TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, and information. The plan involves moving populations into city centers and achieving centralized control. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being used to impoverish populations and bring down developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to preserve personal freedom.

Economic hitmen create a secret global empire by exploiting countries with resources. They arrange large loans from organizations like the World Bank, but the money never benefits the majority of people. Instead, it goes to infrastructure projects that only benefit a few wealthy individuals. These countries are left with massive debts they can't repay. In return, the hitmen demand favors like cheap oil, UN votes, or military bases. If their demands aren't met, they send in "Jackals" to overthrow or assassinate leaders. This predatory form of capitalism has created an unstable and dangerous world. To eliminate terrorism, we must address the root causes and understand that the entire planet is our homeland.

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim that it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The goal is to establish a one-world government with centralized control. The speaker argues that sustainable development is not about recycling or resource allocation, but rather about moving populations into concentrated city centers and impoverishing large portions of the population. They emphasize the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to protect personal freedom.

Speaker 0 describes the Georgia Guidestones in Albert County, Georgia, built in 1980 by someone using the pseudonym r c Christian who remained anonymous. The monument comprises four large standing stones, a capstone, and an explanatory stone, functioning as an astronomical clock and calendar focused on the sun, moon, equinoxes, and solstices, with a hole in one stone viewing the North Star. The stones bear inscriptions in eight modern languages, with a top stone inscribed around its perimeter in four ancient languages: Babylonian, classical Greek, Sanskrit, and ancient Egyptian. The message is presented as a set of guidelines for humanity, including: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature,” “Guide reproduction wisely, improving fitness and diversity,” “Unite humanity with a living new language,” “Rule passion, faith, tradition, and all things with tempered reason,” “Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts,” “Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court,” “Avoid petty laws and useless officials,” “Balance personal rights with social duties,” “Prize truth, beauty, love, seeking harmony with the infinite,” “Be not a cancer on the earth,” and “Leave room for nature.” The speaker notes these lines as pointing to population control, eugenics, a single language, a world court, social duties over personal rights, reason over passion, truth over unspecified “whose truth,” and nature over humanity, labeling it as the age of reason. The video then connects the Guidestones to a broader cabal and the so-called protocols of Zion, claiming that sustainability is a cover. It asserts that the United Nations (UN), founded in October 1945 after World War II to maintain peace and security, represents a dual image: peacekeepers (“blue helmets”) and a hidden goal of a new world order or one-world government. The narrative claims that in 2008 the UN established a New World Order project led by Nelson Mandela’s grandson and ex-CIA Jaime Ilien, and that prominent figures like Bush Senior, Bush Jr., and Gorbachev supported a world order founded on collective security. It describes UN peacekeeping missions as having intervened militarily in Korea (1950), the Persian Gulf (1990), Sierra Leone (1999–2006), and other crises. The speaker details alleged UN abuses, including decades of sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers, trafficking, and rape in Cambodia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Central African Republic, and other places, with examples of coerced sex, child trafficking, and lack of accountability or prosecution for perpetrators. They reference Peter Dalglish’s arrest for abuse in Nepal (2019) and recount failures to protect civilians, notably in Srebrenica (1995). The Club of Rome, a think tank founded in 1968 by figures including David Rockefeller, is described as shaping UN agendas, with Limits to Growth (1972) and a shift toward sustainability as a unifying threat. The video links this to the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit) and the 1993 Agenda 21, followed by Agenda 2030 (2015), which purportedly expands sustainability goals to 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 169 targets, and 232 indicators. The speaker claims these goals require increased taxation and a loss of national sovereignty, predicting a move toward a one-world government and alleging that agenda 21/2030 serves a socialist/communist redistribution of wealth, benefiting corrupt regimes while burdening ordinary taxpayers. They challenge the feasibility of the SDGs and contend that the agenda imposes a carbon footprint tax from birth. The transcript ends with a provocative allusion to Henry Kissinger and a transition to further discussion in part six.

Speaker 0: United Nations agenda 21, sustainable development. It is the inventory and control plan. Inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the agenda for the twenty first century. And so many of us around the world think that a sustainable development just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas. It's constructed of non governmental organizations, corporations, and government in order to dictate and what it is that happens around the world. Regionalization is the stepping stone to globalization and globalization is the standardization of all systems. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all. And the goal of agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit. The principles are public private partnerships, which is fascism. And this is how it's implement it on the ground is through this joining together between corporations, nongovernmental organizations, and governments in order to cut out the actual individual, your voter, and instead to take that to a level where we literally cannot penetrate. This is a corporatocracy. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world while we are moving towards the endgame. We are not there. And this is the opportunity that all of us have now to stand up, to speak out. We are free, and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight.

The narrative prior to the focus on climate was centered around the Cold War, which justified a powerful federal government. In 1991, the Club of Rome, including leaders like Mikhail Gorbachev and Al Gore, met and proposed a new justification for global control: the environment and climate change. This plan was outlined in the book "The 1st Global Revolution." Scientists now emphasize the urgency of the climate crisis, but this top-down approach based on scientism disregards other important aspects of society. The World Economic Forum, in partnership with the UN, plays a critical role in implementing the agenda. Surprisingly, there are connections between the World Economic Forum and China, raising questions about the true motivations behind the sustainable development agenda. It appears that power and control, rather than genuine environmental concern, drive this agenda.

The conversation follows Howard Beale, who declares a final revelation and that “the light is impending. I bear witness to the light.” He appears disoriented, and Speaker 1 escorts him to a conference room, noting Beale’s agitation and his own impression that Beale is mad. Speaker 2 interrupts Beale’s crisis with a stark warning: “You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, mister Beale, and I won’t have it. Is that clear? Do you think you merely stopped a business deal? That is not the case. The Arabs have taken billions of dollars out of this country, and now they must put it back.” He frames the disruption as an ecological and economic rebalancing, insisting that “There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no third worlds. There is no West. There is only one holistic system of systems.” He lists currencies—“Petro dollars, electro dollars, multi dollars, Reichmarks, RINs, rubles, pounds, and shekels”—as the structural reality of the world’s order. Speaker 1 expands on the idea, stating that “It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today.” He further declares that “the world is a college of corporations, inexorably determined by the immutable bylaws of business.” He argues that the world’s dynamics are driven not by nations or ideologies but by corporate power, likening the global arena to a business enterprise. The dialogue then moves to Beale’s role and the proposition of his audience: “And you will atone.” Speaker 1 asks if he’s getting through to Beale, noting Beale’s television platform: “You get up on your little 21 inch screen and howl about America and democracy. There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBN and ITT and AT and T and DuPont, Dow, Union Carbide, and Exxon.” He contends that the Russians also operate with analytical tools, using “linear programming charts, statistical decision theories, minimax solutions,” to calculate prices and investments, asserting that “We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies, mister Beale. The world is a college of corporations.” Speaker 1 concludes with a chilling vision: “The world is a business, mister Beale. It has been since man crawled out of the slime. And our children will live, mister Beale, to see that perfect world in which there’s no war or famine, oppression or brutality. One vast and ecumenical holding company for whom all men

United Nations Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to inventory and control various aspects of the world, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings. Contrary to popular belief, Sustainable Development is not just about recycling and creative reuse. It involves moving populations into concentrated city centers to regulate global activities. The ultimate goal is to establish a 1 World Government and achieve total control from a central unit. This is implemented through public-private partnerships and the use of chips. It is important for us to be aware of this development and stand up for our freedom.

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to establish a totalitarian state with control over land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, information, and human beings worldwide. Contrary to popular belief, Agenda 21 is not about recycling or resource allocation for all. Instead, it focuses on relocating populations to concentrated city centers and achieving centralized control. The plan's three pillars are economy, ecology, and equity, but social equity is used to impoverish large portions of the population and weaken developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and fight for freedom.

Speaker 0 outlines a narrative linking the origins of the environmental movement to the Club of Rome, described as a crisis think tank that purportedly specializes in crisis creation. The speaker cites a document, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, claiming it states that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and similar dangers would fit the bill as a new enemy to unite the world and justify a global response to local problems, thereby claiming “the origin of global warming.” The speaker then connects this to Australia, asserting that in 1975 Australia accepted a new economic order via the Lima Declaration at the UNIDO conference. The Lima Declaration, they say, was a blueprint for redeploying tools, jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, leaving Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs, and that unworkable trade and tariffs agreements followed. They claim these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of Agenda 21 and contend Australia has been moved on a global chessboard with leaders either complicit or naive to long-term consequences. The segment cites 1992 remarks by former U.S. president George Bush Sr. about Agenda 21, describing it as requiring a profound reorientation of human society and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources, integrating concern for environmental consequences into decision making at every level. The speaker urges the audience to consider the implications of “profound reorientation of all human society” and “unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The speaker references Morris Strong, then secretary-general of the UN Earth Summit, stating that affluent middle-class lifestyles are not sustainable, including high meat intake, frozen foods, fossil fuels, vehicle ownership, and other consumption patterns. The implication drawn is that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of life—what and how we eat, how we move, food production, quantity of food, and where we live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, is quoted as saying Agenda 21 seeks to transfer wealth from citizens to the third world. A fear-based trajectory is described where fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government with UN central direction. The speaker quotes a Habitat One report suggesting land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset and that private land ownership contributes to social injustice, implying a redistribution of wealth through land and resource control. A report from the president’s council on sustainable development is cited as advocating a new collaborative decision process for better decisions and more rapid change in resource use. Harvey Ruben of the Wildlands Project and Jay Gary Lawrence are invoked to suggest that individual rights would be subordinated to the collective, and that participating in UN-planned processes would provoke conspiracy-minded groups to resist, leading to alternative labels like comprehensive planning or sustainable development. The narrative claims that costs are rising for citizens while services are cut, portraying this as wealth redistribution and redeployment of resources that harms the working poor. It references debates over land rights and water allocation, the native vegetation act, and development and planning acts as threats to food producers and long-term security, with alluding to heritage status used to justify control over land titles. The speaker argues for legislative Council checks and balances as a safeguard against parties colluding to pass restrictive policies, urging public participation to restrain erosion of common law, and portraying agenda 21 as an ongoing threat since 2008. The account then traces the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth and its environmental alarmism, linking Ted Turner and Mao to early endorsements of the movement, and cites 1987 and 1996 statements about a new world order and an environmental crisis unlocking a one-world government. It asserts the Earth Summit produced the Earth Charter, co-written by Morris Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, as a new set of commandments with environmentalism as a new world religion, and connects this to Agenda 21. Ted Turner’s 1996 reductionist population statements are included, along with a 1998 Baltimore Sun report on Turner’s donations to the UN aimed at stalling population growth and supporting sterilization to “save mother earth.”

The narrative prior to the focus on climate was centered around the Cold War, which served as a pretext for a powerful federal government. In 1991, the Club of Rome, including Mikhail Gorbachev and Al Gore, met and decided to use the environment as a new justification for an all-powerful state. A book called "The 1st Global Revolution" outlined this plan, stating that pollution, global warming, and other environmental threats would be used as a common enemy to unite humanity. However, some argue that this approach is dangerous and disregards other important aspects of society. The World Economic Forum and China have played significant roles in implementing the UN's Agenda 2030, with both capitalists and communists working together on sustainable development. Critics question whether the true motivation behind this agenda is environmental protection or the pursuit of power.

The narrative prior to the focus on climate change was centered around the Cold War, which justified a large and powerful federal government. In 1991, the Club of Rome, including influential figures like Mikhail Gorbachev and Al Gore, met and proposed a new justification for global control: the environment and climate change. This plan was outlined in the book "The 1st Global Revolution." Scientists now emphasize the urgency of the climate crisis, but this top-down approach based on scientism disregards other important aspects of society. The World Economic Forum, in partnership with the UN, plays a crucial role in implementing the sustainable development agenda. Surprisingly, there are connections between the World Economic Forum and China, raising questions about the true motivations behind this agenda. It appears that some proponents of environmental protection are more interested in power and control than in genuinely safeguarding nature.

Agenda 21 is a United Nations plan from 1992 that aims to control and inventory everything, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings. It focuses on moving populations into concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. The plan involves non-governmental organizations, corporations, and governments working together to regulate and dictate global affairs. The ultimate goal is to establish a one-world government with total control. This implementation is done through public-private partnerships, which is essentially fascism. It's important for us to be aware of this development and stand up for our freedom.

"This is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 nations. It's called the agenda for the twenty first century." "It's a totalitarian state being developed right now all over the world." "The three pillars of United Nations Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, the three e's." "Social equity is about impoverishing huge portions of the population and bringing down the nations." "Everything that we're looking at now is destined to collapse our economies." "The mainstream media is owned by five major corporations and you're not going to get this information from the mainstream press." "You need to be your own press."

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim that it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The plan focuses on moving populations into concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being about impoverishing large portions of the population. The speaker believes that major corporations support this plan to have unrestricted movement of workers and goods, reduce wages, and increase control. They emphasize the importance of educating oneself and others about this agenda and working together to preserve personal freedom.

The speaker explains how they, as an economic hitman, create a secret global empire by exploiting countries with resources. They arrange large loans from organizations like the World Bank, but the money never benefits the people. Instead, it goes to corporations for infrastructure projects that only benefit the wealthy. The countries are left with massive debts, and the speaker and their team use this as leverage to gain advantages like cheap oil or military bases. They argue that this form of capitalism is unstable, unjust, and dangerous. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of addressing the root causes of terrorism and understanding that the entire planet is our homeland. Another speaker mentions how neoliberalism prioritizes the market over democracy, benefiting billionaires and corporations.

The United Nations Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to control all means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings worldwide. Contrary to popular belief, sustainable development is not just about recycling and creating resources for all. It involves relocating populations to concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. Agenda 21 is implemented through public-private partnerships, which is a form of fascism. It seeks to establish a one-world government and total control from a central unit. This corporatocracy is currently being developed globally, but there is still an opportunity to stand up and fight for freedom.

The Agenda for the 21st Century, agreed upon by 179 nations, aims to establish a totalitarian state with control over land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, production, food, energy, information, and people worldwide. It focuses on moving populations into concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, but social equity actually leads to impoverishment and the collapse of economies. Major corporations support this plan to have unrestricted movement of workers, reduced regulations, and lower wages. The mainstream media, owned by five major corporations, does not provide this information, so individuals must educate themselves and others to preserve personal freedom. We must work together as individuals within groups to fight for our freedom.

The UN and the World Economic Forum (WEF) share a vision to remake the world by 2030. The WEF, comprised of independent, non-elected individuals, has been meeting since 1971 to discuss their vision for the world. The UN initiated Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) with a 15-year plan that expired in 2015, followed by another 15-year plan expiring in 2030, encompassing 17 goals. While the SDGs appear beneficial, the methods to achieve them involve social engineering, centralized power, and control. For example, achieving food security involves funding big pharma and big agriculture, like corporate farms and GMOs, which forces small farmers out of business worldwide as farmland is bought up by large corporations.

The speaker discusses the Agenda for the 21st Century, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They explain that sustainable development is not about recycling and resource creation, but rather about moving populations into concentrated city centers and controlling all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The speaker emphasizes that social equity is not about providing clean water and air, but rather about impoverishing large portions of the population and bringing down developed nations. They argue that major corporations want unrestricted movement of workers and goods to reduce wages and exploit and control populations. The speaker urges individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together for personal freedom.

We should create our own bank by setting up a community trust structure. Everyone becomes a managing director of a trust and gets a trust account. We pool our resources, buy gold and silver, invest, and pay dividends to the community. This way, we can bypass the federal government and international bankers, reclaiming wealth from those who don't care about us. The new world order only seeks power and control out of fear and insecurity. Every community, church, organization, and family can do this and shift wealth back into our hands.

The UN's 30 by 30 agenda aims to seize 30% of all land and water on Earth, disregarding private property rights. The European Union is implementing it, and California and Joe Biden are using similar language, mentioning conserving 30% of lands and waters by 2030. The speaker claims this isn't about conservation but about taking, facilitated in the US by the sustains act, which allows the government to receive private funds for conservation programs. This act assigns value to environmental services provided by privately owned land, such as pollination, photosynthesis, and clean air/water, monetizing them through partnerships between private investors and the government, without landowner consent. The speaker asserts this is a seizing of American assets aligned with the UN's goals, without public consent or input. Representatives, according to the World Economic Forum, are now solely responsible, without needing to consult the public.

Speaker 0: And they came up with this incredible document where they actually said we need a new justification for this all powerful state. So the new excuse is going to be because the environment is gonna be harmed and because climate is going to hurt us. Speaker 1: Wait. What? What? I could not believe what I just heard. Did world leaders really lay out this globalist plan in plain English, in a physical book way back in 1991? I went on Amazon, and there it was, the first global revolution, which states, and I quote, in searching for a common enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. And therefore, the real enemy is humanity itself.

My job was to identify resource-rich countries and secure large loans from organizations like the World Bank. However, the money didn't benefit the country but instead went to our corporations for infrastructure projects. These projects brought profits to our corporations and improved the lives of a few wealthy families, but the majority of the people suffered. The funds meant for health and education were diverted to pay off the debt. When the country couldn't repay the loans, we would step in through the IMF and arrange refinancing. This resulted in the country selling its resources cheaply to our corporations, without environmental or social restrictions, and aligning with us politically. This was how we effectively enslaved these countries.