TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The Senate leaders are heading to Kyiv with $61 billion, possibly in cash, while our border is being invaded by 800,000 illegal immigrants in the last month. They had no time or money to address the border issue, but managed to prepare the money, load the planes, and get ready for their trip to Kyiv.

She's the dumbest congresswoman ever, proving it daily. I can't believe any member of Congress, regardless of party, would want to educate criminal illegal aliens. These are individuals in the country illegally, convicted of violent crimes, and ordered removed by an immigration judge after due process, all at taxpayer expense. If a congressperson doesn't want us to do the job Congress has mandated and funded us to do, that's a problem.

We led a delegation of 64 House Republicans to the border. The deputy chief of border patrol told us that the situation feels like trying to control an open fire hydrant. He said we need to reduce the flow, and one way to do that is by reinstating Trump's policy of remaining in Mexico for asylum seekers. This alone could reduce the flow by 70%, but President Biden refuses to do it. Making a few other changes would solve the problem, but he won't take action.

Under my leadership, the US had the most secure border in history. We replaced catch and release with detain and deport, and implemented title 42 to instantly expel illegal aliens. However, when Joe Biden took office, he terminated successful border policies, opened the borders, and allowed millions of illegal aliens into the US. Now, Biden plans to remove the remaining parts of title 42, leading to mayhem and lawlessness as fraudulent asylum seekers flood in unchecked. Tens of thousands of illegal aliens are already massed on the Mexican side of the border, ready to storm in. This mass resettlement of millions will be aided by the Biden administration. Congress should cut funding for catch and release and prevent taxpayer dollars from being used to release illegal aliens. We must fight to save our country from this invasion.

Ruben Gallego has consistently opposed border security, including calling the border wall "dumb" and "stupid." Career politicians promised border security but failed until President Trump, who was hampered by opposition from figures like Gallego. The border wall demonstrably enhances safety in Arizona, preventing illegal crossings where it exists. Gallego supports the Biden administration's open border policies, which have allegedly led to 20,000,000 illegal entries, including 400,000 convicted criminals. Gallego's legislative focus has been on removing the term "illegal alien" rather than border security. The current situation allows terrorists to enter, endangering citizens. Gallego has empowered cartels. The speaker pledges to fully fund and expedite border wall construction, lamenting that Gallego and Kamala Harris sold $325,000,000 of border materials for minimal value.

My colleague claims we passed strong border bills, but the current state of the border is a disaster. We didn't use enough leverage to get results. The regulatory reforms mentioned can be easily waived by the Biden administration. The welfare programs they streamlined will actually grow due to expanded eligibility. I'm glad work requirements weren't imposed on Medicaid, as it could have led to its expansion. I won't take lectures on fundraising from those who bend to lobbyists and special interests. I'll fund my political operation through hardworking Americans, while you continue attending lobbyist fundraisers.

I'm not as eloquent as my colleagues, but politicians voting for this bill own the consequences. American people expect us to fight, not just slow down the country's destruction. We need to pick principled fights, like stopping the border invasion. To the American people: pay attention and stop sending politicians who talk one way and vote another. I'm a strong no on this bill.

Republicans must make a decision on the strongest border bill ever, as doing nothing is not an option. The former president opposes the bill because he wants to use the border problem as a political issue against me. It is widely acknowledged that the American people want a solution that ends the ineffective political rhetoric.

6 Democrats voted against a bill because Donald Trump preferred to campaign on the problem rather than solve it. The speaker believes the American people want solutions and a president focused on fixing issues, not playing political games. The bill in question would have allowed 1,800,000 illegal immigrants into the country annually, which many conservatives opposed.

The speaker describes a scenario of a trendy illegal immigrant arriving at the U.S. Southwest border during the 2023 crisis, aided by taxpayer-funded NGOs, and released into the interior with a notice to appear in immigration court. He asserts the person will file a bare-bones, frivolous asylum application, aided by another NGO, and that due to a nearly 4,000,000-case immigration court backlog, the case will take years to be heard. In the meantime, the individual is said to move to a major city, receive taxpayer-funded benefits, commit crimes, be supported by sanctuary-city leadership, and be defended by Democrats who oppose strict immigration laws. The process allegedly drags on with continuances and motions, and years later an immigration judge supposedly denies the asylum claim. The individual is said to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which allegedly takes months or years, followed by appellate denial in a federal court of appeals. The speaker charges that federal departments and courts expend many taxpayer dollars on such cases, all to deport an apparently frivolous claimant. The focal policy proposal is the expedited removal of criminal aliens act, described as straightforward: criminal aliens cannot misuse the asylum system and must be detained and deported quickly if they are in the U.S. with certain criminal convictions. The speaker notes that current law already permits expedited removal for aggravated felon aliens, who are considered ineligible for asylum and relief and are presumed deportable; this is said to be constitutionally upheld by every federal court of appeals that has addressed it. The bill would expand categories of criminal aliens who may face removal proceedings when in criminal custody and authorize the Department of Homeland Security to place additional criminals in expedited removal. It would allow fast-track deportation for non-lawful permanent residents who are in a gang, transnational criminal organization, or foreign terrorist organization, or who have been convicted of dangerous crimes. The bill’s specified conviction categories include: any felony; any misdemeanor against a member of a vulnerable group; any assault on a law enforcement officer; any sexual offense; any crime of domestic violence; any stalking; any crime against children; sex trafficking or sexual exploitation of minors; sexual abuse of a minor; any activity involving child sexual exploitation; or any violation of a protective order. The term “vulnerable group” covers a child under 16, a pregnant woman, a person with severe disability, and seniors over 65. The speaker cites a poll claiming 78% of Americans support deporting illegal immigrants who have committed crimes, including nearly 70% of Democrats, and asserts broad public support for tougher immigration action while criticizing Democrats’ handling of border policy. He accuses Democrats of previously expanding border openings, cites alleged prior high border encounters, millions of entrants, and 2,000,000 “gotaways,” along with terrorists allegedly released and a record immigration court backlog, blaming the Democrats for a perceived border crisis. He argues recent House actions and votes against border-security measures and declares the bill a step toward securing the border and reforming immigration policy, urging support. He concludes by urging colleagues to back the expedited removal of criminal aliens act.

Congress released a 1,012-page bill with a $1 trillion price tag full of questionable spending. Examples include $850,000 for a gay senior citizen home in Boston, $15 million for Egyptian college tuition, and $400,000 for a group teaching elementary school kids about being trans. Even a posthumous earmark for Dianne Feinstein. The bill also includes $500,000 for an anti-racist nature program at the San Diego Zoo. This bill, signed by Biden, will spend taxpayer money recklessly.

While Americans were celebrating Memorial Day, Washington was making another debt-increasing deal with no real changes. This bill has no cap on raising the debt and we don't know the exact number. It might cut $12 billion in year 1, but that's not worth the $4 trillion it adds. The bill keeps Biden's policies and spending intact, including the Green New Deal subsidies that could harm the electric grid. Republicans should not vote for this bill because it doesn't demand renegotiation and doesn't address the border issue. Democrats are supporting it because it doesn't change their policies or spending. Republicans should vote no and find a better deal.

Donald Trump is seen as the main threat as he wants the border problem to worsen so he can use it for his own political gain. He is even willing to cheer for an economic recession, which would harm people's jobs and savings, if it helps him in the upcoming election. This shows that Trump prioritizes himself over the United States. If Republicans in Congress are influenced by Trump's attempts to sabotage this deal, it reveals who they truly put first. They used to prioritize millionaires and billionaires, but now it's Trump at the top, followed by the wealthy, and then everyone else. They are not focused on improving and ensuring safety.

During my leadership, we had the most secure border in US history. We replaced catch and release with detain and deport, and implemented title 42, which allowed for instant expulsion of illegal aliens. However, when Joe Biden took office, he terminated successful border policies, opened the borders, and resettled millions of illegal aliens. Now, he plans to remove the remaining shreds of our border policy, leading to mayhem and lawlessness. Countless fraudulent asylum seekers will flood into the US, and states like California offer free healthcare and education, attracting more people. It's absolute lunacy. Congress should cut funding for catch and release and prevent the Biden administration from using taxpayer dollars to release illegal aliens. We must fight to secure our country's survival.

Entitlement spending is most of the federal spending. It's a mechanism by which Democrats attract and retain illegal immigrants by essentially paying them to come here and then turning them into voters. This is why the Democrats are so upset about the border situation. If we turn off this gigantic money magnet for illegal immigrants, then they will leave, and they will lose voters.

The president's bill includes support for Israel, Ukraine, the southern border, and Taiwan. It seems like a favorable bill for both Republicans and Democrats. Regarding Ukraine, the question is whether the United States should fund it at the levels proposed by President Biden. However, it's worth noting that the money allocated for the border aims to process more illegal immigrants rather than address the root of the problem, potentially worsening the situation.

"We have to realize the democrats, their whole argument is we are going to shut down the government unless you give a trillion dollars for medical benefits for illegal aliens." "And they're saying that unless you give that money to those legal aliens, unless you give those benefits to those illegal aliens, we are going to shut down the people's government." "It's such a stark contrast between two parties priorities." "We want to put the government to work for the American people first." "We're not gonna be taken hostage by the Democrats' desperate desire to give your tax money to illegal aliens." "We're just not gonna do it."

We are halting all grant funding to NGOs that facilitate illegal immigration. Millions of taxpayer dollars have been misused to support this issue, and we are reevaluating how these funds are spent to ensure they strengthen our country and enhance safety. Many NGOs operate not only in the U.S. but also in Mexico, encouraging illegal immigrants to cross the border. Initially, I viewed NGOs as charitable organizations, but I've come to see that some function as shadow governments, using taxpayer money for actions the federal government cannot legally undertake. This has compromised our national security, and we will no longer support these operations with federal funding.

Under my leadership, we had the most secure border in US history. We replaced catch and release with detain and deport, and implemented title 42 for instant expulsion of illegal aliens. However, when Joe Biden took office, he terminated successful border policies, opened the borders, and resettled millions of illegal aliens. Now, he plans to remove the remaining shreds of our border policy, leading to mayhem and lawlessness. Countless fraudulent asylum seekers will flood into the US, and states like California offer free healthcare and education, attracting more illegal immigrants. Congress should cut funding for catch and release and prevent the administration from using taxpayer dollars to release illegal aliens. We must fight to secure our country and remove the illegal aliens Biden allowed in.

The speaker expresses concern about the situation at the border, criticizing the White House's proposal to allocate more funds for processing and allowing more undocumented immigrants into the country. They refer to the deputy chief of the US border patrol, who compared the situation to an open fire hydrant. The deputy chief emphasized the need to stop the influx of immigrants rather than trying to handle the increasing numbers.

To the millions of illegal aliens being released, it's time to start packing. We've been to the border, and the claims of a crisis are exaggerated. Mass deportation can happen without separating families; families can be deported together. The narrative of an invasion is a fabrication. Criminal cartels are responsible for significant drug trafficking and violence, and they will face severe consequences. There's a notable increase in sex trafficking and terrorism at the border, marking a major national security issue. The current administration's approach is seen as a vanity project, and I will not support building a wall. We need effective solutions, not just a wall, to address this situation.

Republican rejection leads to a Hobson's choice: proceed with the bill or risk a shutdown orchestrated by Donald Trump. While the CR bill is bad, a shutdown would be much worse for America. The Republican bill is a terrible option. It is not a clean CR and is deeply partisan, failing to address many of the country's needs. However, allowing Donald Trump to take more power via a government shutdown is a far worse option. No one on my side of the aisle wants a government shutdown. Members who support this CR do not want a government shutdown, and members who oppose this CR do not want a government shutdown.

Republicans should not cut Medicare or Social Security to pay for Biden's spending. Biden has wasted trillions on the Green New Deal and opened our borders to migrants from prisons and mental institutions. Our border is now the worst in the world. Instead of burdening American families and seniors, we should cut spending on corrupt foreign countries, mass releases of illegal aliens, left-wing gender programs in the military, climate extremism, and waste fraud and abuse. We must save Social Security and not let the Democrats destroy it.

If I were the governor here, I would be afraid. We see trucks and groups of people crossing the border, and the Border Patrol is watching. There are a lot of people coming in, and this is just the first wave. There are more coming. It's not good that Joe Biden is allowing this. I want Trump back in office because he would deport these people. Islam is terrible for the world, like a new virus. We have a lot of terrorists in America, but I don't have the exact numbers.

parliamentarian ruled that sections of it were outside of the process that they're using to get this through. Do you think that senators should respect the decisions of the parliamentarian? And what have you personally done in the last forty eight hours to try and get Republican senators who are against the bill to a yes? 'If it's not approved, your taxes will go up by 68%. Think of that. 68, a record, the highest in the history.' 'The Democrats won't approve it only because, politically, it's so good for the Republicans.' 'They're not approving border security.' 'We've done a great job at the border, but we have to add some wall.' 'We have no money for that.' 'But if the Democrats it'll be interesting to see if we get any Democrat votes. We should.' 'If I were a Democrat, I would vote for this bill all day long because it's tax cuts and so many other things that are common sense.'