TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses real-time election data from SIDL in multiple states, highlighting oscillations and deletions in vote counts. They question the accuracy of projections and media calls, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in the election process. The speaker also mentions legal challenges and concerns about the media influencing election outcomes.

The speaker claims that a sudden increase of 138,000 votes for Biden is statistically improbable due to its linear movement and the absence of any votes for Trump. They argue that in any location with that many voters, at least some votes would be expected for the opposing candidate. The speaker suggests this anomaly occurred around 4:30 AM, followed by another at 6:23 AM. They also find it inexplicable that Nevada suddenly stopped counting votes in the middle of the day, contrary to typical election procedures.

The speaker claims that real-time Edison data reveals election data manipulation. According to the speaker, Seidl receives raw election data directly from election officials in at least nine states. The speaker alleges that an additive process should show more votes, not deletions, in each interval report. However, a video of Edison reports allegedly shows pauses, oscillation, and deletions in total, in-person, and mail-in votes. The speaker claims this is the algorithm trying to figure out the math problem. The speaker points to North Carolina and Georgia counties as examples, noting Seidl directly contracts with Georgia. The speaker then plays a clip of someone discussing estimated vote percentages dropping, suggesting the reported results are not actual results. The speaker questions the calling of races with razor-thin margins, particularly Arizona, based on projections and alleged impossible data anomalies. The speaker asserts that historically, those counting votes called races, but now machines and news outlets do, deterring challenges.

The discussion centers on the integrity of the 2020 election processes and how Georgia’s handling of audits and recounts could shape reforms for 2026. Speaker 0 argues that ensuring elections represent the will of the people is fundamental, noting that Trump and his allies made a spectacle in 2020 by pursuing audits and recounts and even the Capitol insurrection, yet Georgia, among other states, would not have allowed Trump to win even without Georgia’s results. They claim Democrats and progressives avoided touching the issue in 2024 despite Trump’s unexpected nationwide sweep, and criticize the inability to conduct a proper recount. Speaker 1 warns that Trump’s team is likely to present ballots and photographs from 2020 to claim irregularities, arguing that there were thousands of irregularities in Fulton County, with miscounts and ballot manipulation possible, though there is no evidence that these irregularities would have changed the Georgia result. They contend that irregularities occurred both ways and tended to offset, but many records were destroyed and the recount and audit lacked quality. The speaker asserts that 2026 must avoid untrustworthy machines and inadequate audit/recount processes. The speakers discuss the possibility that Trump’s supporters will use information from the DOJ to misrepresent the facts, stating that even if facts were presented, they would expose known errors in the certified processes. They allege that ballots were counted multiple times during the recount, including counting some ballots two or three times and even introducing fake test ballots to force outcomes. Marilyn is cited as noting that a Barack Obama appointee judge confirmed the unreliability of Dominion machines, and that a demonstration at DEF CON Voting Village showed how easily a Dominion machine could be hacked. Jessica is referenced as discussing Phil Davis, a pro-Trump election integrity figure who admitted that Biden won Georgia despite his broader views. The point is to emphasize that, even among election integrity experts with conservative leanings, there is belief that Biden won Georgia. The conversation returns to Raffensperger, who selected the machines and the audit/recount method, spending approximately $150 million on machines and avoiding transparency about errors. The guests argue that the law required a hand count at tables with representatives from both campaigns and the clerk, instead of a machine-only recount. Bypassing this process enabled the perception of fraud and contributed to the January 6 insurrection’s fuel in Georgia. A key lesson for 2026, they assert, is to implement a transparent process with hand counts and representative participation at counting tables, preventing the bypass of proper procedures and reducing the political pressure that distorts outcomes. They critique the atmosphere surrounding the 2020 aftermath as vilifying and pressure-filled, predicting a similar environment in 2026 unless genuine transparency and nonpartisan verification are pursued.

Georgia owes President Donald J. Trump an apology for election fraud. Evidence shows 17,852 votes were counted without ballot images, and 3,930 ballots were scanned and counted twice intentionally. The process involved randomly selecting and rescanning ballots on different days. This deliberate duplication was not an administrative error but human intervention, constituting election fraud. The speaker urges Secretary Raffensperger to investigate independently.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that many of them show fraudulent numbers. They mention that the sheets are signed by the person who filled them out, but the information is redacted. They then shift focus to the ballot images obtained through a lawsuit, pointing out that there are over 4,000 duplicate images. They mention a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items comparing original election numbers to the recount, which has an error rate of 59.5%. The transcript ends abruptly.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that some sheets show fraudulent numbers, such as 100 to nothing or 150 to nothing. They mention that the sheets are signed by the auditors, but the person responsible for the fraud remains unknown. The speaker then shifts focus to the ballot images obtained through a lawsuit, pointing out that there are duplicate markings on different ballots. They mention that over 4,000 duplicate reports were found, with an error rate of 59.7% according to a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items comparing original election numbers to the recount.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that many of them show fraudulent numbers, such as 100 to nothing or 150 to nothing. They suspect that the people conducting the audit filled out these sheets with incorrect counts. The speaker also mentions that the sheets are signed by unknown individuals, making it difficult to determine who committed the fraud. They then shift focus to the ballot images obtained through a lawsuit, pointing out that there are over 4,000 duplicate scanned ballots. They mention a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items that shows an error rate of 59.5% between the original election and the recount.

New evidence suggests that there was no voting machine election audit performed in Georgia, despite claims by the Secretary of State. This is concerning because Georgia played a crucial role in the 2020 election. A public comment during a state election board meeting revealed that there is little to no evidence that the audit actually took place. In addition, Georgia election workers are suing Giuliani and seeking to bar him from making public statements about the election. Surveillance footage shows workers scanning the same stack of ballots multiple times and continuing to count after observers had left. The video evidence and accounts from the 2020 election point to clear election fraud, yet there seems to be a lack of evidence to support further investigation.

The speaker questions the certification of the election results, stating that the margin of victory is less than 1%. They mention testimony from the secretary of state's counsel, who sent letters to 8,000 people who voted illegally, advising them not to vote in the US senate race. This number is almost three-fourths of the margin of victory. The speaker also points out that there is a 10% margin that is not accurate. They ask how the senate and house can stand by the certification.

The speaker reveals that zero audits were conducted by Pro VNB, contradicting the Secretary of State's claims. They then highlight that Fulton County counted 20,713 votes that did not exist in the 2020 election, with the majority favoring Joe Biden. The speaker also mentions the absence of records for 10 tabulators, which were included in the election night results. They accuse Brad Raffensperger, Brian Kemp, Fannie Willis, Georgia Democrats, and others of being aware of the election fraud. The speaker asserts that Donald Trump won Georgia and the 2020 election, claiming that the left stole it using tactics like blocking observers and bringing in truckloads of ballots. They emphasize that this evidence was provided to the Trump team.

The speaker highlights statistical irregularities in the election results, pointing out multiple batches where Biden received all the votes and Trump received none. They assert that this is a statistical impossibility and challenge the media to stop denying the evidence of election fraud. The speaker emphasizes that the incorrect information has been publicly available for months and urges the Secretary of State to acknowledge it.

The speaker discusses an incident where there were errors in the vote count for Biden and Trump. They explain that the voting machine generated a high number of errors, which were then sent for adjudication. The rate of ballots needing adjudication was 68%, much higher than the federal allowable rate of 1 in 125,000. The speaker suggests that this program is designed to generate errors and manipulate votes. They also mention that on November 4th, all system files related to adjudication were deleted. This is seen as a significant issue.

Biden consistently received high numbers of votes while Trump received none, which the speaker deems statistically impossible. They claim that the Secretary of State should be aware of this incorrect information, as it has been publicly available for months. The speaker challenges the media and anyone who denies the existence of election fraud, stating that there is evidence and those who claim otherwise are lying.

In this video, the speakers discuss the findings related to voting irregularities in Georgia. They mention the use of various databases, such as the electronic registration and information center, the national change of address database, and the DPS database, to identify problems. They highlight that there are approximately 66,247 mail-in ballots cast by underage voters and 2,506 registered felons who voted. Additionally, they mention cases where individuals were registered to vote in another state but still voted in Georgia. These findings raise concerns about the integrity of the voting process.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that many of them show fraudulent numbers, such as 100 to nothing or 150 to nothing. They suspect that the people conducting the audit intentionally filled out these sheets with incorrect numbers. The speaker also mentions that the ballot images obtained from Dominion machines show duplicate markings on different ballots, with over 4,000 instances of duplication found so far. They highlight a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items comparing original election numbers to the recount, revealing an error rate of 59.5%.

During the election night, there were significant vote swings observed on CNN between Joe Biden and Trump. Biden's votes fluctuated drastically, raising questions about the accuracy of the counting process. The speaker questions the legitimacy of such errors and the impact they may have had on the election results nationwide. The concern is raised about the responsibility for these errors and the potential impact on the outcome.

Based on an analysis of voter rolls, it was found that there were 364,000 ineligible voter records in Georgia. The speaker met with Secretary Raffensperger to discuss this issue, and Raffensperger acknowledged the number. However, despite certifying the election and conducting audits, they did not investigate how these ineligible voters actually voted. It was later revealed that 67,000 of them had cast their votes. The speaker believes this was a cover-up and accuses the GOP of negligence.

The Georgia legislature is presenting a set of facts to the court asserting widespread voting irregularities in Georgia. They claim: - 2,506 felons voted illegally in Georgia. - 66,248 underage and therefore ineligible people were illegally registered to vote before their seventeenth birthday, when the law requires 17 years old. - At least 2,423 individuals voted who were not listed as registered. - 1,043 individuals cast ballots who had illegally registered to vote using a post office box. - 4,926 individuals voted in Georgia who had registered to vote after their Georgia voter registration date, thereby canceling their Georgia voter registration. - 10,315 or more individuals voted who were deceased by the time of the election. - 395 individuals voted in Georgia who had cast ballots in another state, which is illegal in both states. - 15,700 individuals voted in Georgia who had filed a national change of address with the United States Postal Service prior to 11/03/2020. - 40,279 individuals voted who had moved across county lines at least thirty days prior to election day and had failed to properly re-register to vote in their new county, also in violation of Georgia law. The petition to contest will include affidavits of more than one hundred Georgia voters sworn under penalty of perjury, attesting to and confirming multiple violations of the Georgia election code. You will hear from several of those witnesses today. They also assert there are issues of outright lies and potential fraud. The speakers contend that the actual results of legal ballots cast in the November election in compliance with the Georgia election code cannot be known ever, not by the secretary of state, not by the governor downstairs, not by the voting public, and not by this Georgia legislature.

The speaker discusses the Arizona audit report and criticizes the media for misrepresenting the findings. They argue that the audit revealed tens of thousands of fraudulent ballots, including 57,000 questionable ones and 23,000 that were cast by people who no longer lived at the addresses. They mention an analysis by Dr. Shiva, who found 17,000 duplicate ballots, with a significant number arriving after November 3rd. The speaker asserts that the election should not have been certified and calls for further investigation. They accuse the media of lying about the findings and emphasize the need for certification based on the evidence.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that many of them show fraudulent numbers. They reveal that the sheets are signed by unknown individuals, making it difficult to determine who committed the fraud. The speaker then shifts focus to the ballot images obtained through a lawsuit, pointing out over 4,000 duplicate ballots. They mention a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items comparing original election numbers to the recount, which shows an error rate of 59.5%. The conversation ends abruptly.

The speaker discusses how the vote total may have been altered through the HAMMER program and ScoreCard software, affecting the election outcome. They mention a computer glitch in Michigan that favored President Trump, suggesting similar issues in other states. They question the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden, deeming it statistically improbable.

It seems like there are concerns about election integrity and potential fraud. The speaker mentions the Mesa Docks and dropbox, suggesting that there may be issues with these. They also criticize the reporters on TV for not being truthful. The speaker believes that if there are more votes than voters, it should not be questioned. They mention Georgia Claws and ballot mules, implying that there may be manipulation happening. The speaker accuses those in power of not caring about the truth and suggests that lawsuits are being used to delay the process. They emphasize the importance of holding those responsible accountable.

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that they contain fraudulent numbers and are signed by unknown individuals. The speaker then mentions that over 4,000 duplicate ballot images were found, with a spreadsheet showing a 59.5% error rate between the original election and the recount.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.