reSee.it - Related Video Feed

No evidence has been shown to prove that human emissions of carbon dioxide cause global warming. If it could be proven, it would also need to be shown that the natural emissions, which make up 97% of the total, do not drive global warming. This is a scientific fraud. The idea that increased levels of carbon dioxide will lead to disastrous global warming is not supported by chemistry or historical data from ice cores. The inverse solubility of carbon dioxide has been known for 200 years, and ice core samples show that carbon dioxide levels increased after natural warming periods. Temperature drives carbon dioxide levels, not the other way around.

For the past 4000 years, the planet has been cooling. In the last 38 years, there has been no temperature change. Over the last 150 years, there have been 3 warming and 3 cooling periods, with a total warmth of 0.6 degrees Celsius. The warming trend began after the Little Ice Age ended in 1850. If measurements start from the Industrial Revolution, warming is observed. However, if measurements start from the medieval or Roman warming periods, cooling is evident. The overall trend has been cooling since those times. So, when someone claims it's warming, ask them since when, as we have been cooling down. Translation: Durante los últimos 4000 años, el planeta ha estado enfriándose. En los últimos 38 años, no ha habido cambios en la temperatura. En los últimos 150 años, ha habido 3 períodos de calentamiento y 3 de enfriamiento, con un aumento total de 0.6 grados Celsius. La tendencia al calentamiento comenzó después de que terminara la Pequeña Edad de Hielo en 1850. Si las mediciones comienzan desde la Revolución Industrial, se observa calentamiento. Sin embargo, si las mediciones comienzan desde los períodos de calentamiento medieval o romano, se evidencia enfriamiento. La tendencia general ha sido de enfriamiento desde esos tiempos. Por lo tanto, cuando alguien afirma que está calentando, pregúntales desde cuándo, ya que hemos estado enfriándonos.

The speaker questions whether the planet is warming and if it should be our main concern. They explain that while temperatures have been unusually high in recent times, this warming trend started over 300 years ago during the little ice age. Proxy data, such as ice core and sediment data, is used to estimate temperatures from hundreds of thousands of years ago. The speaker argues that throughout history, warmer periods, like the medieval warm period and the Roman warm period, were beneficial for humanity and led to flourishing civilizations. They suggest that we should celebrate warming and increasing carbon dioxide levels as they have positive impacts on Earth's ecosystems and human conditions.

Human emissions of carbon dioxide do not drive global warming. Natural emissions make up 97%, showing carbon dioxide does not cause warming. Claims of a disaster from increased carbon dioxide are false. Chemistry proves carbon dioxide cools, not warms. Ice core data reveals temperature rises before carbon dioxide levels. Temperature drives carbon dioxide levels, not the other way around.

There is no scientific evidence that human emissions of carbon dioxide cause global warming. Despite extensive research, no correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide has been found throughout history. In fact, the opposite is true. We have experienced six major ice ages, all of which occurred when there was more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than there is now. Therefore, it is clear that carbon dioxide does not and cannot drive global warming.

There is no scientific evidence that human emissions of carbon dioxide cause global warming. Despite extensive research, no correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide has been found throughout history. In fact, the opposite is true. We have experienced six major ice ages in the past, all of which occurred when there was more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than there is now. Therefore, it is clear that carbon dioxide does not and cannot drive global warming.

The speaker argues that life on Earth is in crisis due to crop failure, social and ecological collapse, and mass extinction, framing these as part of Extinction Rebellion’s climate alarmist narrative and a broader political and financial “climate industrial complex” that aims to control purchases, diet, and travel in the name of sustainability and net-zero emissions. They contend that people rely on governments and the media rather than data, and promise to show that temperatures fluctuate, are not unprecedented, and that natural disasters are not getting worse. They claim climate data is unreliable and that CO2 plays a small role in climate, while presenting scientific evidence that we are not in a climate crisis. Using a 65-million-year temperature graph, the speaker states the Earth today is in a cool period and is coming out of an ice age, noting that life thrived in much warmer times without human CO2 emissions. They assert that over the last two thousand years there have been two warm periods and two cold periods, including the Roman warm period, the cold Dark Ages, the medieval warm period, and the Little Ice Age, with current warming described as a recovery from the Little Ice Age. The three degrees Fahrenheit of warming cited by scientists and the media is described as not unprecedented and not cause for alarm due to ongoing fluctuations. The speaker argues that warming and CO2 emissions have not made natural disasters more frequent or violent, citing hurricane and wildfire data. They reference a graph from the Bulletin of the American Urological Society showing a slight downward trend in US hurricanes per year since 1900, and a North Atlantic hurricane intensity graph from 1920 to 2016 showing no trend. They claim the 2014 US National Climate Assessment presents an illusory upward trend by focusing on a red-highlighted portion. They also claim that US and global acres burned by wildfires have been decreasing since 1900. Regarding data reliability, the speaker highlights a gap between climate model predictions and observed data, noting that temperature measurements from weather balloons align with satellite data, while climate models over-predict warming. They discuss the urban heat island effect, giving Paris as an example where city temperatures are much higher than surrounding rural areas, suggesting data can be biased to frighten the public. The speaker argues CO2 is not the climate control knob, as it is only 0.04% of the atmosphere, and that historical CO2 levels have been far higher than today. They cite MIT oceanographer Carl Wunsch (spelled as Karl Wench) to claim that when oceans warm, more CO2 is released, and when oceans are cold, CO2 is absorbed. A graph is described showing CO2 rising centuries after temperature increases, implying temperature drives CO2 more than the reverse. They acknowledge CO2 may have some small influence but emphasize many other factors—volcanic activity, cosmic rays, and the sun—and claim limiting CO2 would largely stunt biodiversity with little effect on temperature. The speaker argues CO2 is essential for photosynthesis and that farmers use high CO2 in greenhouses to boost crop yields, illustrating CO2 as a life-giving gas and stating it would green the planet and increase food supply if CO2 increases. They conclude that climate change is an existential threat in Western discourse but offer this as historical context from Aztecs to the Salem witch trials. They mention carbon taxes and individual CO2 budgets as signs of climate issues infiltrating daily life and frame their conclusion as pursuing truth by examining data themselves. In summary, the speaker presents historical temperature variability, critiques of data and models, downplays CO2’s role, highlights CO2’s benefits to plant growth, and asserts that the climate crisis is a hoax to be opposed by scrutinizing data personally.

Climate is always changing, with measurable changes in temperature and rainfall. The planet has been warming and cooling for 4.567 billion years, and for most of that time, it has been warmer and wetter with higher sea levels than now. Warmings and coolings are driven by the Earth's distance from the sun, which changes due to its orbit shifting from circular to elliptical, its axis changing, and its wobbling. Unless you can change the magnetic fields of the sun or the Earth's orbit, you cannot change the climate. Throughout Earth's history, there have been millions of climate changes, none of which have been identified as driven by changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide. There is no record of carbon dioxide driving climate in the past, so there is no logical reason to think that current climate change is driven by changes in carbon dioxide. The past is the key to the present.

Over the past 400,000 years, there have been four interglacial periods and four glacial maximums. It takes 80,000 years to transition from an interglacial period to a glacial maximum, but only 10,000 years to come back out of it. The Milankovitch cycle, influenced by the gravity of Jupiter, affects the tilt of the Earth and the shape of its orbit, which in turn impacts temperature. Contrary to Al Gore's claim, CO2 does not cause temperature increase; rather, temperature warming the oceans leads to the release of CO2, while cooling oceans absorb it. The Vostok ice core record shows an 800-year lag between temperature and CO2 changes. Currently, CO2 levels are rising due to human emissions, but it is not causing a corresponding increase in temperature.

CO2, a small part of the atmosphere, is one of many greenhouse gases. Ice core data shows temperature changes before CO2 levels, contradicting the idea that CO2 drives climate. Historical CO2 levels did not cause temperature changes. Recent industrial CO2 output does not align with temperature records, with most warming occurring before the 1940s. The 1930s and 1940s were unusually warm, despite lower human influences. After World War 2, CO2 increased while temperatures decreased, leading to concerns about a possible ice age.

The speaker challenges the idea of man-made global warming, stating that the science behind it is weak and uncertain. They argue that the Earth's climate has always changed throughout history, without any help from humans. They mention the Little Ice Age in the 14th century, when the Thames River froze over and ice fairs were held. They also discuss the Medieval Warm Period, a time of prosperity and vineyards in Europe. Going further back, they mention the Holocene maximum during the Bronze Age, when temperatures were significantly higher for over 3 millennia. The speaker concludes that climate variation in the past is natural.

200 years ago, the temperature was only 1.5 degrees Celsius cooler than now, so claiming a 1.5-degree increase will be catastrophic is ridiculous. In the past, temperatures were much higher, yet CO2 levels were decreasing. There is no clear relationship between temperature and CO2 levels based on historical data.

Speaker 0: We have been cooling down for the last four thousand years. If we look at the last thirty eight years, there has been no change in temperature. In the last hundred and fifty years, we've had three warming periods and three cooling periods with a total warmth of about point six degrees Celsius. 1850, what happened then? Oh, yes. That was the end of the Little Ice Age. Do you think it's gonna warm or cool after Little Ice Age? Of course, it's gonna warm. So if you start taking measurements from 1850 in the industrial revolution, we have been warming. If you take measurements from the medieval warming, we've been cool. We've cooled about five degrees since then. If you take measurements from the Roman warming, we've cooled about five degrees. So as soon as someone tells you, oh, it's warming, the reply you give is since when?

For the past 10,000 years, it has been warmer than today for about 95% of the time. Throughout the Earth's history of 4.65 billion years, there has been substantial ice on the planet for only about 5-10% of that time. Currently, we have low levels of CO2 compared to Earth's history. The carbon dioxide in the room is around 900, but there is nothing bad about it. In fact, the more carbon dioxide, the better.

Many well-known individuals claim that we are in a climate emergency, but there is disagreement. One person argues that the world has been warming for centuries, even before the use of fossil fuels. They state that there is no evidence linking CO2 increase to rising temperatures, as temperatures were already increasing. They mention a graph from central England, which shows a steady rise of just over 1 degree Celsius in 320 years, suggesting that the current rate of increase is not unprecedented. They also highlight a period from the late 1600s to early 1700s when temperatures rose even faster.

The ice core surveys in Vostok, Antarctica, show a correlation between carbon dioxide (CO2) and temperature, but the relationship is more complex than Al Gore suggests. The data reveals that temperature increases first, followed by a rise in CO2, with an 800-year lag. This pattern is consistent across multiple ice core surveys. CO2 is not the cause of warming; rather, it is a product of temperature changes. Additionally, humans contribute only a small fraction of CO2 emissions compared to natural sources like volcanoes and the oceans. The oceans, in particular, have a memory of temperature changes and release or absorb CO2 accordingly. Earth's long climate history provides no evidence that CO2 has ever determined global temperatures.

Over the past 4000 years, the planet has been cooling down. In the last 38 years, there has been no change in temperature. In the last 150 years, there have been 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods, resulting in a total warmth of about 0.6 degrees Celsius. The warming after the little ice age in 1850 is expected, and if measurements are taken from that time, we have been warming. However, if measurements are taken from the medieval warming or the Roman warming, we have actually been cooling by about 5 degrees. So, when someone says it's warming, the question to ask is, since when?

Scientists have found a link between temperature and CO2, but it's the opposite of what many believe. In the past, temperature has risen first, followed by a rise in CO2 levels. Ice ages start when CO2 is at its maximum and end when it's at its minimum, contradicting the idea that CO2 controls temperature. Looking back over millions of years, CO2 levels have changed drastically, but they have never driven temperature changes.

"The average temperature of the planet does seem to be going steadily upwards." "Since the mid eighties." "It went down in the seventies." "Since then, it's warmed at about a quarter of a degree per decade on average across the last thirty, forty years." "And it's maybe they say it's 1.5 degrees above pre industrial levels now." "So we're not in a period of unprecedented warmth." "We're not in a period of increasing extreme weather." "Floods, droughts, storms, there's no increase in either frequency or severity." "But at the same time, the carbon dioxide we're putting in the air is having a very measurable effect that's beneficial." "There is there is more green vegetation on the planet now compared with the nineteen eighties equivalent to a continent the size of North America that's been added of green vegetation."

Human emissions of carbon dioxide do not cause global warming, as 97% of emissions are natural. Claims of a disaster from increased carbon dioxide are false; in reality, carbon dioxide cools when warmed. Ice core data shows that natural warming precedes an increase in carbon dioxide, proving that temperature drives carbon dioxide levels, not the other way around. This is a scientific fraud.

We are currently in an interglacial period within an ongoing ice age that started 34 million years ago. The climate fluctuates between cold glaciation and warm interglacial periods, driven by the sun's heat. The distance from the sun determines the temperature, not trace gases. No legislation can alter the Earth's orbit, which will eventually lead us into another cool period. These climate cycles occur every few hundred million, hundred thousand, and few thousand years, influenced by factors such as continental movements, cosmic rays, orbital changes, solar activity, tides, and oceanic patterns. The combination of these cycles can bring about rapid climate changes.

Over the past 4000 years, the planet has been cooling down. In the last 38 years, there has been no change in temperature. In the last 150 years, there have been 3 warming periods and 3 cooling periods, resulting in a total warmth of about 0.6 degrees Celsius. The warming after the Little Ice Age in 1850 was expected, and since then, we have been warming. However, if we consider measurements from the medieval and Roman warmings, we have actually cooled about 5 degrees. So, when someone claims it's warming, the question to ask is, "since when?"

Global warming is a hoax based on ice core data, which is accessible online. Ice core data shows cooling and warming periods of Earth over thousands of years, revealing natural cycles. The current warming cycle is not the hottest one recorded; past warming cycles have been hotter before modern technology existed.

People shouldn't panic about global warming because current changes are normal based on Earth's natural history. Over the last 10,000 years, temperatures have fluctuated by about one degree at the Equator and two degrees at the poles every thousand years. The current rate of rise is about one degree per century, which is not unusual. The IPCC's models are flawed because they assume no natural change. The greenhouse effect is small compared to other atmospheric factors like solar radiation and gravity, with oceans and clouds primarily controlling climate stability. The pre-industrialization period used as a baseline by the IPCC was the lowest point in the last ten thousand years. It is currently one degree above that low but two degrees cooler than the warmest period in the last eight to ten thousand years. During the last interglacial period, it was six degrees warmer, and hippos and elephants lived in England.

A 1.5 degrees Celsius increase in global atmospheric temperature is not a disaster. It's less than the temperature difference between breakfast and lunch and will open up vast areas of farmland. During the Eocene thermal maximum, the temperature was at least 5 to 7 degrees Celsius warmer than now, maybe even more. At the same time, CO2 was going in the exact opposite direction of the temperature. There is no clear relationship between CO2 and temperature.