reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Henry Kissinger, world famous as US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor under Nixon and Ford. NSSM 200, the Kissinger Report, was a top secret 1973 memorandum about the planet’s resources. Kissinger proposed a plan to consolidate the smooth flow of valuable resources from various countries to the US. He stated that taking other countries’ resources was easy when countries were stable, but unstable countries were difficult to access. The question, he posed, was how to stabilize less developed countries. He argued that the world’s most valuable resources such as oil, natural gas, gold and minerals were in less developed countries. In his report he wrote: Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interest of The United States. This was presented as a rationale for population policy, including abortion and birth-control measures, to create stability and access to resources. Kissinger advised that in order to create stability one needs population policy, including legalizing abortion, giving families money if they use contraception, and if necessary, accepting sterilization and abortion. If that wasn’t sufficient, population policy could entail forced birth control, forced sterilization and forced abortions. Furthermore, he advised withholding aid, disaster aid and food aid if a less developed country refused to implement US population control programs. The content claimed that this was a method to pillage a country’s resources, create stability by reducing the population, and remove anti-imperialist youth. The result, it is claimed, was a massacre worldwide documented in research papers ignored by mainstream media and the UN. Two examples cited are China and Peru. China: It is claimed that China’s one-child policy started in 1979 and changed in 2015 to a two-child policy if the first child is a girl. With the financial help of the United Nations Population Fund, UNFPA, China developed state-of-the-art tracking systems to monitor women’s monthly cycles. It is claimed that if a fetus was not allowed by the government, the woman would be arrested and forced to have an abortion. The speaker states that the UN supported, funded, and facilitated China’s population control program, including a $100,000,000 donation to UNFPA and a $12,000,000 computer complex to monitor the program, along with technical expertise and personnel. It is claimed that abortions were used as a weapon of mass destruction and that hundreds of millions of lives were exterminated. The UNFPA allegedly defended China’s actions and was awarded by the UN for China’s population control program. The policy is described as preventing hundreds of millions of births and conducting hundreds of millions of abortions under the one-child policy, with reports of high female suicide rates and a skewed sex ratio. Peru: Between 1995 and 1997, over a quarter of a million Peruvian women were sterilized as part of President Fujimori’s family planning goals financed by the US, described as the Voluntary Surgical Contraception Campaign, with reports of coerced sterilizations and threats to withhold food for refusing sterilization. It is claimed that many women were traumatized, with poor hygiene in hospitals causing deaths or severe harm. The transcript argues that in every less developed country, UN concern was not development, health or women’s empowerment, but reversing unchecked population growth. Kissinger is described as laying out protocols for modern times, and various allegations are presented about his background and alleged roots, including claims about his family name and ethnicity. NGOs: The transcript discusses NGOs connected to the UN, noting that NGOs are tax-exempt and 501c organizations, with examples including the Population Council, funded by John D. Rockefeller III and associated with eugenics and depopulation aims. It claims the Population Council supported et al. projects such as intrauterine devices in several countries, and published material advocating measures like adding fertility-control agents to water and compulsory sterilization. It argues that there are 37 NGOs worldwide advocating negative population growth under the banner of sustainability and overpopulation concerns. Planned Parenthood: The transcript asserts that Planned Parenthood, founded by Margaret Sanger, has internationally scaled activities with abortions, and claims about tissue procurement and compensation. It cites statements about compensation for tissue specimens and mentions editing to discuss tissue donation, with a claim that Planned Parenthood profits or receives funding from major foundations and governments. It states that the Trump administration ended US funding for Planned Parenthood in 2019. Ending note: The transcript mentions Kissinger’s removal from the Pentagon Defense Policy Board and promises to continue discussing the UN, its NGOs, and alleged threefold purposes: pillaging resources, money laundering, and population control, with the aim to expose the alleged depopulation program.

The speaker opens by reframing Jesus’s presence in today’s terms: “If Jesus were here today, he would be a clinic escort distracting women from the hatred of the protesters or an abortion doula holding women's hands and offering support and love as they end their pregnancies.” They anticipate Jesus would have “a stern word for self righteous legislators who use abortion as a political issue rather than showing compassion for the people seeking abortions.” On this Row Sunday, the speaker aims to share some collected stories, describing them as “the sacred stories of women's lives.” They note that if Jesus were giving a sermon today, he might also have said, “blessed are those who end pregnancies, for they will be known for their loving kindness.” The speaker continues with a personal testimony: they have been pregnant four times, “I have had two abortions, and I have two amazing children.” They describe each reproductive decision—to have children and not to have children—as sacred because “they reflect the moral responsibility of reproductive power that is part of our inheritance as human creatures.” They remind the audience that each person has a reproductive story, and they point out a statistic: “one quarter of American women will have an abortion by the age of 45,” suggesting that some audience members’ reproductive journeys may also include abortion. They reiterate, “Blessed are those who end pregnancies for they will be known for their loving kindness.” The speaker then calls for a reimagining of theological understanding surrounding abortion, arguing it is essential “to addressing the violence that is being done to people across the country in the name of Christianity.” They frame the current climate as marked by “rampant reproductive injustice in our society,” and pose the question: “what does God require of us?” They close with “Amen. Amen.”

Speaker 0 argues that abortion is murder and frames it as a ritual akin to human sacrifice, claiming civilizations like the Incas and Vikings killed people to appease gods and gain power. They insist abortion isn’t ritualistic, reference an abortion truck outside the Democratic convention, and challenge the idea that abortion is a right, suggesting that abortion is the only right people have. They express empathy for individuals who might face pregnancy decisions, recounting childhood conversations about a 12-year-old farmworker who might be pregnant from rape, and acknowledge sadness about abortion, but insist that now abortion is “the only right you have.” Speaker 1 pushes back by denying that abortion is a ritual and emphasizes that people do not have the right to keep someone from taking a medical injection or consuming unknown products, arguing that the only right claimed is to murder one’s own children. They describe the statement as dark and urge Speaker 0 to reconsider their stance. Speaker 0 responds with a personal perspective as a father, asserting that the most important thing in life is having children and that one’s children are what will matter most. They reject the notion that jobs or material concerns are paramount and criticize the idea of just killing one’s children. They apologize to Brookie for the upset but maintain their view that abortion is grotesque and sad, noting that many people who have abortions are not happy about it. Speaker 1 contends they don’t care about what Speaker 0 says and asserts a lack of interest in further discussion. Speaker 0 elaborates on the idea that the issue is highly ideological and that the reality of abortion is often hidden behind abstractions. They argue that a human being is beheaded with a knife inside a woman, insisting that if beheading didn’t take place, that person could have led a different life, and that it is not for us to kill people simply because they are “in the way.” They warn that if it is permissible to kill children who are in the way, then the elderly or even others could be killed as well, concluding with the assertion that you can’t do that. Speaker 1 reiterates that abortion is a matter of human rights, while Speaker 0 maintains that there is no human right to kill people, insisting that killing people is the enemy of human rights and that the human right is to live. The conversation ends with an unresolved tension between preserving life and recognizing individual rights, framed by extreme positions about abortion and its moral implications.

Abortion is seen as a choice and a right, but it is also considered a tragedy. The focus should be on making it rare and safe, and finding common ground to limit the number of abortions.

Speaker 0 describes birth control as something created by Margaret Sanger and connects her to the “tiny hats.” He claims Sanger was attempting population control and that her project aimed to “get rid of one group of people and then get rid of everybody else,” calling the birth control movement “poison.” He asserts that birth control involves taking synthetic estrogen and a synthetic steroid, “poisoning your body,” and reiterates that Sanger was a demonic figure who “can expect to” receive retribution from the tiny hats. He asserts that the tiny hats funded Planned Parenthood and the birth control movement, with funding from the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, and labels the entire matter a “deep rabbit hole.” He argues that birth control and clinics were part of a broader scheme leading to depopulation, and ties the issues to Marxism, feminism, and the involvement of the Rothschilds, describing a conspiratorial network behind these movements. Speaker 1 counters that birth control could help keep the population more or less static until resources can be increased, suggesting that preventing starvation depends on either birth control or resource acquisition, and framing the question as choosing between the two: “birth control or picking up the resources.” He concedes there is a limit to increasing resources, implying that there is a trade-off between controlling population growth and expanding resources, but he does not take a firm stance beyond recognizing a resource limitation. Overall, the transcript presents two perspectives: Speaker 0 advances a conspiratorial critique linking birth control to Sanger, “tiny hats,” and powerful financiers, portraying it as poison and part of a depopulation agenda connected to Marxism and feminism. Speaker 1 raises a pragmatic ambiguity, suggesting that birth control could stabilize population while resources are improved, but notes that resource limitations impose a constraint.

President Trump has stated he will veto a national abortion ban, viewing it as a state's rights issue. The speaker believes that if a baby can survive outside the womb, abortion is not permissible; it constitutes murder at that stage of gestation. The speaker claims the education system has instilled terror in girls and women, pushing the idea that pregnancy is the end of their lives and careers. This fear leads them to believe they must have access to abortion, even in extreme circumstances, and they will vote against any candidate who might restrict it. The speaker asserts that having children brings more joy than anything else and that it is natural to love one's children.

The Pfizer papers reveal an intentional attack on human sexuality, particularly targeting women and babies. The documents show they killed babies, poisoned breast milk, damaged placentas, and lowered sperm count, all while being fully aware of these consequences. There are charts detailing the injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles. Their research concluded that babies were dying in utero due to maternal exposure to the vaccine. This information was given to Dr. Walensky, yet she still recommended the COVID vaccine before, during, or after pregnancy. This is a satanic act on a massive scale. The Pfizer executives knew what they were doing, which is evident in the thirteen to twenty percent drop in live births. They tried to kill us, wipe us out, and sterilize us. Despite the deaths and fertility struggles, we survived, and the truth has come to light.

"Every aspect of our lives. They've taken over our schools, churches, politics, media, music industry, bank, financial industry." "Planned Parenthood is selling viable, healthy, aborted babies to the University of California." "I'm just trying to schedule some gender affirming care. And the Planned Parenthood workers said, are you over 18? No. I'm 16." "Tissue is donated from aborted fetuses through Planned Parenthood and other facilities." "Planned Parenthood is now under federal investigation by the Department of Justice for selling fetal body parts." "Hollywood is run by Jews. It's owned by Jews." "They run all the politicians and run all the propaganda." "Mossad is going to its own Twitter account and making extortion, passive aggressive threats to American college students saying if you are attending these protests and you are insufficiently pro as you." "Please know we are using facial recognition to help you." "We will identify you."

Abortion was legalized in this country, and crime rates subsequently dropped by 40%. The speaker questions whether abortion is responsible for the decrease in crime. They mention that statistics show that women, particularly black women, have the highest abortion rates. However, the speaker criticizes the idea of targeting black individuals for termination, calling it racist.

I've always questioned everything, starting in my teenage years. I learned that the tetanus vaccine was said to prevent death from tetanus bacteria entering through wounds, but I discovered no one has actually died that way. During my training in Detroit, I noticed a disparity in who received the vaccine: those on welfare often did not, while private pay patients did. I found a significant difference in fertility rates between the two groups. Research revealed that since 1972, the WHO and NIH have been developing the tetanus vaccine with a pregnancy hormone, potentially causing early pregnancy loss. This has reportedly been used in various countries, and I suspect similar practices may occur in the U.S. These organizations are now behind the COVID vaccine.

The speaker is suspicious of anyone claiming something is central to faith when Jesus doesn't mention it. They believe the religious right has made homosexuality and abortion the biggest issues for Christians in the last 40-50 years, despite the Southern Baptist Convention being pro-choice until the late 1970s. The speaker argues there's no historical, theological, or biblical basis to believe that being Christian means being anti-gay and anti-abortion. While abortions existed in the ancient world, the speaker believes the idea of a set Christian orthodoxy on abortion isn't rooted in Scripture. They welcome theological debate on the issue. Biblical evidence supporting a pro-choice stance includes God breathing life into Adam, which suggests life starts at first breath. Jesus broke first-century norms about women, affirming them as full and equal people. In the story of Mary, God asks for her consent before the incarnation, suggesting creation must be done with consent and freedom.

The speaker, Bernard Nathanson, a physician, discusses the advancements in fetology and ultrasound technology that have allowed us to see the unborn child in the womb. He describes the process of a 12-week abortion, showing the graphic details of the procedure. He emphasizes that the unborn child is a human being and calls for a better solution to the issue of abortion, one that prioritizes love, compassion, and the preservation of human life. Nathanson accuses organizations like NARAL and Planned Parenthood of keeping women in the dark about the true nature of abortion. He urges for an end to the killing.

Speaker 0 explains that even the obstetrics and gynecology association has reportedly pushed to vaccinate pregnant women as a duty, but doctors are the ones who do not know the facts. They reference a highly regarded medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, which published a study claiming a 12.6 percent user rate for the vaccine’s research results. Based on that paper, the 三 富 士 川 学 会 then attempted to vaccinate pregnant women. In reality, among the 827 individuals involved, 700 were in the postpartum period, 127 were in the antepartum period, and initial data were from that group. Specifically, for the group limited to those under twenty weeks (twenty weeks or less), which is 127 people, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. Therefore, the argument is that, going forward, one can see how dangerous the vaccine is from those numbers. The speaker contends that data were hidden and later mixed into the 700-person postpartum group, yielding a miscarriage rate of 12.6 percent. Because of this, the claim is that even a leading medical journal has been influenced by money to publish such conclusions. Overall, the points presented are: - The obstetrics field is described as advocating vaccination of pregnant women as a duty, while physicians allegedly lack awareness of the underlying facts. - The NEJM published a study deemed to show a 12.6 percent user rate, which the speaker implies is problematic. - The 三 富 士 川 学 会 vaccinated pregnant women, but the data show that among 127 women under twenty weeks, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. - The speaker asserts that this information was hidden and later combined with data from the 700 postpartum cases to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate. - The implication is that even a top medical journal can be swayed by financial influence, resulting in biased reporting.

The transcript presents a critical examination of Bill Gates, portraying him as transforming from a software magnate into a global health power broker whose wealth and influence have reshaped public health, vaccine development, and population policy. It argues that Gates’ philanthropic activities are not purely charitable but are deployed to extend control over health systems, global research agendas, and even the reproductive choices of people worldwide. Key claims and points are detailed across several strands: - Public image and power shift: Bill Gates is described as no longer a “public health expert” yet becoming a central figure in billions of lives, guiding medical actions and vaccine strategies. The program asserts that Gates’ reinvention through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been aided by a sophisticated public relations apparatus and by directing media coverage of global health issues. - Foundation scale and reach: The Gates Foundation is depicted as the world’s largest private foundation, with assets reported as tens of billions of dollars and a broad remit in global health, development, growth, and policy advocacy. Its influence extends to funding media outlets, think tanks, and reporting units across multiple outlets (BBC, NPR, Our World in Data, ABC, among others), creating what the program calls “tentacles” across global health. - Partnerships and funding of global health initiatives: Gates is credited with initiating and funding major global health vehicles, including: - Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, with seed funding and ongoing commitments that have shaped vaccination markets. - The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and other public-private partnerships that coordinate vaccine development and immunization programs. - Support for CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), the World Health Organization’s vaccine initiatives, and other pandemic preparedness efforts. - The World Health Organization’s funding profile, described as heavily dependent on Gates Foundation support, with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted as a non-medical doctor connected to Gates-backed initiatives. - The “Decade of Vaccines” and vaccine policy: Gates is credited with launching a decade-long vaccine initiative, including a pledge of billions of dollars to vaccine development and distribution. This is linked to the creation of a global vaccine action plan and to Gavi’s role in establishing vaccine markets. The narrative asserts that vaccines have been used to steer global health policy and to secure roles for private firms in public health decision-making. - Vaccine development concerns: The program raises concerns about the safety and speed of vaccine development, criticizing the eighteen-month timeline Gates advocates for a universal vaccine, and questioning the use of new technologies (DNA and mRNA platforms) and rapid deployment with limited testing. It highlights potential safety risks, including historical vaccine-associated disease enhancement and concerns about broad immunization in a short period. - Vaccine safety and regulation: It is claimed that vaccine safety at scale is hard to guarantee and that liability protections for vaccine makers and public health officials have been enacted (e.g., a U.S. declaration granting liability immunity for COVID-19 countermeasures), a point framed as enabling risk-bearing without accountability. - Population control framing: A central thread is the assertion that Gates seeks to reduce population growth through health improvements, vaccines, and reproductive health services. The transcript traces Gates’ interest in contraception and population issues to his family background and to Rockefeller-era eugenics historical contexts, arguing that discussions about fertility, contraceptive technologies, and demographic trends have long-term population implications. It cites specific Gates Foundation activities in reproductive health, including funding for innovative birth-control delivery methods, depot injections, implanted devices, and efforts to develop digital identity tied to health services as tools within a broader population-control framework. - Digital identity and biometric ID: The narrative emphasizes Gates’ involvement with biometric identification through Gavi and ID2020, noting partnerships with Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation, the Aadhaar system in India, and the World Bank’s ID4D initiative. It argues that vaccination programs, biometric identity, and cashless payments are being integrated into a comprehensive “population control grid,” enabling state and private actors to track, truncate, or deny access to services based on identity and health status. - Data, surveillance, and privacy concerns: The piece contends that the push for digital IDs, digital health records, and biometrics will erode privacy and enable broad government and corporate surveillance, linking health data to financial services, voting, housing, and welfare. It highlights projects involving digital certificates, immunity passports, and real-time health data collection via microneedle patches and barcode-like skin markers, suggesting these innovations could be used to control access to services. - Epstein connections and broader conspiracy context: The program references alleged connections between Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, including flight logs and involvement in philanthropic funding discussions, framing these ties as part of a broader pattern of influence. It also points to prior associations with notable figures (Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros) and critiques of Gates as aligning with a “population control” ideology. - The underlying motive and conclusion: Throughout, the narrative asserts that Gates’ wealth is being used not for charity alone but to build an overarching system of control—over health institutions, research funding, public policy, identification, and financial systems. It contrasts his public image as a generous philanthropist with alleged hidden agendas, suggesting that the real aim is to shape global governance and human behavior through vaccination, identification, and digital infrastructure. - Final framing and call to action: The closing sections urge viewers to recognize Gates’ influence as part of an ideology rather than a single person’s plan. It frames the situation as a broader movement that could continue beyond Gates personally, urging awareness and action to resist what the program deems a population-control regime embedded in global health and digital identity initiatives. In sum, the transcript portrays Bill Gates as a central figure driving a multifaceted, globally interconnected program—through the Gates Foundation, Gavi, CEPI, and related partnerships—that allegedly reconfigures vaccine policy, global health governance, reproductive health, biometric identification, and digital payments into a cohesive system of population control and surveillance, using philanthropy as a veneer for power and control.

At the time of the election, the Republican Party was allegedly changing its platform to support abortion up to twenty-seven weeks and the abortion pill. The speaker claims Republican candidates lobbied against a full abortion ban in Arizona, instead favoring a policy where a woman can allegedly "murder her baby the day before it's born." The speaker believes candidates operate based on money/donors and fear of backlash. The speaker claims that Trump said Florida's bans go too far, prompting the speaker to publicly disagree, risking donor loss. The speaker argues against voting for the "lesser of two evils" and emphasizes not fearing opposition. The speaker references an Irish revolutionary quote about sacrificing one's reputation for peace. The speaker and one other pro-life leader allegedly leveraged the Trump team. After the speaker's statement, the Trump team contacted the speaker to negotiate for pro-life support.

We are determined to have agency over our bodies and control our reproductive choices. We will not go back, regardless of the laws. Women will rise up, and Jane, an activist, may even receive a Nobel Prize. Besides protesting, what other suggestions do you have? Well, jokingly, she mentions murder, but it's not serious. Let's not dwell on that. Instead, let's focus on Jane's legendary activism.

If Donald Trump is re-elected, he will go further, and it is important to remind everyone of the high stakes. The speaker is certain that Trump would sign a national abortion ban, outlawing abortion everywhere. This would also force states to report on women's miscarriages and abortions. The speaker expresses disbelief that Project 2025, which contains these plans, was put in writing and distributed.

Planned Parenthood investigation dismissed as based on false premises. Witnesses include Dr. Anthony Levatino, a former abortion provider who describes a second trimester D&E abortion procedure. He recounts the graphic details of dismembering the fetus and admits to performing over 1200 abortions before a personal tragedy made him reconsider. After seeing the body parts on the table, he stopped performing late-term abortions and eventually quit all abortions.

Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth? Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why? Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports. It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it. What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid. I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it. Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story. Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was? Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs. Speaker 1: And they had h c g Speaker 0: in it. That's correct. Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men. Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections. Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant. Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG. Speaker 1: There's Gates famously, Speaker 0: of course, Speaker 1: in the speech saying Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera. Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report. Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months. Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.

The speaker claims the Pfizer papers reveal an intentional attack on human sexuality, especially on women and babies. They allege Pfizer killed babies, poisoned breast milk, damaged placentas, and lowered sperm count, knowing the consequences. The speaker states that Pfizer has a chart documenting injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles, and concluded that babies were dying in utero due to maternal vaccine exposure. This information allegedly went to Dr. Walensky, who then recommended the COVID vaccine before, during, or after pregnancy. The speaker accuses Pfizer of trying to kill and sterilize people, resulting in deaths and fertility struggles. They cite a thirteen to twenty percent drop in live births and conclude that despite these attempts, the truth has emerged.

Pfizer documents reveal a deliberate attack on human sexuality, particularly harming women and babies. The documents show knowledge of fetal deaths, poisoned breast milk, placental damage, and reduced sperm counts. Charts detail the injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles. Despite this, recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy were issued. This was a massive, satanic act. The 13-20% drop in live births proves they knew the consequences. They attempted to kill and sterilize us. Many died, and fertility struggles will continue, but we survived, and the truth is out.