reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and the issuance of executive orders by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the government, developers, and regulators from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and leading to the funding and reinforcement of the program by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the products, people involved, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

Speaker 0 argues that anyone can file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy and demand arrests and prosecutions. He points to a 2013 press release claiming that DARPA awarded Moderna Therapeutics up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics, noting that DARPA is the Pentagon and claiming the Pentagon bought, paid for, and envisioned these mRNA shots. He contends Fort Detrick was involved in developing COVID-19 at the UNC BSL-3 and asserts the Pentagon is on both sides of the argument, developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines. Speaker 1 asks whether there is any liability shield for deploying a biowarfare weapon and whether the narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is a SIOP. Speaker 0 agrees that civil liability is separate from criminal liability, stating in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny that executives at companies developing these mRNA shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He cites a Portugal report claiming that upwards of 300,000 Americans had been murdered by the mRNA Franken shots and invokes the JAB resolution, describing it as a Nuremberg crime against humanity and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. He defines a Nuremberg crime against humanity as murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against civilians. Speaker 1 asks about liability for government officials who approved the vaccines. Speaker 0 says FDA officials who approved the shots could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, noting the FDA’s involvement in developing COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNC BSL-3, including a cited contract listing National Center for Toxicological Research and FDA as contributors. He claims the FDA, which approves the vaccines, was involved in this development. Speaker 1 questions the CDC and media accountability, noting the CDC’s recommendation of the vaccines and media promotion of boosters. Speaker 0 says the CDC, including Director Milensky (appointed by Biden, from Harvard Medical School), is complicit, and claims the CDC has a history dating back to the Reagan administration of handling offensive biological warfare projects, including shipping weaponized agents to Saddam Hussein with implications for U.S. troops after Gulf War I. Speaker 1 asks whether there are lawmakers with intel on gain-of-function biowarfare. Speaker 0 mentions Senator Rand Paul as having a strong understanding, but asserts that some lawmakers were threatened and obstructed after consulting him, recounting an experience with Walter Jones of the House Armed Services Committee who briefly engaged but then did not follow up, implying threats prevented action. Speaker 1 asks how citizens should respond, and Speaker 0 advocates reporting to sheriffs, district attorneys, and state attorneys, noting progress with a Collier County health freedom declaration. They discuss enforcement mechanisms, seizure, and incineration of stockpiles, and trial and sentencing for those responsible. Speaker 0 condemns China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology as a bioweapons lab, alleging it was a Chinese counterpart to Fort Detrick, with the Chinese president seeking his own BSL-4 program and an offensive biowarfare arsenal. Speaker 1 notes U.S. funding and international bioweapons labs, including Ukraine and Taiwan, and ends by referencing Lindsey Graham and a speaker labeled as a professor Boyle.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon used laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies. Documents obtained by a former executive show that the vaccines were not compliant with good manufacturing practices, with extreme variability in adverse events. Clinical trials were deceptive, with subjects and investigators kept in the dark. The National Security Council treated COVID as an act of war, while telling the public it was a health event. The Pentagon's influence extends to multiple agencies, with a secret Pandemic Enterprise formed in 2013. The countermeasures used are prototypes, not fully tested vaccines.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the start, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon employed laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies and avoid proper clinical trials. Documents obtained by a former pharmaceutical executive, Sasha Lydipova, confirm that the vaccines were not good manufacturing practice compliant, with extreme variability in adverse events. The Pentagon's involvement stems from treating COVID-19 as an act of war, with the National Security Council setting policy. The deception extends to censoring lab leak theories and coordinating efforts across multiple agencies. The public was misled about the nature of the vaccines, which were actually prototypes and not subject to proper testing.

The top agencies leading Operation Warp Speed were the NSA and the Pentagon, not public health agencies like HHS, CDC, or NIH. The vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military tractors, with Pfizer and Moderna being paid to put their names on them. The speaker believes that Operation Warp Speed is not new, as it has been happening since 1980 at Fort Detrick, a bioweapons lab. They claim that the government has been involved in unethical practices, such as injecting the military with HIV in the 1990s.

A meeting occurred in June involving biopharma, the military, DARPA, and ASPR, focusing on medical countermeasures. The DOD is planning for a future event, allowing biopharma companies to manufacture countermeasures before FDA approval, similar to how COVID shots were stockpiled. The meeting, titled "Partnering with US government to achieve our national security mission," indicates a planned public health threat that will impact national security. The aim is to advance defense readiness through DOD partnerships for rapid development and deployment of medical countermeasures. AI will be used without safety or efficacy testing, creating dual-use products that could be weaponized. Laws have been rewritten, making the PREP Act seem minor in comparison, potentially deputizing police or doctors as DOD employees. Deployment methods may include spraying schools, cruise ships, or communities, or using transdermal patches, not just injections. DARPA has been funding dual-use products, turning military bioweapons into an industry.

Speaker 0 summarizes a view that public health has been militarized and the military repurposed as a public health front. The term “kill box” is used to describe a geographic or three-dimensional area established for military attacks; the speaker asserts the DOD and WHO aim to render the entire world as their terrain, with the population as all people and the campaign as permanent. Weapons in this campaign are described as informational (propaganda and censorship), psychological (fear and obedience to government), and chemical/biological/radiological/nuclear (referred to as pharmaceuticals, vaccines, but claimed to be toxins and pathogens). The speaker contends this project has centuries-long roots in globalist banking and military interests, intensifying in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act and in the 1930s–40s with public health. By the mid-1960s, they claim, poisons were fraudulently labeled as medicines or vaccines to induce civic duty, citing COVID as an example of coercion (do this or you’ll kill your grandma). The pharmaceutical method is described as enabling plausible deniability and legal impunity, allowing mass harm with less traceable fingerprints. Coercion is described as cascading from the Bank for International Settlements to other federal central banks, then down through state, national, local governments, school districts, hospitals, and beyond. Compliance with masking, testing, isolation, and injections purportedly grants financial access, while noncompliance cuts such access. Legally, the speaker traces a framework beginning in 1969 with a U.S. law to set up chemical and biological warfare programs (50 USC Chapter 32) and the key terms “protective,” “prophylactic,” and “defensive,” used to justify research while arguing that all biologically active products are inherently toxic. The 1983 Public Health Service Act amendment created the Public Health Emergencies Program and a $30 million “slush fund” (still funded under later acts). The 1986 National Vaccine Program and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act established a liability exemption for manufacturers and a compensation program for injuries, later modeled by the countermeasures injury compensation program post-COVID. Internationally, the World Health Organization is described as a military arm of a one-world government, with International Health Regulations amended in 2005 to 2007 to push national systems toward surveillance, detention, quarantine, and forced treatment during international outbreaks. The real aim is shifting sovereignty from nation-states to WHO and BIS upon a public health emergency of international concern. Key years cited include 1997–1998 (Emergency Use Authorization and rehoming CBRN stockpiles), 2000–2002 (Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act, AUMF), and post-9/11 legislation (Patriot Act, Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness, Homeland Security Act), expanding a permanent state of global conflict. From 2003–2009, executive orders, funding, and agency guidance integrated DHS, DOJ, HHS, and DoD, enabling experimental products like vaccines and gene therapies. The Pfizer matter is cited to claim DoD prototypes bypass standard trials and FDA authorization, with government support for early termination of normal processes. Since 2020, the speaker links the WHO declaration of Public Health Emergency of International Concern with domestic PREP Act declarations and subsequent acts (Defense Production Act, Stafford Act, National Emergencies Act) to build a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research and use, while shielding participants from liability and enabling state sovereignty pushback through Article 10 of the Constitution. The speaker argues that these developments threaten constitutions and state protections, calling for increased state authority, and predicts a tipping point with criminal prosecutions, asserting that the actions constitute war crimes.

Public health has been militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and the issuance of medical countermeasures. Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden passed acts and issued executive orders to strengthen the program. This created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease were reclassified as national security threats, allowing for actions without consent. The framework also shields products, individuals, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

Public health has been militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and the issuance of medical countermeasures. Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden passed acts and issued executive orders to strengthen the program. This created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease were reclassified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields products, individuals, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon used laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies and avoid proper clinical trials. Clinical trial subjects and investigators were deceived, and informed consent was not required. The National Security Council treated COVID-19 as an act of war, while telling the public it was a health event. The Pentagon's influence extended to agencies like the FDA and NIH. A secret Cabal called the Pandemic Enterprise was formed in 2013 to discuss countermeasures with strict confidentiality. The so-called vaccines were actually prototypes ordered by the Department of Defense, and people were not informed of this. Safety testing and animal trials were skipped, violating regulations.

Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and leading to the funding and reinforcement of the program by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the products, people involved, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making the DOD the target for lawsuits, which would be difficult to win without the data they are hiding. They believe EcoHealth Alliance created SARS CoV-2 in the Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's approval, transferring the necessary technology to the CCP. A study showed a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent from 2016 perfectly matched SARS CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, suggesting the need to investigate the real history of COVID. They also claim to have Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a Komunardi approval agreeing to a study based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon used laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies and avoid proper clinical trials. The documents obtained by Sasha Lydipova, a former executive of a pharmaceutical contract resource organization, show that the vaccines were not good manufacturing practice compliant and had extreme variability in adverse events. The Pentagon's involvement was part of treating COVID as an act of war, with the National Security Council setting policy. The deception extended to censoring lab leak theories and keeping the public in the dark.

The discussion centers on a Dutch civil litigation in which Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, and Marc Rutemp (Marc Rutza) are named as individual defendants in cases linked to “Project COVID” and broad pandemic preparedness efforts years before the 2020 pandemic. Key facts asserted: - The defendants are plaintiffs in civil tort litigation filed in the Netherlands around 2023. Two cases exist: an older 2023 case and a second case involving additional plaintiffs. The Dutch approach allows individuals to be named as defendants in civil tort actions. - Gates and Bourla (and Rutza) have appeared as defendants; Gates attempted to avoid jurisdiction, but the Amsterdam court ruled that Gates and Bourla, as individuals, respond to the case. They have not appeared in court personally, but their lawyers appear on their behalf. - On March 9, an appeal hearing occurred in Amsterdam at the Court of Appeals, with extensive public attendance (about 60 journalists, podcasters, and plaintiffs). The hearing was described as explosive; a single attorney, Peter Stassen, presented a long argument as co-counsel had been imprisoned and disbarred, leaving one attorney on a tight budget. A video of the proceedings and a standout speech went viral. - The plaintiffs allege the defendants conspired to create “Project COVID” and a “pandemic preparedness racket” years prior to 2020. The core claim is that Gates, Bourla, Rutza, along with others, collaborated with private NGOs, the military, NATO, and DOD through a DARPA-linked pandemic program to identify pandemic potential viruses and to develop vaccines and therapeutics within sixty days, with funding from the DOD. - Evidence cited includes a 2017 AstraZeneca tape in which a key AstraZeneca executive states that DARPA approached them in 2017 to join a consortium to identify pandemic viruses and deliver vaccines within sixty days; the response was, “I thought it was science fiction.” The tape is part of an evidence package showing pre-2020 planning. - February 4, 2020 is highlighted as a crucial date: a telephone call from DARPA indicating COVID was declared a national security threat, followed by retroactive emergency declarations around March 2020. A February 4, 2020 conference was scheduled, with widespread communications among government, military, HHS, and CDC; the aim was to secure liability protection for pharmaceutical countermeasures during a declared emergency. - The defense includes the assertion that the public-private partnership extended to many companies (including 300 others) that joined the consortium, with U.S. and European regulatory synchronization through mutual recognition agreements. - The alleged motives are primarily framed as profits and control, with references to a long-standing history of military involvement in vaccine development and public health measures, including the PREP Act in the U.S. and parallel European countermeasures frameworks that waive liability and regulatory requirements during declared emergencies. The PREP Act’s role — especially in the U.S. — is discussed as shielding manufacturers from liability, with European frameworks described as allowing similar protections through contracts and synchronized countermeasures legislation. - Expert testimonies: five experts have provided evidence supporting foreknowledge and intentional deception by government health officials and the named defendants. Sasha Ladopova and Catherine Watt contributed written testimonies; Ladopova references foreknowledge by health regulators, and the broader regulatory harmonization across EMA and FDA. - Francis Boyle, a professor known for work on bioweapons law, testified that the vaccines/metas could be viewed as bioweapons; he died three weeks after agreeing to testify. - Injuries to plaintiffs: in the initial case, seven injured plaintiffs with one death; the second case added three more plaintiffs. Injuries cited include cardiovascular inflammation, autoimmune conditions, and cancer; plaintiffs contend their lives were destroyed by the countermeasures, while regulators and manufacturers allegedly denied injuries and deaths. What happens next: - An October 22 hearing in the lower court in Lewarden (The Netherlands) is planned, with a public in-person event and a press conference. - The appeal on the second case seeks to have expert witnesses heard under oath; the prior lower court denied this, and the higher court’s decision is anticipated (with expectations of denial, according to the interview). - The campaign invites public interest and financial support; the foundation in the Netherlands funds the case, and the English-language YouTube channel is available for updates and evidence. Contact points for following the case include Sasha Ladopova’s Substack and the Dutch foundation’s YouTube channel and materials.

The virus sequence was posted to GenBank on January 9, 2020, supposedly from a Chinese patient. By January 30th, the CDC claimed a first US case in Washington state. On February 4th, Colonel Matt Hepburn from DARPA told pharmaceutical companies to switch to COVID models because it was a national security threat. Despite only a few reported cases in the US, the DOD was already growing stocks of the virus. This was announced at a press conference in early March. Afterward, we saw an explosion of cases. This wasn't a pandemic; it was a military attack deploying a chemical weapon. The deaths were caused by hospital protocols like remdesivir, ventilators, dehydration, and isolation. The main point was to deploy biological weapons: the shots.

COVID-19 has been a fortunate rescue for vaccine companies tied to the US military. One such company is BioPort, now known as Emergent BioSolutions, which faced controversy over its anthrax vaccine monopoly. The vaccine caused adverse effects and Gulf War Syndrome in US troops. The Pentagon bailed out BioPort multiple times due to safety violations. They partnered with Battelle, known for gain of function research, which involved the anthrax vaccine. However, the 9/11 attacks derailed plans to release a report on the vaccine program. Donald Rumsfeld stepped in to save the program, and concerns about the vaccine disappeared. Today, Moderna faces a similar situation, as COVID-19 saved them from collapse. A slight delay would have spelled their demise.

COVID-19 has been a fortunate rescue for vaccine companies tied to the US military. One such company is Emergent BioSolutions, formerly known as BioPort. They faced controversy over their anthrax vaccine monopoly, which caused adverse effects and Gulf War Syndrome. The Pentagon bailed them out multiple times due to safety violations. They partnered with Battelle, known for gain of function research, and were set to release a report on the anthrax vaccine program in September 2001. However, the 9/11 attacks derailed the inquiry, and Donald Rumsfeld saved the program. Moderna, another company, also benefited from COVID-19, as they were on the verge of collapse. A slight delay in the pandemic would have spelled their demise.

In 2012, DARPA initiated the ADEPT Protect P3 program for pandemic prevention using gene-encoded vaccines. The military had been working on mRNA vaccines since then, not as a response to COVID-19. Operation Warp Speed was not as rapid as claimed, with contractors like Moderna receiving funding in 2013. The military's involvement in developing vaccines and monoclonal antibodies predates the pandemic, with emergency use authorization primarily for military use. The FDA's lack of control over the process reflects its military origin, executed with military precision. No one is exempt from its reach.

In 2012, DARPA started the ADEPT Protect p3 program, aiming to use gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA to prevent pandemics within 60 days. This approach was already in progress when President Trump launched Operation Warp Speed in response to COVID-19. The military had been working on mRNA vaccines since 2012, with Moderna receiving its first contract in 2013. The military has various biological threat programs, including those for Smallpox, Monkeypox, and anthrax. The idea of mRNA vaccines originated from the military, not Pfizer or Moderna, and it was not a direct response to the Wuhan outbreak. Emergency use authorization, primarily for the military, was later applied to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and leading to the funding and reinforcement of the program by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions to be taken without consent. The framework also shields the products, people involved, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

The COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out under a series of laws that allowed the military to take over distribution, bypassing typical clinical trials and safety testing. The FDA's involvement was a "pretend authorization," as their mandate is to regulate interstate commerce of medical products, not countermeasures. The Department of Defense is fully in charge of the development, clinical trials, manufacturing, and distribution of the vaccines, utilizing "other transaction authority" (OTA), initially intended for NASA and weapons procurement. The vaccines are purchased under OTA as demonstration products, exempting them from FDA and CDC authority. Pharmaceutical companies were brought in largely for branding purposes, while the military oversaw manufacturing and distribution through military contractors.

In 2012, DARPA initiated the ADEPT Protect P3 program for pandemic prevention using gene-encoded vaccines. The military had been working on mRNA vaccines since then, not just in response to COVID-19. The rapid development of vaccines under Operation Warp Speed was part of a long-term military program. The FDA's lack of control over the process is due to its military origins. The military approach to vaccine development leaves no one exempt.

Public health has been militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and leading to the funding and reinforcement of the program by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the products, people involved, and government funders from liability and prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.

Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.