TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

If you have no evidence, will you retract your statements that Trump won Pennsylvania in 2020? I traveled to Pennsylvania and saw things firsthand. I’m moving on because you’re not answering. The attorney with Giuliani made similar claims and has been disbarred for false statements about the election. As a potential chief law enforcement officer, you must rely on facts, not conspiracy theories. Your role is to protect voters and election workers. You acknowledged Biden as president, yet many in his circle still spread false claims. I’m here to answer questions, not do your homework. The 14th Amendment addresses birthright citizenship. I’ve served as a state prosecutor and AG, and I look forward to working with you if confirmed. I was preparing for today.

Your party supports law enforcement, but if released prisoners commit crimes, should Trump be held accountable? No more than Biden should be for his policies. If Biden charges offenders who reoffend, he bears responsibility. Why can't your party admit when Trump is wrong? If offenders like the Proud Boys reoffend after being released, isn't Trump responsible? If judges are Trump-appointed, they face consequences; if Biden-appointed, they often walk free. During the Black Lives Matter protests, many offenders weren't prosecuted. You claim there's no coverage of riots, but that’s not true. I left the White House during a riot, and my life was threatened, yet there's no coverage of that. If they break the law, they go to jail. I asked you to acknowledge if you think the pardons are wrong. Those released under Soros-backed DAs often commit worse crimes without punishment. Thank you for your time.

It is essential for a prosecutor to begin with a crime rather than targeting an individual. The issue over the past four years has been the perceived targeting of Donald Trump, which began in 2016 with multiple investigations. If appointed attorney general, I will ensure the office remains non-political and will not pursue individuals based on their political affiliations. Justice will be administered fairly across the country. We need to unite and move forward to preserve our nation. Concerns about the potential politicization of the justice department during my tenure are valid, and I assure you that I will maintain independence and uphold the Constitution, even if it means disagreeing with the president.

You mentioned wanting to eliminate 600 NIH workers on day one and 2,200 from HHS. Which departments will you cut from? There are 200 political appointees that change with each administration. If you remove those, will you replace them with your appointees? President Biden changed 3,000 employees at HHS. As a potential top health official, will you commit to not firing federal employees working on food safety or cyber protection? There are 91,000 employees. So, will you ensure those working on food safety and cyber security keep their jobs? I commit not to fire anyone doing their job. Will this commitment be based on your opinion or political agenda? It will be based on my opinion. So, it seems those with differing views on vaccines may be at risk of losing their jobs.

President Biden issued pardons to members of the January 6th committee, which you were part of. This came after President Trump suggested the committee should face jail time. You previously expressed that you did not want a pardon and communicated this to the White House. Now that you’ve received one, are you considering accepting it or seeking legal recourse? We are evaluating the situation, but it’s unclear what can be done since the pardons apply to the entire committee. This is unprecedented territory. We’ve operated collectively, and the law regarding such pardons is ambiguous. It seems likely we’ll have to accept the pardon unless there’s an attempt to prosecute the committee.

Have you ruled out a pardon for yourself or family members? Yes, I have. What would I pardon myself for? I have no intention of pardoning myself because I didn't do anything wrong. Could you comment on Meta's decision to...

You're being considered for FBI director, yet you didn't check if your associates, including the president, were involved in attacking police officers. Look at the Capitol Police behind you. Are you proud of raising money from those who assaulted them? You claim to support law enforcement, but your actions tell a different story. Did you ever publicly state that Donald Trump declassified all documents at Mar-a-Lago? You mentioned a declassification order, but did you confirm it included all those documents? Shouldn't we consider the potential risks to sources before declaring documents declassified? Did Trump consult agencies about the risks? You say you support transparency; will you back the release of your grand jury testimony and relevant sections of the special counsel's report? Your time is up.

Is it standard for your department to meet with dark money groups secretly? I can't speak to actions taken by the former deputy secretary, who is no longer with us. But you are the secretary of the interior, correct? Yes, I am. Do the people here work for you? They work with me. So you're not in charge? I provide vision and direction. Do you take responsibility for the department? Yes, I do. Then why are your leaders meeting with dark money groups off the books? This is the first I've heard of this. I can't comment on my deputy's actions. What did they gain from canceling leases at their request? I don't know who that individual is. You seem unaware of your department's issues. We have a corruption problem in your department.

I questioned Mr. Patel's fitness to be FBI director, given his association with individuals convicted of assaulting police officers and profiting from it. I asked him to look at the Capitol Police officers present and explain why he is proud of what he did. I responded that I have never accepted violence against law enforcement. I have worked with law enforcement and never glorified violence against them. I never made a single dime out of violence against law enforcement. I also questioned whether Mr. Patel had claimed that Donald Trump declassified all the documents at Mar-a-Lago and whether he considered the potential risks to sources before advocating for declassification. I responded that President Trump issued a declassification order to a large number of documents. It was the responsible thing to do and no one died. I support following the law and providing whatever information the law requires.

The president and his lawyers asked me to reject votes, which would have caused chaos by turning the issue over to the House of Representatives. I hope the government can prove criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt, but it's important for the American people to know that they didn't just ask me to pause. They wanted me to overturn the election by returning and rejecting votes.

Will you work with President Trump to reinstate the Remain in Mexico program to ensure that only legitimate asylum claims are processed while individuals wait in Mexico? Yes, I will partner with him to reinstate this policy. Regarding the CBP 1 app, which allows asylum seekers to apply without providing evidence, will you end its use? Yes, if confirmed, I will shut down the CBP 1 app and preserve necessary data. The CHNV program has allowed mass parole without proper evaluation. Will you stop this abuse? Yes, we will return to case-by-case evaluations for parole and ensure our legal immigration system is fully utilized, with more judges and courts to process cases properly, unlike the current administration's approach.

You mentioned that President Trump asked you to address corruption and conflicts of interest, and to close the revolving door between government and the industries it regulates. So, will you commit to not accepting any compensation from drug companies, medical device firms, hospitals, or health insurers for at least four years after leaving this position, including roles as a lobbyist or board member? Can you repeat that last part? Will you refrain from taking money from drug companies in any form? Yes, I can commit to that. I believe it's a straightforward question, and honestly, I don't think any of them would want to give me money anyway. Let's continue.

The president has suggested investigating Jack Smith, but I need to review the facts before committing to any investigation. A summary from the president isn't sufficient for me to act. Currently, I have no knowledge of any factual basis to investigate Jack Smith or Liz Cheney. My role requires independence, and I won't play politics. Regarding the 2020 election, I cannot confirm massive fraud without examining evidence. As for pardons, I will review each case individually if confirmed. I will ensure that evidence from the January 6th investigation is preserved according to the law and ethical guidelines. I cannot promise to destroy or not destroy evidence without understanding the legal context.

Rudy Giuliani has suggested the possibility of pardoning himself, claiming he has that authority, though it hasn't been tested in court. This raises concerns about the precedent it sets and how it affects perceptions of justice in the nation. The justice department will operate independently, and I won't dictate their actions or prosecutions. The people I appoint to lead the department will have the autonomy to make decisions on prosecutions. In our administration, we will not adopt a similar approach to pardons.

I am deeply troubled by your responses today. You need to acknowledge that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election. You avoided answering that question when asked by Senator Durbin. Additionally, you should clearly state that those involved in the January 6th insurrection who committed violence should not be pardoned. I don’t have to say what you want me to say. I speak the truth and won’t say anything just to gain confirmation. I will answer questions to the best of my ability.

This past week, a record 1,500 commutations were granted, the highest number in a single day. Among those commuted were individuals involved in serious crimes, including a judge linked to a cash-for-kids scheme that imprisoned many, a man guilty of tax fraud costing over $1.6 billion, and a woman involved in a $26 million Medicare fraud scheme. Are you comfortable with these decisions? No, I’m not. There was also a man in Duluth running a major drug operation who had money hidden under his bathroom tiles that was commuted. I also disagreed with the pardon of the president's son.

I will comply with all ethical guidelines. However, you are implying that I should not challenge backseat decisions. As Secretary of HHS, Robert Kennedy could undermine vaccines and their manufacturing, potentially profiting while risking children's health. I support vaccines and the childhood schedule, but I prioritize good science. You should clarify that Kennedy has undergone the same ethics review as other nominees and has signed an ethics letter regarding conflicts of interest. While concerns about his financial interests are raised, he has complied with all applicable laws. I cannot confirm if any previous nominee has made millions from suing entities they would regulate, but all nominees face scrutiny over their financial interests, and Kennedy has met the necessary requirements.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The Supreme Court's ruling in Trump versus United States grants the president immunity in certain areas, raising concerns about potential abuse of power. It's crucial to have an attorney general who can assert independence and say no when necessary. Regarding investigations, I need to review the facts before committing to any action. A summary from the president is not sufficient. When asked about the 2020 election, I will not engage in political discussions. I can only provide information based on what I have seen. As for pardons, I will review each case individually. I commit to following the law and consulting with ethical officials regarding evidence preservation in the January 6th investigation. I cannot promise to never destroy evidence, but I will adhere to legal requirements.

I don't want a pardon. Accepting one implies guilt, and I'm not guilty of anything except revealing the truth about January 6th and exposing Donald Trump's inaction during that time. He may attempt to target others through various investigations, as seen with Brad Raffensperger in Georgia. While I wish to move on from this chapter of my life, if Trump brings it up again, I'm ready to discuss everything the committee uncovered.

I served as a prosecutor for 18 years. There’s no basis for the suggestion that I would start with a name and then look for a crime; I have never done that, and my former colleagues would support this. As attorney general, I have no intention of doing so either. Thank you for your time today. While I believe you will be confirmed, I suggest that a good way to foster unity is by responding to Grassley's letters. Addressing this issue will be important, as he is persistent in seeking answers. Thank you, senator.

I'm asking if you will agree not to sue drug companies. I'm not agreeing to that. As secretary of HHS, you could influence lawsuits in many ways, such as promoting anti-vaccine views, appointing like-minded individuals, or changing vaccine schedules and compensation rules. You could even share FDA data with law firms for their benefit. I'm asking you to commit not to financially benefit from these lawsuits while serving as secretary. I will comply with ethical guidelines. You're trying to undermine vaccines. As secretary, you could harm vaccine access while profiting from it. I support vaccines and the childhood schedule; I just want good science. Then say you won't profit from your role as secretary.

Can you clarify the presence of federal agents or assets on January 5th and 6th? Specifically, how many were there, did they encourage people to enter the Capitol, and did any actually go inside? I can't comment on an ongoing investigation. Two years ago, you were asked the same question. Can you provide an answer now? I don't know the answer. So you don’t know how many were present or if there were any at all? I have no knowledge of that. You’ve had two years to find out.

You mentioned that the White House will not interfere, but the incoming president believes he can direct the Justice Department. If he suggests investigating a political enemy, would you comply? I wish we could have discussed this in a meeting. It's essential for the attorney general to remain independent. While I haven't heard the president make such a request, I recognize that many Americans have lost faith in the DOJ. If confirmed, my priority will be to restore integrity to the department and ensure justice is served fairly. Let's move on to your current responsibilities as attorney general.

The speaker questions the attorney general about pardons for January 6th offenders and asks if she advised the president on this. The attorney general refuses to discuss conversations with the president. The speaker accuses the administration of incompetence, corruption, and cruelty, focusing on corruption. She asks if the attorney general was ever registered as an agent of a foreign principal under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The attorney general acknowledges representing Qatar for anti-human trafficking efforts related to the World Cup. The speaker accuses her of being a registered lobbyist for Qatar and not disclosing this during her Senate confirmation. The attorney general claims it was discussed in detail. The speaker asks if the attorney general advised that President Trump could accept a $400 million airplane from Qatar. The attorney general refuses to discuss advice given to the president. The speaker asks if she recused herself from that issue, and the attorney general questions the speaker's claim that the president wanted the jet because it was "pretty."

Are you prepared to say under oath that Donald Trump lost the presidential contest to Joe Biden in 2020? President Biden is the president of the United States, having been duly sworn in after a peaceful transition of power. Trump left office and was overwhelmingly elected in 2024. Do you have any doubts that Joe Biden had the necessary electoral votes to be elected president in 2020? As a prosecutor, I accept that Joe Biden is the president. I witnessed many things during my time in Pennsylvania as an advocate for the campaign. While I accept the results, I believe we should all want election integrity and ensure our elections are free and fair, following the rules and laws. I think that question deserves a yes or no, and your lengthy answer suggests you weren't prepared to answer yes.