TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A forensic engineering and animation lab, Knot Laboratory, claims to have new evidence disproving the Warren Commission's single bullet theory in the JFK assassination. The Warren Commission concluded that one bullet struck President Kennedy in the neck and then struck Texas Governor John Connolly. Knot Laboratory created a digital twin of Dealey Plaza using laser scans and matched it to the Zapruder film. Their analysis suggests Governor Connolly's wound was misaligned with the trajectory of the bullet that supposedly passed through Kennedy, indicating a second bullet. Sammy "The Bull" Gravano, a former mafia informant, claimed JFK was shot from the front, from the Grassy Knoll. Knot Laboratory welcomes feedback and hopes their findings will prompt further investigation by ballistics experts and law enforcement. A podcast episode will delve further into the visualizations and Gravano's claims, including who he believes was responsible for the fatal shot.

A congresswoman claims NBC has a previously unseen video allegedly showing Oswald near the vehicle during the JFK assassination, suggesting he wasn't the shooter. She says they will request the tape, which director Stone saw a secondary copy of, believing it could "blow open" the JFK investigation, but that NBC has been "guarding" it. She also references a CIA document that supposedly shows the CIA never bought the "lone gunman theory." She praises Trump, Radcliffe, and Gabbard for pushing for transparency and hopes to bring forward legislation to prevent similar situations. She encourages the public to ask NBC to release the tape so the American people know the truth about JFK's assassination.

President Kennedy's assassination remains a hotly debated topic. While the official Warren Commission concluded Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, evidence suggests a more complex narrative. Many eyewitnesses reported shots coming from the front, contradicting Oswald's position. The rushed investigation and immediate pronouncements by President Johnson and FBI Director Hoover to quell any notion of conspiracy raise serious questions. The CIA actively discredited those questioning the official story, labeling them "conspiracy theorists." Kennedy's shifting stance on the Cold War and his growing conflict with the military and intelligence agencies further fuel ongoing debate about his death. The lack of accountability for those behind Kennedy's murder casts a long shadow over US foreign policy.

There is doubt that the newly released JFK files contain any revelatory information. The speaker believes there was not a single gunman. The magic bullet theory is dismissed as impossible. The speaker states that everybody heard a shot from the grassy knoll. It is unlikely the full truth will ever be known because this was the final news dump. The speaker doubts the CIA will ever admit involvement, even though a lot of people wanted them to be involved.

The speaker discusses the Zapruder film, an amateur film capturing the Kennedy assassination. Abraham Zapruder, a Dallas dress manufacturer, filmed the motorcade in Dealey Plaza. The speaker warns viewers about the graphic nature of the footage, calling it the "execution of President Kennedy." The film shows the motorcade entering Dealey Plaza. As the car passes a sign, Kennedy is shot, followed by Governor Connolly. The speaker points out the backward motion of Kennedy's head upon impact. The Warren Commission concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, fired all shots from behind. However, the speaker claims the backward head movement suggests a shot from the front. The speaker states that the film shows Kennedy being hit from the front.

Upon election, the speaker will establish an independent presidential commission on assassination attempts. This commission will release all remaining documents pertaining to the John F. Kennedy assassination. The commission will also conduct a rigorous review of the attack that occurred last month. The speaker states that many people have asked them to release the documents on the Kennedy assassination.

John Collin created a video showing a bullet's trajectory that suggests it would have been very difficult for the round to travel the path it did if it came from Thomas Crooks. The speaker suggests that the investigators should bring in John Collin and see his evidence. The speaker believes that any worthwhile investigation should examine all theories, including those that some might consider conspiratorial, and then try to disprove or debunk them, or see if they hold water. The speaker reiterates that John Collin is someone the investigators should bring in to examine the video evidence.

The speaker is part of a senate bipartisan investigation into an assassination attempt. According to the speaker, the Secret Service and FBI are dragging their feet and not providing requested documents, such as 302s and interview transcriptions. Documents that are provided are heavily redacted and delivered the day of the interview, making them unusable. The speaker believes this behavior is suspicious and fuels conspiracy theories. They claim releasing the body for cremation before autopsy or toxicology reports further drives suspicion and conspiracy theories.

Retired FBI agent Paul Landis, a former Secret Service agent on Jackie Kennedy's protection detail, claims to have found the "magic bullet" that was part of the JFK assassination. The bullet, known as Warren Commission exhibit 399, was found in almost pristine condition and was believed to have entered JFK's back, exited his throat, and then hit Texas governor John Connally. Landis argues that it would have been impossible for Lee Harvey Oswald, the supposed shooter, to fire two shots in less than a second with the rifle he had. Landis suggests that there was a second shooter in Dealey Plaza, contradicting the Warren Commission's conclusion that Oswald acted alone. Landis plans to discuss this further in a podcast or video with his partner, a retired Secret Service agent.

Speaker discusses Fed operations and JFK shooting, stating 'there are often decoys, even decoy sounds' and that 'it is totally plausible' there were multiple people who knew who would take the shot. They say 'a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun,' and, considering the trajectory, that the shot 'kinda had to come from the front of Charlie.' This is 'my well informed opinion' and suggests 'we are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie and likely in the audience.' The speaker claims this explains why footage behind Charlie's head is hidden, calling it 'crucial first and foremost.' They claim 'the person who took the cameras down was absolutely not instructed to do so by law enforcement' Question 'why grab the one behind his head first?' They note a 'remarkable blind spot on the left of Charlie' and ask for footage accordingly.

The Kennedy family had a long-standing feud with the CIA. Joseph Kennedy, the family patriarch, called for an end to the CIA's operations, and John and Robert Kennedy criticized the CIA's role in Vietnam. Before his assassination, John Kennedy planned to remove the clandestine services from the CIA. There were many enemies, not just from the CIA, who opposed the family. It wasn't until recently that doubts arose about who killed John Kennedy. Paul Schrade, a close friend of Robert Kennedy, believes Sirhan Sirhan did not act alone. The autopsy report and ballistic evidence suggest that Sirhan couldn't have shot John Kennedy from behind. The speaker doesn't draw any conclusions but emphasizes the importance of facts, autopsy reports, ballistic evidence, and eyewitness accounts. The involvement of the CIA or another government agency remains uncertain.

After the assassination, doubts emerged about the official story, leading to various conspiracy theories. The single bullet theory from the Warren Commission report is a key piece of evidence. It suggests that a bullet from the 6th floor of the building entered Kennedy's back, exited his neck, hit Connally in the armpit, broke his ribs, went into his wrist, and then into his thigh. However, the Zapruder film, which was released later, shows that Connally turned to his right before getting hit, indicating that the bullet that went through Kennedy couldn't have hit Connally. Connally himself maintained this until his death, suggesting another shooter and a conspiracy.

It is an honor and solemn responsibility to testify regarding disturbing new revelations from the newest JFK files. It is a grave matter to assert that CIA officers were culpable or complicit in the death of a president, so fact checkers should have all the evidence used to support this testimony.

Speaker 0 admits to never believing that the CIA killed Kennedy. Speaker 1 claims to have read the entire JFK file, including the secret information and the 7 pages of the 911 report. Speaker 0 warns against sharing what they have seen, as they could be bribed. Speaker 1 mentions being bribed in Texas. Speaker 0 introduces themselves as Cash and mentions JFK and UFOs.

I spent 17 years in the military, 14 in a special operations unit. I believe the recent assassination attempt on former President Trump involved help from an agency or government. The shooter couldn't have reached the rooftop alone to take a shot at the president. It seems too obvious that assistance was involved.

The speaker discusses the conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy. They mention Rob Reiner's claim that JFK was shot by four shooters and question the official investigation. They also mention a CIA agent who confirmed the CIA's involvement in the assassination. The speaker highlights the lack of trust in the government and the existence of powerful forces within the US government that are beyond democratic control. They mention a Secret Service agent's account that challenges the lone gunman theory. The speaker concludes by calling for truth and honesty in the matter.

The speaker, initially uninterested in the JFK assassination due to its association with conspiracy theories, has since learned enough to believe "there's something actually there." Trump issued an executive order to release files on the JFK, Bobby Kennedy, and MLK assassinations, but the files have not been released. The speaker believes the CIA was involved in some way, but doesn't think protecting the CIA is the reason for the delay, especially after the Church Committee hearings. The speaker questions who is being protected and if a foreign government is involved, stating there is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure. The speaker questions who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking the disclosure, as slow-walking the disclosure is the same as not providing the disclosure. The speaker believes it's important to get to the bottom of the JFK assassination.

Our first investigation will thoroughly examine the John F. Kennedy assassination. Preliminary findings suggest flaws in the single bullet theory presented in the initial congressional hearing. We believe there were two shooters. We're working to access secure information, hopefully before public release, to uncover more evidence. We'll announce our findings soon.

We need to prove multiple people were involved in the assassination by analyzing the Zapruder film. The film shows inconsistencies with the single bullet theory proposed by the Warren Commission. The theory suggests one bullet caused multiple wounds in Kennedy and Conley, which is highly improbable. The film's time frame and the number of wounds do not align with the Commission's conclusion. The magic bullet theory, as it's known, is widely criticized for its implausibility.

From the outset, one of the speakers says there was a sense that the official narrative about the day didn’t add up, expressing that many Americans feel they were being lied to. The major problem they identify with the assassination narrative includes inconsistencies and unanswered questions rather than acceptance of the official story. Speaker 1 recalls being told Charlie Kirk was shot and initially in critical condition, but notes that the video shows an exit wound and movement of Kirk’s shirt that suggests an impact nearby. With extensive experience around gunshot wounds, they say what they saw didn’t make sense. They reference the FBI’s announcement of a shooter and describe a separate incident involving a person on the roof who allegedly disassembled and reassembled a firearm, aligned a scope, fired a cold bore shot, moved to the roof, and then wrapped the rifle up. They mention texts from the shooter that didn’t sound like a typical 22-year-old and state that these observations raise questions. They say asking questions leads to being torn down or accused of holding conspiracy views, and they specify they aren’t claiming “Israel did it,” but insisting the questions about the event “don’t look good.” They raise specific questions: did the security team remove Charlie Kirk’s lapel mic after the incident and give it to someone else; what happened to the SIM card; did someone take the camera behind him; why was the crime scene contaminated and rebuilt. They admit they don’t know what is true but insist the questions deserve answers. They note that once they question, they’re labeled antisemitic, and they say they didn’t even bring up Israel. They emphasize the personal and national significance of the incident. Speaker 0 mentions a claim that Charlie Kirk was portrayed as Superman, with his body supposedly stopping the 30-odd-six bullet, and asks what would have happened if a 30-06 round hit him. Speaker 1 says it would likely blow his head off and leave remnants of the bullet, arguing that they don’t think such remnants have been found yet. They question why the chair and desk were moved and contend that a forensic expert could determine the shot’s origin, insisting they are simply asking questions. If those questions can be refuted, they would stop asking; but they claim they’re not getting any answers beyond “this is what happened” and being told to “shut up.” Speaker 0 adds that telling someone to be quiet amounts to labeling them antisemitic, and that when the trial comes, they will look like a fool. Speaker 1 says that’s a tactic of the left—when you call them out, they label you a name—and that the right is now doing the same to them.

The speaker discusses the assassination of their father, Robert Kennedy, and their belief that Sirhan Sirhan was not the true killer. They mention Paul Schrade, a close friend of their father who was also shot that day, and how he convinced them to read the autopsy report. According to the report, Sirhan fired two shots at their father, but the fatal shots came from behind. The speaker believes that Eugene Dan Sazer, a security guard and CIA operative, was the real shooter. They emphasize the need for further investigation into the case.

Our first investigation will be announced soon and will cover a thorough investigation into the John F. Kennedy assassination. Based on what I've seen so far, the initial hearing held in Congress was faulty regarding the single bullet theory. I believe that there were two shooters, and we should find more information as we gain access to the SCIF, hopefully before the files are released to the public.

Kennedy's assassination was linked to an Israeli, possibly Lee Harvey. Kennedy's interest in investigating Israel's nuclear reactor may have been a motive. The files need to be opened to uncover the truth.

CIA counterintelligence was responsible for Kennedy's assassination, according to newly reviewed documents. CIA counterintelligence officers targeted Oswald for recruitment as an agent in 1959, surveilling him for four years, then lied about it to investigators. The documents reveal deep CIA involvement with Oswald before the assassination and subsequent deception. Oswald was never regarded as a security threat, despite actions that should have raised alarms. James Angleton had two FBI reports on Oswald on his desk in mid-November, confirmed in the latest JFK releases. Whether or not Oswald was a shooter, he was not the intellectual author of Kennedy's death. The focus should be on the actions of CIA counterintelligence. Fifteen specific JFK documents, known to exist and easily retrieved, have never been seen in their entirety by the public, violating the JFK Records Act.

There is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure of information, specifically regarding the JFK assassination. The source of this pressure is unknown, but it is not believed to be the CIA or John Ratcliffe. The question is, who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking disclosure, which is the same as preventing it? The purpose of this slow-walking is to continue hiding facts. What force is acting on the US government and the new administration to prevent disclosure? It is a fair question because the president of the United States was murdered, which overturned the vote of the people. It is important to get to the bottom of the JFK assassination.