reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Free speech should exist, but boundaries are needed when speech incites violence or discourages vaccinations. The question is where the US should draw those lines and what rules should be in place. With billions of online activities, AI could potentially encode and enforce these rules. A delayed response to harmful content means the harm is already done.

There are people who hate transgender individuals and want to erase their existence. Radical feminists are one group that refuses to accept people like me, not because of pronouns or appearance, but simply because we exist. Even though I don't do anything to upset them, they still say horrible things about me. I recently spoke to someone who works in the gender critical space and she was shocked by the hate she witnessed. These radical feminists view me as a threat to women and are out to harm people like me. It's important to address this hate because it discredits our fight against discrimination. I appreciate the support I've received.

I have experienced the consequences of abuse and believe women's private spaces should be exclusively for women. Rape victims should not have to undress in front of men. This issue is pervasive in schools and public facilities, and I will fight against it. Critics claim my language fuels transphobia, but I have supported LGBTQ rights while opposing policies that allow men in women's spaces. I've received numerous death threats for my stance, highlighting the extreme reactions from some. Many women, including those from the left, feel marginalized by these policies. It's crucial to protect women's rights without compromising safety. The hypocrisy of those who preach kindness while attacking dissenters is evident. The focus should be on protecting all women's rights, not just those of trans women.

I am sad and angry, and though I may not say the right thing, I have to speak up because I have a platform and have always stood for equality, being a voice for those who feel voiceless. This has gone on too long; people have gotten away with murder. We need fairness and justice for all because the world is not fair. If you don't understand, you've never felt unheard or unequal. Magnify that feeling and see what's happening. Let's send love and try to find peace and communication.

We support free speech, but there are limits, especially when it incites violence or discourages vaccination. It's important to define these boundaries. If we establish rules, how can we enforce them effectively, perhaps using AI? With billions of activities occurring, identifying harmful content after the fact can lead to significant consequences.

Social media sites must be held responsible and understand their power. They speak directly to millions of people without oversight or regulation, and this has to stop. The same rule has to apply across platforms; there can't be one rule for Facebook and another for Twitter.

The speaker criticizes the Australian government for censoring online content and imposing fines for expressing opinions. They highlight a case where a post was taken down for misgendering a transgender individual. The speaker calls out the eSafety Commissioner for restricting free speech and urges people to take personal responsibility online. They warn against a government-controlled internet and advocate for individual freedom. The speaker encourages viewers to stand up against censorship and government overreach.

I'm trans, and I'm worried about the trans community. Some say my TikTok skits are why people don't take us seriously and blame us for issues in the economy and society. It feels heavy, but I accept it. It’s important to recognize how silly those comments sound. People need to relax—maybe drink some tea or take a bath. Internalized bigotry isn’t helping anyone. Despite the negativity, I still care about you and will support you if things get tough, even if you don’t return the favor. Thank you, and have a good day.

Our incitement hatred legislation needs to be updated for the social media age. It's not just the platforms that are responsible, but also the individuals who post messages and images online that incite hatred and violence. We need new laws to hold them accountable.

I don't understand why Congresswoman Mace's safety and privacy are being questioned. She's a victim with valid reasons for wanting only biological women in the women's bathroom. As a trans woman, I respect her feelings and her desire for privacy. This isn't an attack on anyone; it's about her lived experience. After learning about her story, I see her concerns as legitimate. There are gender-neutral bathrooms available, so I don't see why this is such a big issue. She simply wants safety and privacy in women's spaces. Stay tuned for more insights from an informed trans woman.

Today is October 27, 2023, and it has become a day to honor freedom of expression on x. I want to thank everyone who follows me on x and social media, and those with whom I have cordial and kind exchanges, even when we disagree. Social media is not perfect, but it's not just a space for hate, misinformation, and cyberbullying. It's also a place for sharing movies, documentaries, ideas, and engaging in lively, passionate, and sometimes superficial discussions. Social media reflects society, and trying to suppress it instead of addressing real societal issues is a mistake. It's a space where we can share laughter and humor, especially during crises, to create connections. I'm grateful for the exchanges I've had with people I wouldn't have met otherwise. We must remind those who wanted to boycott x and establish a Ministry of Truth to impose their single-minded thinking that freedom of expression is vital, especially in a democracy. I'm glad that so many people have shown their support for and paid tribute to freedom of expression on x today.

All of us. And I have heard about a whole lot of hate that's being directed at our trans community. Anybody who is using this as an using this as an opportunity to villainize our trans community or any other community out there has lost their sense of common humanity. We should not be operating out of a place of hate for anyone. We should be operating from a place of love for our kids.

We support free speech, but there are limits, especially when it leads to violence or discourages vaccination. It's important to define these boundaries. If rules are established, how can they be enforced effectively? With billions of online activities, relying on AI to monitor and enforce these rules is crucial, as catching harmful content after the fact can lead to irreversible damage.

The woman behind the bullying Internet account, Libs of TikTok, was appointed to the Oklahoma library Board, despite not being from Oklahoma. This highlights the harmful impact of far-right attacks and elevating anti-trans individuals. Tragically, a non-binary student in Oklahoma was bullied to death. Let's show respect and kindness to non-binary individuals today. Reach out to a non-binary person and offer love and compassion. Thank you. Translation: The person who manages the bullying account, Libs of TikTok, was appointed to the Oklahoma library Board, even though she is not from Oklahoma. This emphasizes the dangerous effects of far-right attacks and promoting anti-trans individuals. Sadly, a non-binary student in Oklahoma was bullied to death. Let's show respect and kindness to non-binary individuals today. Reach out to a non-binary person and offer love and compassion. Thank you.

A community I care about is hurting because of offensive posts attributed to me. Many of you have seen these blog posts online and on social media. They are homophobic, discriminatory, hateful, and weird. When a friend showed them to me in December, I was stunned because I couldn't imagine where they came from. I've spent months trying to understand these posts and hired cybersecurity experts to investigate if someone manipulated my words or my former blog. They haven't been able to prove manipulation, but I genuinely don't believe I wrote those hateful things because they are completely alien to me. I understand why some people don't believe me based on my past tweets and writings. I've been dumb, cruel, and hurtful to the people I advocate for. I own that, and I'm truly sorry.

Today is transgender day of remembrance, a day where we mourn the loss of 26 transgender Americans who were killed this year. Sadly, we observe a recurring pattern where the majority of these victims are black women and women of color. It is important to acknowledge that no one should experience violence, live in fear, or face discrimination solely because of their gender identity.

The conversation centers on the core idea that democracy hinges on freedom of speech, but with in-depth debate about what that freedom should look like in the context of large platforms. Speaker 0 references the bedrock of democracy and notes a new policy posted yesterday titled “freedom of speech, not freedom of reach,” highlighting the tension between protecting speech and avoiding amplification of harmful or extremist content. Speaker 1, Jonathan, clarifies his stance: “I don't think it's about censorship. I believe in freedom of speech. The ADL is a civil rights organization, but I don't believe in freedom of reach.” He argues that Twitter, like other publishers, should have the ability to choose whom it privileges and who it doesn’t privilege, suggesting there should be a “lunatic fringe” kept on the fringe rather than algorithmically amplified. He lists examples such as “Russian propagandists, alt right crazy people, you know, violent anti Zionists,” implying that such content should not be algorithmically promoted. Speaker 2 asks whether this should be achieved through a free marketplace of ideas managed by private companies or through legal intervention in Washington, prompting Speaker 1 to respond that social media platforms should “simply obey the same rules of business that other publishers do.” Speaker 3 reframes the issue: it is not about limiting anyone's free speech but about giving people the largest platform in history to reach a third of the planet, noting that “Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach.” He asserts that there will always be racist, misogynist, anti-Semites, and child abusers, but argues that the goal is not to give bigots and pedophiles a free platform to amplify their views and target their victims. Speaker 4 shifts to the ADL’s operational stance, noting that they opened a center in Silicon Valley in 2017 and that the person running it will be “the next Facebook executive.” They describe having software engineers and data scientists monitoring online content and working with major platforms—Google, YouTube, Meta, Twitter, Reddit, Steam, Amazon, and others from Apple to Zoom. The speaker emphasizes ongoing collaboration with Twitter “since it was founded,” describing continuity with both “the old regime” and “the new regime,” and adds a provocative aside: “Like, I'm talking to Ivon. Bad guy.” The overall thread is a sustained effort to monitor, engage with, and influence platform policies through cross-platform collaboration while advocating for restraint in amplifying harmful content.

If we don't speak up against this nonsense, we'll lose women's rights, sororities, and our safety. We shouldn't have to expose ourselves to perverted men or surrender to this madness. Let's find our voices, ladies, and the men who support us. Otherwise, this will be our future. We can support trans people without compromising our own well-being.

Mister Musk's recent Twitter activity sparked a discussion on freedom of speech. While we also value this freedom, we acknowledge the need to address illegal content online.

Free speech should exist, but there should be boundaries regarding inciting violence and causing people not to take vaccines. Rules are needed, and AI could encode those rules due to the billions of activities happening. If harmful activity is caught a day later, the harm is already done.

Millions of people are being purged from the Internet as big tech titans have the power to control and censor. It's time to recognize social media companies as public utilities, just like electricity and telephone services. Social media is essential for businesses, nonprofits, and political campaigns. The establishment has been censoring those who question them, using any excuse to consolidate power. We must unite as Americans and demand an Internet bill of rights that protects our freedom of speech in cyberspace. This is the United States, where our right to free speech is not optional.

We humans are capable of incredible things, yet in 2023, when someone identifies as trans or non-binary, it often sparks fear and anger. Trans people are simply human, deserving of the freedom to be themselves without fear or hatred. When allowed to express our true selves, we can shine brilliantly. It's essential to show kindness and compassion, embracing visibility and understanding. Let us be who we are without fear.

I haven't personally presented my case to Mark Zuckerberg or Jack Dorsey, but I did email Jack before January 6th to warn him about a potential coup on his platform. However, I haven't heard from him since. If I had the chance to speak to Mark Zuckerberg, I would first have a private conversation. From my perspective, I'm concerned about the internet being defined by hate, division, and lies. This is not right, especially for those with children. We shouldn't let greed, profit, and growth shape our future. I hope that as human beings, they prioritize people's safety and consider the impact on the internet and future generations.

An 8 or 10 year old deciding to be transgender should face no discrimination. Many transgender women of color are being murdered, with the number possibly at 17 this year. Every daughter should have the same rights to be who they are.

Social media sites must be held responsible and understand their power. The speaker claims these sites speak directly to millions of people without oversight or regulation, and that "has to stop." The speaker asserts that the same rules must apply across platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Someone "has lost his privileges" and content "should be taken down."