularized policies framed as sustainability but ultimately designed and implemented to limit ownership and control by individuals. Specifically, the speaker cites WEF proposals such as not owning cars—renting them instead—and the deployment of autonomous fleets to drive people around within a defined radius. They also note proposals around not owning homes but renting and sharing apartments when unoccupied. A concrete example given is the Columbus smart city initiative tied to the Columbus Partnership, which Wexner chaired for roughly twenty years (2001–2021). The speaker notes that Columbus received a large Department of Transportation grant and private funding, possibly from Wexner, to implement a system where private car ownership would disappear in favor of fleets of autonomous vehicles. In this system, the autonomous cars would determine where people go, with specific routes available for payment and use. The speaker references the National Security Commission on AI, chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google, which reportedly described, as part of a strategy to beat China in AI, the need to end private car ownership in the United States and replace it with autonomous fleets (Waymo-like) guided by AI to manage where people go and work, implying a nationwide shift toward centralized planning of mobility. Finally, the speaker connects these initiatives to the Technocracy Inc. model, noting influence from Taylorism and industrial-revolution-era thinking that prioritized efficiency and micromanagement. The implication is that the new systems aim to extract data and monetize daily life, elevating efficiency and control above individual autonomy.

In 1976, the United Nations introduced the Habitat 1 plan at the Vancouver Convention, which aimed to relocate people from rural areas to cities, now called human settlements. The idea behind this plan was to concentrate populations in specific areas to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. As a result, people would stay at home more, potentially even working from home, and rely less on cars and energy. The UN's focus on sustainable development led to the phasing out of single-family homes, which they considered suburban sprawl. Instead, people would live in apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. This concept of "smart growth" or "new urbanism" advocates for using only the necessary amount of space. The overall goal is to make private transportation and owning homes less desirable, promoting the idea of being a responsible global citizen.

In 1976, the United Nations introduced the Habitat one plan, which aimed to relocate people from rural areas to cities to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. Single-family homes were considered suburban sprawl and would be phased out in favor of apartments and condos in megacities. The concept of smart growth or new urbanism promoted the idea of living in spaces that are only necessary, eliminating excess. The goal was to make private transportation and owning a home seem unsustainable. High-rise buildings with smart meters and surveillance systems would ensure efficient energy use, and those who exceeded limits would be monitored by the energy police. The agenda behind this plan was to remove people from rural areas and have corporations control food production. The ultimate aim was to create fit and healthy individuals who would rely on genetically modified foods.

By 2050, there are plans for human settlement zones resembling the Hunger Games, where people are packed into small living spaces. Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, has announced the first phase of Agenda 21, which involves building 165,000 units in New York. These apartments will be as small as 10 feet by 30 feet, reflecting the classic Agenda 21 approach. Building regulations are also changing to reduce land usage, and the European Union aims for all new buildings to be nearly energy-free by 2020. This reflects the vision of the archon bloodlines, lacking creativity, as seen in the uninspiring houses proposed under Agenda 21.

Designing mini cities called districts with mixed-use buildings that have residences, offices, and retail spaces but limited parking. City of Toronto is rezoning these areas, resulting in identical buildings with minimal parking infrastructure. The concept is to encourage residents to live, work, and access amenities within the building, similar to COVID lockdown restrictions. The 15-minute city aims to limit travel distance to 5 kilometers, making it difficult for those without cars to venture beyond their immediate vicinity.

Clayton opens by arguing that Agenda 2030 is not dead but advancing more aggressively than ever, reshaping how people live, eat, travel, work, own property, and how populations are managed. He notes the plan was rolled out by the United Nations in 2015 as a global mission to tackle poverty, hunger, and promote health, education, equality, DEI, and a move toward a one-world governance system. He contends that, despite promises of peace and prosperity, evidence suggests Agenda 2030 has pushed forward a broader globalist control agenda, including depopulation theories, the end of private property, and a shift to digital ownership. He highlights “fifteen minute cities” and other reforms as developments seen in real time, while claiming the policy has not fulfilled its stated health or sustainability goals. Clayton emphasizes a specific disconnect: while Agenda 2030 promised safer agriculture and reduced chemical exposure, actual agricultural data show increasing chemical dependence. He cites FAO data indicating that total pesticide use in 2023 reached 3,730,000 tons of active ingredients, a 14% rise over a decade, with pesticide use intensity over two pounds per acre—twice the 1990 level. He notes that other global studies show pesticide use up about 20% over the previous decade. Despite rhetoric about sustainability and reduced chemical inputs, Clayton argues agriculture has moved toward greater chemical dependence, implying a contradiction between promises and outcomes. He also references a curb in insects he previously observed, suggesting ecosystem disruption consistent with rising chemical use. Clayton then critiques a recent executive order that he sees as protecting Bayer and Monsanto in glyphosate production, despite allegations linking glyphosate to cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. He frames the move as counter to the stated goals of better health and safer food, calling out a tension between official health claims and policy action. Kim Bright, founder of Brightcore Nutrition, joins to unpack these concerns. She agrees Agenda 2030 marches forward regardless of administration, noting that the policy has created chaos and confusion. She argues farmers have become dependent on pesticides for quantity of food production, not necessarily quality, leading to soil degradation and diminished ecosystem health. She asserts glyphosate and other pesticides are harmful to human health and soil microbiomes, and she emphasizes the need to regain local control of farming inputs to reduce dependence on foreign manufacturers. She argues that even organic farming cannot fully avoid pesticide exposure due to global contamination, and she highlights chlorpyrifos as particularly damaging to DNA, cardiovascular and respiratory systems, and cognitive health. She discusses the link between environmental toxins and increases in dementia and other neurocognitive disorders, suggesting environmental exposure plays a role alongside other factors. Bright stresses that the gut microbiome is central to health and cognitive function, describing the gut-brain axis via the vagus nerve, where gut microbes influence mood, digestion, and cognition. She explains that a degraded soil microbiome leads to a degraded gut microbiome, reducing the body's ability to produce serotonin and other essential compounds, contributing to anxiety, depression, and chronic diseases like heart disease and diabetes. She notes that antibiotics and modern medical practices can disrupt the microbiome, and she criticizes the tendency for physicians to treat symptoms rather than root causes. In discussing mitigation, Bright advises careful food sourcing, supporting organic or regenerative farmers, and prioritizing prevention while acknowledging that some pesticides cannot be entirely avoided. She highlights kimchi as a potent natural modulator of the gut microbiome, pointing to its 900+ probiotic strains, prebiotics, and postbiotics that work together to support gut health. She cites studies showing kimchi improves cognitive function impaired by amyloid beta, reduces aging in human cells, and may lower body fat when eaten daily. She argues kimchi provides a robust, multi-pathway benefit beyond typical probiotic supplements and emphasizes daily consumption for health gains. Bright explains that kimchi fermentation degrades chlorpyrifos, a pesticide with high toxicity, and notes that kimchi’s gut-protective properties help shield against toxins. Bright further discusses the superiority of a diverse microbial ecosystem over sheer CFU counts, arguing that complex microbial ecosystems more accurately predict health. She shares anecdotal success stories of Kimchi One customers experiencing brain fog relief and mood improvements, attributing these outcomes to gut health. The conversation concludes with Bright reiterating that Agenda 2030 remains active and urging proactive personal health measures, including daily kimchi intake and informed food choices. She encourages readers to take responsibility for their bodies and to seek reliable information while resisting uniform passivity.

Humans living in rural areas will be relocated to cities, known as human settlements, in order to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. The UN aims to phase out single-family homes and promote apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. These dwellings will adhere to UN building codes and sustainable development practices. The concept of smart growth or new urbanism advocates for living spaces that match actual needs, discouraging excess space. There is an apparent effort to discourage private transportation and homeownership, with incentives to convince people that these practices are unsustainable. The goal is for humans to live in transit villages and smart cities while animals roam freely in continental corridors.

The United Nations Habitat one plan aims to relocate humans from rural areas to cities to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. Single-family homes will be phased out in favor of apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. The ideology of smart growth or new urbanism suggests that people should only have the space they need, discouraging excess. The goal is to make private transportation and owning homes seem unsustainable, pushing people towards living in high-rise buildings with smart meters and surveillance systems. The focus is on managing and monitoring residents' energy usage. Those with gardens or single-family residences are seen as using too much water and are deemed unsustainable. The ultimate objective of this plan is to remove people from rural areas and have corporations control food production. The goal is for everyone to walk or use bikes, promoting fitness, although the genetically modified foods they are forced to eat may affect their health.