reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I got vaccinated, but not boosted. The sickest I've been in 15 years was after the vaccine. I've had COVID five times, but the vaccine made me much sicker; I was in bed for two days with a racing heart. It's disturbing that we can't even discuss this. My worst COVID experience was just a sinus infection, and I'm not willing to trade that for the vaccine's side effects. Many people I know felt incredibly sick after their second shot, which is a side effect we don't discuss enough. These are companies with a history of lying and criminal fines, yet they're exempt from responsibility for vaccine side effects.

I got vaccinated, but not boosted. The vax made me the sickest I've been in 15 years. I've had COVID five times, but my worst experience was just a sinus infection. It's crazy that we can't even talk about how sick the vaccine made me. I was in bed for two days with a racing heart, and that's not a trade I'm willing to make. Many people I know felt awful after their second shot, but we don't talk about that side effect enough. Plus, these are companies with a history of lying and criminal fines, yet they're exempt from responsibility for vaccine side effects.

The speaker shares their experience with a vaccine safety specialist who advised them to submit vaccine injury reports. However, when the speaker sent in six reports, public health denied them and claimed there was no evidence of harm. The speaker also mentions that after they wrote a letter to a doctor, the College of Physicians warned doctors not to contradict the public health narrative or they would be investigated and disciplined. This warning has led to doctors staying silent and not questioning the narrative. The speaker submitted 14 vaccine injury reports, but all were denied by public health, who claimed they were coincidences and not vaccine injuries. The speaker concludes that reporting vaccine injuries is impossible as public health censors them to maintain the belief that side effects are rare.

Medical authorities are denying the existence of vaccine-related cancers, leaving patients without proper research or treatment options. Doctors are being threatened and silenced, with some losing their positions and labs for speaking out. Only a few doctors are raising the alarm, while the medical establishment ignores the issue. This denial extends to other vaccine injuries, such as myocarditis, which can lead to sudden cardiac arrest. The denial prevents the development of new treatments and solutions. The medical authorities' refusal to acknowledge vaccine injuries is causing harm and preventing the advancement of medical knowledge and care.

A Michigan jury awarded a woman $1 million for being fired over vaccine refusal, highlighting a need for accountability in vaccine manufacturing. It's concerning that vaccine makers have blanket immunity from lawsuits, unlike other businesses. This immunity, granted by Congress in 1986, shields pharmaceutical companies from liability, which is unjust. Everyone else faces risks in their professions, yet these companies operate without accountability. Transparency in government and vaccine trials is crucial to restore trust and eliminate corruption. If information is being withheld, it likely indicates wrongdoing.

People received the COVID vaccine for various reasons, including vulnerability, protecting loved ones and patients, and traveling. Afterward, they experienced injuries and were often dismissed by doctors who didn't know how to help or attributed the symptoms to other causes. Some were told not to share their stories. Many faced disbelief and bullying, with some receiving death threats. They have been injured for months. No one seems to know how to help, research the injuries, or believe them. Experiences shared on social media were labeled as misinformation, leading to warnings, bans, and the silencing of support groups. Reports to VAERS often went unanswered or were incorrectly recorded. Despite being told their experiences are rare and the vaccines are safe, their reality is unchanged. They feel abandoned, marginalized, and silenced, and seek help, research, and recognition. They emphasize they are real people, not misinformation, and are not rare.

People glaze over when the possibility that "these things" caused problems is raised. Some confidently state the COVID vaccine saved millions of lives, but it's unclear how they know this. Many people know others who were negatively affected by the vaccine but don't want to admit it, claiming correlation isn't causation. The news scared people with death tolls, and there's a lot of money involved, including huge bonuses for fully vaccinated kids. Instead of attacking those who say this, it should be investigated as a potential conflict of interest.

Speaker 1 says they took a vaccine but have not received any boosters. They describe the moment they “really started to get red pilled” about vaccines as when they took the vaccine and became “the sickest” they have been in the last 15 years. They say they were in bed for two days with their heart racing, and they claim they are not allowed to discuss “serious injury” or even the fact of how sick they were. They add that they have had COVID five times, with their worst COVID experience being “like a sinus infection,” and they say they are not willing to trade that for the vaccine experience. Speaker 1 also says many people they know reported being “really, really sick” from their second vaccine shot, calling that a side effect that “we even talk about enough in this country.” Speaker 0 responds that the discussion involves companies with a long history of lying and being forced to pay criminal fines, and that these companies receive an exemption from being responsible for any side effects. Speaker 1 agrees.

Some people who raised concerns about vaccine side effects were silenced to prevent vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines are crucial for older individuals but may not be as critical for younger people. While vaccines have saved lives, some individuals have experienced significant side effects. It is important to acknowledge these issues despite the benefits vaccines provide.

There is a group of people called the "invisibles" who have experienced adverse effects from vaccines. They have been ignored by the medical community, dismissed by mainstream society, and hidden by institutions. The president of a committee dedicated to listening to these individuals shared that they were abandoned and suffering. When they finally had a hearing in the Senate, they were told that they were not expected or accounted for. This reality was disregarded and continues to be. One person's mother, for example, became partially paralyzed and experienced nausea after receiving two vaccines. She is still in the hospital after three years. Despite similar stories, some people deny that the vaccines are to blame.

I got vaccinated, but never boosted. The sickest I've been in 15 years was after the vaccine. I've had COVID five times, but the vaccine put me in bed for two days with a racing heart. It's concerning that we can't even discuss these reactions. My worst COVID experience was just a sinus infection, which is preferable to how the vaccine made me feel. Many people I know felt extremely ill after the second shot. These side effects aren't discussed enough. Plus, these are companies with a history of lying and criminal fines, yet they're exempt from responsibility for vaccine side effects.

The exemption for pharmaceutical companies from liability for vaccine injuries is alarming. Many people have experienced severe side effects, yet discussing these issues remains taboo. After receiving the vaccine, I felt sicker than ever, even after having COVID multiple times. Many friends report feeling ill after their second vaccine dose, but this side effect isn't openly acknowledged. The history of pharmaceutical companies lying and facing fines raises concerns about their accountability. Political donations from these companies influence discussions, and there's a reluctance to address vaccine injuries, especially among those on the left. Some individuals fear being labeled as anti-vaxxers, despite experiencing lasting effects like dizziness and balance issues. Many are hesitant to speak out, even if they believe they were vaccine-injured.

The speaker claims the medical landscape is dominated by COVID vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths, and that they submit multiple entries daily to VAERS, facing scrutiny and potential penalties for falsification. They state they diagnosed an executive in her late thirties with Guillain Barre syndrome from COVID-19 vaccination. The speaker estimates that only 1% of manuscripts on COVID vaccine injuries are being published, suggesting a tremendous bias, and that there are about 4,000 papers on the vaccine debacle, which is about 1% of reality. They claim to have never seen myocarditis, heart failure, or blood clots from eating frosted flakes, but are seeing people devastated by the shots. The speaker advocates for removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market, a critical reevaluation of the vaccine schedule, dropping all vaccine mandates, and rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

Over 100 million Americans were required to get vaccinated due to job mandates. The government claimed vaccines were safe and effective, but data showed vaccinated people could still carry the virus. Despite promises of freedom, there have been 1 million adverse events reported from COVID-19 vaccines, with only 11 compensated cases. Big Pharma has immunity from liability for vaccine injuries.

I got vaccinated, but never boosted. The sickest I've been in 15 years was after the vaccine. Since then, I've had COVID five times, but the worst bout was just a sinus infection. I was in bed for two days after the vaccine with my heart racing. It's concerning we can't even discuss these reactions openly. Many people I know felt extremely ill after their second shot. These side effects aren't discussed enough. Plus, we're dealing with companies known for lying and criminal fines, yet they're exempt from vaccine side effect liability.

The transcript presents a critical examination of Bill Gates, portraying him as transforming from a software magnate into a global health power broker whose wealth and influence have reshaped public health, vaccine development, and population policy. It argues that Gates’ philanthropic activities are not purely charitable but are deployed to extend control over health systems, global research agendas, and even the reproductive choices of people worldwide. Key claims and points are detailed across several strands: - Public image and power shift: Bill Gates is described as no longer a “public health expert” yet becoming a central figure in billions of lives, guiding medical actions and vaccine strategies. The program asserts that Gates’ reinvention through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been aided by a sophisticated public relations apparatus and by directing media coverage of global health issues. - Foundation scale and reach: The Gates Foundation is depicted as the world’s largest private foundation, with assets reported as tens of billions of dollars and a broad remit in global health, development, growth, and policy advocacy. Its influence extends to funding media outlets, think tanks, and reporting units across multiple outlets (BBC, NPR, Our World in Data, ABC, among others), creating what the program calls “tentacles” across global health. - Partnerships and funding of global health initiatives: Gates is credited with initiating and funding major global health vehicles, including: - Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, with seed funding and ongoing commitments that have shaped vaccination markets. - The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and other public-private partnerships that coordinate vaccine development and immunization programs. - Support for CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), the World Health Organization’s vaccine initiatives, and other pandemic preparedness efforts. - The World Health Organization’s funding profile, described as heavily dependent on Gates Foundation support, with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted as a non-medical doctor connected to Gates-backed initiatives. - The “Decade of Vaccines” and vaccine policy: Gates is credited with launching a decade-long vaccine initiative, including a pledge of billions of dollars to vaccine development and distribution. This is linked to the creation of a global vaccine action plan and to Gavi’s role in establishing vaccine markets. The narrative asserts that vaccines have been used to steer global health policy and to secure roles for private firms in public health decision-making. - Vaccine development concerns: The program raises concerns about the safety and speed of vaccine development, criticizing the eighteen-month timeline Gates advocates for a universal vaccine, and questioning the use of new technologies (DNA and mRNA platforms) and rapid deployment with limited testing. It highlights potential safety risks, including historical vaccine-associated disease enhancement and concerns about broad immunization in a short period. - Vaccine safety and regulation: It is claimed that vaccine safety at scale is hard to guarantee and that liability protections for vaccine makers and public health officials have been enacted (e.g., a U.S. declaration granting liability immunity for COVID-19 countermeasures), a point framed as enabling risk-bearing without accountability. - Population control framing: A central thread is the assertion that Gates seeks to reduce population growth through health improvements, vaccines, and reproductive health services. The transcript traces Gates’ interest in contraception and population issues to his family background and to Rockefeller-era eugenics historical contexts, arguing that discussions about fertility, contraceptive technologies, and demographic trends have long-term population implications. It cites specific Gates Foundation activities in reproductive health, including funding for innovative birth-control delivery methods, depot injections, implanted devices, and efforts to develop digital identity tied to health services as tools within a broader population-control framework. - Digital identity and biometric ID: The narrative emphasizes Gates’ involvement with biometric identification through Gavi and ID2020, noting partnerships with Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation, the Aadhaar system in India, and the World Bank’s ID4D initiative. It argues that vaccination programs, biometric identity, and cashless payments are being integrated into a comprehensive “population control grid,” enabling state and private actors to track, truncate, or deny access to services based on identity and health status. - Data, surveillance, and privacy concerns: The piece contends that the push for digital IDs, digital health records, and biometrics will erode privacy and enable broad government and corporate surveillance, linking health data to financial services, voting, housing, and welfare. It highlights projects involving digital certificates, immunity passports, and real-time health data collection via microneedle patches and barcode-like skin markers, suggesting these innovations could be used to control access to services. - Epstein connections and broader conspiracy context: The program references alleged connections between Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, including flight logs and involvement in philanthropic funding discussions, framing these ties as part of a broader pattern of influence. It also points to prior associations with notable figures (Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros) and critiques of Gates as aligning with a “population control” ideology. - The underlying motive and conclusion: Throughout, the narrative asserts that Gates’ wealth is being used not for charity alone but to build an overarching system of control—over health institutions, research funding, public policy, identification, and financial systems. It contrasts his public image as a generous philanthropist with alleged hidden agendas, suggesting that the real aim is to shape global governance and human behavior through vaccination, identification, and digital infrastructure. - Final framing and call to action: The closing sections urge viewers to recognize Gates’ influence as part of an ideology rather than a single person’s plan. It frames the situation as a broader movement that could continue beyond Gates personally, urging awareness and action to resist what the program deems a population-control regime embedded in global health and digital identity initiatives. In sum, the transcript portrays Bill Gates as a central figure driving a multifaceted, globally interconnected program—through the Gates Foundation, Gavi, CEPI, and related partnerships—that allegedly reconfigures vaccine policy, global health governance, reproductive health, biometric identification, and digital payments into a cohesive system of population control and surveillance, using philanthropy as a veneer for power and control.

World governments have harmed millions without apology. Vaccines are linked to autism, ADHD, and other health issues. The more shots kids get, the more likely they are to have these conditions. The truth is often silenced in mainstream media.

Vaccines have saved countless lives, but not all vaccines are safe for everyone. In the US, hundreds of children are injured by vaccines each year, leading to the government paying out $3 billion since 1986 through the vaccine injury compensation program. However, questioning this issue often results in being shut down. Let's discuss this further on Twitter.

My friends, including doctors, who initially supported vaccines are now skeptical due to the COVID vaccine propaganda, adverse effects like strokes and heart attacks, athletes collapsing, and increased all-cause mortality post-vaccination. Some even got pacemakers. People are hesitant to admit they were wrong and may have harmed others.

I got the initial vaccine but haven't been boosted. What really made me question things was how sick the vaccine made me. It was the sickest I'd been in fifteen years. I've had COVID five times, and the worst bout was just a sinus infection. I was in bed for two days after the shot and my heart was racing. It's strange that we can't even openly discuss how sick the vaccine made some people. Many people I know felt awful after their second shot, and that's a side effect we don't discuss enough. Plus, we're giving exemptions from responsibility to companies with a history of lying and criminal fines.

The speaker describes a severe post-vaccination experience, saying the vaccine “took my immune system and just shook it around again,” and noting that “that’s still going on.” They reference reading evidence about adverse reactions, including “damage to the immune system,” and acknowledge they were not made aware of these risks beforehand. They recount losing the use of their hands for about three weeks and realizing they were “in real trouble.” The speaker was invited by Robin Monarchy to discuss the experience, and by that time they realized they “weren’t the only one that was suffering.” They contrast this personal ordeal with a sense of media over-saturation, saying they have “stopped watching TV.” They share a cartoon memory of a guy interviewing two Quakers who ask, “How come none of your community has got COVID?” and the Quakers respond, “Well, we don’t watch TV,” remarking, “It’s so true, man,” and noting that “so much of the sickness is in our heads now.” They describe feeling trapped between trusting what “your heart tells you is right” and what appears to be the prevailing narrative, and they emphasize the difficulty of communicating their feelings to family. The speaker mentions taking a risk by speaking out, noting they were “pleased to see that it went around without too much of flack,” but they did experience some backlash, particularly from people they least wanted to upset. A central concern expressed is fear about what vaccination could do to their children, describing it as perhaps “the biggest part of the reason” for speaking out and talking to their daughters about the possibility that they “may not be able to have kids.” They acknowledge that at that point in life, their daughters “don’t probably care,” implying a tension between present concerns and future implications. The speaker concludes with that vaccination remains a source of personal risk and disclosure within their family discussions.

Vaccines have saved countless lives, but not all vaccines are safe for everyone. In the US, hundreds of children are injured by vaccines each year, leading to the government paying out $3 billion since 1986 through the vaccine injury compensation program. However, questioning this issue often results in being shut down. Let's discuss this further on Twitter.

The pharmaceutical industry is seen as untrustworthy, being compared to a criminal cartel due to the large penalties they have paid for their other products. Vaccines, however, are exempt from liability, meaning companies cannot be sued no matter how negligent or reckless they are. This lack of accountability may lead to a lack of caution in product development.

Doctors and politicians have promoted vaccines, but refuse to acknowledge potential harm. Many Americans who received the vaccine may face unknown risks. The truth must be revealed to prevent future harm from the mRNA platform.

The speaker finds it difficult to find someone who hasn't been damaged by the vaccine, and even senior consultant colleagues haven't connected their ailments to the vaccine. The speaker claims the vaccine causes autoimmune diseases, of which there are 131 types, all reportedly linked to the vaccine. Individually, these appear as coincidences, but collectively, a high percentage of vaccinated people suffer from one or more autoimmune conditions. The speaker is annoyed by their GP practice constantly pushing boosters, even knowing their views, suggesting they are incentivized by payment. The speaker believes that if the practice adhered to "first do no harm," they would refuse to administer the vaccines.