reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The SAVE Act, requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration, passed the House with every Republican and four Democrats voting for it, while 98% of Democrats voted against it, despite 84% of Americans supporting voter ID. One argument against voter ID is that it suppresses voting among elderly, poor, and minority groups, echoing post-slavery laws. Obtaining a valid ID can cost $10-$30, and updating documents or traveling to ID offices can be inconvenient. Recently, it was revealed that Social Security numbers were given to millions of illegal immigrants, and thousands of them were found on voter rolls and had voted. While voter ID has cons, the pros outweigh them. Subsidizing IDs for low-income people and acknowledging that voting is a shared inconvenience for all citizens could be solutions. The opposition to voter ID may stem from partisan politics, but politicians should prioritize the will of the people over party loyalty.

In Georgia, there were numerous instances of illegal voting during the election. This includes 2,506 felons voting illegally, 66,248 underage individuals registering to vote before they were eligible, and 2,423 unregistered individuals casting their votes. Additionally, 1,043 people used a post office box to register and vote illegally, while 4,926 individuals voted after canceling their Georgia voter registration. Shockingly, over 10,315 deceased individuals were found to have voted, and 395 people voted in both Georgia and another state, which is against the law. Furthermore, 15,700 individuals who had changed their address with the Postal Service voted, and 40,279 people failed to properly re-register after moving across county lines.

Efforts to prevent noncitizens from voting are gaining attention, despite it being rare. Only American citizens should vote, and in Georgia, a 100% citizenship verification process revealed that about 1,600 attempted registrations could not verify citizenship and were excluded from voter rolls. A recent court case, initiated by a coalition including Stacey Abrams' New Georgia Project, upheld the right to conduct citizenship verification before adding individuals to the voter rolls. This ruling sets a precedent for other states. All officials emphasize their commitment to ensuring only U.S. citizens vote, adhering to federal laws and state regulations. It's crucial for states to enshrine this in their constitutions, as Georgia has done.

Voter ID laws are considered racist and suppress the African American vote because black people are supposedly less likely to have state IDs or access to DMVs. Obtaining IDs online is also allegedly difficult due to lack of internet access and knowledge. In East Harlem, black people were asked about these claims. All those interviewed carry ID and know other black people who do as well. They found the assertion that black people don't have IDs to be false. Interviewees also knew the location of the DMV and how to get there. The claim that black people, especially poor black people, have no internet access or don't know how to use the internet was dismissed as untrue, with one person calling it "stupidity."

Georgia passed a law preventing people from giving food and water to those standing in line to vote.

The claim is that 69 million married women won't be able to vote if they took their husband's name, disenfranchising voters. Voters want ID, signature verification, chain of custody controls, and updated voter rolls. They also want partisan observers watching the voting process. The only reason to be against these measures is if you want illegal aliens to vote in large numbers. Every other country requires an ID to vote. The idea that married women, a Republican voting demographic, can't get ID is a dumb talking point. The REAL ID Act creates an ID at the DMV that proves citizenship. Democrats want illegal aliens to vote. The Biden administration gave millions of illegal aliens Social Security numbers, making it easy to vote, collect welfare, and get free government benefits. They want illegals to steal elections.

Speaker 0 states that nearly 70,000,000 married women in the country have changed their last name, but their birth certificates don’t reflect that. In Michigan’s 3rd District alone, 160,000 women could be unable to register simply because when they got married, they didn’t change both their ID and their birth certificate. A 160,000 women in my district alone.

The speaker argues against the SAVE Act, claiming it would cause gridlock and is a pernicious, nasty piece of legislation described as “Jim Crow two point o.” They allege the SAVE Act would cause more than 20,000,000 people to lose their right to vote, requiring registration with a passport or original birth certificate, and would eliminate vote by mail. The speaker criticizes senior citizens confined to homes by wheelchair, suggesting they would lose their right to vote under the Act. They warn that the voter rolls would be purged using an AI system “set up by Musk and Doge,” so people could show up at the polling place only to be told they’re not on the rolls and would not be notified. The speaker emphasizes that millions would be purged from the rolls because of this system, and voters would be denied notice and turned away at polling sites. The rhetoric likens the measure to one of the nastiest pieces of legislation, returning to the Old South where people were prohibited from voting and spreading it across America. Additionally, the speaker references President Trump’s stance, stating that Trump says he will not sign any legislation until Congress passes Doge, and asserts that “we ain’t passing Doge.” The broader point is that this stance would provoke gridlock in Congress and prevent passage of bills that could lower costs for prescription drugs and electricity.

In Georgia, there were numerous instances of illegal voting. This includes 2,506 felons voting, 66,248 underage individuals registering before they were eligible, and 2,423 unregistered individuals casting votes. Additionally, 1,043 people voted using a post office box as their registration address, 4,926 individuals voted after canceling their Georgia voter registration, and 10,315 deceased individuals voted. Furthermore, 395 people voted in Georgia and another state, 15,700 individuals who had changed their address with the postal service voted, and 40,279 people moved across county lines without properly re-registering to vote. These actions violated Georgia's voting laws.

Some people believe voter ID laws are racist and suppress the African American vote because minorities are less likely to have required IDs, lack access to DMVs, and face internet access barriers. They also cite felony disenfranchisement in swing states like Florida. In East Harlem, when asked about these claims, black people stated they carry ID and know others who do as well. They found it strange to suggest otherwise. They also knew the location of the DMV and how to get there. They stated they have internet access and know how to use it, calling the opposing claims "stupid" and "ignorant," with some suggesting racism. They had no problem with showing ID to vote.

North Carolina, there are significant issues with voter registrations. Since the start of the year, there have been 499,566 total registrations. Notably, 110,462 lack information on race, sex, or ethnicity. Additionally, 149,699 do not have a North Carolina driver's license or ID, and 274,589 have no recorded birth state. This raises concerns about the integrity of the registration process.

Some people may struggle with voter ID laws because not everyone has easy access to copy their ID. It's important to consider the impact on rural communities without nearby copy services. While proving identity is necessary, it should not be overly burdensome.

Voter ID laws are a vestige of post-slavery laws where Black people had to prove their right to vote, often failing due to tests or lack of appropriate ID. These laws also affect married women whose passports may differ from their birth certificates or driver's licenses. Less voter ID laws allows more people to vote, which is how most democracies operate, unlike the United States.

Mail-in ballots are problematic, and so is the lack of voter ID requirements. It's baffling that some argue against needing ID to vote, especially since IDs are required for many everyday activities, like getting a driver's license. Recently, Gavin Newsom signed a bill prohibiting inquiries about voter ID status, raising questions about the rationale behind it. At the Democratic National Convention, extensive identification was required for attendees, yet voting—an essential civic duty—does not have the same requirement. Many people, including Democrats, believe voter ID should be mandatory, but some politicians oppose it, possibly to facilitate cheating. Ultimately, it's hard to understand why there would be resistance to ensuring the integrity of the voting process.

Governor Tim Wall signed the driver's license for all bill into law, allowing all Minnesotans to obtain a driver's license regardless of immigration status. One speaker stated that instead of changing the politician, the goal is to change the voter. Allowing undocumented immigrants to have an ID is considered un-American, and the speaker believes the intention is to flood the market with illegal voters, given concerns about free and fair elections. The speaker claims this policy will allow millions of people to have an ID. The speaker believes that taxpaying and everyday Americans find this policy disgusting and outrageous, and that policymakers are not listening to the concerns of the public.

Mail-in ballots pose significant issues. Voter ID requirements are also contentious, with arguments against them often lacking clarity. It's perplexing why some oppose having ID, especially since it's required for many everyday activities, like obtaining a driver's license. Recently, Gavin Newsom signed a bill prohibiting inquiries about voter ID, raising questions about the rationale behind such a decision. In contrast, organizations like the Democratic National Convention require extensive identification for their events. If ID is necessary for various transactions, why not for voting, which is crucial? Many citizens, including Democrats, support voter ID, but some politicians resist it, possibly to maintain opportunities for fraud. Ultimately, the lack of voter ID raises concerns about the integrity of elections.

It is against the law for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. However, some states are not requiring proof of citizenship when noncitizens register to vote. Governor Glenn Youngkin in Virginia issued an executive order to clean up voting rules. The Biden administration's Department of Justice sued the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia to try to prevent them from cleaning up their voter rolls. This creates doubt and concern because everyone should want the law to be followed.

This bill is like a poll tax because getting a proof of citizenship document costs money, unless states provide it for free. It's like the Jim Crow poll tax of 2024, and we should reject it.

In Georgia, there were several instances of illegal voting. This includes felons voting, underage individuals registering to vote before they turned 17.5 years old, people voting without being registered, and individuals using post office boxes to register. Additionally, there were cases of people voting after registering in another state, voting after moving across county lines without re-registering, and even deceased individuals voting. These actions violated Georgia laws and resulted in thousands of illegal votes.

It is against the law for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. However, some states do not require proof of citizenship when noncitizens register to vote. Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin issued an executive order to clean up the state's voting rules. The Biden-Harris administration Department of Justice sued the governor and the Commonwealth of Virginia to prevent them from cleaning up their voter rolls. This creates doubt and concern in the minds of many Americans.

A crowd gathered at the Saint Paul Armory after the governor signed a measure making driver's licenses available broadly, described as “driver’s licenses for all,” effectively serving as a photo ID for all residents, regardless of citizenship. The discussion then centers on how these licenses interact with voting and registration processes. One speaker notes that if someone comes in with a driver’s license, they would receive a photo ID and register accordingly, even if their social security number is incorrect or missing. The concern raised is whether that person, after obtaining a driver’s license, could then cast a vote despite incomplete registration information. The dialogue explores the potential for a non-citizen who possesses a driver’s license to participate in elections. In response, another participant—referred to as the chair—addresses the procedure for handling incomplete registrations. The chair explains that the designation on the roster for someone whose registration is incomplete can be resolved if the person presents an acceptable identification document. In such a case, the challenge from the roster would be cleared, and the individual would be permitted to cast a ballot. A subsequent aside acknowledges the potential problem inherent in this approach, with a speaker named Anderson prompting clarification. The core question remains: could a person who is not a citizen, but who presents a driver’s license at the voting point, be permitted to vote? The chair provides a definitive statement regarding eligibility: at both the time of registration and at the time of submitting a ballot, every voter signs an attestation affirming their eligibility to vote, including that they meet all eligibility requirements that they are a US citizen. This underscores the requirement that, despite the availability of driver’s licenses to a broad population, the attestation of citizenship remains a binding condition for voting. The exchange highlights a tension between broad ID access and the constitutional requirement of citizenship for voting, with the chair reiterating that citizenship is required to vote, even if driver’s licenses are issued more inclusively.

In Georgia, there were several instances of illegal voting. This includes felons voting, underage individuals registering to vote before they turned 17.5 years old, people voting without being registered, and individuals using post office boxes to register. Additionally, there were cases of people voting after registering past their registration date, voting while deceased, voting in multiple states, and voting after changing their address. There were also individuals who moved across county lines but failed to properly re-register in their new county. These actions violated Georgia law.

We work for a company registering Hispanic voters. Visited a Georgia complex, found 14% noncitizens registered to vote. Georgia has 339,000 noncitizens, potentially 47,000 registered. Biden won by 12,000 votes. 2024 election at risk.

The speakers claim that noncitizens could sway elections if even a small percentage voted, alleging it's easy for them to register. They say there are no federal requirements for states to verify citizenship before voter registration. A proposed Republican bill to mandate proof of citizenship is expected to fail in the Senate. They cite Title 18 US Code 611, stating noncitizens can vote in federal elections if they reasonably believed they were citizens. They suggest that migrants granted asylum could claim they thought they could vote, avoiding penalties. They claim states like New York allow voter registration without ID or a Social Security number, only requiring a utility bill or similar document. One speaker alleges Democrats are working to conceal the number of illegal votes cast. They argue that providing noncitizens with benefits and pressuring them to register to vote is a deliberate strategy to gain illegal votes. They suggest a scenario where Chinese nationals could register and vote for Biden to avoid Trump's tariffs, calling it election interference. They conclude that illegal votes disenfranchise citizens and that Democrats prefer noncitizens over US citizens.

In California and New York, it is illegal to ask for or show ID when people vote. According to the speakers, there is no logical reason for this law other than to facilitate election fraud. To commit fraud, one would eliminate the need for ID and allow mail-in ballots.