reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A government memo confirms retaliation against individuals who reported illegal actions at Homeland Security. Despite their claims, no officials have faced discipline; instead, some have been promoted. Those who spoke out have suffered severe consequences: one had their law enforcement credentials and retirement revoked, while another was assigned menial tasks, hindering their career prospects. A third individual was demoted three levels and lost their firearm and credentials, marking a significant blow to their career. They collectively noted that in their combined 75 years of service, they had never faced disciplinary action until now. One supervisor even stated that the agency's goal was to drive them to despair or worse.

Miss Reyrich asked about the retaliation people experience when trying to expose fraud and corruption in Minnesota. Speaker 1 said retaliation has been ongoing for some time. They cited Faith Bernstein’s 2019 Newsweek report: Bernstein was heavily investigated and moved to a different state agency, retaliated against in every kind of way you can think. Recently, retaliation has escalated to threats of losing your job and losing your home, and to tracking your children, with efforts to ensure you can't get a job anywhere in state government. For Minnesota this means you can’t get a job anywhere Democrats control, including Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Hennepin County, Ramsey County, Duluth, Rochester. Miss Reyrich then asked if this will prevent people from continuing to speak out. Speaker 1 said they hope that with light on it and telling people that this is the retaliation, if something like that does come to fruition right now, it’s threats, although some people have been fired, that they have a little bit more ability to speak up and speak to them and that they can cover them in that way. But it’s been really, really bad, and it’s been bad for quite some time.

Hi. My name is Nancy Dee, and I was fired on Friday for saying that I was having a hard time finding empathy for Charlie Kirk. Apparently, I was doxxed by a convicted and pardon? January 6 there on Twitter. And so my name and my company's name was put out there, and then my company was flooded with calls for my termination. And this is day one of unemp

Before the COVID pandemic, Dr. Fauci, as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, provided millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund “dangerous gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, work described as the source of an unintentional lab leak that sparked the pandemic. On the final day as Director of National Intelligence, the speaker says they are releasing “never-before-seen communications and documents” intended to show how Fauci worked with “politicized career leadership” in the intelligence community to suppress the truth about his actions, the lab leak origins, and his role in directing U.S. funding for the research. The documents are said to demonstrate Fauci’s influence over and manipulation of intelligence community COVID-19 assessments and to show Fauci lied to Congress in 2024 by denying knowledge of or participation in discussions with intelligence officials about viral research. The speaker also states that multiple intelligence community whistleblowers provided testimony that they faced retaliation for challenging manipulation of intelligence regarding the virus’s origins. The speaker describes this as a “pattern of suppressing dissent, silencing critics, and burying the truth.” The speaker says Fauci’s close relationships with the intelligence community enabled him to occupy three roles that “shield[ed] him from scrutiny”: 1) Funding dangerous gain-of-function coronavirus research linked to big pharma and its pursuit of universal vaccines worth trillions of dollars. 2) Acting as a behind-the-scenes advisor, alongside hand-picked “experts,” to push the intelligence community to endorse a natural animal origin, framed as a way to hide Fauci-funded gain-of-function research using taxpayer dollars and to shift blame away from Fauci’s actions. 3) Serving as a “pandemic pundit,” publicly pushing “lies, disinformation, and censorship” across available platforms. According to “hundreds of reviewed emails” included in the release, the intelligence community “almost always incorporated Fauci’s recommendations.” The speaker says Fauci promoted a paper whose publication he helped prompt as legitimate information for intelligence community consideration. Senior analysts are described as praising Fauci as an “unbiased guide” to real coronavirus experts while ignoring experts who might dissent from Fauci’s narratives. The speaker further claims Fauci “blatantly lied” to Congress under oath during his 2024 testimony to the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, denying he spoke to any intelligence agency about COVID, and says the newly released correspondence directly contradicts that sworn testimony. The speaker reports whistleblowers described threats of retaliation, marginalization, and career setbacks for analysts who challenged Fauci’s conclusions. Examples provided include a contractor terminated days after coming forward to ODNI as a whistleblower, and managers telling advocates for the lab leak hypothesis or those expressing dissent that leadership would determine promotions. The speaker says senior leaders also attempted to undermine whistleblowers by removing anonymity required by the whistleblower process and insisting their managers or attorneys be present during ODNI meetings, described as creating an atmosphere of intimidation. The speaker concludes that the release is intended to provide transparency, truth, and accountability, citing “lies and censorship and coverups,” and describing the tactics used as part of a “deep state playbook.”

I witnessed a ballot being changed from Trump to Biden in the duplication room. When we reported it, we were scolded and told not to discuss it. Others in the room saw the same thing. People were threatened if they spoke up. I believe it's important to speak the truth.

I blew the whistle on the American Taliban case after discovering that torture had been used during the investigation. The Department of Justice failed to disclose this evidence during the prosecution. I went to the media about it, which led to a criminal investigation against me and being put on the no-fly list. This experience showed me the power and aggression of the government when you go against their narrative, even if it's based on falsehoods.

I blew the whistle on the fake vaccine administration. They pressured me to either take the vaccine or fake it, and I chose to expose the situation instead. It seemed like they wanted to manipulate the numbers or silence me. The doctor was instructed to have me fake the vaccination, which angered me. It should have raised alarms for others as well. When I heard the ultimatum, I realized I had made the right choice. Looking back two years later, it’s clear that my decision was justified.

Yes, other IRS employees have reached out about coming forward as whistleblowers. They are closely watching my case, and how I am treated will influence their willingness to take risks. The personal cost of coming forward has been significant; I've lost relationships and faced debilitating depression. I'm not wealthy and live paycheck to paycheck, struggling against a powerful system that can wear me down. The IRS feels like a smothering force, hoping I will quit or be terminated. My career feels over due to how the IRS and the Department of Justice are treating me.

I was informed of my firing from FEMA verbally after I was demoted, but I never received written confirmation. My team and I faced political hostility during our deployment, particularly in areas with Trump campaign signs. FEMA promotes avoidance and de-escalation, and we documented hostile encounters without identifying specific homes due to privacy concerns. I have worked with FEMA since 2019 as a reservist while holding a civilian job at a property management company, which also terminated my employment. I have received threats and have had to relocate for safety. I welcome inquiries from Congress to share my experiences and urge FEMA to address the breaches of confidentiality by their partnering companies. I regret the way FEMA has treated me but still value the work I do. I am open to exploring legal options regarding my termination.

The speakers confirm retaliation for speaking out against Homeland Security officials. No one at Homeland Security has been disciplined, demoted, or fired for not complying with the DNA law. The speakers faced consequences like losing credentials and firearms. They were marginalized and their careers destroyed. One supervisor mentioned the agency's goal was to bankrupt, force resignation, or worse.

People are really scared because overnight, many lost their next paycheck and ability to pay for childcare and medical bills. Christina Drey and Adam Dubard were fired this month amidst the chaotic shutdown of foreign aid distributed by USAID. Over 8,000 USAID employees were sent home, not based on competency but on loyalty tests. These are people with decades of public service across administrations, and they had to leave the building immediately. As far as I know, they received an email, and if they didn't leave, they were escorted out. There was no process or explanation given to them.

I was fired from my therapy internship for whistleblowing to the Wall Street Journal about ideological conformity in therapy training. My boss regretted the decision but felt he had no choice. This will harm clients, as a lack of therapists with diverse worldviews and tolerance will alienate those needing care. I am sharing this to bring public attention to a crisis in therapy. I have been in contact with people who have large platforms and am willing to speak with anyone, regardless of political affiliation, as this is not a partisan issue. I am unsure of what is next for me.

I was fired the morning after a demotion, with no written notice. My termination was attributed to actions taken for my own political gain, but this ignores a broader pattern of political hostility against my team and others displaying Trump campaign signage. This wasn’t an isolated incident; similar avoidance of issues occurred across Florida and the Carolinas. Senior leadership denies knowledge, but field crews (DSA leads and specialists) can confirm the widespread problem. Requesting FEMA incident reports will substantiate these claims of political targeting.

Speaker 0 is a current state employee, a Democrat, and describes themselves as a loyal person with 20 years of service at their state agency, few job changes since graduating from college, and long-term residence on the same block. They say that in 2019, a poster was put up at the agency listing three names to contact if there were concerns about fraud, waste, or abuse. Speaker 0 says they worked with those three people and that over the next year the three names “really made my life about as miserable as it could be,” including episodes of crying at home to avoid a young son seeing them. Speaker 0 identifies the three people and describes what each did. First, the agency ethics officer allegedly called Speaker 0 to say that if Speaker 0 spoke in front of the legislative committee, they would likely be fired. Second, at that time the chief compliance officer, now the commissioner, allegedly made Speaker 0’s situation worse by involuntarily transferring them to a different position; Speaker 0 says the commissioner called on a Saturday with an HR representative and told Speaker 0 that when they returned to work the next week they would have a new job, and that Speaker 0 asked whether they had a choice and was told, “no, it’s this or nothing.” Third, the director of auditing, whom Speaker 0 says is an auditor, allegedly completely outed Speaker 0 after Speaker 0 reported fraud to him; Speaker 0 says the director of auditing called the person Speaker 0 reported on and told them that “Faye Bernstein” had told him “da, da, da” about them, which Speaker 0 says led to further crying.

He was fired for reporting COVID vaccine adverse events under the emergency use authorization to the VAIR system, the vaccine adverse event reporting system. He was required to do this by law and he whistle blew on his organization on the High Wire show with Dell Bigtree. He also did a little piece for the New York Times. This was when the man gays were coming down and they asked me why I wasn't getting the COVID vaccine and I talked about all the side effects and the suppression of the reporting that was going on. Two weeks after without warning. I was surrounded in the middle of my shift; I had been actively seeing patients on the floor. They surrounded me and then literally threw me out of the hospital. Patients were abandoned that day because I was supposed to go back and see them for discharge and they don't know what happened to me.

Speaker 0 introduces Desiree as an outspoken whistleblower who has challenged the Davos elite, asserts that old systems are not fit for the twenty-first century, and asks how Desiree helped build the WEF’s great reset. Speaker 1, Desiree, recounts that in 2020 she obtained her dream job as chief sustainability officer at Deutsche Bank. She states that while in that role she witnessed fraud and describes the annual report as a “legal living document” filled with lies. She says that a couple of weeks after she spoke out, she was fired, and shortly after, the annual report was released with “all the lies.” She describes a subsequent “horrific smear campaign” and notes that within two days, U.S. authorities contacted her, including the SEC, the FBI, and the Department of Justice. She mentions that they asked her questions, implying inquiry or investigation directed at her claims. Speaker 0 questions whether Desiree is advancing the view that “they’re controlling the world.” Speaker 1 asserts that the WEF is vast and that its tentacles affect every part of life. She claims that this situation is not stakeholder capitalism but socialism, accusing the WEF of lying to the public. She contends that the Davos agenda involves more than net zero and asserts that it is connected to a “climate crisis” manufactured by a “multi trillion dollar industrial complex.” She reiterates that the Davos agenda is about more than climate goals and frames it as a broad, powerful economic and political enterprise. Speaker 0 asks Desiree whether she ever met Claus Schwab and whether she has anything to say about the encounter. Speaker 1 responds with a brief affirmative, saying “Yes,” to having met Schwab, and adds “Truthfully” when asked for further remarks about the meeting. Summary of key points: - Desiree’s career move to Deutsche Bank in 2020 as chief sustainability officer and her claim of discovering fraud and a lies-filled annual report. - Her claim of being fired and subjected to a smear campaign, followed by inquiries from U.S. authorities (SEC, FBI, DOJ). - The assertion that the WEF’s influence extends across life, characterizing the Davos agenda as socialism rather than stakeholder capitalism, and alleging a manufactured climate crisis tied to a multi-trillion-dollar industrial complex. - The claim that the Davos agenda encompasses more than net zero and entails broader power and influence. - Desiree confirms she met Claus Schwab, with a brief, candid acknowledgment.

In 2023, a whistleblower conference took place shortly after the Whistleblower Protection Act was activated, hosted by Stephen Greer at the National Press Club. Several whistleblowers shared their stories, and I was sent there by my employer to identify potential whistleblowers to report to the FBI. I found myself torn between becoming a whistleblower and suppressing them, as there are valid and invalid reasons for whistleblowing. During the event, I heard Michael Herrera's testimony, which caught me off guard. Many attendees were skeptical of his claims, but his firsthand experience was compelling.

I joined the FBI in 2014, focusing on violent crimes on Indian reservations and later on child pornography and human trafficking in Florida. In 2021, I was reassigned to domestic terrorism, where I became concerned about the January 6 investigations. I noticed the FBI was straying from its guidelines, which I believed jeopardized important cases and public safety. After raising my concerns, my security clearance was suspended, and I was placed in an unpaid position indefinitely. The FBI pressured me to lie to charge me with a crime and denied my requests for outside employment. If the FBI treats its own agents this way, what might they do to ordinary citizens?

From a firsthand account about the whistleblower within ODNI who worked for then, Obama's DNI, James Clapper, about how he refused to go along with this. "As a result, he was sidelined and cut out of this." "He was the cyber guy in the director, in the director of national intelligence, James Clapper's, team." "He was sidelined because he wouldn't play along with the lie that they were creating, and he did blow the whistle." "He raised this through the ICIG." "He raised this, tried to raise this with multiple members of congress, including senator Warner." "He never got calls back." "They were not interested in what he had to say and what he had experienced." "He even tried then to go and report this to the Department of Justice, under, president Biden and was refused." "No action." "They were not interested in taking action in this."

The speaker states that they were fired for reporting COVID vaccine adverse events under the emergency use authorization to the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS). They say they were required by law to report to VAERS, and they whistleblew on their organization on The HighWire show with Dell Bigtree. They also did a piece for the New York Times. This occurred when the man gays were coming down and they asked why the speaker wasn't getting the COVID vaccine, and the speaker talked about all the side effects and the suppression of the reporting that was going on. Two weeks after, without warning, they were surrounded in the middle of their shift. They had been actively seeing patients on the floor. They were surrounded and then literally thrown out of the hospital. Patients were abandoned that day because the speaker was supposed to go back and see them for discharge, and they don’t know what happened to them.

This internal government memo confirms I was retaliated against for speaking out against Homeland Security officials who I believed were breaking the law. No one at Homeland Security has been disciplined, demoted, or fired for failing to comply with the DNA law. To the contrary, some have been promoted. I've had my law enforcement credentials and firearm taken away, and my law enforcement retirement revoked. Publicly removing someone's firearm is the ultimate insult. I was iced, left to do menial tasks, and my future career potential vanished. I was demoted three levels, and like my colleague, my firearm and credentials were taken. Never in our combined seventy-five years of service have any of us even had a disciplinary action. One of the supervisors said the agency's goal is to bankrupt you, make you quit, die, kill yourselves, or preferably all of the above.

I blew the whistle on the fake vaccine taking. They pressured me to either take the vaccine or fake it, but I chose not to comply. I realized they wanted me to fake it to keep the numbers up and silence me. The doctor was ordered to convince me to go along with it, which was infuriating. This should have raised alarms for others. When I heard the ultimatum to fake it or face charges, I knew I had made the right choice. Looking back two years later, it’s clear that my decision was justified.

The speaker reported a subordinate for criminal conflict of interest but was discouraged from doing so, learning that reporting corruption leads to trouble. Subsequently, the speaker was accused of publishing classified information from two years prior and fired, while those engaged in corruption kept their jobs. This created a culture where criticizing corruption leads to retaliation using tools meant for criminals. The speaker has been in court for three years trying to get the facts released, similar to cases with Senator Ernst, where information is withheld from courts and Congress. Regarding uncovering fraud inside USAID, the speaker believes forensic accountants are needed due to bureaucrats' crafty methods of hiding money. Even in 2019, programs unknown to political appointees were still being discovered. The speaker suggests that during the Trump term, some appointees were not vigilant enough, but now there is a stronger, more concerted effort to obtain all the information.

The speaker testifies about the weaponization of the FBI and DOJ against its own employees and the American people. He served in the Army in Iraq and Afghanistan, then as a police officer, and later as an FBI special agent. Despite receiving high performance reviews and being selected for specialized units, he has been smeared as a subpar employee after witnessing weaponization within the FBI. He states that too many in the FBI prioritize avoiding difficulty over upholding the Constitution, leading to an Orwellian atmosphere that silences dissent. He is speaking out despite the potential personal cost, including the loss of his job and family's home. He claims the FBI allowed him to accept orders to a new position, sell his family's home, and report to the new unit before suspending him on his first day, rendering his family homeless. He concludes that bad actors have begun running parts of the government, but he will never stop trying to serve the nation and protect the innocent.

I worked in the Medicare department at UnitedHealthcare for nearly 10 years and witnessed shocking events. A colleague was terminated, then committed a violent act, yet the company offered no increased security or support, only threats against speaking to the media. Women's safety was disregarded; I faced harassment from my trainer, who was not punished but promoted. I dealt with a threatening caller, and despite my distress, I was reprimanded for disconnecting the call. Drug use among employees was rampant, and management ignored serious incidents, like an attempted abduction outside the office. When I helped a caller find affordable medication, I was punished for going against company policy. My relationship with my boss led to retaliation, with management closely monitoring my attendance. The environment was toxic, with many employees relying on substances to cope. There are many more troubling stories to share about this company.