reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 discusses Christopher Krebs, former head of CISA, claiming: Krebs weaponized his position against free speech in the election context and in the context of the COVID-19 presidential memorandum, and that he might have instructed the Department of Justice and other parts of government to investigate what Krebs participated in while head of CISA. Speaker 1 asserts they did not know Krebs personally, but that he came out right after the election, which was a “rigged election, badly rigged election.” He claims the country’s outcomes included open borders and millions entering the country, and asserts that “Russia and Ukraine, that would have never happened,” and that “October 7 would have never happened,” followed by the Afghanistan withdrawal with “13 dead, but so many killed, actually. I mean, so many so many killed outside of the 13 soldiers, hundreds of people killed.” He says, “and maybe, I don’t know, never,” but mentions it, that Krebs was saying the election was great, adding that “it’s been proven that it was not only not great.” He cites lawyers and law firms signing on, “giving us hundreds of millions of dollars,” and claims the election was proven by legislatures not approving, and other forms from “the all of the different, scamming operations,” describing it as a very corrupt election in which COVID was used to cheat. Speaker 1 contends Krebs claimed, “we’ve proved this is the most secure election in the history of our country,” describing the result as a disaster. He insists they should adopt “paper ballots, same day voting, voter ID,” and proposes adding a certificate showing citizenship before voting—“a citizen piece of paper that says you’re a citizen before you can vote.” He reiterates support for voter ID, paper ballots, and same-day voting. He describes events: if you don’t have same-day voting, they change the air, move boxes, and then don’t bring the boxes back, implying a lack of safety in elections. He asserts that elections must have borders and, ideally, a free press, which he claims we do not have, calling the press dishonest. Speaker 1 concludes that Krebs is a “fraud” and a “disgrace,” and says, “We’ll find out whether or not he was right,” promising that Krebs “has a big price to pay” if the election wasn’t safe, labeling Krebs as “a bad guy.” He also states he has no idea who Krebs is, though acknowledges Krebs “was in the room at some point,” and ends by noting that the last two points are important for the country.

Speaker 1 respects the right of people to vote for the president. However, it is questioned why, for the first time in American history, a president won every swing state while also being best friends with and having their largest donation from a man who owns and runs the Internet. It is hoped that this will be investigated to determine if it was an anomaly. It is curious, especially since Kamala Harris was filling up stadiums with supporters, while Donald Trump was not. As an American and believer in democracy, Speaker 1 hopes to look at all the reasons why this happened in the country.

Catherine Engelbrecht and Greg Phillips from Truth to Vote have done an incredible job. They have uncovered more fake votes than anyone in the country. They have evidence on tape, and we appreciate their hard work. We need to prepare and keep those tapes handy because we will all need them as a country. Thank you for your fantastic and patriotic work.

The speaker serves on the armed services committee, overseeing cyber efforts and receiving quarterly classified briefings. After a recent briefing from the intelligence committee and Department of Defense, the speaker believes that the listeners and Tim Pool were victims of a Russian malign influence campaign. The speaker emphasizes that they were not involved or solicitous, but rather the victims. The speaker feels obligated to share this perception, based on access to intelligence and evidence, because the listeners and Tim Pool have been unfairly smeared. The speaker believes it's clear they were victims of Russian election interference, and that's how it should be portrayed.

Tulsi Gabbard is described as "doing a great job" in the speaker’s view, with an aside that includes the word "Whisk." The speaker notes that Gabbard "took a lot of heat two days ago because she went in at Pam's insistence," and that she "looked at votes that wanna be checked out from Georgia." The question is raised aloud: "They say, why is she doing it? Right, Pam? Why is she doing it?" The response given is that the reason is "Because Pam wanted her to do it." The speaker emphasizes the motive by stating, "And you know why? Because she's smart." The dialogue then references a belief that others suggested the action was tied to Gabbard’s position or stance, saying, "they said, well, this has to do her position. Has to do it's really not so, but her position has to do with international." The speaker counters that line of thinking by invoking a different narrative about international affairs and election interference. The speaker recalls the longstanding chorus that has claimed Russia, Russia, Russia has been meddling in elections, noting, "the same people that said that, they've been saying Russia, Russia, Russia has been screwing our elections." The speaker then contemplates the possibility that Russia "had something to do with it," but follows with, "They say, no. No. Russia didn't have." The implication is that the narrative on foreign interference has shifted, leading to the assertion that "now they're saying Russia had nothing to do with it." The speaker adds a broader hypothetical, stating, "Because if I say Russia, that it's perfectly fine. But you could add China and about five other countries to it." Amid these discussions, the speaker reiterates praise for Tulsi Gabbard: "But she's done a great job, and Pam has done a fantastic job, and we appreciate it both." The closing lines suggest a personal note about not having seen the person in a while: "I haven't seen you in a couple of times. And I have one of..." The remainder of the sentence is cut off in the transcript.

The speaker states that, regarding election security, everyone must acknowledge egregious behavior and foreign influence, of which there is direct evidence. Other foreign partners also have evidence and were watching attacks on the election system on November 3rd. They are willing to provide that evidence directly to the president, and this evidence was received today. These foreign partners and allies are willing to help. The speaker concludes that foreign influence against election security and the SolarWinds system is dangerous, and more must be done.

Speaker 0: You broke this incredible story about NSA intercepts showing Ukrainian officials basically discussing a plot to funnel back millions in American aid money back to the Biden 2024 campaign through, you know, none other than USAID. I mean Yeah. Really, I guess it shouldn't surprise us anymore, but it should shock us. You know, can you walk us through it and, you know, what else we need to know? Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's give everybody a little quick history lesson because the context of this is important. In 2016, we know that The US the Ukrainian embassy in The United States was advocating for Hillary Clinton's campaign. They the ambassador even wrote an op ed doing so. Yeah. In the period before that, they were enriching the Ukrainian gas company. Barisma was enriching Joe Biden's son Hunter. So Ukrainians generally have had a leftward lurch in their support in the American political system, sometimes very overtly, like putting Hunter Biden on the board or Burisma or their ambassador writing an op ed saying they would prefer Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump in 2016. Then we get through the whole impeachment scandal. We're told, don't believe any of that Ukrainian liberal preference. Turns out it was all true. It wasn't a conspiracy theory. Hunter Biden and the Democratic party were deeply entangled with the Ukrainian government, Ukrainian businesses. And we lived through that. Joe Biden's in the White House. And in 2022 and early twenty three, his fundraising is lagging even though he's the incumbent. He's got the problems with the Afghanistan withdrawal, questions about his mental acuity, enormous unpopularity, particularly when it comes to an open border. And so it's at that moment when NSA guys with headphones on are listening and they intercept a series of conversations. Some of these are probably on email. And it's a senior government official in the Ukrainian government of president Zelenskyy talking about a plot, that has been discussed with USAID workers, our foreign aid agency workers in Kyiv to give a $2,300,000,000 clean energy grant to Ukraine. Now Ukraine's in the middle of a war with Russia. The last thing they're gonna be building is some clean energy project. They're trying Speaker 0: to They're not building solar panels and you're getting bombed every day. It's probably not a great use of a panel. Speaker 1: Complete ruse. And they even say so. Listen, the intercept suggests that this is not gonna be a justified project. But you'll spend the money, and then by the time they discover it, won't it be recoverable. And the goal is take that money, then you're gonna give it to nongovernmental organizations, nonprofits, then they're gonna hire subcontractors with the USAID money. And then those subcontractors are gonna hire American companies. And those American companies are then gonna move the money into the coffers of Joe Biden's 2024 campaign and the Democratic National Committee. And they said they hope to arrange this in such a way that 90% of the money that originally came from you and I taxpayers through USAID to Ukraine would ultimately be laundered into the DNC and Joe Biden to help his 2024 campaign. That's what's been captured. That was only recently discovered. That intercept or series of intercepts were not ever brought to the attention of anyone at the FBI or anyone during the Biden years. Tulsi Gabbard just recently found it. She's asked the USAID to go look and see if they can find the contract. Did it happen? Was there some fraud involved? And so there's a beginning of an investigation to find out what whether whether what was discussed ultimately transpired, and we should know answers in a couple of weeks. Speaker 0: I mean, do we trust

Speaker 1 is asked about their previous tweets regarding Trump and Brian Kemp stealing elections. Speaker 1 dismisses the comparison as ridiculous and clarifies that they were referring to the threat to voting rights at that time.

The speaker advocates for a return to paper ballots, stating Russia cannot hack them. The speaker contrasts this with Kamala Harris.

The speaker states that the promise was to put America first, and believes there are still voices in the administration, such as J.D. Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and RFK Junior, who could prevail. However, they were not persuasive in this case, but somebody was. The speaker claims that APAC, the Israeli lobby in congress, is very persuasive. The speaker observes that their colleagues' social media feeds all look the same, tweeting the same message about supporting Israel.

Maria Zak, from Nations in Action, discusses alleged foreign interference affecting U.S. elections, presenting secondhand intelligence and personal testimony to support claims of a coordinated global operation. Key assertions and narrative: - The Italian Secret Service reportedly received information from Arturo’s girlfriend (who considers him a husband) whose uncle is part of Italian intelligence. She said Arturo came home and questioned why America’s election was being stolen, prompting an investigation by Leonardo after conversations with Arturo. Arturo allegedly confesses, and Italian intelligence claims to be watching a coup d'etat in the United States. - Two affidavits from Italian citizens were delivered to Congress. Italian intelligence agencies reportedly attempted to reach out because their country had fallen, and they describe worldwide corruption with China buying off politicians, influencing and using fraud to control countries and property. - Maria Zak plans to play an audio tape she says should shock America. She notes she has testified before and asserts credentials in government affairs. She argues that Kansas was a pro-Trump elector victor but contends the “real result” of the election is unknown to the public, along with undisclosed happenings in Italy. - Alleged movements related to Leonardo, a defense contracting firm, are described: people moving from Frankfurt to the Italian US embassy in Rome (Via Veneto) supposedly to collaborate with Leonardo to alter the U.S. election results. She claims 47 to 52 presidential elections globally and more than 200 telemetry experts speaking various languages, framing this as a calculated effort to topple presidencies and control countries. - An audio recording is presented from an individual described as a former CIA and State Department member named Larry Johnson. Johnson purportedly explains efforts to contact a lawyer, arrangements to extradite an individual (Arturo Delia) who would testify, and a plan involving witness protection and an airplane; Johnson urges Maria Zak to contact him. - Zak asserts that this “transcript” demonstrates proof and calls for immediate investigations by local, state, and federal law enforcement into Larry Johnson’s activities in the United States during the event. She emphasizes the “if you see something, say something” principle and states witnesses filed many affidavits. - Specific Georgia-related voting irregularities are cited: over 35,000 illegal cross-county votes, with cross-reference to state documents and USPS data showing voters did not reside where they voted; claims of fake residences, photocopied ballots, stacks fed into tabulators, and many fake, unfolded absentee ballots. She notes zero arrests among the thousands of affidavits filed by Nations in Action. - Individuals connected to the alleged international plot are named: Stefano Serafini (a former state department member who allegedly retired days before the election to avoid consequences), General Claudio Graziano (EU commander at the time), Ignacio Moncada (CEO of FATA SPA, a Leonardo subsidiary), and Charles Robinson (a telemetry expert who allegedly uploaded Mil-Spec software a week before the election and traveled from Frankfurt). Zak states they met at the Saint Regis Hotel to coordinate the plan and claims the Italian intelligence services provided her with Graziano’s go-order cellphone number.

Speaker 0 is being accused of spreading a Russian plan, but this claim is dismissed by both parties and former heads of the CIA. The accusation is considered garbage and not believed by anyone, including Speaker 0's friend Bernie.

Eric Swalwell allegedly had a relationship with a Chinese spy named Fang Fang, who fundraised for his campaign and donated money to him. Fang Fang reportedly placed staff in Swalwell's office before fleeing the country after being discovered. Separately, Eric Swalwell was recorded grabbing himself on live television. The speaker contrasts this with accusations that the president used taxpayer dollars to solicit the Ukrainians' help to cheat in an election.

Tulsi Gabbard released new evidence asserting that former president Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. She claims that while publicly maintaining a peaceful transfer of power, Obama privately worked to sow discord and sabotage his successor, and that the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence used to justify baseless smears against Trump to delegitimize his victory before he took the oath of office. She contends that Trump never had anything to do with Russia and that the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud known to be false by Obama and others, including former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and more. Gabbard says the report confirms there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, but rather by Obama and weaponized intelligence agencies, with the Russia hoax being a lie driven by Democrat political operatives approved by Obama and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump and his first administration. She asserts that allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some having their lives destroyed due to the lie. According to her, the first two years of Trump’s presidency were consumed by debunking these lies at the highest government levels. She notes that nearly ten years later, declassification of documents shows the truth, vindicating Trump, his family, and his allies. She claims this new evidence strengthens the case that those who sabotaged a duly elected president did grave harm to the republic. Gabbard credits CIA Director Ratcliffe, Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, and the declassification of a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, which she says shows the intel community did not have any direct information that Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect Trump in 2016; instead, Russia was actively preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory, but, at Obama’s unusual direction, the intel community published implausible intelligence to sabotage the incoming president. She describes this as one of the greatest political scandals in American history and contends that Legacy outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post were awarded Pulitzer Prizes for perpetuating the hoax, arguing it’s time those awards be stripped for journalism that propagates political disinformation in service of the Democrat Party and certain intelligence officials.

The discussion centers on allegations of foreign and domestic interference in the 2020 U.S. election and related vulnerabilities in mail-in voting. - A 2020 FBI intelligence memo warned that China might have been sending fake driver’s licenses into the U.S. to create fake mail-in ballots intended to help Joe Biden win. The memo, reportedly corroborated by licenses intercepted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in Chicago, was allegedly dismissed and not investigated because it would reflect badly on Trump. There are claims that intelligence reports were requested to be destroyed under federal records rules to prevent leaks before the election, as the memo allegedly indicated China preferred Joe Biden over Donald Trump. - A 60 Minutes segment quoted the head of Homeland Security’s cyber security division stating there were no foreign intrusions in the 2020 election, which is asserted as false by the speakers, citing later indictments of Iranians in Manhattan in 2021 for interfering in the election by hacking a state database to obtain voter IDs used in a malinformation operation. - In Colorado, it is claimed that 670 Dominion passwords from 63 out of 64 counties were exposed on the secretary of state’s public website since June, and that these passwords were known to Secretary of State Jenna Griswold during a trial but not disclosed to clerks. There are accusations that this could imply compromised elections, referencing fraudulent activity in Mesa County and asserting that passwords beyond Colorado were involved with Dominion machines. Dominion’s Colorado base is noted, with a claim that Dominion also has ties to Serbia. A video referenced by Gary Brunson is suggested to support these claims about the origins of the electoral manipulation. - A video and related claims allege a connection to a 30-year CIA whistleblower and trace the origins of the alleged election manipulation to Venezuela and Hugo Chávez, tying in references to Patrick Byrne and broader alleged corruption. - The speakers assert there was a second country deeply involved in meddling in the election, with FBI involvement in August 2020 in recognizing a Chinese operation to mass-produce fake U.S. driver’s licenses and mail-in ballots to influence the election in favor of Biden, describing the operation as designed to help Biden beat Trump. Customs and Border Protection reportedly intercepted 20,000 fake driver’s licenses, corroborating the intelligence, while the Biden administration and the Chris Wray-led FBI allegedly covered this up for five years until the document was provided to Chuck Grassley by Kash Patel. - It is claimed that China viewed mail-in ballots as an enormous vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic, exploiting the weakness in the system, and that this concern remains for states lacking strong mail-in voting security. - Additional notes include a claim that there were tightened voting laws in several states post-2020, with increased confidence in the system where tightened; an arrest by HSI Miami and partners of a permanent resident Haitian national for unlawful voting and casting a false ballot; and estimates that 130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with the trailer disappearing. - The final claim references tens of thousands of fake voters having illegally cast ballots in the November election, implying broad down-ballot effects across Senate, Congress, and local elections.

First speaker: Calls the indictment unjust and says intimidation tactics have been pervasive, with weeks showing different members seeking sanctuary in hopes of intimidating and distracting from the Epstein files. They look forward to their day in court to prove themselves and state the truth. If Congress becomes about intimidation and scare tactics, especially attacking minorities, they will keep fighting for the district. They have received much support and will continue fighting until the district gets fair prices, housing, and fair representation in Congress. They note that those who hate the fight will come for them. They urge some colleagues to step down or resign, arguing they weren’t elected by those who are in the district. They insist they will keep fighting for the people and work to ensure only those who elected them make decisions. They reiterate that they are here for the people. Second speaker: Questions about the investigation into the congresswoman’s families, stating that this is part of congressional duties. They say the congresswoman is under investigation for congressional ethics regarding violations of campaign finances and assert that she must answer to the people of her district.

The speaker states they haven't called European or US leaders in a while, but are open to contact and exchange information through channels like the foreign ministry. They claim it's not for them to determine US elections, but if they had a favorite candidate, it used to be Joe Biden. The speaker says Biden recommended supporting Harris, and that is what they are going to do.

The speaker discusses foreign interference in elections and questions why the president is not pursuing this avenue. They mention evidence of votes being sent overseas and foreign actors meddling in elections. The speaker then explains how voter rolls are kept in foreign nations, such as Pakistan, and how fake ballots are attributed to registered voters who have not yet voted. They reveal that 171,000 blank fake ballots were dropped into the system and attributed to different people, ultimately benefiting the Democratic candidates. The speaker concludes by stating that there are other aspects of foreign involvement in elections.

Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, released new evidence alleging that former President Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. The speaker asserts that while Obama publicly appeared to support a peaceful transfer of power, privately he took steps to sow discord and sabotage Trump, including manufacturing and politicizing intelligence that was used to justify baseless smears against the new president. The claim is that Trump had no involvement with Russia and that the Russia collusion narrative was a massive fraud, known to Obama and others involved, including former CIA director John Brennan, former DNI James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and others. The speaker reiterates that DNI Gabbard’s report confirms there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, attributing any wrongdoing to Barack Obama and the “weaponized” intelligence agencies of the time. The Russia hoax is characterized as a blatant lie manufactured by Democrat political operatives, approved by Obama, and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump in his first administration. Allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some personally harmed by the false narrative. The speaker notes that much of this occurred during Trump’s first two years in office, consuming vast resources, time, and political capital to debunk the allegations at the highest levels of government. According to the speaker, nearly a decade later, declassification of documents by DNI Gabbard, alongside contributions from CIA Director Ratcliffe and committee Chairman Rick Crawford, supports a newly declassified 2020 report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. This report reportedly found the intel community did not have direct information that Vladimir Putin sought to help elect Trump in 2016; instead, Russia was allegedly preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory. The narrative claims that, at the time, Obama’s unusual stance led the intel community to publish implausible intelligence to sabotage the incoming president. The speaker asserts this constitutes one of the greatest political scandals in American history, noting that legacy media outlets such as the New York Times and the Washington Post were rewarded with Pulitzer Prizes for propagating political disinformation. The claim is made that those awards should be stripped from journalists who disseminated out-of-context and false intelligence to push a political narrative in service of the Democrats and associated intelligence actors.

The transcript centers on a heated, interconnected discussion about Tucker Carlson, U.S. politics, and the perceived influence of Israel, the Israel lobby, and foreign interests on American public discourse. The participants volley accusations, defenses, and conspiracy theories, with several notable claims and counterclaims. - The opening segment portrays Tucker Carlson as a target of powerful actors. Speaker 0 argues that Netanyahu and others have labeled Carlson a problem, suggesting that calling him a “fox in a henhouse” is a veiled call for violence and censorship. They warn that such rhetoric could provoke political suppression or harm toward Carlson, and they reference debates over whether Carlson’s anti-war stance and Iran policy have drawn attacks from prominent Israel-first voices. - The conversation shifts to alleged political interference and investigations. Speaker 0 references Kash Patel and a mid-September claim that Patel confronted J. D. Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and others about an investigation, asserting Patel was told not to involve certain intelligence matters or foreign involvement in domestic issues. They describe “the Israel lobby literally run by Netanyahu” as attacking Carlson and pressing to “neutralize” him. There is also a claim that Democrats celebrated or advocated harm against Charlie Kirk and that “six trainees” in a town suggested Kirk would be dead the next day, though no evidence is presented for these claims. - Speaker 1 introduces a harsh critique of Carlson, saying he is “the most dangerous anti-Semite in America,” accusing him of aligning with those who celebrate Nazis, defend Hamas, and criticize Trump for stopping Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The comment emphasizes that Carlson is not MAGA, and asserts a leadership role for Carlson in a modern-day Hitler youth narrative. - The dialogue between Speakers 0 and 2 (Adam King) delves into broader political positioning. Adam King says Carlson “left MAGA,” that MAGA is a big tent whereas Carlson seeks a smaller, more controlled sphere, and that Carlson is working against the Trump agenda by attempting to influence 2028 considerations. Speaker 0 counters, arguing Tucker covers a wide range of topics and remains central to the movement, not simply fixated on Israel. - There is debate about the influence of Jewish voters and donors on the 2024 campaign, with back-and-forth estimates of Jewish contributions and skepticism about the degree to which Jews will back Vance or other candidates. The participants discuss antisemitism accusations, censorship, and the difficulty of debating these topics. They criticize the idea of labeling people antisemitic as a manipulation tactic and urge more open dialogue. - The dialogue touches on the media landscape and the limits of speaking on both sides. Adam King argues for more balanced dialogue and warns that the current rhetoric—terms like “neutralize”—fuels violence. He expresses concern about online harassment of Jews and the normalization of violent language in political discourse. - There are tangential conversations about foreign influence in U.S. affairs. Adam King mentions Qatar, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and other foreign money; he cites a Newsmax report about Mamdani’s foreign funding and discusses debates over whether Qatar has a U.S. airbase or is primarily involved in training programs. The participants debate where influence truly lies, whether with Soros, the left, or other actors. - The segment ends with a mix of promotional content and entertainment, including a satirical insert about Ultra Methylene Red, a product advertised with claims about cognitive and physiological benefits, followed by fictional, humor-laden banter about “Batman” and “the Riddler” reacting to the product. In sum, the transcript captures a multi-faceted, contentious exchange over Carlson’s position in the MAGA movement, accusations of antisemitism and censorship, perceived foreign influence in U.S. politics, and the tensions within the right-wing ecosystem, all interwoven with promotional and humorous interludes.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard unveiled new evidence alleging that former president Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. The private actions contrasted with publicly presented peaceful transfer of power, as Obama allegedly sought to sow discord and sabotage his successor. The released evidence purportedly confirms that the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence that was later used to justify baseless smears against President Trump in an effort to delegitimize his victory before he took the oath of office. The speaker asserts that President Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and that the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetuated from the start, with Obama and others allegedly knowing the truth. The speaker names several officials as part of the alleged scheme: former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and other officials. The report is said to corroborate that there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, but rather wrongdoing by Barack Obama and the weaponized intelligence agencies at the time. The Russia hoax is described as a blatant lie, devised by Democrat political operatives, approved by Obama, and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump and his first administration. Allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some having their lives destroyed due to the allegations. The speaker notes that the first two years of Trump’s presidency were overshadowed by this fake distraction, with extensive resources, time, and political capital spent debunking the lies from the highest levels of government. Nearly ten years later, declassification of documents by the director is said to reveal the truth, vindicating Trump, his family, and allies who were smeared. The speaker claims there is now damning evidence implicating those who attempted to sabotage a duly elected president and harmed the republic. Thanks to work by CIA Director Ratcliffe and committee Chairman Rick Crawford, a newly declassified 2020 report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, declassified by DNI Gabbard, allegedly finds that the intel community did not have direct information that Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect Trump in 2016; rather, Russia was preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory, but was allegedly steered by Obama’s unusual direction to publish implausible intelligence suggesting otherwise to sabotage the incoming president. The speaker describes this as one of the greatest political scandals in American history and criticizes reporters from legacy outlets, including the New York Times and Washington Post, who allegedly continued to propagate the hoax, saying they were awarded Pulitzer Prizes for disinformation. The call is made for those awards to be stripped from journalists who produced disinformation in service of the Democrat Party and certain intelligence officials.

I'm confirming that Tulsi Gabbard has appointed someone with a history of being untrustworthy, potentially aiding adversarial nations. In Connecticut, the leading Democratic candidate in a major US Senate race is facing scrutiny after being caught misrepresenting his military service. Richard Blumenthal, the state attorney general, previously stated he served in Vietnam, but reports indicate he received five wartime deferments and served stateside in the Marine Reserves. I misspoke, and I won't let a few misplaced words tarnish my record of service to our country. However, video evidence exists of Blumenthal claiming he was in Vietnam.

Speaker 0: By a member of the Ukrainian parliament. Let's talk about the tape recording evidence. Speaker 1: We don't know. Yeah. We don't know much about it because it's floating around Ukraine, but we do know the general prosecutor of Ukraine, our equivalent of the attorney general, came on our show this morning and said the following. There's enough evidence for me to open up a criminal investigation into the illicit effort by a Ukrainian to try to influence the United States election in favor of Hillary Clinton. That's a profound statement coming from the top law enforcement official of Ukraine. Why is it important? There's a court in Ukraine that's already concluded that, Ukrainian officials leaked Paul Manafort's financial records to try to sway the US election. You haven't heard anything about that in the American press, but that ruling occurred recently. Then a parliamentary member comes out and says, I have a tape of these law enforcement officials saying they did it specifically to help Hillary Clinton. That becomes the foundation of the Ukrainian investigation. Speaker 0: You have talked to people that have heard this tape. Correct? Speaker 1: Well, the, the prosecutor himself has heard the tape and said it was important enough, good enough evidence to warrant opening the investigation. So the tape, the court ruling, the top prosecutor in Ukraine says there was a foreign power Speaker 0: Two separate issues here. Number one Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Did Ukrainian officials offered us evidence that, in fact, they were involved in election interference in 2016 to help Hillary Clinton's campaign? But why didn't anybody in in the media pursue the interference story? And I thought they cared about interference, but, obviously, only if it's Russian interference and Trump because we know they don't care about the dirty Russian dossier. Speaker 1: That's right. Keep in mind that just a few months ago, Sean, we reported on your on your show and inside the hill that Ukraine's embassy in Washington confirmed on the record that back in 2016, the Democratic National Committee trying to help Hillary Clinton get elected asked the Ukraine Embassy to help interfere in the election by doing two things, dig up dirt on Paul Manafort and have Ukraine's president make a kerfuffle here in Washington about Manafort and Trump when he came to visit. Now the Ukrainians say they they rebuffed that attempt, but Hillary Clinton's campaign, the DNC, made that request according to the, Ukraine embassy in