TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

It's important for a leader of a Canadian political party to denounce far-right extremism and a group labeled as a terrorist organization. Many conservatives are not extremists or racists, and they deserve representation. Most Canadian conservatives are not far-right racist extremists, unlike Diagholon, who met with such a group, which is disgraceful and must be condemned. Translation: It is crucial for a leader of a Canadian political party to condemn far-right extremism and a group identified as a terrorist organization. Many conservatives are not extremists or racists and deserve representation. Most Canadian conservatives do not consider themselves far-right racist extremists, unlike Diagholon, who met with such a group, which is disgraceful and should be denounced.

The speakers discuss a dangerous and divided world, citing threats from Iran, Russia, and China, as well as changing security and commercial relationships with the United States. One speaker mentions having obtained top secret security clearance within three weeks to be informed and make decisions. He then points out that another speaker has refused the opportunity to obtain top secret security clearance for 950 days. The other speaker explains that while he previously held top secret clearance as a minister, he refused the recent offer because it would have gagged him under security law, preventing him from speaking freely about foreign interference without fear of prosecution. He claims Canada has experienced Chinese interference in two elections. He says that refusing the clearance allowed him to speak freely about issues such as a candidate who allegedly threatened a political opponent, and a quarter billion dollar loan obtained in China. The first speaker responds that robust debate has occurred despite the situation, and observes that China is not the only country accused of foreign interference.

I always made sure when I ran for congress to be truthful and back up my claims with evidence, especially regarding my background, because trust is essential for public office. I'm asking you directly about your claim of not speaking Chinese. I've seen videos of you speaking Mandarin during your congressional run. Why do you say you don't speak Chinese when you clearly do? I encourage people to watch the clip in question. I said thank you for inviting me in Chinese, but 99% was in English. My Chinese is at a rudimentary, kindergarten level. It's a family joke how bad my Chinese is. I understand my parents when they speak to me in Chinese, but I can't articulate myself well. I stand by my statement that I'm not able to have a fluent conversation.

Constable Ryan Davidson from the Integrated National Security Enforcement Team addresses a post made by the speaker regarding Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The speaker denies making threats and claims to seek a lawful remedy for what they perceive as a criminal conspiracy with the Communist Party of China. They express concern for the well-being of citizens and offer their services to authorities for a conversation about the issues. The speaker questions the government's transparency, mentioning Jagmeet Singh's alleged ties to terrorism and the lack of clarity regarding money allocation. They emphasize the need for investigation and express willingness to contribute as a concerned citizen.

The speaker asserts that every federal government from Mr. Mulroney to Mr. Trudeau has been compromised by agents of communist China. Every government were informed at one point or another. Every government chose to ignore ceases warning either by negligence, self interest or partnership partisanship, sorry. Every government were infiltrated by agent of influence acting on behalf of the Chinese government, and we knew who they were. The speaker states that every government took decisions about China that are questionable and can only be explained by interference exercised from within or motivated by self interest. Not only the sitting government have been compromised, but all federal political parties have been compromised at one point or another. The inaction of the federal government, all federal governments, were led to attacks on many municipal and provincial government. Ultimately, every government have been part of the problem, not the solution. And I and remember, not only China is practicing interference.

The government says it has been in close contact with Ottawa's mayor and municipal and provincial officials, and that the RCMP has mobilized nearly 300 officers to support the Ottawa Police Services, with readiness to do more. A second speaker says Trudeau is using police against the public, and describes officials and others with terms such as “globalist players and thugs.” The transcript centers on Peter Slowly, portrayed as a former deputy police chief who allegedly argued that being Black made him a suitable candidate for Toronto's next police chief, and who resigned after not being chosen. It is claimed he joined Deloitte, whose CEO sits on Pfizer’s board and who was awarded money by the CDC to build a vaccine-management system, and that Slowly was made chief of the Ottawa police a few months before the COVID-19 pandemic. The text links these claims to alleged international private-sector connections.

I want to be very clear. We can prove that every federal government, from mister Mulroney to mister Trudeau, have been compromised by agent of the communist China. Every government were informed at one point or another. Every government chose to ignore CISO's warning either by negligence, self interest or partnership partisanship, sorry. Every government were infiltrated by agents of influence acting on behalf of the Chinese government, and we knew who they were.

The speaker is asked to explain a discrepancy between their claim of being in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests in the spring of 1989 and reports that they didn't travel to Asia until August of that year. The speaker says they grew up in rural Nebraska, joined the National Guard at 17, and used the GI Bill to become a teacher. In the summer of 1989, they traveled to China and started a program taking basketball teams, baseball teams, and dancers back and forth to China to learn. They say their community knows who they are and that they have poured their heart into the community, while acknowledging they are not perfect. They claim to have been a bipartisan member of Congress and were elected governor twice. They admit to sometimes getting caught up in rhetoric. They say the experience in China made a difference in their life and that Donald Trump should have come on one of those trips. When asked again about the discrepancy, the speaker says they misspoke and were in Hong Kong and China during the democracy protest.

The speaker from Halton Hills accuses the government of neglecting national security, citing documents that show collaboration between Canadian government employees and Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's claim that no sensitive information left the country is contradicted by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still supports those comments. Translation: The speaker criticizes the government for ignoring national security concerns and collaborating with Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's statement that no sensitive information left the country is disputed by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still stands by those remarks.

The speaker discusses a document revealing foreign interference in the 2019 Canadian federal election involving Chinese individuals, community leaders, and politicians. They mention CSIS briefings on PRC interference in the elections, implicating candidates and staff. The panel received briefings on PRC's pragmatic interference tactics. The speaker confirms CSIS briefings to the panel but struggles to recall specific details. The language used in the briefings aligns with public summaries on PRC's activities.

Speaker 0 states this is the most important election in most of their lifetimes. They claim Trump has made unacceptable threats against the economy, workers, and sovereignty. They believe a particular leader can address these issues and needs support. Speaker 1 accuses Catherine McKenna of losing track of 20,000 contracts worth $236,000,000,000, which they claim is why she is no longer in parliament. Speaker 1 repeats the accusation and insults Speaker 0. Speaker 1 continues to harass Catherine, repeating the $236,000,000,000 figure and using abusive language. Speaker 1 then states that everyone is "fucking retarded."

I haven't received official word from the Liberal Party about my disqualification. It's shocking that I learned about it from a news headline before receiving any direct communication. This is alarming. It speaks to the state of the Liberal Party that I'm finding out about my disqualification on air. It's not surprising, though. Our internal polls showed we were neck and neck with the frontrunner. They didn't want me on the debate stage or on the ballot because the Liberal Party of Canada wanted to complete the coronation of Mark Carney. All allegations are completely false and fabricated. I won't allow the Liberal Party of Canada or anyone to smear my name or the name of thousands of volunteers in our campaign.

Speaker 0: We are proud to have penetrated the cabinet. Speaker 1: A constituent asked about outside interference in our democracy. Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, boasted about infiltrating governments worldwide, including over half of Canada's cabinet. Can the member disclose which cabinet ministers support the WEF agenda for transparency? Speaker 2: Sorry for the poor audio and video quality. I'm unsure if the member...

A Globe and Mail reporter asked about a Liberal candidate's ties to China-friendly groups and the speaker's meeting with the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada, a "pro-Beijing group." The reporter questioned if the Liberal party is comfortable with Peter Yen's closeness to the Chinese consulate, given the foreign interference inquiry. The speaker denied ever hearing of the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada and refuted having a "setup meeting" with them. They stated that attending events and taking pictures with people does not constitute a meeting. Regarding Peter Yen, the speaker defended him as someone who has served his community for decades, including as deputy police commissioner. They asserted that Yen's meetings with community groups were part of his job and that they are proud to have him as a candidate.

I'm here to discuss names and entities from my updated book and raise a question about whether Canadian journalists should investigate the evidence surrounding these networks. My book details a 2020 recording of Senator Yuen Paowu during a private briefing with the Canada Committee 100 Society, which includes Conservative Senator Victor Oh and a member of the Chinese United Front Overseas Leaders Group. This society, led by journalist Ding Guo, also has ties to British Columbia Premier David Eby. Journalists at this meeting later supported Liberal candidate Parm Bains, who opposed Kenny Chu's foreign agent registry bill, calling it exclusionary. Ding Guo was also involved in the 2022 Conservative Party leadership race, alongside leaders connected to Beijing's overseas influence.

Speaker 0 accuses the man of lying, noting he claims he only ever met him once while they had lived next to him for twenty-some years. Speaker 1 explains that, with his wife present, they apologized, left, and decided they will never be in the room with that disgusting person again—social, business, or philanthropy—because that guy was there. Speaker 0 adds that it’s a disgrace how this guy has a job today, calling him a proven liar advising the president of the United States every day, and says they’re done with these people.

In 2015, I emphasized rejecting divisive politics, hate, and fear. It's unacceptable. Recently, unacceptable views were discussed. A security breach at a sensitive lab led to a snap election before the news broke. China interfered to help win. Admiration for China's dictatorship was expressed. Trudeau was called a disgrace to democracy.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

There are associations of various community groups that have clearly been infiltrated. They originally started completely innocent—members of the Chinese diaspora, like any community, wanting to come together, celebrate their culture, and engage in activities in their new home. But over time, those groups have been systematically infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party, and they’re used as a front for other things. Some of the organizations identified as alleged police stations are public; you can look them up and see they have been beneficiaries of different federal government grants. You also see them actively trying to obstruct. At the time, we hadn’t passed the legislation to create a foreign agent registry—something our American friends have had for nearly a century—but we did end up passing it on 06/20/2024, last year, yet the government hasn’t implemented it. A coincidence, I’m sure. And you see the obstruction. You see them repeating—parliamentarians repeating—clear talking points out of the Chinese Communist Party. This focus on the Chinese Exclusion Act, which was a sad part of Canada’s history when it was official government policy to be discriminatory and you couldn’t immigrate to Canada if you were of Chinese heritage. And it’s true that was bad. But speaking as someone of the community, people of Chinese heritage don’t live in victimhood. K? That’s not who we are. It’s not part of our culture. We are merit-based. We work hard. We put our heads down, and we get shit done. And so to see now these talking points coming out of the Chinese Communist Party, repeated on the floor of the House of Commons by people who have been alleged to be their proxies, was a huge wake-up call.

I want to be very clear: we can prove that every federal government, from Mulroney to Trudeau, has been compromised by agents of communist China. Every government was informed at some point, and every government chose to ignore warnings, whether through negligence, self-interest, or partisanship. Each government was infiltrated by agents of influence acting for the Chinese government, and we knew who they were.

The speaker claims that not only the current government, but all previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe it took so long for this information to come out because of partisan politics and the influence of Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised, posing a significant security risk for Canadians. They suggest the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws similar to Australia's 2017 law against foreign interference to protect the country's future.

Mary Ng faced criticism regarding an ethics breach related to her connections with a friend, which involved significant financial interests. She accepted responsibility for her actions, stating she had recused herself and was vetted by security. Ng emphasized her commitment to serving Canada and her constituents, rejecting claims against her character. Reports from national security sources indicated that Ng was linked to Chinese consulate influence during the 2019 election, suggesting her staff had private meetings with a diplomat identified as an intelligence actor. Despite requests for comment, neither Ng nor Prime Minister Trudeau's office responded. Ng reiterated her dedication to improving the lives of Canadians.

Speaker 0: Are you concerned about your supporters being harassed and subjected to racial slurs? Does it put them in a difficult position to support you? Speaker 1: I won't back down from standing up for Canadians. The election highlights the stark differences in our approaches and the important issues at hand. While there is a small fringe element that spreads hate, the majority of Canadians do not support them. They won't dictate our policies on vaccines or the pandemic. We need strong leadership to recover our economy and keep our kids safe. Aaron O'Toole seems to take cues from these groups, but Liberals will stand up for Canadians. Speaker 2: Does attending events with anti-vaxxer protesters pose a health risk? Speaker 1: Anti-vaxxers pose a risk wherever they go, not just at protests. We will implement measures to ensure the unvaccinated cannot travel, work in public service, or access nonessential services. Canadians have a choice in this election, and it's crucial to move forward in the right way. Aaron O'Toole's suggestion that testing is enough is not acceptable. Liberals will continue to stand strong on this issue alongside Canadians.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau addressed allegations of Chinese interference in Canada's elections, stating he has not received any information from security agencies regarding federal candidates receiving money from China. Reports suggest that intelligence officials briefed Trudeau about China targeting Canada, including funding a network that supported 11 candidates in the 2019 election. A National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians highlighted significant foreign interference threats from countries like China and Russia, which aim to exploit Canada's openness and manipulate its political processes. Trudeau emphasized the importance of public concern for democracy and acknowledged attempts by China to interfere in Canadian elections in 2019 and 2021. In response, China's foreign ministry criticized Trudeau's remarks, urging Canada to refrain from statements that damage bilateral relations.

I'm confirming that Tulsi Gabbard has appointed someone with a history of being untrustworthy, potentially aiding adversarial nations. In Connecticut, the leading Democratic candidate in a major US Senate race is facing scrutiny after being caught misrepresenting his military service. Richard Blumenthal, the state attorney general, previously stated he served in Vietnam, but reports indicate he received five wartime deferments and served stateside in the Marine Reserves. I misspoke, and I won't let a few misplaced words tarnish my record of service to our country. However, video evidence exists of Blumenthal claiming he was in Vietnam.