TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker is concerned that acute myocarditis cases will continue until vaccines are stopped. They state there have been two vaccine deaths this year alone. The speaker questions the benefit of continuing the vaccine campaign after four and a half years, considering how many more people will die.

These ten deaths are the tip of the iceberg. There is a vast number of deaths in the peer reviewed literature. These have cases have already been vetted. We don't need FDA officials to comment to them on them. They're deeply concerning. And then our US CDC vaccine administration adverse event system, VAERS, has in total now, this is shocking for United States residents, nineteen thousand four hundred and eighty deaths. About two thousand of these have occurred right within forty eight hours of the shot, and then nineteen thousand two hundred seventy nine Americans reported to be permanently disabled. These are reported to VAERS by doctors like myself who have already determined the vaccine is the cause of the injury, disability, or death. Because if the vaccine was not the cause, then we wouldn't do the report to VAERS. So this is the VAERS does indicate causation by proxy of reporting. This is very important. The VAERS system, I'll say it again, indicates the vaccine is the cause of the problem because the doctor or the health care provider in the field at the scene who's examined the patient, examined the autopsy and the medical record information, examined the clinical record, the vaccine administration has determined the vaccine is the cause. Otherwise, a VAERS report would not be made. So this is very important. I would say at this point in time, both Macron and Prasad should immediately call for the COVID nineteen vaccines to be removed from the market. Every day they continue to delay on this, the more Americans will be hurt by boosters. We've already had several hundred deaths this year that have occurred on their watch. B, they should initiate a safety review of the 19480 deaths with an independent panel to review all the information. The CDC has the patients and their families' phone numbers, emails, addresses. There ought to be interviews of family members for the deceased, interviews of the patient themselves for injuries and disabilities to to get their side of the story. The CDC has all that information. The review should be done independently by people who are not CDC or FDA employees, And there should be multiple reviewers and should be an adjudication process and finally, a determination of causality for the vaccine. And then I would say, finally, the FDA officials, including Macari and Prasad, needs to start showing up to important proceedings in Washington. There have been multiple hearings on vaccine safety. One that I was the lead witness on, 05/21/2025. Yeah. We published a report indicating that there was a government cover up of COVID nineteen vaccine induced mild pericarditis, including fatal cases.

Myocarditis was most common in young men, with rates as high as 1 in 5000 vaccine recipients. The condition was mostly mild but could have lasting effects. Natural immunity from prior COVID infection was shown to be more protective than two vaccine doses. Combining prior infection with vaccination provided even better protection. The speaker did not take a booster shot.

The speaker discusses potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, including its potential to suppress the immune system and reactivate latent viral infections. They mention a scientific journal, The Lancet, which released a study showing that immune function among vaccinated individuals was lower than that of unvaccinated individuals. The speaker expresses sympathy for those who may have been misled or forced to take the vaccine. They also highlight data from The Lancet's study, revealing a higher rate of medical incidents among double-vaccinated individuals aged around 80 compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker questions why this finding is not receiving more attention.

"Doctor Menares and Speaker 1 debate the science behind vaccines. 'The COVID vaccine can reduce viral load... When you have reduced viral load, you will have reduced transmission,' yet 'it doesn't prevent transmission. You can still transmit the virus if you've had the vaccine,' with Omicron-era reductions 'around 16%.' On hospitalization for 18-year-olds: 'It can,' but 'the statistics are inconclusive' and 'there is no statistical evidence that it does reduce the death rate.' They point out that 'no proof of reduction in hospitalization or in death' guided by 'make antibodies' rather than outcomes: 'it's based on whether you make antibodies or not'—'I can inject you with a foreign protein every week and measure antibodies.' They flag myocarditis risk: 'between six and eight and ten thousand,' 'much greater than the risk of hospitalization or death.' They question the medical basis for newborn hepatitis B vaccination and six-month COVID vaccine: 'What is the medical reason... if the mom is hep B negative?' 'The burden is upon you... prove to us.' 'Untrue.'

The speaker discusses the underreporting of adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccines in the VAERS database, highlighting safety signals like myocarditis and death. They compare the number of deaths reported to VAERS to past incidents that prompted product removal, questioning why COVID-19 vaccines have not been halted. The speaker presents data showing a significant increase in adverse events with COVID-19 vaccines compared to other vaccines, particularly in younger age groups. They emphasize the need to follow standard procedures for analyzing safety signals and suggest that the CDC, HHS, and FDA are not properly addressing the issue.

The speaker discusses the safety concerns of COVID-19 vaccines and emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. They mention the risk of blood clots with the J&J vaccine but assure that all vaccines are good and safe. The speaker urges parents to vaccinate their children, even though COVID poses minimal threat to healthy kids. They recommend adolescents to get two doses of the vaccine and mention the possibility of needing a booster shot. The speaker suggests that innovative solutions may be required, including a fourth immunization. They highlight the importance of getting vaccinated to protect against hospitalizations and rising COVID cases. The speaker also addresses misinformation and emphasizes the need for everyone to be vaccinated, including children. They mention the possibility of needing additional boosters in the future. The transcript ends with praise for the speaker's expertise and a brief mention of monkeypox being transmitted among a specific social network.

The speaker questions the effectiveness and safety of COVID vaccines, citing data on high death rates and adverse effects like myocarditis. They criticize the small sample size of Pfizer's clinical trials and argue that the benefits may not outweigh the risks, especially for young people. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparent data and larger studies to make informed decisions about vaccination.

The speaker asks if there is a higher incidence of myocarditis among adolescent males aged 16 to 24 after taking the vaccine. The other speaker responds by saying that the data from the CDC shows that there is actually less myocarditis in people who get the vaccine compared to those who get COVID. The first speaker disagrees and presents six peer-reviewed papers that contradict this claim. They also mention speaking with the president who privately acknowledged the increased risk of myocarditis. The conversation then shifts to discussing the rationality of mandating three vaccines for adolescent boys and the timing of myocarditis after the second dose. The first speaker criticizes the CDC's recommendation to vaccinate individuals who have recovered from COVID and experienced myocarditis. They argue that many countries do not offer the vaccine to children unless they are at risk for severe disease. The first speaker concludes by stating that the risk and benefits of vaccination need to be weighed, and that parents are unlikely to comply with mandatory vaccination for their children.

I was upset with the CDC for stopping tracking of infections in vaccinated individuals. Vaccines should not have been mandated, and side effects should have been acknowledged. The vaccines do not fully protect against infection. The spike protein in the vaccines can cause harm. I now prefer using a protein-based vaccine by Novavax, as it provides a known amount of spike protein without the risk of prolonged impact seen with mRNA vaccines.

Three papers by Nathaniel Mead, containing nearly a thousand references, concluded that COVID-19 vaccination risks outweigh any theoretical benefits. According to the speaker, wishful thinking suggests vaccines saved lives and reduced severity, but early multi-drug treatment, not vaccines, reduced the risk of death. The speaker claims a marathon runner died because he didn't receive effective early treatment, and his vaccination status was irrelevant. The CDC allegedly knew that thousands of fully vaccinated patients were dying of acute COVID-19 early in 2021, making it obvious the vaccines did not reduce the risk of death. The speaker does not want America to be fooled into thinking that the vaccines save lives because they didn't.

The speaker discusses potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines, including the suppression of the immune system and the reactivation of latent viral infections. They mention a study published in The Lancet that found lower immune function in vaccinated individuals compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker expresses sympathy for those who may have been harmed by being forced to take the vaccine. They also highlight data from the study showing a higher rate of medical incidents, including hospitalizations or death, among double-vaccinated individuals aged around 80 compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker questions why this finding is not receiving more attention.

The speaker was upset when the CDC stopped tracking vaccinated people who were infected, suspecting it was to avoid making the vaccine seem ineffective. They believe mandating the vaccines was a mistake and that there should have been more honesty about side effects and the fact that vaccines don't protect against infection. The speaker recalls that while serving as a public health advisor in Maryland, two-thirds of infected individuals had been vaccinated, contrary to claims that it was an epidemic of the unvaccinated. They state the vaccine's efficacy lasts only 4-6 months and that some patients are experiencing long COVID symptoms from the vaccine. In the speaker's opinion, the spike protein is immunotoxic, whether from infection or vaccination. They express concern that mRNA vaccines cause the body to produce an unknown quantity of spike protein for an undetermined duration. They now prefer and use the Novavax protein vaccine, where the amount of spike protein is controlled and its decay curve is known. They believe the mRNA vaccines may cause prolonged spike protein production or negative consequences in some individuals, although it is rare.

The speaker expresses skepticism about the number of COVID patients in hospitals and claims that most patients are vaccinated. They urge the media to tell the truth and ask for support. Another speaker, identified as a nurse, asks if they are seeing the same people in the hospital. The first speaker responds by mentioning serious adverse effects, specifically myocarditis in 20-year-olds, which can lead to cardiac transplants. They highlight the low organ donor rate in Australia. The conversation ends with a request for clarification.

The speaker, an oncologist, expresses concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines and boosters. They believe that the spike protein in the vaccines has harmful effects due to its charge and similarity to human epitopes. They argue that the boosters are unnecessary and can suppress the T cell response, leading to cancer relapses and other health issues. The speaker criticizes the medical community for ignoring their concerns and calls for a ban on mRNA vaccines and boosters. They also mention the contamination of DNA in the vaccines and its potential impact on increasing cancer rates. The speaker emphasizes the need for government action to address these issues.

The speaker claims that myocarditis accounts for only 1% of overall vaccine deaths, with the primary cause of vaccine-related deaths being blood and circulatory system clotting and bleeding. They state that vaccines have killed far more life years from the American public. Analyzing a database of 500,000 deaths from Massachusetts through August 2023, the speaker found that in 2020, excess deaths were primarily respiratory-related, but in 2021, this shifted to blood and circulatory causes. They observed a doubling of acute post-hemorrhagic anemia and an increase in cardiac arrhythmia and pulmonary embolism. The average age of excess deaths dropped by 16 years. The speaker plans to release a book under the pen name Cocaine de Chien (The Real CDC) and distribute a "CDC Memorandum" documenting alleged crimes by the FDA, CDC, and NIH, including fraud, felony murder, and first-degree murder. The memorandum includes graphs breaking down individual causes of death. The speaker concludes that the symptom spectrum profile has shifted from respiratory to circulatory issues, and the age spectrum profile has also changed, with younger individuals dying.

The CDC has recommended COVID vaccines for everyone over the age of 6 months, which contradicts the UK's recommendation for those over 65. The CDC's communication does not mention the vaccines being safe and effective. They provide some data on the estimated risk of hospitalizations prevented per 1,000,000 doses, but there is limited information on adverse reactions. The speaker questions the CDC's thinking and highlights the high number of adverse reactions compared to the number of hospitalizations prevented. They also mention the increase in the price of COVID vaccines and raise concerns about the independence and trustworthiness of drug regulators. The symptoms of COVID are similar to those of a common cold for most people.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 vaccine decreases white blood cell production by 50% after the first dose and an additional 25% after the second dose. They also mention that the booster shot contains 81 strands of foreign bacteria and 8 strands of HIV, which supposedly shuts off the body's ability to produce white blood cells. The speaker suggests that this leads to chronic inflammation in areas where individuals have preexisting health issues. They state that 20 to 30% of the population will die during each series of this vaccination process, and big pharma benefits from the boosters by creating a dependency on them. The speaker advises listeners to critically think and wait for 2 to 3 years before getting vaccinated.

Speaker 0 questions whether it is a conflict of interest for government employees who profit from the vaccine to dictate vaccine policies. Speaker 1 responds that the government should decide. Speaker 0 asks about the higher incidence of myocarditis among adolescent males after vaccination. Speaker 1 claims that the data shows less risk with the vaccine compared to getting COVID. Speaker 0 disagrees and presents peer-reviewed papers contradicting Speaker 1's claim. Speaker 0 questions the scientific soundness of mandating three vaccines for adolescent boys and suggests having a rational discussion about one vaccine. Speaker 1 defers to public health leaders. Speaker 0 criticizes the CDC's recommendation to vaccinate children multiple times and compares it to other countries' approaches. Speaker 1 admits to vaccinating their own children multiple times. Speaker 0 argues that the risk of myocarditis after vaccination should be weighed against the risk of the disease. Speaker 0 also expresses concern about conflicts of interest in government decision-making.

As a vaccine researcher, the speaker opposed COVID boosters from the start, based on the principle that vaccines shouldn't require them. Boosters were given because antibody levels fell off, which the speaker says is normal. The speaker claims the booster was a waste of time because it targeted a virus that no longer existed. The speaker alleges the booster suppressed the T cell system and switched antibodies to be tolerizing, increasing the risk of COVID and other infections. The speaker claims to have observed cancer patients relapsing after boosters, despite advising against them. The speaker says they were silenced for raising concerns, but now "everybody knows the truth" that these observations were correct. The speaker cites a Japanese study correlating increased cancer incidence with the vaccine program and expresses alarm that the study was based on deaths. The speaker says data from around the world shows how boosters can suppress immune response and drive cancers. The speaker concludes by lamenting that clinicians and scientists were silenced and unable to make a difference.

The speaker asks Pfizer and Moderna to explain how the COVID-19 vaccine causes myocarditis. The response from the doctors is that the exact mechanism is still being studied, but myocarditis is generally an autoimmune response that can occur after COVID-19 or other infections. The speaker questions if other organs could also be affected by the vaccine, but the doctors explain that ongoing surveillance is in place to monitor potential risks. The speaker expresses concern about the lack of initial disclosure of these risks. The doctors emphasize the importance of preventing COVID-19 and state that the reported rate of myocarditis is around 2-3 per 100,000 doses. The speaker argues that if it can happen to the heart, it could happen to other organs. The conversation ends due to time constraints.

The former health and human services cabinet secretary faced questioning on Capitol Hill regarding the COVID vaccine. Representative Mary Miller raised concerns about the CDC's data showing an increase in myocarditis among young men and teenage boys who received the vaccine. She questioned why the Biden administration continues to promote the vaccine for this demographic, as they are at higher risk for myocarditis. The speaker supports Miller's stance and urges others not to give in on mask mandates, social distancing, closures, or new mandates. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of non-compliance.

The speaker wants the CDC to provide more specific information about who is being hospitalized and dying from COVID-19, including their ages, comorbidities, vaccination status, and antiviral use. They also suggest studying the long-term effects of T-cell frequencies. The speaker shares their personal experience with vaccinations and T-cell frequencies. They express concern about the potential downsides of getting a different COVID booster every year, mentioning the rare possibility of adverse effects like myocarditis. They believe it is important to weigh the risks and benefits when the benefits of vaccination are not clear.

The speaker questions the validity of claims that millions of lives have been saved by the COVID vaccine, stating that the evidence is weak and based on modeling studies. They argue that the vaccine has serious adverse effects, such as heart problems, and that the reported side effects are likely underreported. They criticize the lack of transparency and suppression of information by institutions and call for rebuilding the system. The speaker believes that the truth about vaccine harms will eventually come out and that getting COVID is not worse for the heart than vaccine side effects, contrary to some claims.