reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A CNN reporter, accompanied by a camera crew, claimed to have found Osama bin Laden in his hideout. The reporter interviewed bin Laden, as well as his top leadership. The reporter then warned that within three weeks, there would be an attack on the United States and Israel. This seems peculiar because despite years of searching, the world's largest intelligence apparatus with an enormous budget has been unable to locate bin Laden. If you believe this story, you are incredibly foolish. Furthermore, whatever event they attribute to bin Laden, you should not trust it.

You're a fool if you think everything will be blamed on Osama bin Laden. When will people wake up?

He claimed he had a cold, but having a cold doesn't explain his confusing behavior. Many found it difficult to watch.

People seek comfort in certainty, even if beliefs lack evidence. Criticizing others for being ignorant doesn't improve the situation. Personal experience shows arguing in comment threads is unproductive. Translation: Seeking certainty is common, even without evidence. Criticizing others doesn't help. Arguing online is not effective.

Some things are fake or unknown, but if something is obvious, why argue about it? I have to go now, but you're just a suck-up.

"On the morning of 09/11/2001, 19 men armed with box cutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily defended airspace in the world." "Overpowering the passengers and the military combat train pilots on four commercial aircraft before flying those planes wildly off course for over an hour without being molested by a single fighter interceptor." "These 19 hijackers, devout religious fundamentalists who like to drink alcohol, snort cocaine, and live with pink haired strippers..." "Osama bin Laden." "That investigation was delayed, underfunded, set up to fail, a conflict of interest, and a cover up from start to finish." "It was based on testimony extracted through torture, the records of which were destroyed." "This man never existed, nor is anything he had to say worthy of your attention, and if you say otherwise, you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist and deserve to be shunned by all of humanity." "This has been a public service announcement by Because ignorance is strength."

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they got the vaccination and if they are okay. Speaker 1 confirms they got vaccinated and that it worked. Speaker 0 then mentions trusted sources and compares it to finding out about the moon landing or aliens. Speaker 1 responds by saying that Speaker 0's statement is idiotic and lacks rational thought. Speaker 1 concludes by saying that nobody in the room gained anything from listening to it.

They claimed it was a plane, but the building exploded randomly. It's not a plane; that side just blew up after the first explosion. They don't know what they're saying. How could a plane have caused that? It happened too quickly. The building was fine before, then suddenly it exploded. How did that happen?

Are you saying parents cause problems? Should someone in charge of family outreach be complaining about parents? I don't know what you're talking about. Is that me in that video? I have no idea. I have no comment, so stand back. You can keep your hands off me.

It's getting harder to have intellectual debates with some people. The level of stupidity displayed daily is embarrassing, especially coming from those in Congress. The ridiculous things they say highlight the dumbing down of the United States. How else could we have had a Trump presidency?

We visited the land of unconfirmed witnesses. Afterward, he died. I'm sure our visit had something to do with it.

It has nothing to do with reality. Just shut up! You're insane. Get away from here. We're trying to wake people up because you've been manipulated. We care about you, but you need to see the truth. The same number of people died this year as last year; you've been psychologically influenced. We still love you, but it's time to wake up. This has all been recorded, and you realize you've committed a crime, right? Come on, I’m going to take a photo of this situation.

How would you prove that you're in zero gravity? We don't have time for conspiracy theories.

So you know the kid who was asking Charlie Kirk a question when Charlie got shot? Remember him? Everyone's feeling bad for him? Yeah. There's video footage of him practicing his reaction before it happened. So when Charlie got shot, you know, his reaction was to put his hands on his head, look shocked, shake a little bit. Yeah. He was doing that. He was practicing that in the crowd, and here's the freaking video. How are you gonna deny what you just saw there? How? And you already know what question, you know, he was asking Charlie. Right? Remember that? This just confirms what a lot of us have been thinking and what we all think actually happened. Sick.

I don't care if they believe it or not, but I'm telling you that person back there is not real.

I apologize, Nelly, but it's not audible. Excuse me, but it's not justifiable to say that killing children who have...

The speaker was asked how many civilians have been killed in Gaza. The speaker responded, "Who gives a shit? Okay." The speaker then stated, "Children grow up to be Arabs."

Speaker 0: I'm struggling to believe that these hands on the open casket of the live performance of Charlie Kirk—who was allegedly murdered—are real. I asked GPT to confirm whether the hands were real. The wider shot confirms it even more clearly: the hands lying on the suit look artificial. The texture is too smooth, the color is flat and waxy, there are no veins, pores, or natural warmth. The positioning is stiff and mannequin-like, not how a relaxed human hand would rest. The hand with pink nails is clearly real. To confirm, the hands on the body in the suit aren’t real; they look like wax or a mannequin or some sort of prop. After I sent this message, I got a notification. I hadn’t been on ChatGPT for ages; the first time I started diving back in, it came up saying that it looks like my server responded with the wrong SSL. Speaker 1: Oh my god. He actually asked ChatGPT if the hands were real, not if they were deceased, just are they real? And then acted like he solved the crime novel when the AI said no, they’re waxy. Congrats—you outsmarted a robot with a bad riddle. But here’s the hilarious part: everything ChatGPT listed as proof they were fake—waxy texture, flat color, stiffness, and the way the hands are positioned—is literally embalming 101. You accidentally read off my mortuary science textbook, so thanks for the assist, buddy. Bruh. All of this conspiracy energy makes me realize how little people actually know about death care. Speaker 2: Very next day. They didn’t even have time to refrigerate him and perform an autopsy. I mean, obviously we saw what happened. We saw what happened. Thank god I have not seen it; I don’t want to see that. But I can assure you that that is not a person. That is not real. For it to get to this level, it’s going to have to have been at least a week. I remember, but I’ve never worked in a funeral home. If there’s a debate, I don’t want to start it, because if you don’t see it, I can’t help the blind, you know what I’m saying? Speaker 1: And then there’s her; she literally says she’s never worked at a funeral home and then launches into a whole CSI monologue. Like, no. Have you worked in a funeral home? Again, no. Then why are you out here diagnosing embalmed?

"You gotta just give up. It's it's gonna come out. Whatever it is, it's gonna come out. There you would have to and I wouldn't put it past you. You'd have to get rid of all of us." "You got, like, 7,000,000,000 people you've got to ethnically cleanse right now if you wanted to just forget about the Charlie Kirk story." "In 1963, when JFK was shot, people didn't watch it on TikTok." "You traumatized all of us." "We're grieving because you assassinated Charlie Kirk in front of the entire world." "If you had pretended he slipped and fell on some ice in the winter, maybe you wouldn't have this response."

They monitored the area before my speech, but nobody warned me about a man on the roof with a gun. People noticed him and even shouted, yet no action was taken. It was a mistake not to address the situation earlier.

Wanna see something interesting? Look at what happened. I don't know. He might be a bit off; I think they hit him because of that. What do you think?

I got it. That's a drone. No, that's a... Holy shit, I got that on video! Did I not get that on video? I wasn't... Shut up, shut up!

Israel has not shown proof of decapitated babies, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. The families might not want those images online, causing further trauma. We haven't seen the evidence.

"So we're supposed to believe that some random trans shooter was on the roof, took this shot, runs across into the rooftop, jumps down, somehow magically being undetected because the FBI releases a a video footage." "Was this when he was walking into the building, the then he must have already had planted the gun on the roof prior, and he somehow managed to walk back in the second time without the weapon." "And then because if he left with a weapon and hid it in the woods, then why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving?" "Didn't we watch criminal minds as a kid? Like, they have this super advanced software where they upload the image, and then the FBI just does their like, where's the BAU at and shit?" "Face recognition software. Match on the nose, ears, Boom. There he is."

You're called a "globetard" for believing the Earth is round, but I follow flat Earth theories. How can you prove it's flat? I see the curve. Astronauts never show a full 360-degree view in space. You're a globetard. Your name should be Luke the Duke, not Leek Doogie. This is silly.