reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This video reveals the shocking reality of an industrial cobalt mine called Shabara. Despite claims by consumer tech and EV companies that there are no artisanal miners, the footage shows over 15,000 people working in the mine. This mine is a crucial part of the supply chain for popular brands like iPhone, Tesla, and Samsung. The speaker emphasizes being the first outsider to witness this situation firsthand.

Stanislav Krapivnik, a former US army officer from Donbas, returns to discuss the escalation of NATO-Russia proxy warfare, the role of drones, and potential strategic escalations. The conversation centers on how Europe is contributing to deep strikes in Russia, especially against energy installations, and the resulting danger of a broader conflict. Key points and claims, as presented: - Drones and deep strikes: The EU, through its defense alignment, aims to overwhelm Russian air defenses and threaten strategic assets, including nuclear-capable targets, by using long-range drones. The objective is to degrade Russian defensive systems and the production rate of missiles, potentially opening the path to strikes on radars, early warning systems, strategic assets like bombers, and even nuclear submarines in port. - Nuclear war risk: The interviewee asserts that by mid-to-late summer there could be a zone of possible nuclear war if ground warfare arises or escalates due to Western actions. He notes that Russia’s anti-aircraft and early warning capabilities are limited to manageable scopes, with occasional corridors allowing strikes in, and that Europe’s current strategy could push the conflict toward a nuclear dimension. - Deterrence and first strikes: The discussion contrasts U.S. first-strike doctrine with other nations’ second-strike assurances. The speaker argues that in a blinded Russia, the logic for targeted first strikes becomes stronger for the other side, while lamenting that Europe’s leadership might be pushing toward a nuclear exchange. He cites studies suggesting that as few as 47 key targets could collapse the U.S. in a nuclear context, highlighting the fragility of a high-tech economy under nuclear disruption. - European psyche and policy: There is criticism of what the speaker describes as a mass psychosis in Europe, where warnings about striking Russia’s early radar or deterrent systems are dismissed in favor of defending Ukraine. The rhetoric suggests deep political and media reinforcement of pro-Ukraine narratives, with limited space for risk discussion about nuclear consequences. - Energy installations and economy: While drone strikes have targeted oil facilities, the speaker notes that most damage has been to storage facilities rather than critical infrastructure like pipelines or refineries. Refineries are large, and damage to some vessels can take longer to repair. Russia’s production has not been significantly reduced, but the attacks are accelerating a shift of energy facilities eastward toward Asia, while Europe faces higher oil prices on the spot market and potential disruptions to gas routes like TurkStream and Caspian Pipeline Authority, with broader economic impact on Southeastern Europe and Turkey. - Russia’s response and drone modernization: The Russian military has reorganized its drone capabilities, forming dedicated drone battalions and establishing new schools to standardize and professionalize drone operations. The move encompasses reconnaissance, kamikaze, bombing, and supply drones, with adjustments after initial disorganization. Ukrainians reportedly helped inspire and provide drone countermeasures, and Russia’s modernization integrates drones with air defenses. - Zelensky and Victory Day threat: The possibility of Zelensky threatening to strike Moscow’s Victory Day parade is discussed. The guest suggests Zelensky would want to be at the head of such a move, while acknowledging the uncertainty of who controls decisions in Kyiv and the level of Western involvement. The parade’s downscaled format is noted, but the broader question remains whether such a strike could occur. The guest asserts that Russian deterrence may have been eroded, and Western actors might not take credible deterrence seriously until an incident occurs. - Africa and Mali: Russia’s activities in Africa, especially Mali, are described as significant. Mali’s leadership under Asimi Goata is navigating between Western and Russian influence. Russian forces, including elements from the former Wagner group now under the Russian defense ministry, are described as rebuilding Mali’s military and supporting a campaign by jihadist groups. The situation includes rapid, mobile “flying columns” that can cause chaos but lack staying power against organized defenses. Russian drones and aviation (including ME-20 aircraft) are reportedly effective, and Mali is moving toward energy and resource development, including three nuclear power plants proposed by Russia to Elektrify the country. France’s position is framed as colonial, with Mali’s uranium, gold, and other resources creating strategic interest. Burkina Faso’s involvement and regional dynamics involving Niger are cited as part of a broader, expanding conflict network across Africa. - Global frontlines and war risk: The guest argues that multiple frontlines are forming—Ukraine, the Persian Gulf, and Western Africa—and that they could merge into a single broader conflict if not stopped. He asserts that the West is driving this escalation, and he characterizes Western public sentiment as often indifferent to Ukrainian casualties, focusing instead on political or financial gains from the conflict. - Frontline realities: On the ground, Ukraine has tactical successes but limited staying power due to heavy casualties and supply problems. Russian forces are reportedly stronger in Donbas, Kherson, and Sumy, while Ukrainian forces face difficult conditions, including open fields and heavy artillery advantages for the Russians. Drone warfare has prompted reorganized Russian drone corps, with improved training and standardized units. The discussion ends with a warning that the conflict has global implications, with fronts expanding and risks of a broader, possibly world-scale war if not curtailed. The interviewee emphasizes that the West’s actions are fueling escalation and that African theaters, particularly Mali, are becoming an integral part of the wider confrontation.

Energy companies, military-industrial conflicts, and pharmaceutical companies all profit from crises like energy crises, wars, and pandemics. This creates a constant need for crises, benefiting the elites while harming everyone else. It is undeniable that these elites prioritize profit over human life, morals, and ethics.

The Biden-Harris administration persuaded Ukraine to abandon a peace deal that would have resulted in losing only half of the territory currently occupied by Russia, leading to significant loss of life. This decision was driven by interests in the vast mineral resources under the Donbas region and the desire to weaken Russia's military. Additionally, U.S. hedge funds are profiting from Ukraine's fertile land and mineral rights. The narrative of the U.S. standing with Ukraine is misleading, aimed at justifying prolonged conflict for profit. Ultimately, the actions taken have cost Ukraine its territory and the lives of its children, with war profiteers showing no genuine support for the Ukrainian people.

In the 1980s, the Cold War complicated the US military's relationship with Africa, which possesses over a third of the world's natural resources. Many African governments sided with the Soviet Union, and the CIA was caught assassinating Congo's president in the 1970s. Congo holds 85% of the world's cobalt, plus lithium, copper, aluminum, gold, and diamonds. The AIDS crisis led to the rapid construction of a public health infrastructure across Sub-Saharan Africa, which allowed the US to influence and topple governments using civil society pressure funded by humanitarian aid. African AIDS diagnostics differed from those used elsewhere, relying on a four-part test that included questions about weight loss and diarrhea. The AIDS crisis coincided with a population boom. This medical crisis allowed for military presence, leading to robust civil societies that could influence elections and control foreign politics. This model was then potentially replicated with Zika, MERS, SARS, and COVID.

The speaker expresses concern about silver bullet solutions like electric vehicles receiving too much attention. They highlight the negative impact of the EV boom on cobalt production, leading to human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo where most cobalt is mined. The speaker criticizes the global north for ignoring these issues.

Children in the DRC mine cobalt, a mineral more valuable than gold for lithium ion batteries. Working in dangerous conditions without safety equipment, they earn very little while facing health risks. The youngest worker is just 4 years old, showing the harsh reality of child labor in the mining industry.

The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is often compared to Wakanda due to its abundance of sacred minerals, including electrically charged stones that resemble Vibranium. These stones are not coltan or lithium, which do not retain an electric charge. However, the DRC has its own sources of electricity. The country continues to discover new resources, and there are concerns about what the future holds. Let's keep Congo in our thoughts and prayers.

In Lubero territory, near Toyo and Bandulu villages, bodies were brought to the morgue as a witness helped. They had found 61 remains of men and women, some in a wake after a farmer’s death, with many villagers arriving only to be slaughtered. Three people were wounded; a woman who fled and two others are in the general hospital of Mbaghurikiba. "Last night in the Lubero territory in Toyo and Bandulu village, they are just close to one another, these two villages, About, they said a 100, but they had found 61 remains." The speaker notes ISIS claim that it was them doing this "in the open like this, and nothing is happening." This violence has been taking place for years; every day someone is slaughtered because of their faith or because just they are in their field looking for food. This cannot continue. We have to do something.

Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger are consistently ranked as the poorest countries, yet when they demand the departure of those exploiting their resources like uranium in Niger, their requests are resisted. Despite resource extraction, these nations lack basic infrastructure and services. This exploitation led to a revolt to reclaim their destiny. Some tried to coerce them back into subservience, but they refused, leading to infiltration by mercenaries and disinformation campaigns. The people are now aware and fighting for future generations, resolved to resist manipulation and fight for true independence. When Niger decided to "turn the page" on 07/26/2023, there was a threat of war, prompting a vow to defend against any attack. This led to the formation of the AES on 09/16/2023 for mutual defense, which is now expanding beyond defense to include finance, economy, infrastructure, health, and education. The focus remains on the supreme interest of the populations, with a call for unity and solidarity.

I'm here with Dexter Van Zyl, an expert on anti-Christian violence, to discuss the absolutely barbaric atrocity that took place in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where 70 Christians were beheaded in a church. This is happening in a country of 105 million people that is in conflict with Rwanda over territory in Kivu. The violence was perpetrated by an organization affiliated with ISIS. Some people argue that this organization is working on behalf of Rwanda because Rwanda covets and is taking control of the Congo's mineral resources. Why is no one reporting this? Why does no one seem to care?

Many Africans claim that Europeans have stolen Africa's resources, but the truth is that these resources are being sold by African leaders. The real issue is why Africans aren't utilizing their own resources. For example, Mr. Beast had to go to Kenya to build water wells because the Kenyan government didn't take the initiative. Nigeria, with a population of 220 million, produces only 10% of the electricity that Hungary, with a population of 10 million, produces. Africans should build their own future instead of expecting it to be handed to them. However, Europeans should also prepare for Africa's potential rise in technology and military capacity, as there may be a future war between Europe and Africa.

Carlene Georgescu, a former high-ranking UN official, shares his experience and perspective on how the United Nations operates and its relationship with global oligarchic power structures. He begins by noting his initial belief in the UN as a fantastic institution capable of advancing welfare and harmony with nature, informed by his background in environmental protection and sustainable development. However, through field experience, he came to see a different reality: the ground truth reveals how the system serves a small, powerful elite rather than universally beneficial aims. Georgescu argues that the UN functions as a platform and bridge for what he calls the world oligarchic system, controlled by Davos-centered interests and aligned with the World Economic Forum’s agenda, particularly Agenda 2030. He contends that the organization is effectively indistinguishable from, and subordinate to, the same oligarchs who influence the Club of Rome and other major NGOs. He cites his own observations at meetings where participation by a representative from developing regions was stifled or marginalized, while the discussions prioritized consumption and corporate-friendly outcomes over genuine development. A central claim is that the UN and its related NGOs manipulate language and outcomes to mask aggressive aims. Peace and justice are reframed to justify or enable power and war, while sustainable development often ends up accelerating consumerism. Georgescu reports that many in UN circles pursue easy prestige, perks, and funding rather than principled leadership, describing a culture of political correctness and material incentives that ensure loyalty to the system. He asserts that leaders within UN structures and other NGOs are “employees” of the oligarchs, not independently accountable to their populations. Georgescu emphasizes intense exploitation of natural resources and asserts that most sovereign control over resources is lost to global interests. He gives the example of resource-rich but vulnerable African countries, such as Guinea Conakry, where vast mineral wealth is present but political and economic power is effectively centralized outside local populations. He contends that the same dynamics operate across Europe and beyond, with leaders installed or influenced to serve external interests rather than national sovereignty. A recurring theme is the manipulation of fear to maintain control. He links fear to the acceptance of surveillance, digital devices, and the erosion of personal sovereignty, arguing that fear-based governance underpins health, climate, and security narratives. He critiques the World Health Organization as an NGO that operates without democratic elections, arguing that its leadership is appointed rather than elected. He also criticizes the pandemic response and lockdowns as criminal acts against humanity and accuses the system of pushing transhumanist and post-transhumanist trajectories aimed at replacing human autonomy with robotic control. Georgescu recounts his personal turning point in the Marshall Islands, where he witnessed the environmental and human harm from U.S. nuclear testing. He describes attempts to suppress his UN report on the Marshall Islands mission, which reinforced his decision to exit and resist a system that, in his view, prioritizes oligarchic interests over populations. To end, he asserts that true sovereignty and quality life come from harmony with nature, personal consciousness, and authentic human connection, not from UN-led global governance or NGO-driven agendas. He and his interlocutor stress the need for people to say “no” to the prevailing system and to reclaim political agency, recognizing that fear and manipulation are central tools used to maintain control.

Various countries benefit from the exploitation of resources like Coltan, which is obtained through dangerous and laborious mining. Miners risk their lives due to collapsing mines and senseless murders by groups like the M23. However, the blame lies with the most powerful and politically influential nations. A Palestinian writer connected the situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to the genocide in Palestine, highlighting Israel's involvement. Israel has armed and trained militias in Rwanda and Uganda to maintain chaos, allowing Western countries to extract minerals from Congolese mines. Israel's major export is diamonds, even though it lacks diamond mines. Instead, diamonds come from African countries like Congo, where the trade is tainted by violence and referred to as the "dirty trade" or "blood diamonds." This undeniable link persists across various atrocities in Africa.

A Venezuelan American speaker describes the impact of the regime on their family and millions of others. Their family lost everything—work, savings, investments—wiped out by a narco dictatorship that has held Venezuela in a death grip for over twenty-five years. The Venezuelan exodus is described as the second largest displacement crisis on Earth after Syria, a humanitarian disaster and not just tragedy. The regime has jailed hundreds of political prisoners and thousands have been murdered for speaking out. More than a third of the population has fled, not for opportunity or the American dream, but to survive because staying often means death. The speaker contends Venezuela is not merely a collapsed state but an occupied one, with territory, natural resources, and institutions overrun by hostile foreign powers: Iranian militias, Chinese corporations, Russian intelligence, all exploiting the country with impunity. Venezuela, they argue, is no longer a local crisis but a geopolitical threat endangering the Western Hemisphere, a launchpad for authoritarian expansion in the Americas. Amid this, Maria Corina Machado is highlighted as a leader who dared to push for freedom. In 2024, she supposedly led a peaceful democratic uprising that won the election. Her team allegedly smuggled physical voting receipts out of the country—hard proof of victory the regime attempted to bury. The speaker says her courage has sparked belief among millions of Venezuelans that change is possible. Some people have questioned Machado’s decision to dedicate her Nobel Prize to Donald Trump. The speaker accepts the criticism but argues it was a brilliant strategic move on the global political stage. Machado is portrayed as understanding Trump’s character, his campaign for the prize, and the symbolic, personal value of the recognition to him. The claim is that this gesture might keep Trump’s attention focused on Venezuela at a time when U.S. presence and pressure in the Caribbean is rising. The dedication is described not as flattery or optics, but as a strategic act to protect and preserve a form of power that could shift history, grounded in the belief that the ultimate aim is freedom. The speaker emphasizes that Machado is not asking for a U.S. invasion or war; Venezuela is already invaded and held hostage by a narco state with foreign agents and enemies of democracy—Russians, Iranians, Chinese—operating freely to expand influence across Latin America. Machado is calling for the support of the only military capable of countering that threat, framed as liberation rather than imperialism. The argument is that the fight is for Venezuela’s life, not theory or politics, and that the world should recognize what’s at stake. The fight for Venezuela is a fight for freedom, democracy, and continental stability, and if liberty, human dignity, and peace in the Americas matter, Venezuela’s fight must matter to all.

El Fasher, North Darfur, a city of 400,000 civilians, has been under RSF blockade for eighteen months with no food, no medicine, and no way out. Drones circle overhead; aid convoys are bombed; children survive on animal feed. Hospitals have collapsed and disease spreads through the camps. The world calls it famine, but this is described as deliberate starvation. The UAE is alleged to be central to the war’s continuation, with claims that the architect behind the siege survives only through a lifeline built in Abu Dhabi. UN investigators documented a heavy rotation of cargo flights from UAE airfields to Chad and Darfur, and aircraft disappearing from radar manifests with Red Crescent logos masking crates of weapons and drones. When the United Nations tried to condemn the El Fasher siege, the UAE blocked the resolution shielding the forced starving civilians. Each plane landing in Darfur is said to keep the siege alive. Independent inquiries confirm RSF forces systematically target non-Arab tribes, including Massalit, Zaghawa, and Berti. In 2023, up to 15,000 people were massacred in El Janaina; in 2025, another 1,500 were slaughtered at Sudan’s largest displacement camp. Survivors recount commanders ordering fighters to wipe out all the Zaghawa, with entire villages burned and civilians executed at checkpoints, and women and children buried in mass graves. This is described as genocide, financed by foreign gold and protected by silence. The UAE could end Sudan’s war but it won’t. The report mentions chemical weapons and foreign mercenaries, with doctors in Darfur describing victims with severe burns, respiratory failure, and corneal injuries after RSF bombardments, symptoms suggested to be exposure to chemical agents. These reports are under investigation, but if proven, they would mark a new phase of chemical warfare against civilians under Emirati-supplied skies. Investigative files also allege Colombian mercenaries recruited through private networks linked to Emirati contractors, trained veterans deployed to reinforce RSF positions during the siege, bringing imported expertise and death. The UAE could end Sudan’s war but it won’t. The motive is described as gold and power. Between 2012 and 2022, an estimated 2,569 tons of undeclared gold valued at about $115 billion were illicitly exported from Africa, the vast majority flowing to Dubai. Swiss aid notes the UAE has emerged as a key center for smuggled African gold, importing hundreds of tons annually, including roughly 435 tons in 2022. RSF front companies, run by Hamedi’s brothers in Dubai, allegedly sell this gold, launder profits, and purchase weapons devastating Sudan. Every ounce refined in Dubai is said to carry the weight of Sudanese blood. The false narrative claims Abu Dhabi backs the RSF to fight Islamism, yet the RSF was created by Islamists. The real goal is control of Sudan’s gold, farmland, and Red Sea ports. The pattern—proxies, fuel chaos, then profit from reconstruction and resource access—extends from Yemen to Libya to Darfur. The final claim is that cut Emirati funding, stop the flights, and freeze the cover would cause the RSF to collapse within weeks, lifting the siege, allowing aid to flow, and ending famine, but it concludes that Abu Dhabi will not act because chaos is profitable and gold outweighs justice. Every child starving in El Fasher, every body in a shallow grave, every smuggled bar of gold is linked to the same source: the UAE could end Sudan’s war but it won’t.

I will summarize the video transcript in a concise manner: The speaker, a Rwandan, shares her perspective on the Congolese genocide. She explains that historically, Rwanda and Congo had a good relationship, but things changed when the American government asked the Rwandan president at the time to allow them to pillage Congo. The president refused, so they killed him. The current Rwandan president then took power and made a deal with the US, allowing them to pillage Congo in exchange for his share. The speaker expresses sadness that during the Rwandan genocide, Congolese people welcomed Rwandans and provided them with land, but the current Rwandan president continues to harm them.

Speaker 0: Congressman, pleasure to speak to you. There's a topic you've been very vocal about that I think more people around the world should pay attention to. There's obviously a war in Gaza. There's the war in Ukraine. A lot of heartbreak going on around the world. But what's happening in Nigeria, it's been happening for a long time, is beyond imagination. The only comparison I can make that to to what's happening there is what's happening in in Congo, which I've covered extensively. You know, I interviewed president Kagame in Rwanda talking about the genocide there and then the the decades of war in Congo. But, yeah, the world seems to be turning a blind eye to what's happening in Nigeria. Can you just elaborate more on what you've seen and what what brought your attention to the issue? Speaker 1: Well, Mario, that's a good way to put it, turning a blind eye to it. This has been going on for actually quite a while in Nigeria, and it's the persecution and the ethnic cleansing of Christians in the country of Nigeria by Islamic extremists. And there's really about three different groups here that are to blame. One would be Boko Haram. We all are generally kind of familiar with Boko Haram. You have IS. West Africa, more ISIS aligned. And then you have this tribal people, most of them involved in cattle herdsmen called the Fulani. And they have, as of recent, been doing a lot of the killing, and there's been a lot of more focus on that, at least on my end and some folks here in congress. But all three are to blame for this, and to me, the government of Nigeria is to blame for this as well. But if if I could just highlight just some of the numbers here real quick. Since 2009, the estimates are in between fifty thousand and as much as a 100,000, it's been reported, have been murdered Christians in Nigeria. I mean, is an astounding number that nobody is talking about. Speaker 0: Genocidal numbers. Speaker 1: Genocidal numbers. And in that same time period, we've had over 19,000 churches attacked or destroyed. And nobody seems to really care about this, but this is something as a Christian myself, as a Catholic, this is something I care deeply about. My brothers and sisters in Christ are suffering and being martyred in this country of Nigeria, and I'm trying to raise the alarm here in The United States and say we have to do something. And just this year alone, 7,000 Christians have been murdered in Nigeria. That's thirty five a day are being killed, and we had fifty four of them were murdered on Palm Sunday. We had a priest kidnapped and murdered on Ash Wednesday, and nobody seems to care or talk about this at all, which is why you know, thank you for giving me this platform to be able to talk about this. But this is so alarming, so concerning, And I think there's a real question of what type of ownership does the government of Nigeria have culpability in this. And I you know, to me, there has to be some type of collusion of some sort, particularly as it relates to the Fulani, who are not a terrorist organization, but are Muslim ethnic group that lives in kind of that middle band of the country where we see a lot of these clashes happening. The government has been trying to stop Boko Haram, but part of that is also the security assistance programs that The United States has with Nigeria in the effort and the promise that they would try to prosecute conflict against Boko Haram and and their presence in that country. Now they still exist. Just last month, there was an attack on a village by Boko Haram that killed nearly a 100 people. Thousands fled. The air force of Nigeria did some airstrikes that killed about 30 members of Boko Haram, but this is not nearly enough. And now just a couple weeks ago, there was an attack on Christians. 15 were murdered. They flagged this. This is in the Borno state. Flagged this for the government, and the government reported it, and I'm not joking, as fake news. This is not a real threat, and then 15 more Christians lost their lives. So certainly, the government of Nigeria is not doing enough. I think they're complicit in this in their absence in that area in protecting these Christians. Speaker 0: Let's talk about who Boko Haram is, especially people that weren't, you know, following politics back during the war on terror. They've been around for a while. I think it was in 2014, they had they controlled a lot of land in Nigeria, and I think neighboring countries as well, if I remember correctly, and everyone was talking about Boko Haram, and then their leader got killed with clashes with Nigerian military. But they've committed a lot of atrocities over the years. They've lost most of their territories. From what I understand now, there is also under Barack Obama's presidency, and there's been a lot of that's when that's when their peak was. I was going through now some of the notes I've got. But now they're living in, like, islands, Lake Chad Islands and Sambisa, Forest Haida. So first, why are they killing Christians? What is their end goal? And two is how are they still around after all these years? Speaker 1: Well, I mean and that's a good question. Look. We see this same type of persecution and killing of Christians in many Muslim majority or Muslim ruled countries. This is something that seems to be persistent throughout the Muslim world. Now Boko Haram, in particular, they're more Al Qaeda affiliated, so they do have political goals in terms of taking over at least part, if not in whole, the country of Nigeria and cleansing the Christians of that country. You might recall, and this was back about a decade ago now, where there was 276 schoolgirls kidnapped. Speaker 0: I remember the story. Speaker 1: The Obama administration actually saying something about this. Just to be clear, 82 of those girls are still remain missing. And, you know, we're talking a lot right now about the murders and the martyrs of the martyrdom of the Christians that are in that country, but there is systemic rape and kidnapping and enslavement of the Christian population as well. So it's it's not just singular and just the killing of them. I mean, they are being tortured and kidnapped and disappeared on a daily basis as well. So that's also part of this that is happening. And Speaker 0: Have you looked into why, congressman? What is why is it that hate towards Christianity in Nigeria? And you mentioned some other countries as well. I know this is mainly the extremist Islamic factions that are that have that ideology, kind of similar to what we saw with ISIS a few years ago to this day, really. But why do they have that hate to go there and kill fellow humans just because they have another religion? Speaker 1: Well, I I think I'll as I mentioned, Boko Haram is more closely aligned with Al Qaeda. IS West Africa is more ISIS affiliated. And then you have this tribal people, most of them involved in cattle herdsmen called the Fulani. And then you have this tribal people, most of them involved in cattle herdsmen called the Fulani. And they have, as of recent, been doing a lot of the killing, and there's been a lot of more focus on that, at least on my end and some folks here in congress. But all three are to blame for this, and to me, the government of Nigeria is to blame for this as well. But if if I could just highlight just some of the numbers here real quick. Since 2009, the estimates are in between fifty thousand and as much as a 100,000, it's been reported, have been murdered Christians in Nigeria. I mean, is an astounding number that nobody is talking about. Speaker 0: [No further content here to summarize.]

This is about the Franco CFA, a colonial currency printed by France for 14 African nations. France profits from these nations by exploiting their resources. The video shows a child working in a gold mine in Burkina Faso, one of the world's poorest countries. Burkina Faso uses the colonial currency, and in return, France demands 50% of all its exports. The money this child mines mostly ends up in the French treasury. The solution is not to move Africans to Europe, but to free Africa from the exploitation of certain Europeans and allow its people to live off their own resources.

The president of Congo is offering the U.S. ownership of some of its $24 trillion in minerals in exchange for Trump negotiating peace in the region, with talks reportedly ongoing with the White House. Congo has the largest lithium reserves, but minerals are extracted by children and shipped to China or Europe for refining. Congo's wealth paradoxically contributes to its poverty due to a lack of industrialization and governmental protection of investments. The situation is complex, involving Rwanda's alleged funding of the M23 group, a pro-Rwanda group operating in Eastern Congo comprised of Tutsis. This traces back to the Rwandan genocide, where divisions between Tutsis and Hutus persist in Eastern Congo. The Rwandan government has aligned itself with FDLR, a group comprised of some of the genociders, which the U.S. has established is a terrorist organization. The Congolese government is now partnering with the FDLR. Despite Congo's mineral wealth, Rwanda has a better military due to its system.

Speaker 0 outlines root causes to understand Mali events. At the start of this year, the French decided to go in counter-offensive because African countries kicked them out three years ago from Mali, Burkina Faso, and Dinghya. The French have declared themselves a European superpower with nuclear armaments, emphasizing not only to keep nuclear electricity generation going but also to build more nuclear weapons as a geopolitical player. Their main source of uranium for weapon-grade material is apparently Niger. Mali, by contrast, is rich in minerals, including uranium and gold. The connection between Niger and Mali is described as not verified to be in the same region, yet Niger is positioned as a country rich in mineral resources. The attempt by France to create chaos and conduct regime change in Mali is said to have failed. On April 25, there was a well-prepared coup attempt in which between 10,000 to 12,000 so-called rebel forces operated, with many of them being Al Qaeda integrated with ISIS and the Jemim-affiliated group, along with a Tuareg faction seeking to establish their Azovite state. The speaker emphasizes that these 10 to 12 thousand fighters decided simultaneously to attack not only the capital but other locations as well, which would have been a fatal blow to the regime and would have caused the regime to collapse.

The genocide in Congo, apartheid in South Africa, and the exploitation of Africa are interconnected with Israel, particularly through its diamond trade. Surprisingly, Israel's largest export is diamonds, despite having no diamond mines. This revelation highlights the importance of verifying information we encounter online.