reSee.it - Related Video Feed

President Trump announced that Joe Biden stole the 2020 election, citing evidence of auto-penned signatures on documents when Biden was out of DC or the country. According to the speaker, Biden unknowingly reversed a ban on liquid natural gas sales after Speaker Johnson brought it to his attention. Trump and his team are reportedly investigating the Biden White House, with the Justice Department also conducting a criminal investigation. The speaker claims this is now the DOJ's main focus. The speaker alleges that trillions of dollars have been stolen and funneled to Democrats. The speaker says Trump is focusing on pardons and the falsification of evidence related to J6. The speaker also alleges the illegitimacy extends to energy policy, military operations, and the bombing of Russia. The speaker claims indictments are forthcoming, potentially including James Comey. The speaker asserts this issue is bigger than Hunter Biden's laptop and that the Biden presidency and actions are illegitimate.

Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and others received pardons, raising questions about their connections to the NIH funding for the Wuhan lab through EcoHealth Alliance. The January 6th committee had a predetermined agenda. Unlike Biden, who offered pardons to many, I refused to pardon anyone, believing we did nothing wrong. Many individuals, including Bannon and Navarro, suffered significant losses and legal battles. Schiff, a dishonest politician, fabricated the Russia narrative and sought a pardon from Biden, believing he had done something wrong. Tim Scott noted that the call in question was perfect, yet Schiff pushed for impeachment based on false claims. Schiff and his associates should be held accountable for their actions.

The committee is investigating the validity of executive orders and laws, questioning who authorized low-level staffers to sign Joe Biden's name on documents, especially when he was not present at the White House. They cite the Hur report, which concluded Biden couldn't remember dates of his election or family events, suggesting he may not have been mentally fit to make these decisions. The committee aims to determine who gave the authority for these executive orders and pardons, given concerns about Biden's cognitive state, particularly after his debate with Donald Trump. They question the reports from physician Dr. O'Connor, who stated Biden was mentally fit, which they now believe to be untrue.

Former President Trump claims that he is entitled to presidential immunity and criticizes President Biden for not granting him immunity. He argues that he was looking for voter fraud in the 2020 election and found significant evidence. Trump also accuses Biden of allowing a border invasion and mishandling the withdrawal from Afghanistan. He alleges that Biden received money from foreign countries and suggests that he should be indicted. Trump believes that Biden is using the Department of Justice to target him for political reasons and warns that future presidents could face similar treatment. He concludes by stating that indicting a political opponent is unprecedented and undermines the integrity of the country.

Axios reports that Trump's pardons related to January 6 were a last-minute decision. One adviser claimed Trump said, "f it, release them all." Concerns were raised about pardoning violent offenders who attacked the Capitol, with calls for a clear response on whether these actions were justified. The congressman acknowledged the lawbreaking but highlighted that many were charged under federal law without due process. He argued that not all offenders were released and questioned the focus on those pardoned. The discussion shifted to broader issues of law enforcement and accountability, with the congressman suggesting that political motivations influenced the treatment of offenders. Ultimately, he deflected responsibility for potential future crimes committed by released individuals, comparing it to other political figures' actions. The conversation ended without a definitive stance on the pardons.

The January 6th pardons are unacceptable. Notably, President Trump is the only U.S. president to veto a defense bill, which he did in 2020. His reason? He opposed removing Confederate names from military bases, claiming it was a rewriting of history. Recently, he ordered the removal of General Milley's portrait from the joint chiefs of staff wall, which seems contradictory. This raises concerns about what a second term under him would look like and whether it would pose challenges.

Speaker 1 believes there's an open legal challenge regarding the use of an AutoPen for pardons. The typical AutoPen approval process requires signatures from at least five people, including attorneys, policy makers, and the president. Speaker 1 claims President Trump stated that there are no records of these required signatures, and it's unknown who used the AutoPen. Speaker 1 agrees with President Trump that this is a problem. Speaker 1 suggests testing the legality of the pardons by indicting someone who received one.

Biden recently pardoned Mark Milley, Dr. Fauci, and the January 6 committee, which was illegally formed and manipulated evidence. Milley allegedly assured the Chinese general that he had control over nuclear codes, while Fauci misled Congress about gain-of-function research. These actions protect key figures in a larger power structure. Trump is determined to confront these threats, as they have attempted to undermine him. The globalist agenda is increasingly being recognized as deceitful, and the public is growing frustrated. It's crucial to inform the left that their influence is waning. As they continue their destructive behavior, it fuels resistance against their globalist system. The fight against this agenda must continue, and there is a call to dismantle it entirely.

I was going to discuss the January 6 hostages, but there's a lot of action coming on that front. Today, Joe issued pardons for individuals guilty of serious crimes, and the unselect committee has destroyed much of the evidence, including hearings. They deleted information about Nancy Pelosi rejecting an offer of 10,000 soldiers for security. Even 500 could have made a difference that day, despite the large crowd. There are many great photos from that day that aren't shown, focusing instead on the Capitol. I intended to address this, but was advised to wait until tomorrow. I decided to bring it up now.

Thanks for having me. This president has diminished the office and is unworthy of respect. He’s a liar and a criminal, with millions funneled back to the Biden family, particularly regarding Ukraine. Biden's recent pardon of his son Hunter contradicts his earlier claims that no one is above the law. He abandoned allies in Afghanistan and caused chaos in our economy, allowing millions of illegal immigrants into the country. It’s time to consider impeachment. The timing of the pardon seems like an attempt to cover up wrongdoing. This administration is deeply corrupt, and the evidence of bribery is substantial. The current bureaucracy needs a thorough cleaning, and Trump’s upcoming cabinet choices aim to address this mess.

Speaker 0 contends that a large number of pardons were issued by the auto pen on the final day of the Biden presidency, and asserts there is no record showing that Joe Biden participated in the authorization of those pardons. The speaker claims that these pardons include notable examples such as those for Dr. Anthony Fauci, members of the Biden family, Adam Schiff, the January 6 committee, and an extensive list that the speaker describes as continuing at length. The core assertion is that every one of these pardons was signed with the auto pen and there is no evidence that Joe Biden was personally involved in the decision-making process behind them. According to the speaker, the absence of Biden’s involvement in the decision-making is a key element of the argument, and the implication is that this absence of direct participation should be recognized in legal terms. The speaker further states that these pardons could be declared null and void by the Department of Justice. The underlying claim is that there is a basis for such a nullification rooted in the way the pardons were issued, specifically the use of the auto pen and the lack of documented presidential involvement. The speaker also asserts that the ongoing investigation will produce evidence that will support the DOJ’s decision to void the pardons. In this framing, the investigation’s forthcoming findings are presented as capable of reinforcing the claim that the pardons were improperly issued or improperly authorized due to the absence of direct presidential action. The overall narrative presented is one of procedural challenge to the pardons, anchored in the asserted method of issuance (the auto pen) and the supposed lack of Biden’s participation in the process. The speaker emphasizes a sequence in which the pardons, if deemed void, would be reversed or nullified by official action from the Department of Justice, with future investigative evidence expected to validate that outcome in court.

Mister Speaker, President Biden's recent pardons for his family were shocking and unprecedented. It’s hard to believe he would issue pardons for over a decade of nonviolent offenses. Four years ago, when there were hints that President Trump might do something similar, prominent figures like Biden, Schiff, and Schumer condemned it as outrageous. Now, they support Biden's actions, which we find disgusting. This raises suspicions about the so-called "Biden crime family." If they truly weren't involved in wrongdoing, why would they need pardons? This issue will receive significant attention, and we will be examining it closely.

Axios reports that Trump's pardons related to January 6 were a last-minute decision, with Trump instructing his team to "release them all." Concerns arise over pardoning individuals convicted of violent acts during the Capitol attack. One congressman, who was present that day, acknowledges the lawbreaking but argues that many did not receive due process. He defends Trump's decisions, questioning why the media does not focus on those who were not pardoned. The discussion shifts to accountability, with the congressman asserting that if released individuals reoffend, it should not solely fall on Trump, just as Biden shouldn't be blamed for others' actions. The conversation highlights ongoing political divisions and differing perspectives on law enforcement and justice.

Speaker 1 believes there's an open legal challenge regarding the use of an AutoPen for pardons. The typical AutoPen approval process requires signatures from at least five people, including attorneys, policy makers, and the president. Speaker 1 claims President Trump stated that no such signatures exist and the origin of the AutoPen use is unknown. Speaker 1 agrees with President Trump that this is a problem. Speaker 1 suggests testing the legality of the pardons by indicting someone who received one.

The transcript centers on a heated discussion about President Joe Biden’s health, cognitive fitness, and who was calling the shots within the White House during his presidency. Key points and claims raised include: - The campaign and public discourse about the president’s fitness or age were prominent, with questions such as “Was the number one issue in the campaign the president's fitness or his age?” and assertions about visibility, including whether “you ever see president Biden in a wheelchair?” While some speakers note aging and physical signs—“I noticed that, you know, he shuffled more,” and “he has more stumbling over words and gasps than he did” — others maintain confidence in his capabilities, claiming he was “on top of things” and that “his mental acuity is great. It's fine. It's as good as it's been over the years.” - There are allegations of a cover-up by insiders. The narrative asserts “new information now on the people in his inner circle and how the cover up actually operated,” with “Senior aids that worked here until just a couple months ago, the beginning of this year, manipulating an ailing president for their own gain.” A figure asks, “How much were you paid for your role in the campaign in 2024?” with the response “Just a little bit short of $4,000,000.” The implication is that financial incentives influenced actions. - Internal discussions about the president’s decline and how it was handled are described as ongoing. “The official word from Biden world about all these new stories is that nothing has been revealed this week that shows that president Biden was anything but effective president.” There is mention of a senior-level discussion about whether the president should have a cognitive exam. - Testimony from Annie Thomas Seen, former senior adviser to Biden, is presented as significant. She “has now taken the fifth,” and the transcript notes “There is now a pattern of key Biden confidant seeking to shield themselves from criminal liability for this potential conspiracy.” She invokes the Fifth Amendment when asked about being told to lie about the president’s health. - There are explosive claims regarding Hunter Biden’s role. One speaker says, “Hunter was driving the decision making for the family. He was almost like a chief of staff.” There are references to an uptick in activity when Hunter Biden was around, and discussions about pardons for Hunter, with the line “Yes. Were you in favor of Hunter Biden getting a pardon?” indicating support for clemency. - The “auto pen” controversy is described. Speakers discuss whether the president’s name was “hand signed” or “auto pen” used for documents, with questions such as “Did he hand sign all executive orders?” and claims that “the auto bin” or “auto pen” was used and that some believed others may have instructed staff to use it. There is mention that some staff “did not know who was operating the Obalon/auto pen,” and that “an executive order” and “memo” details existed but were not definitively known to those questioned. - Media portrayal and public perception are addressed. Some speakers accuse the legacy media of denial about cognitive decline, while others defend the president’s sharpness, noting that this debate is framed by evolving video and audio coverage, including discussions of “cheap fakes” versus real footage. - Additional context touches on Medicare drug price negotiations as a policy objective, with a line about “the ability of Medicare to negotiate drug prices with big pharma,” and the belief that “if we finally beat Medicare” would be a significant achievement. There are repeated assertions that those who knew and understood cognitive issues took control, implying a broader conspiracy. - Throughout, witnesses emphasize that their statements are contextualized within interviews and testimony, with ongoing questions about who was directing the White House and the true state of the president’s health and decision-making.

Joe Biden is leaving office, having failed to eliminate Trumpism, which remains a powerful force in politics. This reflects poorly on his leadership. Questions arise about Biden's integrity, particularly regarding an 11-year blanket pardon dating back to 2014. The narrative surrounding Biden's presidency is filled with lies, from claims about inflation to the situation in Afghanistan and the border. Critics argue that Biden has misled the public, particularly regarding his son Hunter. There's frustration over the credibility of Biden and his administration, with calls for accountability and a recognition of the dishonesty that has characterized his time in office. The discussion emphasizes the need for honesty in leadership and the consequences of failing to uphold that standard.

"Senator: 'We discovered is that Anthony Fauci was destroying federal records. He was encouraging other people to destroy federal records. That is a crime.' He testified to the house a year ago and said he wasn't doing that. 'That's a crime to perjure himself.' 'We will bring him back. I've asked him to come and testify this fall. If he doesn't come voluntarily, we will subpoena him.' 'The question is, is he immune because of the pardon? I think that that needs to be challenged in court.' 'I have encouraged the Trump administration that they should prosecute this case and challenge the auto pen. I don't think the auto pen is sufficient.' 'There were so many pardons that I'm not sure Biden was aware of all the people he did pardon.' 'There is not a direct link from the person running the auto pen to the president. The person that was running the auto pen never spoke with the president.' 'And I think a president's signature on something so as important as legislation or a pardon is absolutely required.'" "Susan Monarez will testify before the senate HELP committee tomorrow. This will be her first appearance since being ousted from the role. She will be joined by Deb Aury, a former chief medical officer and deputy director who was one of four CDC officials who resigned after Monarez was ousted." "The chair with the president of Moderna ... I asked him about the expectation that he'll be getting a lot less revenue from the vaccine for COVID perhaps this time around. The scientific evidence shows that the risks of taking the COVID vaccine for children exceeds the benefits, and the scientific evidence is abundant on this. There's a study out of Israel that showed that about six to eight kids 20 that are healthy will get an inflammation of the heart that is very dangerous, and that risk exceeds the benefits of a vaccine. Every kid at six months needs to get a COVID vaccination, and that defies the scientific evidence and shows me that she's not objective. It's the same with the hepatitis B vaccine. Unless the mom has hepatitis B vaccine, disease, there is no indication for the vaccine at birth, and we need to readdress that."

Trump accused Biden's staffers of treason, alleging they took over the White House while Biden was senile and unaware. Claims suggest staffers were selling pardons and using an auto pen to sign bills and executive orders without Biden's knowledge. Mike Johnson questioned Biden about cut off natural gas, to which Biden seemed clueless. Whistleblowers claim Biden was unaware of policies enacted in his name. Ben Hur stated Biden was too senile to stand trial regarding classified documents found in his garage. The speaker believes Democrats expected Biden to die in office and hand power to Kamala Harris, but Biden's continued survival is disrupting their plans. Investigations are underway regarding the staffers, auto pen usage, policies, and executive orders. Ed Martin leaked information that several of Biden's staffers have lawyered up, suggesting wrongdoing related to illegally signed pardons. The speaker asserts widespread corruption and deception among Democrats in the White House.

The speaker believes the government thinks Americans are too stupid to research executive orders. They claim many beneficial executive orders signed by Trump, including those benefiting minorities, women, children, and border protection, were revoked by Biden soon after he took office. Specifically, the speaker says Trump lowered prescription costs and capped insulin prices, not Biden. They also claim Trump signed an executive order called "safe policing for safe Americans" to hold police accountable for racial profiling and abuse of power, but Biden revoked it. Additionally, Trump signed an executive order against gender and racial stereotyping, which Biden also revoked, allegedly leading to DEI initiatives. The speaker accuses Biden of renaming similar policies and claiming them as his own. They urge listeners to research these claims themselves.

The discussion centers on the legality and appropriateness of Joe Biden's use of an autopen, particularly concerning pardons. It's claimed that the Trump administration believes Biden's autopen use may be unconstitutional if he wasn't fully competent or if others used it on his behalf. A former US attorney claims to have contacted senior Biden officials early on regarding Biden's competence and the pardons, receiving some responses. The speaker argues that incompetence could invalidate contracts and pardons, even though the pardon power is plenary. He alleges a whistleblower from the 2020 Biden campaign identified three "gatekeepers"—Clayne, Anita Dunn, and Bob Bauer—who controlled access and potentially profited from it. While not yet verified, this information is deemed potentially scandalous. The speaker clarified that he contacted the Biden family and others in the US attorney's office.

The speaker questions Joe Biden's fitness for office, referencing an operation at midnight and suggesting Biden was on Ambien. They allege a cover-up by unelected bureaucrats like Anthony Bernal and accuse Corinne Jean-Pierre of lying about Biden's health. The speaker suggests that deleting hard passes of independent journalists indicates an attempt to squash dissenting voices. They find it suspicious that individuals like Anthony Bernal and the doctor are taking the fifth when asked about Biden's mental and physical fitness. They suggest Corinne Jean-Pierre should be called to testify, arguing her claims about Biden's energy levels are either lies or indicative of her own health issues. The speaker believes the committee needs to strategically call witnesses to expose a greater cover-up. They criticize Corinne Jean-Pierre for focusing on photoshoots instead of her job.

We're diving into the January 6th select committee, which has not been truthful with the American people. The events of January 6th were indeed bad, with assaults on law enforcement being unacceptable. However, the narrative pushed by Democrats over the past four years is false and exaggerated. We aim to clarify what really happened and investigate why President Biden pardoned members of the committee. Since they are pardoned, they must testify, especially those no longer in office. Expect subpoenas to be issued soon.

The speaker believes the government thinks Americans are too stupid to research executive orders. They were under the impression that executive orders signed by Biden were his own. They were also unaware that Trump signed executive orders that benefited the country, minorities, women, children, and border protection, but that Biden revoked them soon after taking office. Biden falsely claimed he lowered prescription costs and capped insulin, when Trump did it first. Trump signed an executive order called Safe Policing for Safe Americans to hold police accountable for racial profiling and abuse of power, but Biden revoked it. Trump also signed an executive order against gender and racial stereotyping, which Biden revoked, possibly leading to DEI. Biden revokes Trump's policies, renames similar policies, and claims them as his own. The speaker urges listeners to research this information.

We need to differentiate between the pardons happening today. Joe Biden's pardons, particularly for those involved in January 6th, are distinct from others. Donald Trump ran on a platform of retribution, which is not constitutional. Pardoning his family is unfortunate and clouds his actions. The events of January 6th were unprecedented, and those pardoned undermined our constitution and the election process. Many people felt their lives were not better under Trump, leading them to elect Joe Biden. Therefore, we should categorize these pardons separately, as not all pardons are equal.

We need to distinguish between the pardons being issued today. Joe Biden's pardons, especially for those involved in the January 6th events, differ significantly from others. Donald Trump campaigned on a platform of retribution, which is not constitutional. While I am a Democrat and find it unfortunate that Trump pardoned his family, the pardons related to January 6th are particularly concerning. They reflect a disregard for the constitution and the electoral process, as many felt their lives were not improved under Trump. Therefore, we should categorize these pardons separately, as not all pardons hold the same weight or significance.