reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In a Utah County court proceeding for State of Utah v. Tyler James Robinson, Judge Graff addressed indigency and appointment of counsel. Mister Scortis stated, "I am not entering appearance. I'm not counsel on this case," and the court provisionally appointed a qualified attorney after reviewing Robinson's financial declaration, with an order that counsel declarations under Rule 8b–8c be filed prior to next hearing, set for Sept. 29 at 10:10 AM. Robinson remains in custody without bail. The state, represented by Chad Gruenander and team, noted a pretrial protective order for Erica Kirk and filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty. The state stated discovery under Rule 16 would be provided within five days of a request. The charges were read: Count 1 aggravated murder, a capital felony, with possible death penalty; life without parole or an indeterminate term of not less than 25 years to life.

Alexander Suker, 42, was contracted with the city and county of Los Angeles to house and feed up to 600 homeless people, but was accused of misusing tens of millions of dollars to live a luxurious life. Exclusive Fox video shows the federal agents’ early-morning bust at the LA mansion. Suker was arrested, and his $125,000 Land Rover was seized by law enforcement. The feds say Suker defrauded the city and county of LA out of $23,000,000 for not only his mansion and car, but a second home in Greece, luxury vacations, designer clothes, and private schools. Speaker 1: He was living the high life while the people suffering, homeless on the streets with no shelter, no food. They're living out in the streets. People are literally dying, and this guy is out vacationing, buying homes, buying Range Rovers, and going shopping. Speaker 0: Prosecutors say Suker was supposed to provide three nutritional meals a day to the homeless, but during one inspection, Suker only had canned beans and ramen noodles on hand. The feds say Suker lied about various aspects of abundant blessings, including fake vendors, facilities and the homeless actually getting meals. The US Attorney's Office in LA says they are actively investigating at least 12 other similar fraud cases here in California. First Assistant US Attorney Bill Asele says there's a tremendous amount of fraud in this state and that today's bust of one man who misused $23,000,000 alone may show how little oversight there is. Speaker 1: California was pushing this money out quickly. A lot of money went out the door, with frankly very little vetting, very little checks and balances, and, he's one of the individuals that got it. Speaker 0: The suspect is scheduled to make his first appearance later today. He faces up to twenty years if convicted on a federal case. The local district attorney is also planning on prosecuting. Sean.

The transcript describes an incident on April 18 in which Judge Hannah Dugan was seen outside her Milwaukee courtroom wearing her black robes and confronting several federal agents who were there to arrest Eduardo Flores Ruiz, a Milwaukee man and Mexican national charged locally with three counts of domestic battery. Milwaukee County released video of the events through an open records request, and the footage is part of the evidence in the case against Dugan, who is charged with obstructing a federal investigation by concealing Flores Ruiz and allowing him to leave her courtroom through a different door after sending the agents to speak to the chief judge. Flores Ruiz, dressed in black with his attorney, is shown in multiple videos leaving by that other door, which prosecutors say was used by jurors and not open to the public. As he exits, he is followed by another agent. When Flores Ruiz gets into the elevator to leave, the agent slips into the elevator as well. According to the criminal complaint against Dugan, the agent followed them down; another video shows the agent following them out of the building downstairs, and once backup arrived, they tried to arrest Flores Ruiz. He reportedly ran north in front of the courthouse for nearly a block before agents caught up with him and arrested him. Federal agents arrested Dugan herself a week later. Eduardo Flores Ruiz’s domestic violence case is moving through Milwaukee County Court, though he is in federal custody on an immigration arrest. The FBI arrested Judge Dugan at the county courthouse one week later on April 25. She pleaded not guilty in federal court last week. In response, Dugan’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss the case, calling it unconstitutional and arguing that she is entitled to judicial immunity. A judge set a tentative trial date for July 21.

Thomas Dickey, the attorney for the suspect, addressed the media regarding the charges against his client, Mangione. He emphasized that he has not seen any evidence linking Mangione to the shooting and stressed the principle of presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Dickey indicated that Mangione is likely to plead not guilty to the charges related to a ghost gun and fake IDs found during his arrest in Pennsylvania. He also mentioned that they expect to plead not guilty to upcoming murder charges from New York. Dickey, who was hired earlier that day, attended Mangione's extradition hearing and argued that his client is entitled to bail, stating that Mangione is coping with the situation as best as he can.

An individual is being arrested for aggravated offenses. They are informed of their right to remain silent, and that anything they say can be used as evidence in court. The arresting officer asks if they understand. The individual is escorted to a van. Someone mentions social media posts and tells the person arresting them to get a "fucking real job."

Defendant faces multiple charges including child endangerment, serious physical harm, and attempted murder. Victims' family requests no bail. Bond set at $5,000,000 with strict conditions. Pretrial on June 17th. Public defender assigned.

There is a substantial amount of discovery in this case; it is voluminous to say the least. The discussion touches on several intertwined aspects of pretrial proceedings and the management of information in a high-profile matter. Speaker 1 notes that his lawyers entered their formal appearance and declined to waive the right to a preliminary hearing. In connection with these procedural steps, Judge Tony Graff issued a gag order preventing anyone associated with the case from talking about it. The purpose of the gag order is to avoid pretrial publicity, which is already a significant problem given the case’s massive media exposure involving a high-profile figure such as Charlie Kirk. The judge’s objective, as stated, is to ensure a fairer trial for Robinson by limiting external commentary and potentially prejudicial publicity. The discussion then turns to the scope and identification of witnesses. There is a request for clarification regarding the phrase “all witnesses,” as there are a number of witnesses who have not yet been identified but would likely be used in the state’s case. This issue arose in the context of a large audience—specifically, an event in front of two to three thousand students at Utah Valley University—where the incident or relevant proceedings took place. The parties are in the process of identifying those witnesses, and those individuals are presently unknown. Speaker 2 responds by outlining how the court will handle this as the witnesses become known. The court will require that as each witness becomes known to either side, the information will be conveyed in a way that complies with the gag order. It is acknowledged that there may be many witnesses, and it is not expected that all witness identifications and related disclosures can be completed upfront before the process begins. The approach is to disclose witness information progressively as it becomes available, while maintaining compliance with the order. Speaker 1 reiterates that the judge wants to ensure the protection of Robinson’s constitutional rights as well as the rights of the victim. The exchange underscores a balance between managing a large, potentially unwieldy roster of witnesses and upholding the defendants’ and victims’ legal protections. The discussion closes with a brief, incomplete note from Counselor, indicating ongoing considerations and procedural safeguards as the case progresses.

The attorney tried to serve a subpoena but was told it was not proper. The judge confirmed the person being served was over 18 and allowed the service to proceed. The attorney asked for the court to note the attempted service.

I'm being detained and can't return to my house. What am I being detained for? What are the specific reasons? Why am I here? You're going to put handcuffs on me? No, do not touch me. Don't touch me.

Calling case 251403576, state of Utah versus Tyler James Robinson. Mister Robinson, you have a right to an attorney. If you cannot afford one, the court can appoint an attorney to represent you under rule eight b and rule eight c for a counsel appointment in a case where death may be a sentencing option. I’m worrying that those declarations be filed prior to the next hearing date, which is set for September 29 at 10:10AM. Mister Robinson, I also wish to inform you of your rights against self incrimination. Anything that you say in court today could be used against you, and we want to protect your constitutional rights. Mister mister Robinson, at this time, you will remain in custody without bail.

State of Utah v. Tyler James Robinson, before Judge Graff. The court informs Robinson of his right to counsel and that indigent defendants may have appointed counsel; declarations detailing qualifications under Rule 8B and 8C must be filed before the next hearing on September 29 at 10:10 a.m. The defendant is advised of rights against self-incrimination. He remains in custody without bail. A pretrial protective order for Erica Kirk was filed by the state and will be issued by the court in her favor. The state also filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty; discovery under Rule 16 will be provided within five days. Charges read: aggravated murder, a capital felony under Utah code 76-5-202, alleged to have occurred on 09/10/2025 in Utah County, with the defendant Tyler James Robinson facing life without parole or an indeterminate term.

The suspect is facing multiple state and federal charges and could be sentenced to 13 years to life. A jury trial in San Francisco may not happen for several months.

The speaker informs Mr. Floyd that they will not be taking any statements from him and proceeds to advise him of his rights. They mention that the charges brought against him include violation of the Georgia RICO Act, conspiracy to commit solicitation of false statements and writings, and influencing witnesses. The speaker asks if Mr. Floyd understands the charges and informs him that his case has been assigned to Judge Scott McAfee. They also discuss Mr. Floyd's options for legal representation and mention his criminal history. The speaker concludes by stating that the issue of bond will be addressed by Judge McAfee and that this is just a first appearance hearing.

- The questioning begins with noting a calendar or schedule, then moves to record-keeping instructions: "Turn off the video record at 01:05PM." - Mister Epstein is asked about sexual attraction to underage minor females. The question is objected to as harassing and argumentative. - Epstein invokes his rights: he states he must invoke his fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendment rights to not answer questions today or any questions relevant to this lawsuit. - The questions focus on the names of any underage minors who were the subject of criminal charges to which Epstein pled guilty. Epstein responds, "I don't know." - The examiner asks what the charges were about and what the underlying allegations were. Epstein states the charge as "Solicitation of prostitution," clarifying it was not underage prostitution but prostitution. - The examiner asks if the victims or prostitutes were minors. Epstein repeats, "I plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution." - The examiner presses for details of the cases—what happened, what the underlying facts were, how Epstein engaged with the individuals. Epstein repeats that he cannot tell more than that and ultimately says, "I plead guilty to the solicitation of prostitution. Not underage prostitution, but prostitution." - The examiner asks to clarify whether the three females who were the subject of the guilty pleas in state court were procured by Epstein by having underage minor females locate other underage minor females and bring them to Epstein’s house. Objections are raised for argumentative, harassing, and assuming facts not in evidence; the examiner moves to strike. - The examiner asks whether all people with whom Epstein engaged in sexual activity were underage and brought by other underage girls. Objections persist; Epstein states he does not understand the question. - The examiner repeats a question about whether Epstein used underage minor females to bring other underage minor females to his house for sex; the exchange indicates the question had been asked and answered earlier. - Epstein again states, due to his counsel, that he must assert his sixth, fourteenth, and fifth amendment rights and cannot answer that question at the moment. - In closing, Epstein cites that his firm, Edwards and Jaffee, has been described by the US attorney as perpetrating one of the largest frauds in South Florida’s history, crafting malicious cases of a sexual nature to fleece people using bogus schemes and investment schemes. He reiterates his attorneys advised he must assert his constitutional rights, and therefore he cannot answer at this time.

The defendant is charged with multiple counts, including causing harm to a child, attempting to cause death, tampering with evidence, and theft. The victims' family requests no bail for the defendant. The judge sets bail at $5,000,000, orders GPS monitoring, no contact with victims' family, and assigns counsel. Pretrial is on June 17th. The victims' family expresses their grief and asks for the defendant to remain in custody. The public defender's office is assigned to the case. The judge acknowledges the severity of the charges and adjusts the bail accordingly.

Hi, Michelle. Here’s the crime victim's rights card with my name, badge number, and the report number for the incident. We can't arrest him right now because we need to go through the city attorney or county prosecutors first. The report will be completed immediately, and notifications are being made to the appropriate officials. This situation is not being ignored or overlooked. However, making a physical arrest could disrupt upcoming election proceedings, which is why we’re holding off for now. His actions are serious, and we understand the implications.

The speaker informs Mr. Floyd that they will not be taking any statements from him and proceeds to advise him of his rights and the charges brought against him. They mention that the case has been assigned to Judge Scott McAfee and that the state needs to act. Mr. Floyd states that he requested a lawyer but was denied, and the speaker explains his options to either hire a lawyer or proceed pro se. Pretrial services provide information about Mr. Floyd's prior criminal history. The speaker then addresses the issue of bond, stating that it will be decided by Judge McAfee and that bond will be denied at this point due to the open charge against Mr. Floyd. Mr. Floyd expresses his disagreement, but the speaker reiterates that the decision will be made by Judge McAfee.

Speaker 0 needs to check on a drop-in. They discuss a client accused of criminal trespass. The client pleads not guilty. The lawyer, Stephanie Mueller, confirms the arraignment is done. When asked about the next court date, Stephanie declines to provide the information. The conversation ends with a thank you.

The court is addressing case 23CR087681003, shortened to 23CR087, beginning with Mr. Hernandez. It is confirmed Mr. Hernandez is present and in custody. The court asks Mr. Hernandez if he received a copy of something, then asks if he wants a break. Mr. Hernandez answers affirmatively. The court states it will complete the office of the special covert offender to recognition.

Hunter Biden will not be receiving special treatment for his gun charges and will have to appear in person for his arraignment. His lawyer's excuse of causing traffic was denied by the judge. Hunter Biden's mugshot from his previous appearance in July is difficult to obtain as searching for it in the database would result in the firing of the US Marshal. The request is made for retiring Federal Marshals to help obtain the mugshot. Updates on the FOIA request will be provided.

A man contracted by the city and county of Los Angeles to house and feed up to 600 homeless people was arrested for allegedly misusing tens of millions of dollars to live a luxurious life. 42-year-old Alexander Suker was taken into custody as exclusive Fox video shows the early-morning federal bust at the LA mansion. Suker’s $125,000 Land Rover was seized, and authorities say he defrauded the city and county of Los Angeles out of $23,000,000, covering a mansion and car, a second home in Greece, luxury vacations, designer clothes, and private schools. Prosecutors say Suker was supposed to provide three nutritional meals a day to the homeless, but during one inspection he only had canned beans and ramen noodles on hand. The FBI says Suker lied about various aspects of his supposed “abundant blessings,” including fake vendors, facilities, and the homeless actually receiving meals. The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles notes they are actively investigating at least 12 other similar fraud cases in California. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Asele says there’s a tremendous amount of fraud in this state and that today’s bust of one man who misused $23,000,000 alone may show how little oversight there is. California was pushing this money out quickly, with a lot of money going out the door, Asele adds, with frankly very little vetting and very few checks and balances, and Suker is one of the individuals who benefited. The suspect is scheduled to make his first appearance later today. He faces up to twenty years if convicted on the federal case. The local district attorney is also planning on prosecuting.

Hearing for 251403576, State of Utah vs. Tyler James Robinson. Judge Graff addresses Mister Scortis, who states he is not entering appearance and is seeking appointed counsel. The court, after reviewing Robinson’s finances, finds him indigent and provisionally appoints a qualified attorney; declarations under rule eight b and c for death-penalty cases must be filed prior to the next hearing, September 29 at 10:10 AM. Robinson remains in custody without bail and was advised of his rights against self-incrimination. The State, represented by Chad Gruenander and team, notes a pretrial protective order for Erica Kirk to be granted. A notice of intent to seek the death penalty was filed by Utah County attorney Jeff Gray. Discovery under Rule 16 will be provided on request. Charges read: count one, aggravated murder, a capital felony in violation of Utah code annotated 76Dash5Dash202. In that on 09/10/2025 in Utah County, the defendant, Tyler James Robinson, intentionally or knowingly caused the death of Charlie Kirk under the following circumstances. The defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to another individual other than Charlie Kirk and the defendant. Notice conviction of this offense may carry the death penalty for pursuant to Utah code seventy six three dash two zero seven point seven, a mandatory mandatory term of imprisonment for life without parole or an indeterminate term of not less than twenty five years that may be for life.

My lawyer, Anthony Rico, has withdrawn from my defense team, stating he can no longer effectively serve as counsel. He cited attorney-client privilege as the reason for his departure, assuring the court this won't delay the trial. I'm currently facing serious charges, including racketeering, sex trafficking, and transporting individuals for prostitution. The Justice Department accuses me of organizing events involving coerced, drug-fueled sexual activity, as well as kidnapping, abuse, and bribery, including against minors. Just this week, I sued NBC Universal over a documentary accusing me of serial murder and sex with underage girls, claims which I strongly deny. I'm currently being held at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center awaiting trial in May and intend to prove my innocence against these allegations.

Warren is arrested for an outstanding immigration warrant. He asks why he's arrested but is told to sit down. He requests a lawyer and bail assistance. The police mention the APU precinct for help.