TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The vaccines were developed by the NIH, not Moderna or Pfizer. The patents are 50% owned by the NIH, and they were manufactured by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their names on the vaccines, but it was a military project from the start.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

A clip shows a Pfizer vaccine development leader discussing dosage and immune response. He says, "we don't really have an understanding of how this vaccine produces an immune response" and, "we just know when we get this much, it seems to get a reaction. When you do that much, it gets a different reaction." He notes, "in the setting of giving a three microgram dose, we had low reactogenicity compared to placebo," and, "after a third dose, just as in adults at higher doses, we're getting an immune response that's comparable." He adds, "we are able to go down to a lower dose in children and the expectation is perhaps they have a more robust response." The speaker counters with, "it's somewhat academic... worthwhile for people to pursue." This was "This was a product that they decided should be forced on every single person in the world" and questions how it works, asking, "Now our cells are just gonna start manufacturing the spike protein. How much are we gonna get?"

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer conducted trials using a synthetic PCR process called Process 1, which involved giving 40,000 people a deliberately engineered mRNA sequence for the shots. However, for mass production, a second process was used, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to make the body produce the spike protein. Essentially, the trials were conducted using a controlled synthetic process, but the majority of the vaccines administered to billions of people used a less tested method. This can be seen as a bait and switch.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer's internal document reveals the manipulation of chemical and biological processes in the BioNTech Pfizer SARS CoV-2 vaccine. It discloses the presence of Graphene Oxide, a dangerous toxin, in each 30 milligram shot, containing 15 billion nanoparticles. Graphene Oxide causes the formation of structures in the body, leading to blood clots and sudden heart failure. Access to deleted Wuhan databases supports the claim that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer conducted trials using a synthetic PCR process called Process 1, which involved giving 40,000 people a precise mRNA sequence for the shots. However, for mass production, a second process was used, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to make the body produce the spike protein. Essentially, the trials were done using a controlled synthetic process, but the majority of the vaccines given to billions of people were made using a less tested method. This can be seen as a bait and switch.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Many are surprised to learn that the vaccines did not undergo traditional clinical trials. Initially, they were manufactured using PCR for 44,000 people, but when scaling up, the process was deemed too costly and was replaced with DNA from E. Coli, which also introduced endotoxins. In pharmaceutical manufacturing, the process is crucial; changing it typically requires new trials. The EMA requested a new trial with 252 patients, but the data was never provided, and it was considered too late since vaccinations had already begun. Thus, the rationale for conducting the trial became irrelevant.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The vaccines were not developed by Moderna or Pfizer, but by the NIH. The patents are owned by the NIH, and the vaccines were manufactured by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on the vaccines, but this was originally a military project.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer conducted trials using a synthetic PCR process called Process 1, which involved giving 40,000 people a deliberately engineered mRNA sequence for the shots. However, for mass production, a second process was used, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to make the body produce the spike protein. Essentially, the trials were conducted using a controlled synthetic process, but the majority of the vaccines administered to billions of people used a less tested method. This can be seen as a bait and switch.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The vaccines were not developed by Moderna and Pfizer, but by the NIH, which owns 50% of the patents. Furthermore, the vaccines were not manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna, but by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were allegedly paid to put their stamps on the vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry, but it was supposedly a military project.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

According to the speaker, Pfizer documents reveal that one month after the vaccine rollout in November 2020, Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't stop COVID and identified vaccine failure. Within months, the company allegedly needed to hire 2,400 staffers to process adverse event reports. The speaker claims Pfizer knew in May 2021 that the vaccines caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection, but this information wasn't shared with parents until August 2021. The speaker alleges that the CDC initially stated the injection materials stayed in the injection site, but Pfizer knew these materials biodistribute throughout the body within 48 hours, settling in the brain, liver, adrenals, spleen, and ovaries. The speaker asserts that there is no mechanism for the body to eliminate lipid nanoparticles from the ovaries, leading to accumulation with each injection.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer conducted trials using a synthetic PCR process called Process 1, which involved giving 40,000 people a precisely engineered mRNA sequence for the shots. However, for mass production, a second process was used, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to make the body produce the spike protein. Essentially, there was a switch from the controlled synthetic process used in trials to a less tested method for the majority of people. This can be seen as a bait and switch.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

We couldn't find any prelicensing safety trials for the 72 vaccines doses that are recommended for American children. Unlike other medications, vaccines were exempt from conducting safety trials that compare health outcomes between a placebo group and a vaccine group. This lack of safety trials is concerning considering the widespread use of these vaccines.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

At the outset, a process was approved by the FDA for emergency use authorization. However, it was later discovered that the approved process was swapped out for one containing contaminants like DNA and a cancer-causing substance. Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, hiding the fact that a carcinogen was included. This lack of transparency led to no informed consent and potential harm to individuals. The vaccine rollout included a trial with a 2.4 times higher adverse event rate, including the presence of a carcinogen.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Key points: "the vials that were in fact approved are not the vials that were given to the public." The clinical trial used "process one that used PCR to make the DNA that was going to then turn into the RNA to make the spike protein." After the trial, "they switched" to a production process that "manufactured this DNA in E. Coli," introducing endotoxin risk. "There are these plasmids that have additional DNA that were not present in the actual clinical trial." Sequencing found mixtures, including "expired" and samples that had "been tapped into." Regarding Pfizer, "the Pfizer vaccines actually had a component that was not disclosed to the regulators." "The plasmid map on the right is what was disclosed to the EMA" with "no mention of the SV40 components" now "inside this DNA sequence." "The plasma on the left is what we actually found," with components not disclosed to regulators nor to patients. Monovalent Pfizer; prior ones were the bivalent vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

For Pfizer's trials, a synthetic PCR-type process was used to create the mRNA sequence for the shots, administered to 40,000 people. This was called process one. To manufacture the shots for billions, a second process was implemented, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to produce mRNA, prompting the body to create the spike protein. The claim is that the initial trials used a controlled synthetic process, but mass production shifted to a barely tested method. This second process was then administered to billions of people. It is described as a bait and switch.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer and Moderna used two processes to create their vaccines. Initially, they used PCR to amplify and create the DNA for clinical trials. However, when they received approval, they needed to produce billions of copies, so they used circular bacterial DNA plasmids. Unfortunately, this led to contamination with junk DNA. Researchers in Ontario, Canada tested 27 mRNA vials from 12 different lots and found billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose, exceeding FDA and WHO guidelines by 188 to 509 times. This is a significant amount, far beyond what is considered acceptable.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

There is significant DNA contamination found in vaccines, with evidence from multiple researchers in Germany, Japan, and the U.S. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA acknowledge this contamination but downplay its significance, relying on Pfizer's assurances. The clinical trials used cleaner DNA, but the mass-produced vaccines did not undergo the same purification, leading to increased background DNA and endotoxin levels. Regulators received a plasmid map missing crucial annotations, suggesting manipulation. Claims about expired vials and PCR methods used to measure contamination have been challenged, with evidence showing that Moderna's vaccines are cleaner. Regulators are allowing different measurement standards for RNA and DNA, raising concerns about transparency and integrity in the regulatory process.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

According to Pfizer documents, one month after the vaccine rollout in November 2020, Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't stop COVID and identified vaccine failure. Internal documents showed COVID was the third most common side effect. Within months, Pfizer hired 2,400 staffers to process adverse event reports. By May 2021, Pfizer and the FDA knew the vaccines caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection, but this wasn't disclosed to parents until August 2021. The CDC initially claimed the injection materials stayed in the injection site, but Pfizer knew the materials biodistribute throughout the body within 48 hours, settling in the brain, liver, adrenals, and spleen. In women, they accumulate in the ovaries, and there's no known mechanism for the body to eliminate the lipid nanoparticles from the ovaries.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer's claim of 96% efficacy for their vaccine was questioned. The study and data were not independently verified, and Pfizer wanted to keep the data hidden for 75 years. The true effectiveness of the vaccine, based on absolute risk reduction, is less than 1%. More people died and were harmed in their trials compared to the placebo group. The vaccine's safety was questionable from the start, and it is not effective. Additionally, appropriate studies were not conducted for new variants.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer and Moderna vaccines use two processes. The first process involves using PCR to amplify and create DNA for clinical trials. Once approved, they use circular bacterial DNA plasmid to replicate billions of mRNA DNA sample copies. However, this resulted in contaminated vaccines with junk DNA. A study found DNA fragments in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines in Ontario, Canada. Researchers tested 27 mRNA vials from 12 different lots and discovered billions to 100 billions of DNA molecules per dose, exceeding FDA and WHO guidelines by 188 to 509 times. This is a significant amount, far beyond what is acceptable.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, Janssen, and AstraZeneca are accused of withholding safety information and causing deaths. The vaccines distribute toxic spike proteins throughout the body, contrary to what was claimed. Clinical trials were flawed, with unblinded studies and data manipulation. Companies misled about safety and efficacy, offering little virus protection.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer knew their failed coronavirus modifications were dangerous, causing heart issues and death in animals. There is extensive literature, including patents and scientific publications, showing that they knew the heart was the target. The mRNA shots using pseudo uridine were known to generate tumors and rapid cancers. Remdesivir, with a 53% mortality rate, was chosen by the FDA as a COVID treatment, despite being deemed unethical by the World Health Organization due to its high death rate. The definition of adverse events was changed to exclude any causal link, allowing them to deny any negative effects. Data on these injections won't be published for another four and a half years.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

None of the vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have undergone proper testing. No childhood vaccine has completed a placebo-controlled clinical trial with sufficient duration and power to confirm its safety before being administered to millions of children in America. This is not an opinion; it can be verified by anyone visiting the FDA website, where the package inserts and clinical trial documents are available for review.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Pfizer has been forced to release previously secret documents, including FDA approval packages, due to court orders and successful FOIA requests. These documents reveal that Pfizer tested different versions of their vaccine during preclinical and clinical trials, which goes against FDA guidance. The different versions included modified RNA, unmodified RNA, self-amplifying RNA, and Spike protein alone. Surprisingly, all these versions were tested under the same investigational new drug number, despite FDA guidance stating that multiple versions should have their own individual numbers. Additionally, the toxicity of the mRNA active ingredient in the COVID-19 vaccines was never studied. This raises concerns about the regulatory process and the lack of safety testing.

Unlimited Hangout

Pfizer and the Public Health Panopticon with Johnny Vedmore

Guests: Johnny Vedmore

reSee.it Podcast Summary

This episode examines Pfizer, Operation Warp Speed, and the push toward mRNA/DNA vaccine technologies. Whitney Webb notes that Trump and Warp Speed leaders praised Pfizer and repeated a “ninety percent effective” claim that Pfizer presents as self-reported and not yet publicly scrutinized, while Fauci says vaccination will not restore normalcy and masks and distancing will continue. Johnny Vedmore explains the difference between DNA and mRNA vaccines, stressing that mRNA vaccines change a function of DNA rather than its sequence and could open the door to broader gene therapies. He notes the FDA has never approved an mRNA vaccine, the long‑term health effects are unknown, and the technology could move toward transhumanist medicine. He adds that Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech have competed, with Moderna reporting higher efficacy. Vedmore traces Pfizer’s moves: purchasing PowderMed (a DNA vaccine company) early on, then partnering with BioNTech to outrun Moderna. He warns that media framing often avoids the nuance of DNA vs. RNA changes. A BBC piece quotes Pfizer’s Andrew Widger saying the vaccine “does not alter the DNA sequence of the human body” while omitting deeper mechanisms. The Kano State Trovan trial in 1996 is recounted: 200 Nigerian children were exposed to an experimental drug; deaths and disabilities followed, and Pfizer settled for about $75 million, with families sometimes forced to DNA-test relatives to claim eligibility. He notes Pfizer’s later recruitment of 12-year-olds in the US and an FDA investigation that was reportedly dropped. In the UK, Matt Hancock promised “hope injected into the arms of millions before Christmas.” The discussion centers on Five Eyes surveillance, GCHQ’s efforts to police vaccine skepticism, and the convergence of intelligence, health tech, and DARPA-linked ventures, including wearables for pharmacovigilance managed by Google and Oracle.