reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion goes back to 1967 to explain why the current news topic matters. Speaker 1 references Congressman Massey’s measure and says it should be investigated by Congress, implying it should have been done much earlier. Speaker 0 says that the matter should have been investigated 59 years ago, while noting that Israel claims the incident involved mistaken identity. Speaker 0 states that Admiral Isaac Kidd’s Board of Inquiry accepted the claim under orders by the JAS administration. Speaker 0 then describes the inquiry’s view that the attack involved violations of international law intended to prevent such a “so-called accident,” including the use of unmarked aircraft and “jamming or distrust frequencies,” which Speaker 0 ties to a historical irony involving Nazi wolf packs machine-gunning life rafts of refugees in World War II. Speaker 1 challenges the “mistaken identity” explanation by emphasizing the timeline: Speaker 1 says the Israelis “strapped the ship,” bombed it, and “hit 90,” which Speaker 1 equates to about 90 minutes—described as an hour and a half. Speaker 1 argues that 90 minutes does not sound like confusion for “a couple of minutes” leading to a few missiles being fired. Speaker 1 asks whether the vessel was flying the American flag or hiding it. Speaker 0 responds that the American flag had been shot down in the early air raid. Speaker 0 says Joe Meadors, the signalman, raised the flag again, and that it was shot down a second time, with the flagstaff destroyed. Speaker 0 adds that after that, Meadors retrieved the “holiday flag,” described as the largest flag aboard ship, and ran it up on the port signal arm.

Speaker 0 notes that the last administration was not transparent on the issue, but with the task force created, they have guided members within what they're cleared for. He asserts that they have encountered alien beings and recovered vehicles, with physical proof, and that he was partially cleared into those activities, having read intelligence reports from those programs. Speaker 1 reflects that online discourse about encounters and videos is plentiful, and asks if there is belief that the US government knows about alien beings coming to Earth. Speaker 0 responds that he doesn’t like to characterize where they came from, but they are definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. He claims to have recovered vehicles and physical proof and says he had partial access to the data and to intelligence reports. He confirms seeing with his own eyes according to his account. Speaker 2 says NASA speaks for itself and claims transparency with data, and asks whether to believe David Crush or if he is lying, and where the evidence is. Speaker 0 asserts that members of the current administration are very aware of this reality and the current president is knowledgeable on the subject. He trusts the president’s leadership and believes the president has assembled a team; he says if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3 says he has access and has had meetings with very smart people who believe there is something out there, and it makes sense there could be. He is not convinced himself. He asks if the person believes one, that he knows, and two, that he’s open to transparency on UAPs. Speaker 0 reiterates that the president is very well informed on the issue, and avoids revealing more than the president might want to reveal. He notes a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 1 asks about years of threat and testimony. Speaker 0 says he was physically threatened even before submitting his intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration, and sought legal protection because of professional and personal fear. Speaker 1 asks about recovering pilots or remains and whether that was seen with his own eyes. Speaker 0 confirms there were pictures and says yes, there were remains. Speaker 1 questions whether the origin is from another planet or outer space, and if it is interdimensional, seeking clarification. Speaker 0 explains he has talked to many veterans of the program and keeps an open mind on origin. He acknowledges an extraterrestrial hypothesis but does not usually go there because he did not see the data, and he is not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government has. He is not aware of any remains or signs of extraterrestrial beings or technology by his department. Speaker 3 says the US government knows, but asks whether other governments know. Speaker 0 says they know and have their own programs, and notes that two and a half years ago the US has been in an arms race with peer competitors like Russia and China, who have their own programs. He says he was able to view intelligence discussing adversarial programs and will leave it at that. Speaker 3 states that they’ve recovered things, and Speaker 0 confirms, noting there were bodies and physical remains. They discuss whether the motive or intent of the visitors was peaceful or not, acknowledging a mixed bag of activity and motive. They consider whether Earth’s genetic material could be a reason for visits, even jokingly proposing Jurassic Park as a tourist attraction for genetic material on Earth.

The speaker states that invitations were extended to both President Trump and the Biden-Harris administration, but there was no response from the White House. They welcomed President Trump to lay wreaths with the families and wounded individuals. At their request, Trump spent time with their loved ones in section 60 without any press present, and they took private pictures. The atmosphere was celebratory, as they wanted to honor their loved ones, which is difficult to do in a cemetery. The speaker notes that President Trump and his team were respectful, and there were no altercations. The speaker emphasizes the desire for their loved ones to be honored and remembered positively.

Speaker 0 stated that while 82,000 Americans are registered as POWs or MIAs, there are at least 20,000,000 LGBTQ members. The speaker accused some people of hypocrisy for ensuring the POW/MIA flag was flown to avoid flying the Pride flag in June, calling it disgusting. Speaker 1 responded that they would not tolerate the assertion that veterans are a political stunt. They stated that the country was founded because veterans lost their lives and that hundreds of thousands died for the country so others could fly a pride flag. Speaker 1 asserted that the 82,000 people who never came home will never have a chance to have a family while others can fly their pride flag. They stated that veterans sacrificed their lives for America and freedom around the world. Speaker 1 warned against disparaging veterans.

A question was asked to survivors about what it means to have their story told at the Capitol and how long they have waited. One survivor said, “59 years,” adding that they have been lobbying Congress for 59 years but “no member of Congress will give us the diamond day.” When asked why that is, another survivor said, “I have no idea,” while also saying “Israel, I’m shocked.” The conversation turned to restrictions placed on the crew: one survivor described being “ordered to secrecy, not to talk to anybody, their wives, and any, even each other,” and said, “We weren’t allowed to talk.” They explained that the situation included threats of punishment. Their superior told the crew that if they talked to anyone, they could “plan on spending the rest of your life in the brig or worse,” warning them with that order. The survivor then described how this secrecy changed: the admiral who commissioned officers “only said tell the day he died,” and fifteen years later, “he died, and then we started fire talking.”

In 1967, I was on the USS Liberty when it was attacked by Israeli forces, resulting in casualties. The attack involved Mirage Jets, napalm, and torpedoes. I believe it was not accidental, as we intercepted classified messages. I think Israel planned the attack, and our government may have known. On this Memorial Day, I remember the fallen crewmen and hope for accountability.

The speaker says they will hold a press conference at the Triangle, but thinks it is more appropriate that everyone be present and ready to proceed. They note that more than a dozen crew members of the USS Liberty are there. The speaker says they stood on the floor of the House and honored the crew for the first time, stating the crew deserve recognition and closure. They emphasize that the crew will not be with them forever, referring to the age of those who were 21 in 1967 and noting that the passage of time places them around 80 years old. The speaker adds that some of the crew members still have dozens of pieces of shrapnel in them, which caused a problem at metal detectors, and calls the individuals brave. They say the recognition should include those who have already passed away and those who died fifty nine years ago that day. The speaker concludes that they did this on the floor of the House and will take questions afterward, including “hard questions” directed to the crew.

Speaker 0 asks if anyone in the audience owes their life to Nicholas Winton and requests them to stand up.

The speaker mentions their uncle who won the Purple Heart in the Battle of Belgium. Their father approached them after they became a senator, asking if they could find out why their uncle never received the Purple Heart. The speaker, being a senator, obtained a personal Purple Heart for their uncle and brought it home to the family. When asked why their father didn't want to deal with it, he simply replied, "The others died."

Speaker 0 expresses gratitude towards the President and a Navy SEAL for their service. Speaker 1 acknowledges the Navy SEAL's pride and thanks him for his contributions to the country. Speaker 0 shares a heartfelt message from the Navy SEAL, who hoped to be remembered. Speaker 1 assures that they will honor his memory. Speaker 0, a marine and mother of a marine, expresses how much it would mean to her. Speaker 1 reassures Speaker 0 and they exchange thanks. The conversation ends with multiple expressions of gratitude.

The speaker was questioned about his duty station on the USS Liberty as a scene leader and member of the forward repair party. He saw two torpedoes aft but not the one that hit the ship, and believed the ship would sink. An admiral threatened the speaker, stating that if he repeated one word about the USS Liberty and who attacked it, he would end up in Leavenworth or worse. The speaker questioned why they were left alone. The speaker felt betrayed and worthless after the encounter, comparing it to the attack and worse than heartbreak. Another speaker stated the admiral knew everything and wasn't a nice man. 28 of the 34 people killed that day worked for him.

Speaker 1 asked whether Jack Ruby and Manson were assets of intelligence agencies specifically pertaining to MKUltra, and whether they were MKUltra victims. Speaker 0 said that, in theory, Manson had never been proven with certainty. He said that Jack Ruby was a different case. Speaker 0 stated that the Warren Commission investigation involved Allen Dulles, the former CIA director, who authorized and ran MKUltra until he was fired by President Kennedy. Speaker 0 said that Richard Helms, the CIA liaison handling information between the CIA and the Warren Commission, was a direct supervisor of Jolly West. Speaker 0 stated that Helms and others knew who West was, what West was capable of, what they had paid him to do, and what West had reported he could do, including inducing mental disorders in people. Speaker 0 said this was never disclosed to the commission “as far as anyone knows,” and he believed West was put in there to keep Jack Ruby from telling his story. In closing, Speaker 1 thanked the attendees and said they would follow up with Dr. Kinzer on a request to fully redact MKLTRA files “that we do have.” Speaker 1 said they would follow up personally with the director of the CIA and that there would be more that would be declassified, specifically pertaining to newly found records that were located in what had been discussed earlier. Speaker 1 also said they would follow up, for the record, on statements made earlier regarding the German government, and that if there were people who were victims who had been buried, they would like to know who those people are and who their families are in order to correct historical wrongdoings of this government. Speaker 1 added that all members had five legislative days to submit materials and additional written questions for the witnesses, which would then be forwarded. The task force was then adjourned.

I am now able to walk with my husband, Michael, and hold hands, something that many Americans were unable to do for years. It's a whole new world for me. I want to express my frustration with this situation. I would like to welcome our distinguished guests and the brave men and women of our exceptional military. I also want to acknowledge Admiral Mueller, Deborah, Michael, and their son, Jack, who is currently deployed. All of you have served our country with extraordinary dedication.

I am the current president of the LVA, aiming to reveal the truth about the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967. The attack resulted in the deaths of 25 Americans and left many others wounded. The Moore Commission highlights the injustices by Israel that our government ignores. As a survivor of the attack, I urge America to reevaluate its relationship with Israel and acknowledge the atrocities committed against humanity and Palestine.

The speaker addresses the US Army soldiers who went missing in Lithuania on March 25 while repairing and towing a tactical vehicle. Three soldiers were found deceased yesterday, and the fourth was found deceased today. The president, the secretary of defense, and the entire White House are praying for the victims' friends and family. The speaker states that this is a reminder of the selfless sacrifice of military men and women who risk their lives around the world every day.

The speaker raises concerns about alleged living doppelgangers of Challenger astronauts, urging a new investigation. Despite objections from commissioners, the speaker insists on addressing the issue, citing suspicious similarities and requesting transparency from NASA. The speaker is eventually removed from the meeting.

Moneypenny, who identifies as British, explains she does not profess to understand the American legal system and notes the British system is harsh. She says that if a high-ranking, medal-awarded UK military figure who used to be a jet pilot and who worked in UK military intelligence came forward with evidence of a misdemeanor involving the death of many people, that matter would be investigated. She says she is stuck and wants to appeal to Pam Bondi and possibly Cash Patel. She describes a US military member who used to be a pilot, who worked in sensitive intelligence, who had visited the Diego Garcia Military Base, and who had a level of clearance allowing him to explore the base, and who was aware of the Black Navy and operations requiring senior sign-in. To her, that individual sounds like someone who would be taken seriously. She questions why information from someone of that caliber who has spoken out, who is recorded speaking out, who has given corroborating evidence and named others, and who can tell where a seven seventy-seven airliner with two hundred thirty-nine souls on board went and how the operation took place, down to the mechanics and the people involved, is not being taken seriously or investigated. She frames this as murder. She notes there are two hundred thirty-nine people on board and thousands of friends, family, and others who have dedicated time to examining the case over the past eleven years, including herself. She mentions videos that potentially reveal some information, but Ashton Forbes, who holds those videos, has been given letters from the American military or American department stating that, in matters of national security, they cannot confirm any of the detail. She reiterates that this decorated military veteran, a former jet pilot who flew into Diego Garcia, who served in Iraq, and who has performed impressive military work for the United States, has spoken out and is on record. She says she will send the video and asks why nothing is being done and why nobody is investigating. She says she does not understand how the United States can overlook this, and she expresses anger on behalf of all those people aboard and their friends and families, many of whom are Chinese and Malaysian. She demands that something be done about this. She adds that she is a nobody, and that she will put this on social media and wait for a bloody good explanation as to why nobody is taking this seriously, because she considers it inhumane. She hopes the Trump administration, among others, would not allow something inhumane to occur, and she ends by expressing that she hopes others agree.

Distinguished guests and members of the military, including Admiral Mullen and his family, I want to acknowledge the exceptional service you have all provided to our country. We are grateful for your dedication and sacrifice.

The speaker says the U.S. government covered up “murder against America on the high seas” and that officials “wanted us all dead to start a war.” They claim their ship was the most sophisticated in U.S. naval history and lists personal and unit decorations, including a Medal of Honor, Navy Cross, Silver Stars, Bronze Stars with a V, Purple Hearts, Combat Action Ribbons, and the Presidential Unit Citation “by that scumbag LBJ.” They describe combat conditions, saying the mess decks were full of broken and wounded people and “a sea of blood.” They were told to go to sickbay and help Doc, who was wounded in the abdomen and both knees while wearing a life jacket. The speaker helped operate, rubbed Doc’s feet after Doc asked to have his socks taken off because his feet were hot, and Doc reportedly told them to “cut him open,” asking whether the speaker thought he would live. The speaker said they told him “No,” and that Doc was cut open, his insides handled, and he died “right then.” The speaker says Doc was sewed up with a couple stitches and “put… over the side,” and that this repeated “all night.” The speaker says they contacted the FBI and CIA, and wrote every congressman and senator, but they received responses saying they were “full of shit.” They say the situation had been going on “ever since day one,” and conclude that “we the people” must bring together Americans to understand “the truth about what the history is already,” rather than relying on mainstream media or alternative networks.

Survivors in the room stood and raised their hands to indicate they have not yet met with the Department of Justice. The Congresswoman urges Attorney General Bondi to apologize to the survivors for the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files, calling the release of the Epstein files and their information “absolutely unacceptable.” She asks Bondi to turn to the survivors and apologize, stating this is about Bondi taking responsibility for the Department of Justice and the harm it has caused. The exchange continues with the Congresswoman insisting that Merrick Garland has sat in that chair twice, and she questions whether Bondi will respond to the survivors, not to those who predated Bondi. The Congresswoman reiterates, “This is not about anybody that came before you. It is about you taking responsibility for your Department of Justice and the harm that it has done to the survivors who are standing right behind you and are waiting for you to turn to them and apologize for what your Department of Justice is.” The hearing appears to encounter procedural friction. The Congresswoman complains that the question is not being answered as expected, accusing the proceedings of theatrics, while another member clarifies that witnesses answer in the way they choose. The chair and other members intervene to maintain “regular order.” The Congresswoman asserts that the situation represents “a massive cover up,” accusing then-President Donald Trump of making the release of the Epstein files a center of his political campaign because he thought it would benefit him. She claims that Bondi’s office claimed to have a client list, but says there was no list, and alleges that Deputy Todd Blanche met alone with Elaine Maxwell and “transferred her to a minimum security prison.” She insists that Bondi should turn to the survivors who are standing behind him on a human level. The chair interrupts and remarks that time has been delayed, noting that the gentlewoman has time remaining but the session ends with a reflection that the general has done something, though the exact action is not specified in the excerpt. The session ends with an acknowledgment of the time constraints and appreciation for the discussion.

In the United States, military service is uncommon, and few people have personal connections to those serving. This contrasts with the situation here, where military involvement is more prevalent. I invite anyone who has served in the past year to stand up. Now, please remain standing. If you are a family member—brother, sister, husband, or wife—of someone currently serving, please also stand.

The speaker states that the two astronauts who were saved from space received only $5 a day per diem for 286 days, totaling $1,430 in extra pay. When asked if the administration can do anything to compensate them fully, the speaker says this is the first time they are hearing about it. The speaker offers to personally pay the difference out of their own pocket if necessary.

The speaker recounts an encounter with high-ranking naval officers during an incident investigation. They were boarded by Captain Ward Boston and Admiral Isaac Kidd. The admiral “came in through the stars on his on the table,” a striking image of his presence, and he spoke to them as if he were a father figure, saying, “talk to me just like I'm your dad.” The speaker describes it as a great relief, feeling reassured by the admiral’s demeanor. The group shared their account in detail, telling the admiral exactly what they saw and believed. They described torpedoes and torpedo boats being shot up, and they mentioned Dave Palm dropping on their slip ships, among other specific observations. The admiral appeared to understand the situation, looking at the speaker and acknowledging that he “could see that he knew it.” This acknowledgment seemed to convey that the admiral grasped the gravity of what had occurred. After listening, the admiral spoke again, delivering a stern warning. He put his “best stars back on me” and said, “listen. Don’t you ever breathe a word to anybody about that.” The warning emphasized severe consequences for disclosure, with the speaker noting that “you many of the guys got fines, but I they they told me fines, imprisonment, or worse.” The exchange underscored the sensitivity and potential repercussions of discussing the events, even as the officers appeared to understand and validate their observations.

The speaker states that the attack on Liberty was not a pure case of mistaken identity and was not pure error. They argue that it’s time for the state of Israel and the United States government to provide the crew members of the Liberty and the American people with the facts of what happened and why it came about that the Liberty was their child thirty years ago to ready.