reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In 1986, the Challenger explosion killed 7 astronauts. Years later, people claim to have found them alive with the same names and faces. Some are now in different professions. The internet makes it easy to verify identities now, but back then, disappearing was simpler. NASA denies these claims, but the similarities are hard to ignore. An investigation is needed to understand this anomaly.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

So we are going to in this episode be looking at hidden labs, secret deals, mysterious deaths, and revelations that challenge what we thought we knew about science, power, morality, and who owns that.

The discussion centers on six American scientists working on advanced materials and plasma technology who have suddenly disappeared, with a parallel pattern of missing Chinese scientists. The speakers debate where the technology originated (with sources suggesting it came from downed UAPs/UFOs) and why these individuals are vanishing, including both U.S. and Chinese scientists who worked on similar high-end military applications. Brandon Weichert outlines a sequence of events and connections: - In mid-March 2026, three Chinese defense scientists — Zhao Jingkang (nuclear weapons expert), Wu Manching (radar and metamaterials expert), and Wei Yiyan (missile systems expert) — were quietly erased from the Chinese Academy of Engineering’s website, signaling they are no longer among the living. - A few days later, hypersonics expert Yan Hong (a key figure in plasma aerodynamics) died suddenly at 56. - Weichert pairs these five Chinese scientists with the six American scientists who were working on related technologies, noting massive overlap in their work and suggesting that the Americans’ and Chinese’ programs mirror each other in advanced plasma and weapon systems. - He concludes that there is shadowboxing between the United States and China, describing it as a shaping operation in the run-up to a potential major conflict, with both sides attempting to eliminate the other’s brainpower—the human capital essential to sustaining high-end warfare. - He recalls historical precedents where nations targeted each other’s scientists (the Americans reportedly killing Soviet scientists and vice versa; Israelis targeting Iranian scientists) and argues this is not unprecedented. - Weichert cautions that the topic is not necessarily about aliens; he suggests that the systems discussed may be advanced technologies developed in the U.S., Russia, and China for years, potentially including non-alien sources and even Nazi-era technologies that were inherited, while acknowledging that alien explanations exist in public discourse. - He notes that there is a broader geopolitical dynamic at play, including the possibility that the timing of alien-related talk may be designed to distract from conventional advances in technology and the fact that China may have caught up to or surpassed the U.S. in some conventional technologies. The conversation also addresses satellites and space warfare: - There are reports on meteors or fireballs in the sky, but the speakers believe some debris could be from satellites shot down in low Earth orbit. - SpaceX Starlinks have suffered “an explosive fragmentary event,” potentially from being hit by anti-satellite weapons; Starlinks have previously been used for protests (in Iran) and supplied to Ukraine, and the Russians have developed systems like Klinka and TOBAL to knock down Starlinks. - There is a longstanding concern that electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons on satellites could disrupt or destroy the U.S. electric grid, with a claim that one EMP detonated 50 miles above the continental United States could knock out 90–95% of the grid and take at least two years to restore, especially given reliance on Chinese-made restoring equipment. - The discussion returns to the importance of human capital and education, with a provocative claim that the Department of Education may be the single greatest national security threat due to its impact on human capital, alongside the national debt. The speakers acknowledge disagreement about whether the origin of the advanced plasma technology is extraterrestrial or terrestrial, emphasizing instead the strategic implications of missing scientists on both sides and the ongoing modernization and counterspace dimensions of the conflict.

A series of inventors who developed groundbreaking energy technologies mysteriously died before sharing their inventions. From free energy to cold fusion, each inventor met a tragic end, raising questions about the suppression of revolutionary technologies. The world is full of strange coincidences and mysteries.

A UFO reportedly landed near two major NATO military bases. The question is posed whether American Air Force personnel were hallucinating or fabricating the event. The central question is whether conspiracy theories will finally be disproven.

The mystery of Malaysian Flight 370's disappearance continues to intrigue. Independent journalist Ashton Forbes discusses a letter from scientist Amy Eskridge to Trump and Pence in 2017, highlighting an international race for UFO technology. Forbes believes this technology could explain the plane's disappearance and suggests it involves gravity manipulation. He emphasizes the need for an open mind regarding these theories, as traditional searches have yielded no results. Eskridge, a researcher with a notable background, reportedly struggled with the implications of her work and tragically committed suicide in 2022. Forbes argues that advanced technologies have been suppressed for national defense, and he advocates for disclosure, suggesting that the true potential lies in free energy for all.

The discussion weaves together claims about advanced predictive technology, space programs, and a supposed timeline war. The speakers reference a “server farm of computers” used to deconstruct images to see future events, naming the Orion cube (the cube) and Looking Glass as the main technologies involved, with Looking Glass also connected to the company or project Looking Glass. One speaker presents themselves as someone with a scientific background in probabilities, noting that in a master’s thesis they “proved Nobel laureate Harry Markowitz wrong” and that their work is in empirical science. They say Grok calculated that certain events are random with a probability of “one to 2.5,” and suggest that while Grok’s calculation isn’t mandatory belief, it can be used to assess likelihood. The discussion then centers on an alleged shooter event and David Wilcock, with the speaker summarizing prior claims about Wilcock’s death and possible manipulation of his actions. They state: “It was an AI dubbed video in English,” and that they speculated Wilcock was murdered to change the timeline, noting that even if he pulled the trigger himself, he “could be manipulated in into it via mind control or radiation, weapons,” and that he talked about personality disorders and dissociation, possibly multiple personalities. The summary then lists numerous coincidences surrounding the event, including: - “UFO whistleblower died of accidental drug overdose” followed by a claim to “forget it” after agreeing to testify to Congress. - Evacuation of JD Vance before Donald Trump and a possible link to Palantir, with a suggestion it could matter to their theory. - Owen Shroyer noting the shooter appeared in an ABC News special. - A prototype for a wheelchair emergency brake being developed, noted as strange. - A shooter appearing in a BlackRock commercial, raising the idea of a “crisis act.” - A circulating photo purportedly showing a shirt with ISF or IDF imagery; the speaker leans toward skepticism about the authenticity of the IDF photo and notes a Palantir connection. - Mario Nofar deleting related posts. - Caroline Levitt predicting “there will be some shots fired,” with debate about whether that was literal or metaphorical. The speakers recount a personal anecdote: someone sitting near Caroline Levitt warned to be safe, after the national anthem, suggesting foreknowledge about danger. They discuss suspicions around foreknowledge, but stress that foreknowledge is not their main point; rather, they present a larger pattern of connections. Key names appear throughout: Henry Martinez, Cole Allen, JD Vance, Palantir, NASA JPL, CHET Propulsion Laboratory, Artemis, Orion, the Orion cube, and the “Law of One” reference to Orion. The shooter is identified by name as Cole Allen, connected to NASA JPL; Henry Martinez is tied to an Orion paper from 2014 and to a 2023 post with timing implications. The group links Palantir’s contract with NASA to the Artemis moon mission and to Orion, suggesting a broader synchronization between the Orion program, Artemis, and predictive capabilities, including a “Looking Glass” concept and a White House press release stating that “Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space.” The overall claim is that a web of coincidences—institutional ties between Palantir, NASA, Orion/Artemis, media appearances, and time-themed postings—points to a coordinated timeline manipulation scenario, with Grok calculating an extremely low probability for these being mere coincidences (less than one in 2.5 to an enormous power). The speakers argue that the only alternative explanation is deliberate timing signaling a timeline war, and they invite further theories while promising a longer video in English with subtitles.

A series of inventors working on free energy technologies mysteriously died before sharing their discoveries. From arsenic poisoning to boating accidents, each death was surrounded by suspicious circumstances. The suppression of these inventions by powerful entities like the Department of Energy and JPMorgan raises questions about the true reasons behind these deaths and the lack of progress in making free energy accessible to all. The world is full of strange coincidences.

UFO sightings are predominantly reported in the United States, leading to skepticism about their credibility. There's speculation that some phenomena might be linked to altered states of consciousness, possibly during psychedelic experiences. Additionally, the conversation shifts to a Chinese scientist, Dr. Ning Li, who worked on anti-gravity technology and vanished, likely returning to China. Her groundbreaking research attracted attention and funding, but after starting her own company, she stopped publishing results. An obituary later surfaced, raising questions about her fate. It’s suggested that if she made significant advancements, the government may have isolated her to prevent information leaks, especially given her background. Concerns about espionage and the potential military implications of her work are discussed, highlighting the delicate balance between innovation and national security.

Pictured here was an astrophysicist at Caltech. He worked on a NASA supported space telescope project and infrared systems. Now he was shot and killed at his home just two months ago. Then there's Frank Maywald. He was a senior scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab focused on advanced satellite systems, and he died nearly two years ago, but his cause of death has never been made public. Meanwhile, Monica Reza. Monica Reza also reportedly connected to NASA's jet propulsion lab project. She went missing last summer while hiking in California. No trace. It keeps going. There's William McCaslin, a retired air force general. He too is missing. He's a former head of air force research lab and oversaw advanced space and surveillance programs. He's been missing since February. Reports say he once oversaw funding connected to a project that also included Monica Reza. Now there's more to New Mexico. Melissa Cassis Cassis. She is been missing since last summer. She worked at Los Alamos National Lab. She had administrative role but reportedly also had security clearances. Just months earlier that she went missing, so too did Anthony Chavez, also connected to Los Alamos, an engineer. He disappeared during a walk. No signs, no answers. And then finally, there's Nuno Larrero. You remember Nuno Larrero? He was the MIT researcher focused on nuclear fusion and was shot and killed in his Massachusetts home last December. It was

Multiple top microbiologists died under suspicious circumstances over a decade before the 2020 pandemic. Professor Wiley, an expert in human immune response and viruses like HIV and Ebola, was found dead in the Mississippi River after investigating dangerous viruses. Other renowned researchers specializing in infectious diseases and biological agents also died. Some were stabbed in car trunks, while others crashed their cars due to missing brake fluid. These scientists were connected to government projects related to bioterrorism, flu pandemics, or anthrax. A total of forty microbiologists were lost in less than four years, revealing connections to weapons research.

There's significant chaos behind the scenes regarding UAP disclosure. Two individuals connected to former Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines revealed a slow drip disclosure agenda originating from her office. The aim was to create the impression that the U.S. government had not seriously investigated UAPs for the past 15 to 20 years, particularly following the Nimitz incident. This plan, spanning 15 to 20 years, consists of several phases. The first phase involves using the James Webb Telescope to release images of artificial structures on distant celestial bodies. Subsequent phases include identifying artificial structures on the Moon and Mars, linking these to archaeological sites on Earth, and ultimately excavating humanoid remains believed to be connected to these anomalies.

Incidents involving the killing, death, and missing status of scientists connected through national security, black budget technology, high energy physics, and related fields are not uncommon. A notably cited case involves roughly 25 scientists and engineers tied to the UK defense contractor GEC Marconi in the 1980s, many of whom were linked to the Reagan-era Star Wars Defense Initiative. The goal at the time was to develop a system to detect and destroy nuclear missiles before they hit the United States, and a string of mysterious deaths, suicides, and disappearances within this network followed a pattern one might expect from a coordinated effort to silence these individuals. Currently, ten scientists are listed as missing, with Steven Garcia identified as the latest missing nuclear official. The names in this group are connected in various ways to black-budget technology, high-energy physics, and the search for extraterrestrial life. This occurs during a period of significant geopolitical instability and while the United States administration has publicly expressed an interest in declassifying currently classified UFO-related intelligence. The discussion raises questions about whether elements within murky, private aerospace circles—loosely connected to government programs—are concerned about daylight breaking into their black projects. While certainty is elusive, the pattern mirrors the GEC Marconi incident from the eighties, suggesting a potential suppression of certain research avenues. Among the highlighted cases, the killing of professor Nuno Larrero in 2025 stands out as a major red flag. Larrero was a leading fusion and plasma physicist, widely regarded as a top-tier scientist in exotic energy and propulsion research, areas that intersect with extreme national security secrecy and potential danger for those who disclose such secrets. Another notable case is general William McCasland, who has been missing for over a month. He was revealed in WikiLeaks emails as a senior adviser on UFO subjects to Tom DeLonge, founder of To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science, which brought figures such as Lou Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, and Jim Semivan into public view on government UFO disclosure topics. The WikiLeaks communications show DeLonge bragging to John Podesta about McCaslin being one of his top UFO advisers. The disappearance of McCaslin, alongside several prominent scientists in exotic physics, plasma research, and the search for extraterrestrial technosignatures, is cited as evidence that a coordinated situation could be occurring.

There is a concerning agenda behind the slow disclosure of UAP information, led by former National Intelligence Director Avril Haines. Two sources confirm that the goal was to create the impression that the U.S. government had not seriously investigated UAPs for the past 15 to 20 years, particularly before the Nimitz incident. This plan, spanning 15 to 20 years, consists of several phases. The first phase involves using the James Webb Telescope to release images of potential artificial structures in our solar system. The subsequent phases include identifying artificial structures on the Moon and Mars, linking them to archaeological sites on Earth, and ultimately excavating humanoid remains believed to be connected to these anomalies.

The segment compiles a series of high-profile disappearances and deaths connected to prominent scientists and military-related figures from July 2023 through the present, noting that some cases remain unexplained or lack full public detail while others appear sudden with few answers. The overarching implication presented is that these cases involve individuals tied to advanced national security work, prompting calls for heightened inquiry. Most recently, retired Air Force General William McCaslin vanished in February. He walked out of his Albuquerque home, leaving behind his phone, after having previously overseen some of the Pentagon’s most advanced aerospace programs. In the same month, astrophysicist Carl Grillmeier—who worked closely on NASA missions—was killed outside his home; a suspect has been arrested in that case. Eight months prior to these events, US rocket scientist Monica Reza disappeared while hiking in California’s Angeles National Forest; records indicate she worked on advanced aerospace materials. The report notes that Congress is weighing an FBI involvement: Congressman Eric Burleson is calling for an FBI investigation, underscoring the perceived severity of the cases and the potential implications for national security. In supporting remarks, a statement attributed to Burleson emphasizes the unusual nature of the individuals involved and the seriousness of the situations. Speaker 1 (the reporter’s interlocutor) adds context by describing these victims as not ordinary citizens but “some of the most advanced scientists that are working on our some of our most critical, nation’s secrets.” The speaker frames the situation as having “all of the hallmarks of a foreign operation,” signaling a belief that foreign involvement could be a factor, and stresses the need for investigation. The report notes that, to date, no local authority has publicly connected these mysterious deaths and disappearances. When the inquiry was directed to the FBI, they declined to comment. The segment closes with a follow-up acknowledgment from the host that these cases have heightened curiosity and understanding but remain unresolved in many aspects. Overall, the compilation highlights a pattern involving high-profile scientists and aerospace professionals with missing or violent end-points, the call for federal scrutiny, and the lack of publicly disclosed connections by local authorities, while the FBI maintains silence on the matter.

There is a pentagon that hides a billion dollars without any accountability, and it has never passed an audit. To uncover the truth, it seems that someone may need to leak information from these labs online, potentially facing dire consequences afterward.

Some stories are challenging to report, especially regarding attacks on intelligence, military, and state department personnel. These incidents have occurred in over a dozen countries, revealing common patterns in the types of injuries sustained. Evidence suggests that a foreign adversary may be responsible for these attacks. The affected individuals are part of a highly vetted group, entrusted with sensitive government secrets. Acknowledging that US personnel are being targeted while on assignment sends a concerning message: no one is safe.

Speaker 0 said that people in the Missile Defense Agency, including the now deceased doctor Peter Pry and his colleague David Pine, had long claimed—about for a decade—that Iranian electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons were placed on satellites in orbit. Speaker 0 added that Space Force has been tracking such suspected EMP activity for years and that the situation might involve preemptive shootdowns of these suspected EMP bomb satellites as part of escalation against Iran. Speaker 1 said EMP attacks on U.S. infrastructure are a major concern, stating that “it wouldn't take much for entire electric grid to be wiped out.” Speaker 0 then stated that one EMP detonated 50 miles above the Continental United States would knock out 90 to 95% of the electric grid, that there is no restoring it for a minimum of two years, and that the grid would not come back online within two years because the physical gear needed to restore it comes from China. The discussion then shifted to missing scientists and technology origins. Speaker 1 said it was fascinating that there is “massive overlap” between U.S. and Chinese scientists who have gone missing, and he said that he and Speaker 0 could disagree on where the technology came from. Speaker 1 described a claim he had heard from special forces and involvement in a secret space program: the technology was accidentally discovered through crash retrieval from UAPs “long time ago.” Speaker 0 said he did not have special knowledge and expressed a belief that extraordinary people and technologies have historically come from hidden or inherited research, referencing Tesla and claiming Nazis developed advanced systems at Peenemünde that were inherited. Speaker 0 suggested that “the alien thing might be a cover story,” while stating he does not have anyone on the inside who could tell him one way or the other and describing it as his opinion. Speaker 1 said the cover story idea includes the pattern that people assume anything seen in the sky is an alien craft, but that it is often U.S. military technology. He also asserted that “the Nazi technology came from these crash retrieval programs in Russia, China.” Speaker 1 then asked a UFO-related question, saying they have seen six scientists go missing, including military personnel working in plasma physics, advanced heat-resistant materials, magnetism, doctors, and the director of MIT’s plasma science fusion center. He said he had sources from special forces that this plasma technology was found accidentally after a downed UAP. He also referenced Brendan Weichert’s earlier reporting that the issue is “not about aliens,” and stated that China and the United States are “playing this very dangerous game” by missing each other’s scientists.