TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes Donald Trump will win the election, regardless of personal preference. They claim the "vibe shift" is profound, with numbers and early voting favoring Trump. More importantly, there's a return to freedom of expression. The speaker asserts that the previous election was rigged because critical information about a candidate was hidden from the public. They believe this cannot happen again, regardless of what tactics are used in the coming weeks. The speaker suggests people will not accept claims of popularity for figures like Kamala Harris, whom they criticize for lacking job experience and consistent pronunciation of her name. They also express frustration with someone raised in Montreal lecturing them about America. The speaker concludes that people have had enough.

I won my election, but I didn't get the job. We were robbed. I don't think it's dangerous to say the election was rigged going into 2024, because we can back it up. It wasn't stolen from me, it was stolen from the voters. I'm never going to concede, because concession acknowledges an action is right, true, or proper, and the erosion of our democracy is not right. People are working for a party today. My election was stolen, it was not free and fair. It was stolen from the people of Georgia, from the voters. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots, and their votes weren't counted.

They stopped counting votes on election night to determine how many mail-in ballots to add, which the speaker believes was fraudulent. The speaker insists it was a planned event, claiming it wouldn't happen in Texas. They express concern over the authenticity of mail-in ballots and assert that anyone could have filled them out. The other person questions the validity of these claims, but the speaker stands by their belief based on personal experience.

The speaker believes that if the votes are counted correctly, Trump will win the state. They urge people not to throw ballots in the trash or vote twice. They claim that some people who are dead are voting, and advise against voting for deceased relatives. The speaker says that the county has always leaned Republican or conservative. They believe leadership is becoming more liberal, which they see as unscriptural from a religious viewpoint and bad for the country.

The speaker expresses concern over the 4.8 million votes cast in the election and suggests that it could have been manipulated. They believe that the same issues occurred in various communities, regardless of size, and that it was an organized crime involving dirty voter rolls, ballot boxes, and mail-in ballots. The speaker claims to have spent the last 15 months developing these findings and concludes that it was an organized crime committed against Americans.

The speaker claims to have won the 2020 election "by a lot." They suggest reviewing tapes and "truth to vote" which allegedly shows ballot box stuffing. They also mention "51 agents" and "FBI Twitter." The speaker alleges cheating in the election, citing "all of the stuff ballots" and the "51 intelligence agents." They claim recounts were not "real recounts." They state Wisconsin "practically admitted it was rigged" and that other states are doing the same. When told a case review found fewer than 475 cases of voter fraud in six battleground states, the speaker claims "they didn't look at the right things," alleging fake ballots. They maintain the election was "very rigged." The speaker believes they are "winning very well" in the upcoming election, citing a recent poll.

This election fraud narrative is shameful and damaging to our democracy. It's time to grow up and accept the results. The focus should be on our institutions and the trust we have in them, not on individual politicians. The actions of some, including Larry Elder and former leaders, are undermining our country. We must not normalize this behavior; it's a serious moment for America. Voter suppression and attacks on rights are real issues that affect us all. I have deep respect for the Republican Party, but I don't recognize it anymore. It's crucial to acknowledge the truth and move forward, regardless of the outcome.

The speaker highlights statistical irregularities in the election results, pointing out multiple batches where Biden received all the votes and Trump received none. They assert that this is a statistical impossibility and challenge the media to stop denying the evidence of election fraud. The speaker emphasizes that the incorrect information has been publicly available for months and urges the Secretary of State to acknowledge it.

I do not concede the election. Many believe there were issues on election day. The president claims the election was rigged, with lawsuits having merit. Legal remedies must be pursued. Georgia was rigged in favor of Biden.

I won the election, but they cheated, so we don't know the exact number of votes. It wasn't a fair election, and I won't concede. The election was stolen from the people of Georgia, and we can't let it happen again in 2020. Thousands of Georgians couldn't vote, and their voices were taken away. If it looks like cheating or rigging, it probably is. The legislative process didn't address the concerns of those who saw the election being stolen.

Speaker 0: They reject the rule of law and the will of the people, refusing to accept the election results. Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi, May 16, 2017, claimed our election was hijacked and there is no doubt about it. Speaker 2: Even if you run a great campaign, become the nominee, the election can still be stolen from you. Speaker 0: Trump did not truly win the 2016 election; he lost. Speaker 1: He knows he's an illegitimate president who didn't really win. How do we fight against him in 2020? He's illegitimate. Speaker 3: He's illegitimate, and my biggest fear is that he'll do it again with the help of his pal Vlad. We'll be stuck with him for 6 more terrifying years. Speaker 0: Would you be my vice presidential candidate? I agree. Speaker 1: Bush versus Gore, a court took away the presidency. Al Gore was the true winner. Speaker 4: I believe I won the last presidential election. They stole it. Speaker 0: Al Gore won that election, or at least I think he did. Speaker 5: Rolling Stone questioned if the 2004 election was stolen. Speaker 4: I witnessed troubling evidence that not every vote was counted in Illinois 4 years ago. Speaker 1: The November 2, 2004 election was not transparent or accurate. There are legitimate questions about our election system's accuracy. Despite the final tally, I have one affirmative statement to make.

Biden consistently received high numbers of votes while Trump received none, which the speaker deems statistically impossible. They claim that the Secretary of State should be aware of this incorrect information, as it has been publicly available for months. The speaker challenges the media and anyone who denies the existence of election fraud, stating that there is evidence and those who claim otherwise are lying.

The discussion centers on the 2020 election, which Speaker 1 claims was rigged due to fake ballots and other factors, including the influence of 51 intelligence agents. Speaker 0 counters that recounts in swing states and over 50 lawsuits found no widespread corruption or voter fraud, citing a potential case of voter fraud in six battleground states that uncovered fewer than 475 cases. Speaker 1 asserts Wisconsin has practically admitted the election was rigged and other states are doing the same. Speaker 0 questions how Speaker 1 will appeal to independent suburban women voters. Speaker 1 references polls showing him leading, including with women. Speaker 0 notes polls can change. Speaker 1 states he would like to be less combative but feels the press's dishonesty necessitates it to get his message across and win.

The speaker claims to have won the election but was robbed of the job due to cheating. They believe the election was stolen from the people of Georgia and that thousands of voters had their voices stolen. They refuse to concede because they believe the process was unfair and the result was not true or right. They acknowledge that their opponent won an adequate number of votes but do not consider them the legitimate governor. They still believe their opponent won through voter suppression. The speaker emphasizes that the election was not fair and accuses their opponent of dismantling democracy in Georgia. They do not consider themselves the governor of Georgia.

The attorney general found no fraud or accounting fraud in this case. The speaker believes this is a political witch hunt orchestrated by the White House to influence the election. They claim that the judge and attorney general manipulated the values of properties like Mar-a-Lago and Doral to deceive the court. The speaker argues that the case should be ended and criticizes the judge for not acknowledging a higher court's rebuke. They believe this is a weaponization of justice and election interference. The speaker expresses frustration at being in court instead of campaigning in Iowa, despite leading by a large margin.

I'm embarrassed that the US can't get its presidential election right. We should not accept this. In some states, there are more dead voters than soldiers buried on historic battlefields. We did not have a free, fair, and transparent vote on November 3rd. Everyone knows who won the election: Donald Trump.

Trump supporters believe he will win a second term despite losing. Allegations of voter fraud involve paying people to fill out mail-in ballots for Biden. Evidence is being presented in the Supreme Court because the media is not helping.

Speaker 1 questions the legitimacy of the 2020 election and refuses to concede in 2022. They accuse an Arizona official of election fraud and defamation. When confronted, Speaker 1 deflects, claiming they are in the middle of a lawsuit. They deny responsibility for inciting violence and criticize the interviewer for lack of understanding. Speaker 1 refuses to commit to conceding if they lose in November. The interview ends with Speaker 1 dismissing the interviewer.

The speaker believes Donald Trump will win the election, regardless of personal preference. They claim the "vibe shift" is profound, with numbers and early voting favoring Trump. More importantly, there's a return to freedom of expression. The speaker asserts that the previous election was rigged because critical information about a candidate was hidden from the public. They believe this cannot happen again, regardless of what actions are taken in the coming weeks. The speaker suggests people will not accept claims of popularity for figures like Kamala Harris, whom they criticize for lacking job experience and inconsistent pronunciation of her name. They also express frustration with someone raised in Montreal lecturing them about America. The speaker concludes that people have had enough.

It's Sunday around 11:30 AM Central Time. I just watched President Trump in Pennsylvania, where he expressed frustration over election fraud claims. Democrats are confidently stating they will win, despite evidence suggesting otherwise. Raskin mentioned on Bill Maher that it may appear Trump wins, but they'll block it, echoing Pelosi's comments from four years ago about mail-in votes. This indicates they are attempting the same tactics again. I urged viewers to vote more to counteract potential fraud. Conditions are tense, and Trump supporters must be prepared for challenges ahead. Infowars faces a potential shutdown soon, but I’ll continue broadcasting on the Alex Jones network. Follow me on X for updates. My message is to fight harder in the upcoming election, and it seems Trump is echoing that sentiment as well.

Multiple speakers express concerns about the legitimacy of elections, focusing on the 2016, 2000, 2004, and 2018 elections. Several speakers claim that Russian interference affected the outcome of the 2016 election, leading them to view Trump as an illegitimate president. Some believe Trump is aware of this illegitimacy. The 2000 Bush v. Gore election is cited as an example of a court-appointed president, with claims that Al Gore won Florida but the Supreme Court halted the vote count. The 2004 election in Ohio is described as riddled with problems, including malfunctioning machines and allegations of voting rights violations. Some believe John Kerry privately thought the election was stolen. The 2018 Georgia gubernatorial election is also disputed, with accusations that Brian Kemp, then Secretary of State, suppressed votes and disenfranchised voters, leading to Stacey Abrams' loss. Speakers assert the election was not fair and that Abrams likely won. Concerns are raised about the integrity of electronic voting machines and the lack of paper trails.

It seems like there are concerns about election integrity and potential fraud. The speaker mentions the Mesa Docks and dropbox, suggesting that there may be issues with these. They also criticize the reporters on TV for not being truthful. The speaker believes that if there are more votes than voters, it should not be questioned. They mention Georgia Claws and ballot mules, implying that there may be manipulation happening. The speaker accuses those in power of not caring about the truth and suggests that lawsuits are being used to delay the process. They emphasize the importance of holding those responsible accountable.

Ballots in Cambria County, Pennsylvania are down, and people are being told to fill out emergency ballots to be counted at the courthouse. This situation is concerning. It feels like chaos is beginning, and there's a fear of Trump winning because he represents a strong option for the future. The past four years have seen a president who seems disengaged and unaware of critical issues, which is troubling. There's a need for change, and regardless of Kamala Harris's name, she is not a viable candidate. The focus should be on addressing these issues effectively.

Speaker 0: I won, but they cheated. We were robbed of an election. Speaker 1: I don't think it's dangerous to use words like rigged and steal because we can back it up. Speaker 0: The election was stolen from the voters, not just from me. I won't concede because our democracy is being eroded. Speaker 1: The election was not free and fair. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen. We can't guarantee their votes will be counted in 2020. Speaker 2: Should the Democratic nominee concede if they can prove widespread voter suppression? Speaker 1: No, we shouldn't concede until we know the results. If it looks like cheating or rigging, it probably is. Speaker 0: We've been taught to accept defeat, but I refuse to concede. The process was not fair. Speaker 1: The election was stolen from Georgia voters. As long as eligible citizens can't vote, the system is rigged. I didn't lose, I just didn't win. Speaker 0: I didn't win officially. We don't know what really happened because of voter suppression. Speaker 1: He is the legal governor, but that doesn't mean he won legitimately. Speaker 0: Just because you win doesn't mean you won. We'll never know for sure if I got more votes. Speaker 1: I refuse to concede because it wasn't fair or right. He performed poorly and crassly against the people he represents. Speaker 1: Georgia voters were suppressed, their votes weren't counted. Brian Kemp dismantled our democracy. Speaker 0: I recognize I'm not the governor, but we won.

Are you prepared to say under oath that Donald Trump lost the presidential contest to Joe Biden in 2020? President Biden is the president of the United States, having been duly sworn in after a peaceful transition of power. Trump left office and was overwhelmingly elected in 2024. Do you have any doubts that Joe Biden had the necessary electoral votes to be elected president in 2020? As a prosecutor, I accept that Joe Biden is the president. I witnessed many things during my time in Pennsylvania as an advocate for the campaign. While I accept the results, I believe we should all want election integrity and ensure our elections are free and fair, following the rules and laws. I think that question deserves a yes or no, and your lengthy answer suggests you weren't prepared to answer yes.