TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The argument described as biological colonialism, as Jeffrey alluded to, runs like this: for the last five hundred years, nations that wanted to get rich built ships, carried soldiers, guns, and horses to the New World, took their stuff, including gold, enslaved people, and forced labor in gold mines, and that’s how Europe and the UK became rich. This five-hundred-year historical pattern extended into neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and the United States. More recently, with the backing of the U.S. military, third-world nations could be made to produce goods for low cost, which maintained Western wealth. Historically five hundred years of colonialism followed by later forms of domination. The problem, according to the speaker, is that eventually there were no new lands to conquer. The ruling class decided that the money and the peasants to exploit were the middle class in the United States and the developed world. How to extract wealth from the middle class? Through iatrogenic injury. If the entire population can be induced to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then persuade the rest of the population and their kids to take COVID shots, and if those injections injure people, it becomes a system of lifelong chronic illness that enslaves individuals to the system. In the speaker’s research, autism lifetime care costs are in the range of 5,000,000 to 7,000,000 dollars per child. That amount goes somewhere and goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex, and the ruling class. With COVID shots, the speaker requests a picture of a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California who receives a COVID shot and then develops myocarditis. She will need regular cardiology appointments and will be in and out of the hospital, sick for years. Over the next five to ten years of her life, her healthcare costs are approximately 2,000,000 dollars, all of which goes to pharma, doctors, and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. If that same woman were enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you could only extract about 20,000 dollars worth of labor from her at most before she perishes. But in five to ten years in the United States, one person can yield about 2,000,000 dollars through iatrogenic injury and a COVID shot that causes myocarditis and leads to ten years of treatment. The claimed crisis is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth from the middle class, working class, and lower classes in the United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. This crisis existed before and, according to the speaker, blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic and the response and the junk science COVID shots.

Pharmaceutical giants like GSK, Sanofi, Novartis, and Baxter have been given the green light by the WHO to sell millions of vaccines, resulting in billions of euros in revenue. However, concerns have been raised about the WHO's handling of the pandemic. The organization is accused of easily declaring a pandemic by changing the definition, removing the criteria of a high number of cases and deaths. This change has allowed the pharmaceutical companies to profit from the situation. It is revealed that contracts for vaccines were signed between wealthy countries and the companies in 2005, with the condition that the WHO declares a pandemic. Furthermore, conflicts of interest are highlighted, as many experts advising the WHO also work for these pharmaceutical companies. The race for vaccine production is now underway.

The pandemic created 40 new big pharma billionaires. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer profited $1,000 per second from the COVID vaccine. Over 2/3 of congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in 2020. Pfizer made $100 billion in profit in 2022, funded by the public. The system benefits from crises, leading to perpetual emergencies for ordinary people, separate from the elite's interests.

Energy companies, military-industrial conflicts, and pharmaceutical companies all profit from crises like energy crises, wars, and pandemics. This creates a constant need for crises, benefiting the elites while harming everyone else. It is undeniable that these elites prioritize profit over human life, morals, and ethics.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but did not benefit from the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, leading to perpetual crises that serve the interests of the elite rather than ordinary people.

A biopharmaceutical complex has formed, with various organizations and individuals colluding to take advantage of medical emergencies. They meet in Davos, Switzerland and have realized that during a crisis, governments will pour money into the complex. The complex includes the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, Welcome Trust, Rockefeller Foundation, UN, Gavi, UNITATE, CEPI, and regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC. Key figures like Scott Gottlieb and Steven Hahn are involved, with Gottlieb now on Pfizer's board and Hahn supporting Moderna. Even high-ranking officials like Deborah Birx have joined biotech companies. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded massive returns. Overall, it's a money-driven operation.

The pandemic created at least 40 new big pharma billionaires. Pharmaceutical corporations like Moderna and Pfizer made a $1,000 of profit every second from the COVID-19 vaccine. More than 2/3 of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in the 2020 election. Pfizer chairman Albert Bourla told Time Magazine in July 2020 that his company was developing a COVID vaccine for the good of humanity, not for money; Pfizer made $100 billion in profit in 2022. The American public funded the development of the Pfizer vaccine, and the German public funded the BioNTech vaccine. It is possible that these reading capitalists made a lot of money, and also there are a lot of people who did need the vaccine and would be dead without it. If you have an economic system in which pharmaceutical companies benefit hugely from medical emergencies, where a military industrial complex benefits from war, where energy companies benefit from energy crisis, you are going to generate states of perpetual crisis for the interest of ordinary people, separate from the interest of the elite.

A biopharmaceutical complex, consisting of organizations like the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller Foundation, has formed a syndicate to exploit medical emergencies for financial gain. They meet in Davos, Switzerland, and have the support of regulatory agencies worldwide. The complex invests in itself, colludes with others, and rewards them with future jobs. Examples include Scott Gottlieb, former FDA commissioner now on Pfizer's board, and Deborah Birx, who went from being a public health official to CEO of a biotech company. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded massive returns. This complex operates for profit.

Speaker 0 explains the biological colonialism argument: for 500 years, nations that wanted to get rich built ships, loaded them with soldiers, guns, and horses, sailed from Europe to the New World, took their stuff, took their gold, enslaved their people, forced people to work in gold mines, and that’s how Europe and the UK got rich. Then there was neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and the United States, and more recently with the backing of the US military, we could get third-world nations to produce stuff for us for low cost that made us feel rich. That historical pattern lasted five hundred years. The problem, according to Jeffrey’s argument, is that at some point there were no new lands left to conquer. The ruling class decided that the middle class in the United States and throughout the developed world would be the peasants to exploit. How to extract wealth from the middle class? Through iatrogenic injury. If the entire population can be induced to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then get all the rest of the population and the kids to take COVID shots and injure them, you can enslave them for life to chronic illness. In the research, autism lifetime care costs for autism are in the range of $5,000,000 to $7,000,000 per kid, a lot of money that goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex, and the ruling class. With COVID shots, the example is a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California who gets a COVID shot and then develops myocarditis. She must do regular cardiology appointments and is in and out of the hospital, sick all the time. Over the next five to ten years of her life, her healthcare costs are around $2,000,000, and that money goes to pharma, doctors, and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. If that same woman were enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you would only get about $20,000 worth of labor out of her, and then she would perish. But in five to ten years in the US, you can squeeze $2,000,000 out of this one person through iatrogenic injury, via a COVID shot that causes myocarditis and leads to ten years of treatment. The insurance company pays, the government pays, she mortgages her house, her family pays; it extracts all wealth out of her and her family, and then after ten years the pharmaceutical industry allows her to perish. The crisis is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth from the middle class, working class, and lower classes in the United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. This crisis was already present with autism and other chronic illnesses in children before, and it blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic and the response and what is termed junk science COVID shots.

A biopharmaceutical complex, consisting of organizations like the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller Foundation, has formed a syndicate. They have been meeting in Davos, Switzerland for years, planning to take advantage of medical emergencies to access government treasuries and invest in themselves. They collude with anyone necessary and offer future jobs within the complex as rewards. The complex includes regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC, with individuals like Scott Gottlieb and Deborah Birx being part of it. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded a massive return. Overall, it is a lucrative situation for those involved.

The evidence shows that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation profited significantly from vaccines. After selling his stock, Bill Gates shifted his narrative, claiming vaccines were ineffective and the virus wasn't as serious as initially thought. This is surprising, given that throughout the pandemic, he promoted vaccines as highly effective in stopping the virus and transmission. These assertions turned out to be false, and he profited from them. Many view him as a philanthropist, but his actions suggest a motivation driven by financial gain throughout his career.

The lockdown exposed the flaws of globalization. Gates profits from vaccines through tax deductions and control over the WHO. He funds vaccines and requires countries to vaccinate a certain percentage of their population to receive money. The vaccines are owned by companies Gates owns, allowing him to make money. This pattern of profiting from philanthropy mirrors his actions with Microsoft. It seems like a way to get revenge for past rejection.

BlackRock, a major global asset manager, controls 40% of investable assets worldwide. They have investments in various industries like food, medicine, weapons, transportation, and media. This is public information. To sustain the economy, they create crises to boost demand. For instance, a war is necessary for a $90 billion weapon industry, a climate crisis drives demand for green energy, a pandemic is needed to sell vaccines, and drama fuels media traffic. This entire ecosystem is controlled by the upper class, and it's not a coincidence that we are always in a state of crisis.

A biopharmaceutical complex, consisting of organizations like the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller Foundation, has formed a syndicate. They have been meeting in Davos, Switzerland for years, realizing that during a medical emergency, governments will pour money into the complex. The complex invests in itself, colluding with anyone necessary and rewarding them with future jobs. Regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC are part of this complex. Notable figures like Scott Gottlieb and Deborah Birx are involved, with connections to Pfizer and Moderna, respectively. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded a massive return. This complex is currently experiencing a financial boom.

Vaccines generate significant profits for companies. Adding just one vaccine to the infant child schedule can result in $1 billion in annual sales. The widespread COVID-19 vaccination has been highly lucrative for Pfizer, earning them $54 billion in 1.5 years. Moderna, on the other hand, made $56 billion, while Moderna made $34 billion during the same period.

The speaker claims that those who oppose the pharmaceutical industry are punished, while those who support it, like Anthony Fauci, rise to the top. Fauci, who has been in his position for 50 years, is highly paid and serves the agency's ambition. The speaker accuses the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of abandoning its mission to understand why Americans are sick and instead focusing on developing drugs for profit. The NIH earns billions of dollars from the Moderna vaccine, with Fauci's employees benefiting from patents and royalties. The speaker suggests that the agency's commercial interests have overshadowed its regulatory responsibilities.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but didn't receive the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, leading to perpetual crises that serve the interests of the elite rather than ordinary people.

The pandemic has led to the emergence of 14 new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer made massive profits from the COVID-19 vaccine, earning $1,000 per second. In the 2020 election, over two-thirds of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies. Despite Pfizer's chairman claiming their vaccine was developed for the good of humanity, the company still made a staggering $100 billion in profit in 2022. This economic system benefits pharmaceutical, military, and energy companies, creating perpetual crises for ordinary people.

The speaker outlines a version of the biological colonialism argument, referencing Jeffrey. The argument traces five hundred years of wealth accumulation by powerful nations: European ships with soldiers and guns arrive in the New World, take gold, enslave people, force labor in gold mines, and thereby make Europe and the UK rich. This pattern continues through neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals and, more recently, with the backing of the US military to compel third-world nations to produce goods for low cost, sustaining Western wealth. The speaker asserts that when there were no new lands left to conquer, the ruling class redirected exploitation toward the middle class in the United States and developed nations, extracting wealth through iatrogenic injury. According to the speaker, this modern form of exploitation involves the entire population injecting their children 72 times during childhood and encouraging further COVID shots for others, resulting in lifelong injury. The speaker claims that autism and other chronic illnesses generate substantial lifetime care costs, estimated at 5,000,000 to 7,000,000 dollars per child, with these costs benefiting the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital-industrial complex, and the ruling class. A concrete example is given: a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California who receives a COVID shot and develops myocarditis. Over the next five to ten years, her healthcare costs are projected to reach about 2,000,000 dollars, paid by insurance, government programs, and her family, circulating to pharma and doctors. The speaker contrasts this with the older colonial model of extracting wealth from a laborer in a gold mine, where at most about 20,000 dollars of labor could be harvested from a person. In the current model, the speaker argues that the same person could be drained of approximately 2,000,000 dollars through iatrogenic injury and healthcare costs over a decade, ultimately culminating in the person’s death. The core claim is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth from the middle, working, and lower classes in the United States, enriching the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. The speaker states that this crisis was already present with autism and other chronic illnesses before the COVID era but expanded in scale during the COVID epidemic, the response to it, and what they describe as junk science surrounding COVID shots.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but didn't benefit from the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, suggesting it perpetuates a divide between the interests of ordinary people and the elite.

In this video, the speaker brings up some facts related to the issue at hand. They mention that the pandemic has led to the creation of 40 new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer made significant profits from the COVID-19 vaccine, while a majority of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies. The speaker also highlights that Pfizer's chairman claimed their vaccine was developed for the good of humanity, yet the company made billions in profit. They point out that the public funded the development of the vaccine, but the profits went to the companies. The speaker questions the economic system that benefits pharmaceutical companies during medical emergencies and suggests it perpetuates crises for ordinary people, separate from the elite's interests.

The pandemic created 40 new big pharma billionaires. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer profited $1,000 per second from the COVID vaccine. Over 2/3 of congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in 2020. Pfizer's chairman mentioned developing the vaccine for humanity, not money, but the company made $100 billion in profit. The public funded the vaccine development, but companies took the profits. The system benefits from crises like medical emergencies, war, and energy crises, leading to perpetual crises for ordinary people's interests. Industries profit from these crises, like the COVID testing industry.

The discussion traces a long, shadowy arc in the development of modern vaccines and medicine, arguing that rapid COVID-19 vaccine progress rests on over a century of influence by powerful interests rather than sudden breakthroughs. - The narrative centers on John D. Rockefeller, who became America’s first billionaire in 1913, the same year the Federal Reserve was created. It frames Rockefeller as leveraging his oil wealth to monopolize medicine, promoting prescription drugs while vilifying natural and holistic remedies. The claim is that Rockefeller used strategic philanthropy (Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, established 1901; Rockefeller Foundation, 1913) to push laboratory-based, drug-centered medicine, marginalize herbalism and naturopathy, and steer doctors toward pharmaceuticals. The effect, according to the speakers, was to keep people sick so they would return for ongoing treatments rather than cures. - The timeline continues with the rise of the pharmaceutical industry from the 1920s to 1940s, described as moving into synthetic drugs with Rockefeller guidance. Natural remedies were said to be non-patentable while synthetic drugs could be patented, creating a business incentive for ongoing, chronic treatment rather than cures. - The conversation shifts to regulatory dynamics, arguing that regulation became regulatory capture from the 1930s to 1960s, with the FDA functioning as a gatekeeper increasingly populated by former pharma professionals. The FDA’s integrity is debated through the example of Dr. Francis Kelsey, who resisted approving thalidomide; the drug was later linked to birth defects worldwide, and Kelsey’s stance is presented as a rare early stand for public safety. - In the 1970s and 1980s, the narrative asserts growing corporate influence: pharma lobbies expand, advertising budgets explode, and medicine becomes a growth industry. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 is cited as enabling private patents on publicly funded research, tying universities to pharma interests and shaping medical education toward pharmaceutical solutions. Direct-to-consumer advertising is highlighted as a turning point in the 1990s, pressuring doctors through patient demand spurred by TV ads. - The discussion includes a first-hand account from a former pharmaceutical sales representative, Lisa Prada, who describes bribes and perks (golf outings, concerts, strip clubs, etc.) to influence prescribing, and asserts that patients were often treated as means to corporate ends. - Kim Bright, founder of Brightcore Nutrition, joins to discuss current health issues, arguing that the pharmaceutical industry prioritizes profits over patient well-being. She notes that the Rockefeller Foundation funded COVID-19 vaccine efforts (she cites $55 million) and argues the foundation and industry continued to push medical interventions globally. She notes that the FDA’s public acknowledgment of COVID vaccine-related child deaths is incongruent with whistleblowers’ claims and autopsy data. - The program underscores the idea that prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death in the United States and Europe, citing studies on gut microbiome disruption from medications like antibiotics and acid-reducing drugs (dysbiosis) as a major contributor to chronic disease. - The gut microbiome is emphasized as central to health. Dr. David Perlmutter’s work on the gut-brain connection is referenced, including criticism faced for linking diet and fermented foods to health outcomes. Kimchi is highlighted as a powerful antimicrobial and a potential anti-aging agent in cellular studies. The hosts discuss kimchi’s health benefits, including improved digestion, immune function, and weight management. - Brightcore promotes Kimchi One capsules as a convenient alternative for Americans who dislike traditional kimchi, claiming benefits such as reduced bloating, better digestion, improved hair and skin, and weight loss. A discount offer is advertised: 25% off online, up to 50% off with a phone order, free shipping, and a free vitamin D3 with the first 100 callers, using the code provided. - The conversation closes with reflections on the do-not-mistake-the-system dynamic, optimism about changes in medicine, and calls for removing dependency on processed foods and advertising-driven medicine, with an acknowledgment of RFK Jr.’s activism against pharmaceutical ads on television.

During COVID, some people saw the actions of figures like Dr. Fauci, Bill Gates, the WHO, and Klaus Schwab, and wondered why more people didn't notice. This narrative has been ongoing since at least 1910, aiming to discredit chiropractors, naturopaths, nutritionists, and functional medicine doctors. Pharmaceutical companies pay doctors kickbacks and fund the schools that educate them. These doctors often sit on government boards, creating a system that protects its members and exploits vulnerable, sick individuals. Pharmaceutical companies, which educate doctors, prioritize profit over people's well-being, and are unconcerned about the millions of deaths they may have caused as long as they profit.

Pharmaceutical companies are profiting immensely from vaccines and the subsequent treatments for vaccine-related injuries. They make $60 billion annually from vaccine sales and a staggering $500 billion from remedies for vaccine-induced conditions. This includes medications for diabetes, ADHD, asthma, seizures, and more. It's a lucrative business model: create illness and then sell lifelong treatments.