TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Before entering politics, my net worth was $316,000. Just four years later, it jumped to $46 million. How did this happen? I bought an island vacation home on a whim and now commute via private jet from my island to Washington D.C. It appears some politicians are using insider information for stock trading, and because I'm in politics, I might have access to similar information.

Members of Congress should not trade stock due to the unfair advantage they have with information. Some lawmakers oppose a stock trade ban, but the issue is clear. Congress is seen as a rich man's club, with some members making significant profits from trading. While it's not technically illegal, it's a problem that needs to be addressed. There is a proposed bill to prevent this, but some disagree with the divestiture provision. If amended to allow holding private assets, it may gain more support. Without the amendment, many Republicans may vote against it.

Senator Hawley introduced legislation to ban members of Congress, the President, and the Vice President from owning or trading individual stocks. When asked if he was in favor of the legislation, the speaker responded that he likes it conceptually. He stated that Nancy Pelosi became rich by having inside information and made a fortune with her husband, which he finds disgraceful. He would need to study the legislation carefully, but conceptually, he likes it.

Voting for a ban on Congress members trading stocks? It's low on my priority list. I've faced accusations of insider trading despite having only about $20,000 in the market. I even had to threaten Fox News with defamation over false claims. While some support a ban, it doesn't affect me much since I have little invested. Sure, there are questionable trades by some, like Nancy Pelosi, but those examples are rare. If we ban stock trading, it might make Congress a place only for the wealthy, as we haven't had a pay raise since 2008. People think banning stock trading or imposing term limits will solve their problems, but those ideas need more thought. Would I vote for a ban? Sure, it doesn’t matter to me since I have no significant investments.

I started a Pelosi stock tracker after seeing politicians' questionable trades during COVID. Richard Burr's insider trading was the last straw. Unusual Whales on X deserves credit for exposing this. I built an app, Autopilot, to let people invest alongside politicians. Pelosi's up 87% since we started tracking her. I'm not political but this corruption needs to stop. Last year, she outperformed hedge funds by 20%. She bought Tesla leaps before Biden's infrastructure bill, then NVIDIA before the CHIPS Act. She made millions. Dan Crenshaw bought Meta then pushed to ban TikTok. They shouldn't be allowed to trade! I want trust back in our institutions.

The conversation centers on allegations surrounding Nancy Pelosi and potential insider trading. Speaker 1 states that Nancy Pelosi should be investigated because “what she has the highest return of anybody practically in the history of Wall Street,” claiming she knows exactly what will be announced, buys stock, and then the stock goes up after the announcements. Speaker 0 notes Pelosi heard the news and ran to CNN with a busted hip, while Tapper treated her like Biden on debate night. Speaker 2 asserts that Pelosi “became rich,” and Speaker 3 is interrupted about the sixtieth anniversary of Medicaid, but wants to respond to the insider trading allegation. Speaker 2 asks Pelosi for a response to the accusation, and Speaker 3 responds that the allegation is ridiculous. Pelosi states she “very much support the stop the trading of members of congress,” clarifying that she does not think anybody is doing anything wrong, but if they are, they are prosecuted and go to jail, because “confidence instills in the American people.” Pelosi adds that she has no concern about the obvious investments that had been made over time, and that “I’m not into it. My husband is.” This points to her assertion that her husband handles the investments, not herself. The discussion continues with a provocative line about Polly P in Napa, described as a Wall Street whiz kid, and reiterates that Pelosi’s wife knows nothing about it. The segment then shifts to the broader political action in the Senate, noting that the Senate is “suiting up,” having “advanced an anti stock trading bill for congress,” while Trump is not pleased. Throughout, the dialogue juxtaposes accusations of insider trading with Pelosi’s claimed support for prohibiting trading by members of Congress, her denial of personal involvement in the investments, and the implication that her husband handles the investments. There is a consistent focus on the tension between allegations of insider trading and calls for restrictions on congressional stock activities, framed against a broader political backdrop involving Medicaid’s sixtieth anniversary and reactions from political figures such as Trump.

Our app, Autopilot, lets you invest alongside politicians. Pelosi's up 87% since May 2021, outperforming the S&P by 50%. We have $300 million invested alongside her, with users profiting $30 million. Her office hasn't reached out to us, even after she defended congressional stock trading as part of a free market. Last year, Pelosi was up 54% versus the market's 26-27%, outperforming it by 25%. She outperformed 95% of hedge fund managers, according to a Bloomberg report. In 2024, Unusual Whales reported she was only the seventh-best trader.

Everyone is discussing a lawmaker's reaction to a question about Congress members trading stocks. The response was dismissive, suggesting that if they can't trade stocks, they might as well cut their pay. This reaction is notable considering Dan Crenshaw was the fifth-best political trader in 2021, even outperforming Nancy Pelosi. His stock portfolio is available for those interested in investing alongside him using an autopilot investment app.

NVIDIA's a semiconductor company, and in 2022, when the Chips Act was passed, Nancy Pelosi bought NVIDIA stock. People noticed, especially on social media, and questioned the timing. She sold it for a $300,000 loss, unusual because she only discloses profit/loss when it's a loss. Her filings often drop before holidays, potentially to bury the news. In late 2023, she re-bought $5 million in NVIDIA leaps. This turned out to be an incredibly well-timed trade. NVIDIA surged, and she's now up around 40% on that trade, potentially millions of dollars. These filings give ranges, so exact amounts are unknown, but it's her best recent trade that people have followed.

Nancy Pelosi reportedly made $3 million in just three hours, which is 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple properties valued over $5 million each. It would take an average person 27 years to earn that amount. This suggests that her primary motivation for being in Congress is financial gain, and she appears to excel at it.

I hate drama. I hate influencer drama. I hate Internet drama. I hate the theatrics of it. And so I want to tell you something. The only reason that I'm going up against Crenshaw is I am sick and tired of watching government officials and people in high places try to silence and bully regular American citizens. I'm sick of saying it. Somebody's gotta stand up to this shit. It might as well be me. It might as well be me. On 12/09/2025, I received a legal demand letter from lawyers representing congressman Dan Crenshaw. They are threatening to sue me for defamation because of comments I made on my podcast about a message that he sent me. So this all transpired from a conversation that I had with Tulsi Gabbard. And I was concerned... Although I didn't mention his name in the interview... I wanted to know how a newer congressman can afford to hire a mainstream DJ, Steve Aoki, to spin at his fortieth birthday party. I didn't just make this up. Somebody sent me the invitation that he had sent out to everybody for his fortieth birthday. And so that's where I got this from. Anyways, here's the clip with Tulsi. Is there any direct money? I mean, know, you see all these people you see all these people show up in Congress, the Senate, the cabinet, whatever, and, you know, not wealthy. Yeah. Speaker 1: I don't have firsthand experience in this. I have often questioned the same thing. I know a big factor is the insider trading that goes on in Congress. And again, some people will say, well, like, hey, I didn't know anything about this. I'm just making investments for my family or my wife or my husband is making investments. I don't know anything about what's going on. Maybe they're being honest, maybe they're not. But the reality is you're in a position where you're making decisions, either in committee or on the House floor, that influence our markets, that influence the outcomes of certain industries, either causing some to tank or others to skyrocket. And the mere perception of insider trading shouldn't exist. This is legislation, again, I introduced in Congress years ago. No member of Congress should be allowed to do any trading of any stocks, neither should their spouse, neither should their senior staff. Period. These are the people who have access to proprietary private information that's not open to everybody in the public, or certainly before it becomes public. And the possibility of the abuse of power in trading on that information should not exist. It's interesting because as we're seeing there are some members of Congress who say that share my view on that, but who are continuing to trade stocks themselves. The Senate just passed, I think out of committee, first step legislation that would reflect similar to banning members and their spouses. We'll see where it goes. In the Senate we've heard a lot of talk coming from leaders from both parties, but no action has been taken. That to me is the most obvious way that people are going from being elected and having no money and you make, what, dollars $160 a year or whatever the salary is now to literally becoming multimillionaires. That is the most obvious way. There are kind of stringent requirements of financial reporting that every member has to do certainly at least once a year, more often if you are actively trading in stocks. But it I think it would be a little hard, not impossible, but a little hard if somebody's just coming and bringing you a sack of cash. Speaker 0: So after the conversation with Tulsi, that's when I got the text or the message on Instagram from congressman Crenshaw that I find threatening, telling me he spoke with his boys at six. Here's a screenshot. Hey, Sean. You have the ability to contact your fellow team guy if you've got a problem with me or have questions about how I'm getting rich. Some of my boys at six told me about your indirect swipe at me. Some of my beliefs are based on trendy narratives instead of facts. And just so you know, I mean, Dan does have a history of threatening people. Once again, here is Dan threatening to kill Tucker Carlson. And then, again, he reaffirms that he's not joking. Speaker 2: Have you ever met Tucker? Speaker 0: We've talked a lot. He's the worst person. Okay. So I get the message. I take it is extremely threatening. It is a tier one unit, the best, most effective tier one unit in the world, deadliest unit. But I don't do anything. I move on. And then a little over a year later, I'm interviewing, oh, a member from SEAL Team six. Maybe he's one of Dan's boys at six. So he brought up the fact that he had asked a congressman with an eye patch, didn't wanna mention his name, to help him with his book debacle. He received no aid. I filled in the blank. I said, oh, you must be talking about congressman Crenshaw. Let me share my experience with you, my interactions with congressman Crenshaw. So I shared him. I told him about the Instagram message, and I told him that I found that threatening. And then I asked Matt if he was one of Dan's boys at six, Maybe he was here to come beat me up. Matt assured me he wasn't. Here's the clip. Speaker 2: I'll give you another example. In the height of my my issues, I contacted a former SEAL. I won't name names, but he has an eye patch, And he's a congressman out of a state You Speaker 0: mean Dan Crenshaw? Speaker 2: I'm not naming names. Speaker 0: Another one of my Speaker 2: favorite Sir, here's my situation. You know, Dan? Speaker 0: Dan actually sent me a message. I should fucking read this to you. But, basically, he tells me I brought something up about him, and I never even met I gave him the courtesy of not even mentioning his fucking name. It was about his birthday party where he hired Steve Aoki to to DJ his birthday. I mean, that can't be fucking cheap. Right? Especially on a congressman's salary. And I brought that up. And Dan sends me a message that says his boys over at six are really upset with me that I brought that up, and they're gonna they might come beat me up. Speaker 2: Boys at six. Speaker 0: His boys over at six. Speaker 2: Well, to infer he's got I don't know why congressman would be Speaker 0: threatening me with seal team six, but I'm still fucking waiting. This is actually a couple years This Speaker 2: is threatened quite a Speaker 0: have not had my ass kicked by a couple of guys over at six. But Dan Crunchy he fits with all these fucking people you're talking about. Speaker 2: So I called him. Right? He's a sitting congressman. He's a former officer. And drum roll, please, he was getting ready to release his book. So I call him up. I get a conversation with him. I said, sir, here's my situation. I hired an attorney. The attorney gave me bad advice. Book was published. I've given up attorney client privilege, cooperated everything I can to to fix this. They've still come after me. We can get into all the the other stuff that I'm dealing with. I said, sir, can you help me out with this? He's like, well, you know, I'm I'm about ready to publish my book, and I'm I'm not getting it reviewed. I'm like, well, sir, same same letter of the law that they came after me for failure to seek prepublication review. I didn't get prepublication review because my lawyer told me I didn't have to, and he could do it. Like, in your case, you know you have to get reviewed. I'm here telling you, confirming you have to get reviewed or the government's gonna come after you. He's like, yeah. No. But I'm not gonna write anything classified in my book. I'm like, there's nothing classified in my book. They they said there was. They went through it. They said, nope. There's nothing classified in it. You just failed to seek review. I'm like, so if I only thing I failed to do was seek review, you're willingly going around that obligation, and you don't give a shit. He's like, yeah. But I'm not gonna write about anything classified in my book. That was his answer. Never talked to him again. So he published his book. No review. Nothing's happened. He's kept his money. He's a sitting congressman. I got a payment plan. So so to say I've been alone So Speaker 0: I guess I guess you're not one of Dan's boys over at six. Speaker 2: That's kinda Definitely not Dave Boys at six. That's a pretty ridiculous statement if I've ever heard one.

Congresswoman Dianne Feinstein passed away recently. She owned a $5 million condo in Hawaii and a $55 million private jet. Accusations of financial crimes include benefiting her husband's companies with $100 million in government funds. Feinstein served as a congresswoman for 32 years with an annual salary of $174,000. Speculation suggests she may have used insider trading to profit from the stock market, potentially outperforming Barack Obama. To copy politicians' trades, comment "Boris" below. Translation: The congresswoman passed away, owning a condo and private jet. Accusations of financial crimes include benefiting her husband's companies. She served for 32 years with a modest salary. Speculation suggests she may have used insider trading to profit from the stock market. To copy politicians' trades, comment "Boris" below.

I run a Pelosi stock tracker and an app with the slogan "invest like a politician." At 25, I quit my finance job in New York and moved to Bali. When COVID hit, I connected with co-founders to build an app that allowed users to follow their friends' stock portfolios. During the GameStop era, I built a Nancy Pelosi portfolio. Politicians were getting called out for their trades, especially during COVID, like Richard Burr's scandal involving COVID trades and insider information. We started tracking Pelosi's trades in 2022. She was up 54% last year, outperforming most hedge fund managers. We've got millions invested alongside her through our app. Our mission is to instill trust back into institutions.

Speaker 0 asked Speaker 1 to respond to an accusation that Nancy Pelosi became rich through insider trading. Speaker 1 responded that the accusation is ridiculous. Speaker 1 supports stopping members of Congress from trading stocks, not because anyone is doing anything wrong, but to instill confidence in the American people. Speaker 1 has no concern about investments made over time. Speaker 1's husband is into investments, but it has nothing to do with insider information. Speaker 1 stated that the president is projecting because he has his own exposure.

There are members of Congress who have become strangely wealthy, accumulating, for example, $20 million while earning $200,000 a year. It is unclear how this is possible. The goal is to figure out how this happens and stop it.

The issue at hand is the disparity in asset ownership among members of Congress. Many Americans question how certain politicians achieve impressive investment returns, especially those involved in stock trades during the COVID pandemic. This isn't just a perception; it's a real problem. Congress members are trading based on information not available to the public. While insider trading is prohibited, members often receive information that, while not classified as insider information by securities laws, still provides them with a significant advantage. This situation raises concerns about fairness and transparency in financial dealings among lawmakers.

We've been tracking Pelosi's stock trades since May 2021, and she's up 87%, outperforming the S&P 500 by 50%. Our users have invested $300 million following her, collectively profiting $30 million. Pelosi has been questioned about congressional stock trading, defending it as part of a free market. However, her success demonstrates the market isn't free. She benefits from insider information due to her position, which is illegal. In 2024, Pelosi's portfolio grew by 54%, surpassing the market's 27% gain. She outperformed the S&P 500 by 25% and even beat 95% of professional hedge fund managers, according to a Bloomberg report.

We've been tracking Pelosi's trades since 2021 and her Nvidia trade stands out as her best, with gains around 40%, potentially turning millions into $5 million or even $7.5 million. We've never been contacted by her office. We've taken things a step further by creating an app, "Autopilot", that allows people to invest alongside politicians. Pelosi is up 87% since May 2021, outperforming the S&P 500 by 50%. $300 million has been invested alongside her through our platform, resulting in $30 million in profits for those mirroring her trades. Despite scrutiny and questions about congressional stock trading, she defends it as part of a free market. Her success shows how rigged the market is.

The speaker pledges to push for a single stock trading ban, arguing "it is the credibility of the House and the Senate" that is at stake from "eye popping returns," observed in figures like "Representative Pelosi, Senator Wyden," suggesting "every hedge fund would be jealous of them." They assert "the American people deserve better than this" and that "People don't shouldn't come to Washington to get rich." Instead, they should "come to serve the American people," as such trading undermines trust in the system, because "if any private citizen traded this way, the SEC would be knocking on their door."

Nancy Pelosi reportedly made $3 million in just three hours, which is 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple properties valued at over $5 million each. It would take an average person 27 years to earn that amount. Critics argue that her motivations for being in Congress are primarily financial, and she has been successful in accumulating wealth.

Members of Congress have the opportunity to enact a stock trading ban, something the public has wanted for decades. 86% of Americans believe members of Congress should not be able to buy and sell individual stocks while in office. Members are privy to information the average person isn't, leading to ethics referrals and investigations into stock trades. This information isn't covered by insider trading laws, but it is valuable. During COVID, members of both parties engaged in stock trading after receiving exclusive briefings. The access members of Congress have is qualitatively different. The proposed bill would allow members to invest in mutual funds and diversified investments, but not individual stock shares due to their unique access to information.

TikTokers on the popular social media platform are copying the stock trades of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. They closely watch her financial disclosures for stock tips and use them to inform their own investments. One user even referred to Pelosi as the "queen of investing." Critics argue that Pelosi's annual returns, which have consistently been successful, suggest that she has prior knowledge or involvement in the trades. This raises questions about the Democrats' claims of being for the working class, as data shows that Democrats represent a higher percentage of wealthy taxpayers compared to Republicans. Additionally, the video suggests that the government's money printing and debt ceiling concerns primarily benefit the billionaire class and further inflate the stock market.

I run a Pelosi stock tracker, which started unexpectedly after leaving finance and living in Bali. Seeing politicians, like Richard Burr, trade based on insider information during COVID was outrageous. I'm not particularly political but I saw the opportunity to expose corruption and highlight the hypocrisy of politicians trading stocks by building an app that allows people to invest alongside them. Pelosi's trades, particularly in Tesla and NVIDIA, raised eyebrows, especially with her family's net worth skyrocketing. Dan Crenshaw's also suspect as he voted against banning TikTok while owning stock in Meta. Despite the scrutiny, Pelosi's office hasn't reached out, and people have invested millions alongside her, profiting significantly.

Nancy Pelosi should be investigated for allegedly having the highest investment returns in Wall Street history, save a few individuals. This is purportedly due to her access to inside information about upcoming announcements. She allegedly buys stock before these announcements, leading to a subsequent increase in the stock's value.

Speaker 0: 'So what do we get for a trillion dollars a year to the US military? Do we get anything in return?' Speaker 1: 'We get some enhanced stock portfolios.' 'I haven't voted for a penny for Ukraine, I'm proud of that. It's not my dadgum war.' 'Some of those contractors we described get a multi multi billion with a B dollar, no bid contract.' 'And who do you think has bought stock in that, in that company? Members of Congress, two weeks prior to the president making that official notice.' 'Return on their, 506100% return on their investment.' 'But why is impossible as to ban stock trading for members of Congress? That's a great idea.' 'I have the bill to do it, and that's why we have a bipartisan group, we've got a bill, but it's not going anywhere.' 'Why? Because too many members of Congress, I mean, we were told by leadership that, you know, these guys can't afford to be here.'