TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Geneva is a beautiful city with a dark side. The World Health Organization (WHO), Gavi, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are all based there. The speaker calls for the arrest of these organizations, claiming they promote poison and are responsible for injecting nanolepeds into billions of people. Another speaker criticizes the UN and the immunity given to WHO and Gavi by the Swiss government. They believe this is a global crime scene and are trying to raise awareness. Both speakers emphasize the importance of building a global movement to protect the people. They call for Swiss neutrality to be restored and for the masses to stand up against the injected poison.

Geneva is a beautiful city, but it has a dark side. The speaker accuses organizations like Gavi, the World Economic Forum, and the WHO of promoting poison through a global injection of nanolepits. They call for the arrest of these people and declare that the World Economic Forum should no longer have diplomatic immunity. Another speaker mentions the UN syndrome and the need for a global movement to counteract the power of world governments. They criticize the WHO and Gavi for their actions and claim that it is a global crime scene. The speakers emphasize the importance of restoring Swiss neutrality and urge people to stand up against vaccination.

A group created a criminal complaint form for individuals to report crimes related to the COVID-19 pandemic, alleging a conspiracy involving influential figures and governments. The complaint lists crimes like genocide and fraud, focusing on the violation of the Nuremberg Code and Agenda 21's goals. The aim is to hold those responsible accountable under universal jurisdiction. Over 12,000 people have downloaded the form, leading to cases in various countries.

Geneva is accused of being the source of evil in the world, with organizations like WHO, Gavi, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) being blamed. The speaker, a Swiss citizen, calls for the arrest of these entities for promoting a global injection of a bioweapon into billions of people. They claim to be a victim and state that justice will bring down this criminal house of cards. They urge everyone to change their mindset and refuse to comply with the injection. The speaker believes that their collective power as billions of people can overcome the darkness of evil.

I'm an attorney looking for ways to sue those responsible for damages during the pandemic, but the PrEP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act, provide broad immunity from liability. As a corporate liability officer, my colleague and I agree, that we should go after Pfizer for the fraud they have committed. The challenge is figuring out how to break through their defenses. Pfizer will argue they delivered the fraud that the government ordered. Even if a case gets dismissed based on this argument, the admission itself is valuable. We need to get them to admit in court whether committing mass murder and genocide is explicit US government policy, or if individuals like Kotlik, Marks, and Fauci were rogue actors acting outside their authority.

The interviewer confronts Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, about the vaccines' failure to stop transmission and accuses him of keeping it a secret. They demand an apology and refunds for countries that invested in the ineffective vaccine. The interviewer questions Bourla's wealth and asks about potential criminal charges and investigations. They also mention Pfizer's history of deceptive marketing and express concern about media censorship. The interviewer urges viewers to visit wefreports.com for uncensored coverage and to support their crowdfunded journalism. They conclude by emphasizing the importance of holding pharmaceutical companies accountable.

The speaker claims that Pfizer documents reveal evidence of a crime against humanity. They state that Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't work to stop COVID just one month after rollout and that the vaccines had vaccine failure and failure of efficacy. The speaker also highlights that Pfizer was receiving numerous reports of adverse events and had to hire staff to process the paperwork. They argue that the vaccines caused heart damage and other severe side effects, and that the materials in the vaccines biodistribute throughout the body, including the brain and ovaries. The speaker suggests that this is a deliberate bioweapon attack by the Chinese Communist Party and calls for justice.

In this video, Pascal and Van der Stiel discuss explosive information regarding criminal charges and indictments against Fauci. They claim that Fauci, along with Ralph Barrick and Pete Tirdaszek, collaborated to create a bioweapon and weaponized the spike proteins of the coronavirus. They also mention the harmful effects of the mRNA vaccines and the violation of the Nuremberg Code. Pascal and Van der Stiel express hope that justice will prevail and that the World Health Organization (WHO) charter will be legally qualified. They emphasize the need to stop the genocide and pray for justice to be served.

Geneva is a beautiful city with a dark side. Organizations like WHO, Gavi, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are based there, but the speaker believes they should not have diplomatic immunity. They accuse these entities, along with Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and Big Tech, of promoting a global injection of harmful substances into billions of people. The speaker, who claims to be a victim, calls for the arrest of these individuals. Another speaker mentions a "UN syndrome" where people are afraid and those who understand the situation either stay silent or try to raise awareness.

Pascal Nagiadi, the son of a World Economic Forum cofounder, is demanding justice for the global release of COVID-19 vaccines. He is joined by Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger in calling for the criminal prosecution of all involved. Nagiadi also wants the arrest of those responsible for crimes against humanity related to the pandemic, including the WEF, WHO, GAVI, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Bill Gates. He believes he and his mother are victims of the vaccines and that the situation is a democide. If his demands are met, it could have significant global health and economic implications. The outcome of this call to action remains uncertain, but it highlights the power of individuals challenging established systems.

Nicole Schwab, daughter of Klaus Schwab, is reportedly cooperating with investigators in a Crimes Against Humanity case, causing panic among the global elite at the WEF, UN, and WHO. Klaus Schwab is under investigation for governance failures and financial misconduct, including misuse of WEF funds. Pascal Najjadi, son of the WEF's co-founder, is also providing evidence against the organization, including records exposing alleged criminal activity. Nicole Schwab's testimony is said to reveal a systematic plan to depopulate the earth through forced injections and contamination of resources. She has provided data stored on secret WEF servers. Najjadi accuses the WEF, WHO, GAVI, Big Pharma, and Bill Gates of advocating for a global injection of a bioweapon. He is working to strip diplomatic immunity from these organizations. The COVID pandemic is described as a manufactured crisis to enable a one-world government. Nicole Schwab claims the injections were an experimental delivery system designed to reduce the population. A former New Zealand TV presenter reported that 30 people who received a COVID injection on the same day died within a close timeframe.

Tonight, we will be filing a complaint against Mrs. Von der Leyen, the European Union, and Pfizer. The complaint is significant because it exposes their complicity in the deception surrounding the Covid vaccine. We have evidence, including a contract signed on November 20th between the EU and Pfizer, where the EU blindly invested €200 million without any knowledge of the product's outcome or nature. This money came from our taxes and was meant to fund Pfizer's research.

This impromptu session of the International Crimes Investigative Committee features Pascal Najadi, who has filed a criminal complaint against several individuals, including the president of Switzerland. Najadi explains that he has filed charges in Switzerland and the United States, alleging violations of laws and rights related to the Pfizer vaccine. He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and criticizes the World Health Organization. The case could have implications for others who have suffered similar damages. The conversation also touches on allegations of a population reduction program and the lack of testing for vaccine efficacy and safety.

Today in The Netherlands, outside the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam, a landmark case brings senior government officials, major media figures, pharmaceutical leadership, and global policy actors together as defendants in a single COVID response case. Among those ordered to appear are Albert Baller, the CEO of Pfizer, the former Dutch prime minister, senior Dutch health ministers, leading figures from the Dutch media, and Bill Gates. This makes the case extraordinary. On March 9, an important step is happening at the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. This hearing is not the main trial. The main trial is proceeding, and Bill Gates, if not appearing in person, must have representation and offer a defense. Today’s hearing concerns a procedural question: should the court allow an appeal against an earlier decision that blocked a request for preliminary evidence? In simple terms, the claimants ask the court for permission to present and examine expert evidence early before the trial, to have experts testify, documents examined, and key scientific and legal claims tested through cross examination. The lower court refused that request. The Amsterdam Court Of Appeal is being asked to decide whether that refusal should itself be reviewed. This hinges on the right to have evidence examined in public. If the appeal is allowed, expert testimony and scrutiny of the evidence could proceed; if refused, the claimants must continue without that preliminary examination. The reason for this hearing traces to the main lawsuit, begun in July 2023. Seven Dutch citizens filed a civil case in a district court, claiming they were misled about the nature of the COVID threat and about the safety and necessity of COVID vaccines. They argue that government officials, public health authorities, pharmaceutical executives, and major media figures promoted a narrative that induced fear and compliance based on unscientific claims of a novel pathogen called COVID nineteen. They claim these representations caused them to take vaccines and to suffer psychological and physical harm. The claimants describe a tort claim: the defendants breached a duty of care owed to the public by providing false or misleading information that resulted in damage. They seek two things: a declaration that the defendants acted unlawfully and compensation for the harm. Before the trial proceeds, the claimants asked for the evidence behind those claims to be examined in court, hence the provisional evidence request and today’s appeal. Central to the request are expert witnesses from multiple disciplines addressing scientific, legal, psychological, and institutional dimensions. The experts include Catherine Watt (legal researcher in public health law), Sasha Latipova (pharmaceutical regulatory processes), Doctor Joseph Sansone (psychologist studying crisis messaging and behavioral compliance), Catherine Austin Fitz (financial analyst on institutional power structures and global policy networks), and Doctor Mike Yeadon (English pharmacologist, former Pfizer VP). Yeadon has argued that the safety narrative surrounding the vaccines is challenged, claiming inadequate testing and concerns about toxicity. The point of a court is that such claims should be tested under cross examination, not dismissed without scrutiny. Allowing this appeal would enable the evidence to be heard and tested in public, with broader implications beyond the Netherlands, potentially influencing accountability, transparency, and public trust in other jurisdictions. What happens here may influence debates about open scrutiny of evidence in courts elsewhere. The speaker closes with a personal note, recalling six years spent fighting misinformation and supporting the truth be told campaign for COVID jabbed, injured, and bereaved, and underscoring that this case concerns justice in action, public scrutiny, and accountability for powerful institutions.

In this video, Pascal and Van der Stiel discuss explosive information regarding criminal charges against Fauci. They claim that Fauci, along with Ralph Barrick and Pete Tirdaszek, collaborated to create a bioweapon using gain of function research. They allege that Fauci lied about funding gain of function research and that the spike proteins in the COVID-19 vaccines are causing cardiac damage and death. They also mention the toxicity of the mRNA packaging and the violation of the Nuremberg Code. Pascal and Van der Stiel express hope that justice will prevail and that the World Health Organization's charter is legally qualified. They vow to stop the genocide and seek justice.

Prominent Swiss citizens Pascal Nejadi, a British Swiss banker, and Dr. Astrid Stuegelberger, a Swiss researcher, discuss their actions against the Swiss president and Pfizer Inc. Nejadi has filed criminal charges against the Swiss president and a lawsuit against Pfizer in New York. The claim is related to the COVID-19 vaccination policy. Dr. Stuegelberger criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) and its role in the pandemic, calling it a criminal organization. They also discuss concerns about genetic editing, digitalization of care, and the sterilization effects of the mRNA injections. Nejadi expresses anger over the harm caused by the injections and vows to seek justice.

Geneva is a beautiful city with a dark side. It houses organizations like WHO, Gavi, and the World Economic Forum, which have diplomatic immunity. However, the speaker believes that the West, along with big pharma, big tech, and Bill Gates, are promoting a global injection of a harmful bio weapon. They call for the arrest of these individuals and declare that the West should no longer have diplomatic immunity. Another speaker mentions the need for a global movement to counter the United Nations' influence and criticizes WHO and Gavi for their power and immunity. They consider this situation a coup d'etat and present evidence of a global crime scene. Both speakers emphasize the importance of standing up against this injustice and restoring Swiss neutrality.

All evil related to genocide stems from Geneva, including WHO, Gavi, and WEF. The WEF, WHO, Gavi, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Bill Gates pushed for a global bio weapon injection harming billions. Swiss citizen demands WEF lose diplomatic immunity and be arrested. Victims of poison urge humanity to reject compliance and stand against darkness. Justice will prevail. Stand up against evil. Stand up for humanity.

The speakers discuss Geneva as a place of beauty and peace that also harbors a dark side. The first speaker asserts that “everything evil in the world related to demo side unfortunately comes from Geneva,” naming organizations such as WHO, Gavi, the World Economic Forum (WEF), Big Pharma, and Big Tech, including Bill Gates. They claim the WEF has diplomatic immunity and declare, as a Swiss citizen, that it is no longer eligible for such immunity and call on Swiss authorities to arrest those individuals. They allege that these groups advocated a “global humanity injection” of nanolipids via a bioweapon to 5,700,000,000 people, and state that Switzerland is hosting them. They frame themselves as a victim, saying they and their mother are dying from this, describe it as a “demo side,” and vow that it will be corrected in the name of humanity. They urge a stand against what they describe as poison being injected into humanity. The second speaker responds by noting a “Geneva Swiss Syndrome” and a broader “UN syndrome,” describing fear around what is happening and claiming the United Nations is occupied; those who understand keep quiet or speak indirectly to awaken others. They say it would have been easy to carve a world government without a populace that asserts “we the people is more important,” and describe a global movement they are trying to build that is “we the people” and highly global. They argue that what is happening in Geneva is the opposite: no right for the WHO to dictate globally, and that Gavi has “total immunity” from the Swiss government, with this immunity being verifiable in the Swiss admin database. They call this a coup d’etat and a global crime scene, presenting pieces of evidence with humility, stressing that science invites doubt as a healthy attitude. The first speaker reiterates optimism for Geneva’s future, insisting that Swiss neutrality must be restored and that the young people who survive will be guarantors that such institutions never regain footholds in Switzerland. They describe a “snakehead” in Geneva as a direct, present danger to the Swiss population but say it is being cut off. They compare the situation to a house of cards—criminal in nature—and suggest justice can cause the collapse. They urge everyone, including those who have been vaccinated, to stand up and say they will not comply, ending with a call in French to honor humanity and dispel darkness.

In this video, Pascal and Van der Stiel discuss explosive information regarding criminal charges and indictments against Fauci. They claim that Fauci, along with Ralph Barrick and Pete Tirdaszek, collaborated to create a bioweapon and weaponized the spike proteins of the coronavirus. They also mention the harmful effects of the mRNA vaccines and the violation of the Nuremberg Code. Pascal and Van der Stiel express hope that justice will prevail and that the World Health Organization's charter is legally qualified. They vow to put an end to this genocide and madness.

Everything evil related to genocide comes from Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO), Gavi, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are all responsible. The WEF, which my father cofounded but left in the early eighties, has diplomatic immunity. I declare that the WEF should not have diplomatic immunity anymore and urge Swiss authorities to arrest them. The WHO, Gavi, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Bill Gates advocate for injecting a bioweapon into 5.7 billion people. As a Swiss citizen, I am a victim of this and so is my mother. It's genocide, and justice will prevail. We, the masses, must stand up and say no to the poison being injected into humanity. We are the guardians of humanity, and our light will overcome the darkness of evil.

Pascal Nagiadi, the son of a World Economic Forum (WEF) co-founder, is demanding justice for the global release of COVID-19 vaccines. He is joined by Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger in calling for the criminal prosecution of all involved and the arrest of those responsible for crimes against humanity related to the pandemic. Nagiadi has also criticized the WEF and wants to remove its diplomatic immunity. He believes he and his mother are victims of the vaccines and are now dying from it. This unprecedented call to action could have significant implications for global health and the economy. It remains to be seen if these demands will lead to any tangible change.

Everything evil in the world is related to Geneva, where organizations like WHO, Gavi, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are based. The speaker, a Swiss citizen, calls for the arrest of these entities for promoting a global injection of nanolepits into billions of people. They claim to be a victim and assert that justice will correct this wrongdoing. The speaker urges everyone to change their mindset and refuse to comply with the vaccination, as they believe it is poison. They emphasize the power of the masses in standing up against evil and protecting humanity.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and uses a four-step process to execute their plans. The speaker also alleges that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a real health crisis but a deliberate act of genocide. They provide evidence of unethical practices, including the murder of children in vaccine trials. The speaker argues that the WHO and its collaborators should be held accountable for their crimes and calls for the organization to be dismantled.

Speaker describes ongoing experiences challenging corona mandates in Switzerland: leading court proceedings as a Swiss lawyer against unconstitutional mandates, representing individuals seeking compensation for injuries from mRNA injections, and initiating a major criminal court proceeding against Swissmedic, the Swiss medical safety agency. Despite over three years of hard work, results regarding justice remain unseen. From these efforts, the speaker identifies a lesson: in Europe, in all involved courts and health authorities, they protect their governments with deceptive information policies, wrong decision making, and, most of all, with totally illegal authorizations of mRNA products granted in Switzerland by safety agencies. The speaker notes that no justice has been done and no lesson learned in the official European world. The speaker then asks what can be done about this and first seeks input from the MAHA team and Doctor Robert Malone about any hope from the United States, where positive signals have emerged, notably on January 20 with the present president Trump’s declaration to exit the WHO and other steps. From today’s event, the speaker derives hope, but contends that the hope must come from Europe. A plan is articulated: Europe will take its destiny into its own hands. The speaker intends to ensure that people can see the true effects of the WHO and the true effects of the industry after many proceedings have resulted in authorities claiming that the WHO was setting Gold standards. The speaker aims to contribute, together with the MEHA movement, all of their experience and investigations conducted against the WHO, and to work together to make Europe healthy again. The commitment is clear: they will never give up.