TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asks when Congress might vote on having the whistleblower appear, claiming Speaker 1 is the only member who knows the whistleblower's identity and whose staff has spoken with them, requesting the same opportunity. Speaker 1 denies knowing the whistleblower's identity and affirms their determination to protect it. Speaker 1 states that after the witnesses testify, there will be an opportunity to make a motion to subpoena any witness and compel a vote.

The speaker was asked what office they were elected to and if they needed support. The speaker responded that they are not the one to ask and that the person should speak with a man. The speaker then stated that they speak to over a million people.

Joseph R. Biden is the president of the United States, according to Speaker 1. Speaker 0 asks if he was duly elected and is lawfully serving, to which Speaker 1 simply repeats that he is the president without addressing the specific language used.

Points of order attacking the president are not allowed during today's impeachment inquiry hearing. Members are encouraged to speak openly.

I am the Chief Technology Officer. Mister Bobolinski, please proceed. I apologize for the disruption. I want to know if decorum rules apply to witnesses. The chairman says it applies to members, not witnesses. Mister Bobolinski, please continue your statement. I want to make sure the American people hear all the facts. Thank you.

I request to remove the recognition of an individual during a joint address to Parliament from the House of Commons Debates and Multimedia Recording. We will now seek unanimous consent. Any objections? No objections were raised. Thank you. Translation: I ask to delete the acknowledgment of a person during a joint address to Parliament from the House of Commons Debates and Multimedia Recording. We will now seek unanimous agreement. Any objections? No objections were made. Thank you.

Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation because his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding contact with the whistleblower and the whistleblower process. The speaker has not spoken directly with the whistleblower but would like to. Acclaimed Republican Intelligence Committee members question this.

I would like to reclaim my time and address the chairman. It seems that Hunter is afraid of what I have to say. It's unfortunate that I burst their bubble.

Speaker 0 is asked if they wish they had a third term. They respond by saying they would be fine with having a stand-in who would wear an earpiece and deliver their lines while they stay in their basement. Speaker 2 interrupts and tells everyone to ignore the person in the earpiece. Speaker 3 mentions something about getting Republicans elected. Speaker 4 says the person speaking is not recognized. Speaker 5 reminds everyone not to engage in personal attacks. Speaker 1 repeats their earlier statement about having a stand-in and being fine with it.

I am not representing the student association, so I don't see anyone here for that.

I see him right there. What's happening? Look, there he is. We have media and media officers.

I am resigning as Speaker of the House of Commons due to recognizing an individual during a joint address, causing pain to various communities. My resignation is effective tomorrow to allow for the election of a new speaker. Thank you for your support during my term.

Speaker 0: What purpose does the gentlelady from Colorado rise? Let's let's let's wait a minute. Wait a minute. The house will be in order. The house will be in order. We The house will be in order. We we will join prayer right after this. Okay?

Thank you, Madam Chair, and Ranking Member Keating. Mr. Chairman, please repeat your introduction. What is the standard you are setting here? Please repeat what you just said when you introduced a duly elected representative from the United States of America. "The representative from Delaware, Mr. McBride." Mr. Chairman, you are out of order! Have you no decency? I've gotten to know you a little bit, and this is not decent. I will not continue this hearing unless you introduce a duly elected representative the right way. This hearing is adjourned.

The ranking member requests a roll call vote due to the absence of a quorum. The roll call begins with Mister Hill, who is present. The roll call continues with Mister Lucas, Mister Sessions, Mister Posey, Mister Loudermilk, Mister Mooney, Mister Davidson, Mister Rose, Mister Stile, Mister Timmons, Mister Norman, and Mister Muser.

The House is called to order, and members are asked to register. A quorum verification is requested and granted. The clerk calls the names of members to determine their presence. If a member is not on the floor, their name is temporarily stricken. After the initial roll call, some members' statuses are updated to present. Ultimately, a quorum is not present, and the House adjourns until 10 AM the following day.

The speaker declared the office of speaker of the house vacant. According to rule 9, a resolution offered by a member other than the majority or minority leader has precedence within 2 legislative days. The resolution noticed by the gentleman from Florida will be recorded, but the chair will determine if it constitutes a question of privilege at a later time.

Speaker 0 is asked if they will be running for reelection in 2026. They apologize for not hearing the question properly and ask for someone else to speak up with a different question.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

Speaker 0 is asked if they will be running for reelection in 2026. They apologize for the interruption and ask for another question.

Speaker 0 mentions that an investigation has been started regarding a recent issue, which Speaker 1 questions. Speaker 2 suggests asking the Party Board members for more information. Speaker 0 asks if there will be an investigation into what happened and the victims' experiences. Speaker 2 explains that the investigation is complicated since the person involved is no longer a member of the parliament. Speaker 0 expresses concern about the victims and their stories. Speaker 2 says everything can be read about it and didn't expect to discuss it. Speaker 0 understands it's a sensitive topic. Speaker 1 mentions going to Afghanistan and having lunch. Speaker 0 points out that an investigation should have been conducted. Speaker 1 explains that the person can only return when there is a vacancy. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 suggesting asking the same question later.

I made a mistake in calling Mr. Parnas a Republican witness, he is actually your witness. I was a Republican for Trump. The committee is in recess due to votes, we will reconvene in 10 minutes.

Speaker 0 asks what you are here to talk about, says “Thank you very much,” and asks, “Any votes in the prime minister?”

Mister President, can you address the funding pause? I don’t think this is the right time for that question. The government is performing well, and we are making significant cuts. Thank you.

Speaker 0 requests unanimous consent. Speaker 1 acknowledges the official opposition leader. Confusion arises regarding the request.