TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I tweeted "Free Palestine" and within ten minutes, the NBA commissioner called, telling me to stop. Agents and people associated with my foundation were telling me to take it down, warning me about potential repercussions in Texas. I was confused, asking what I did wrong. Essentially, I went against the norm and said something people didn't like. I realized I needed to stand by my beliefs. In the league, there's pressure to stay silent, because saying too much could cost you your job. Many former players are in that position, so you feel like you constantly have to hold your tongue.

The Parler CEO, John Matzey, was terminated by the board, but the narrative circulating is inaccurate. Matzey claims he was a strong advocate for free speech and product stability, which is not true. The board, including myself and two other owners, had a clear vision for Parler as a free speech platform, while Matzey's vision diverged from that. We fought to restore Parler after it was taken down by Amazon and others, refusing to compromise our commitment to free speech. Matzey's statements about product stability are misleading, and this situation is an unfortunate breach of trust. The truth will emerge, and those spreading false narratives are misinformed. Parler remains dedicated to free speech, and I encourage everyone to share this message. More details will be discussed on my show tomorrow.

"BB's holding it up like Charlie just in May said, hey, you know what? I just want to write a love letter to Israel." "I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian." "But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan." "But no. I am a bad person if I do this." "Thousands of tweets and text messages." "the people that are attacking me are in a hyperparanoid state because they're at war, and war tends to make things black and white, and you're a hammer looking for a nail." "What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online? How would I behave?" "Tucker Carlson was really the focus when it came to America Fest."

The Biden administration's team would call and aggressively demand the removal of certain content, but we refused to take down anything that was true. They wanted us to remove a meme about potential future compensation for COVID vaccine recipients, but we stood our ground on not censoring humor or satire. Eventually, Biden made a statement accusing us of causing harm, which led various government agencies to investigate our company. The situation became very intense and challenging for us.

I've lost a lot of friends. I've particularly in the Israel question, I've never talked about Israel. I'm not a hater of Israel. Netanyahu is really hurting The United States and the world. It's completely out of control. Over twenty years, twenty five years. And, so I've always had that view, but I've kept it to myself because it's not worth it. But we've been pushed so hard and used so much by him that it's just terrible for the country that I I grew up in. And so I've said something and, you know, you do that and people you really, like, had dinner with and really liked are all of a sudden denouncing you as a Nazi or whatever. I never wanted that and it makes me sad now.

The speaker tweeted "free Palestine" while playing for the Houston Rockets and claims they were kicked out of the NBA as a result. They received a call from the NBA commissioner less than ten minutes after the tweet, and people working with their foundation urged them to erase it. The speaker questioned what they did that was so bad, but felt it was because they went against the grain. They decided to stand on what they believe, despite the risk of not getting another job. The speaker reached a point where they couldn't trust anyone, leading to a period of silence. However, they realized that either they speak their mind, or others will speak for them, and they chose to speak.

The exchange centers on whether the person being spoken to is the author of a controversial social media post and on whether authorities should press for a response. The conversation begins with an attempt to verify the person’s identity: “Picture to make sure it's you. We're not sure.” The responding party, referred to as Speaker 0, declines to answer without his lawyer present, stating, “I refuse to answer questions without my lawyer present. So I really don't know how to answer that question either.” He emphasizes his stance with a nod to freedom of speech, saying, “Well, you're like I said, you're not gonna is freedom of speech. This is America. Right? Veteran. Alright. And I agree with you 100%.” The officers explain they are trying to identify the correct person to speak with and proceed with the inquiry. Speaker 1 presents the substance of the post in question: “the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians tried to shut down a theater for showing a movie that hurt his feelings and refuses to stand up for the LGBTQ community in any way, Even leave the room when they vote and on related matters. Wants you to know that you're all welcome clown face clown face clown face.” They ask Speaker 0 if that post was authored by him. Speaker 0 again refuses to confirm, stating, “I’m not gonna answer whether that’s me or not.” The discussion shifts to the underlying concern. Speaker 1 clarifies that their goal is not to establish whether the post is true, but to prevent somebody else from being agitated or agreeing with the statement. They quote the line about “the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians” and note that such a post “can probably incite somebody to do something radical.” The purpose of the inquiry, they say, is to obtain Speaker 0’s side of the story and to address the potential impact of the post. Speaker 1 urges Speaker 0 to refrain from posting statements like that because they could provoke actions. Speaker 0 expresses appreciation for the outreach, but reiterates that he will maintain his amendment rights to not answer the question. He concludes by acknowledging the interaction and affirming that the conversation ends there: “That is it. And we're gonna maintain my amendment rights to, not answer the question about whether or that's fine.” Both parties part on a courteous note, with Speaker 0 thanking them and wishing them well.

- Speaker 0 asks if the interviewee ever received a payment from Nag. Speaker 1 confirms: one payment from mag Nag for July, two weeks, and it was under contract work. It was based on fulfilling articles, specifically items in the SOW, including articles and hosting with other NAG creators’ spaces and promoting the general NAG brand. - Speaker 0 asks if the interviewee had a NAG badge. Speaker 1 confirms yes, they had a badge from the time until their SOW was severed. - Speaker 0 asks who has the authority to add or remove badges on the app. Speaker 1 says no, they did not have that authority; implies someone else (and mentions “my son”) has that ability. - Speaker 0 asks who removed Mays’s badge. Speaker 1 responds that it was probably “my son.” - After losing the badge, Speaker 1 describes feelings about the organization of NAG and whether it was mutual or comfortable, noting that there might have been a lot of anger directed at them due to political views. They mention not being necessarily pro-Israel and acknowledging that others were getting hate as well, which they think contributed to the decision to pull out of political discussions. - Speaker 0 asks if the removal was purely conjecture or if there was an implication. Speaker 1 explains what was said: between now and the launch of his product, he needs to stay away from political volatility within the app; if the interviewee wanted to continue participating in political discussions, he would take the badge and end the contract (SOW). If not, the SOW would end, and the badge would be removed, with the interviewee being given a choice. - Speaker 1 mentions discovering that many friends were kicked out because they made him co-host, and then says they will swap someone out, indicating a transition or replacement.

And I was being attacked too. By the way, it was a huge effort by people, some of whom I know and have helped and like Seth Dillon, the Babylon Bee, for example. Seth Dillon was out there demanding that Charlie Kirk take me off the roster, pull me off stage because I had said things that BB didn't like or that he didn't like or whatever. Shocking that someone whose whole persona is wrapped up in the idea that we all get to speak and if you don't like it, make a more compelling case. That that person and many others like him were advocating for me getting pulled off the stage because they don't like what I'm saying. This is a trend and one that we should be really concerned about. The trend is really simple. People with power don't want to hear disagreement.

You see, Sabrina, read the comments from your own community. You've failed them. You've absolutely failed them. You've cozied up to people and tried to be friends with people who want to see the destruction of the only Jewish homeland. They're they're your friends. I don't associate with jihadists, Islamists, anti Semites, Jew hatred. I won't give them a time of day. You hang around with them. That's the difference between me and you. And I speak facts and truth, and that's uncomfortable for you because you're a coward, and that's it. You have a problem with me because you think you can cozy up and be nice to the Islamists, and they might just leave you alone. Because of people like you, you allow it to happen. Not me. I won't allow it to happen. That's the difference between us.

I attended UCLA in 2016 when Trump was elected. During midterms, professors offered students time off to "heal" from the election. In a mandatory discussion class, everyone was emotional, and when asked how I was coping, I shared that I voted for Trump and believed it would be a good four years. I was then kicked out for being a "threat" to my classmates' safety. This experience made me realize the need to speak out against such intolerance. I recently started posting on TikTok and encourage others to do the same. I don’t hate anyone, but I’m unfairly labeled with negative terms that don’t reflect who I am. It's important to stand up and be heard.

Speaker says they had to block all their friends because of different political beliefs, though they believed these were the people they would live with after college and stay in touch—the people who saved their life on multiple occasions. They dropped out of school for them and started homeschooling because of them; in a small school, they don’t know how to face them, and these people are their life. They don’t know how to avoid them and feel they might be to blame for blowing up the relationships; everything they hear makes them feel like such a shit person, and they can’t have that in their life anymore. They used to not respect themselves to cut people out for this, but now they do; they respect themselves enough to not want to feel like this. God, I'm probably gonna delete this because this is so fucking embarrassing crying on camera.

A former Houston Rockets player recalls a pivotal moment from a couple of years ago when he tweeted “free Palestine.” He says that as a result, he damn near got kicked out of the league. Immediately after posting the tweet, he received a call from the commissioner of the NBA, and people working with his foundation in Texas urged him to erase the tweet, insisting he would get in trouble. He wondered what he had done that was so bad. The other speaker asks for an explanation, prompting the first speaker to reflect on why he faced such a response. He explains that he went against the grain by saying something people didn’t like, and that led to repercussions. He emphasizes that it wasn’t just that “people didn’t like” it, but that the reaction was strong enough to force him to consider backing down. He describes a period when he was in a leadership position and felt that if he said too much, he might lose his job. This created a climate where he stopped trusting anyone, leading him to decide not to say anything or do anything. He notes that this silence became a problem because others began speaking for him. Over the years, he says, it felt like he had to choose between staying silent or letting others voice opinions about him. He concludes that he eventually chose to speak for himself, deciding, “I’m a speak and that’s the end of it.” The dialogue underscores a tension between personal beliefs, public expectations, and professional risk, highlighting the pressure he felt to conform versus his determination to stand by what he believed.

I was just fired from my job. After six years building the diversity, equity and inclusion department from scratch at Microsoft, I lose my job because a random person reports my posts to my employer and takes my job and security away for a thought, for an opinion. Somebody screenshot all of my TikToks. I made some stupid comments about Charlie Kirk on the day that he was shot, I said some things on blue sky and on threads, and I deleted them when it was requested by my employer. 'and you talk about freedom of speech like you care about it.' 'I felt joy that day.' 'I can't help that. So I don't deserve a job?' 'Fired You from my fucking job.' 'Now I have nothing but this website. I have nothing anymore.'

I tweeted "Free Palestine" and within ten minutes the NBA commissioner called, telling me to delete it. My agents and foundation people echoed the sentiment, warning me about the repercussions. I was confused, wondering what I'd done wrong, but it was simply because I went against the grain. I had to stand my ground and not retract my statement. Being in the league puts you in a precarious position. Speak out too much, say the wrong thing, and you might find yourself out of a job. That fear of losing opportunities silences a lot of players.

I had a disagreement with a colleague in front of others, and the next day he refused to resign, so I fired him. On February 2nd, after a video I made went viral, another person from Project Veritas told me they would have an emergency vote to restructure the company. I received an email with the agenda while I was on a plane, and realized I would be removed from my position by the time I landed.

Speaker 0 says he went and hassled asked straightforward questions to Ted Cruz, describing Cruz as a sitting senator who was “serving for Israel by his own description,” and notes he isn’t targeting Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) because she’s “the most sincere.” He questions why not go after Cruz. Speaker 1 recalls being a friend of MTG; she spoke at his conference, then “the day after, she pretended like she didn't know me,” describing a history that began in 2022. He explains views evolve as people interact with reality and as the reality of self changes, adding that now “everyone agrees with me,” and he would forgive hostility. He says he doesn’t know what MTG’s new views are, noting she’s come around on Israel “this year,” whereas he has spoken on the issue for ten years. He characterizes the past as “ BS” and claims he was treated as if he didn’t exist, canceled for ten years for discussing these topics, particularly during a time of intense censorship. Speaker 1 mentions MTG fired one of his staffers because someone found out a groiper was working in her office, and that person’s life was ruined; MTG allegedly knew exactly what the conference was, yet she pretended not to. He says the issue isn’t personal with MTG, but argues the past disagreement was because she was “on the other team.” Speaker 0 counters that many people were on different sides in the past and suggests the question is bigger than themselves, aiming to restore America for future generations. Speaker 0 adds a personal note: if Dave Rubin called to apologize for calling him “Hitler,” he would consider it meaningful, and he sees legitimate questions to consider. He emphasizes sincerity as central, stating he believes sincerity shows when someone’s heart is pure, and that Joe Kent appeared sincere despite not agreeing on everything, which led Speaker 0 to think Kent was a good person. However, Speaker 0 says Kent was later discredited as being a CIA officer (or contractor), which contradicted their impression, and he recalls showing each other a badge during a mutual suspicion moment. Speaker 1 recalls being disavowed by MTG for his views on Israel and criticized for talking about white people and Christianity, and notes that he worked with Blumenthal on an article while Speaker 0 had called him on the phone. Speaker 0 reflects that the exchange felt “inside baseball” and insists he was seeking a sincere politician, someone brave, regardless of full agreement. He cites Joe Kent as an example of sincerity despite disagreements, and recounts being surprised by Speaker 1’s later revelation that Kent’s CIA association changed his view of Kent.

I tweeted "Free Palestine" and within ten minutes, the NBA commissioner called, telling me to stop. Agents and people connected to my foundation told me to take it down, warning of the consequences. I was confused, asking what I did wrong, but it was clear, I went against the grain, and some didn't like what I said. Now, I have to stand firm in my beliefs. In the league, there's pressure to stay silent, to avoid saying anything that might cost you your job. So many players out of the league face this. It forces you to hold your tongue.

Speaker 1 explains that they were not fired by Mark Zuckerberg, but faced continuous attacks from the media and tech industry. They were put on leave for six months after making a $9,000 political donation supporting Trump. The speaker believes that if Trump had lost, the attacks would have been dismissed, but his victory made it unbearable. They acknowledge a direct connection between the donation and being pushed out of the company. Other Facebook employees fear speaking out or supporting any politician due to what happened to the speaker. The speaker advises right-leaning founders to keep their political leanings private to avoid being terminated by the mob, focusing instead on building and creating value.

I've lost a lot of friends. And I've particularly in the Israel question, I've never talked about Israel. I'm not a hater of Israel. Certainly not a hater of Jews. But Netanyahu is really hurting The United States and the world. It's completely out of control. I've thought that for a very long time, Over twenty years, twenty five years. I never wanted that and it makes me sad now. Friends who denounce you as Nazi for your honest opinion are not really friends. I've lost one real friend Right. In the past ten years. One actual friend, and I and I feel it's painful for me. And it wasn't about Israel, but we just diverged politically and he could not be friends with me.

The speaker states that they tweeted "free Palestine" while playing for the Houston Rockets and were subsequently kicked out of the league. They received a call from the NBA commissioner less than ten minutes after the tweet, urging them to take it down. The speaker questions what they did that was so bad, suggesting the issue was going against the grain. They decided to stand on their beliefs, despite the risk of losing their job. This led to a period where they felt they couldn't trust anyone, choosing to say and do nothing. However, this created a new problem, as others began speaking for them. The speaker resolved to speak their mind, regardless of the consequences.

"The American Jewish Committee called in a statement Charlie Kirk an anti Semite and quote dangerous. 'Charlie Kirk, an anti Semite.' 'Yeah. He was not an anti Semite. He was the opposite, and he was not dangerous.' He was 'a great lover of people and a purveyor of peace,' 'the opposite,' and he was 'very stung by that.' 'Charlie was deeply offended by that' and expressed some of those feelings on Megyn Kelly show and in other places, but that did not let up. The story is told because he called me and then came to see me at my house about this topic. And I said to him every single time, 'look, I've got my own way to communicate my views.' This is actually not the most important issue to me. There are lots of things I can talk about. I don't need to come to Turning Point. I can take a year off no problem. I hated seeing how much he was suffering, the hassle he was getting from people, and I was attacked too. By the way, it was a huge effort. I wasn't fully aware of it actually because I don't go online."

in the last twenty four hours, you locked the accounts and shut down the accounts of two guys, Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones. it's better if you unlock those accounts and let the guys be heard. censorship isn't good for America. It's antithetical to our culture. If you tell people they can't speak, that's when they scream. And if you tell people they can't scream, that's when they tear things down. free speech is a precondition for peace. There's a different category of saying that you may demonetize certain people. What I'm talking about is not a legal point. It's just a cultural point. because of who you are, you deserve not to be heard. restore the accounts of those guys, believe me, it will be a down payment on beginning to reunite this country.

And I was being attacked too. There was a huge effort by people, some of whom I know and have helped and like Seth Dillon, the Babylon Bee, for example. Seth Dillon was out there demanding that Charlie Kirk take me off the roster, pull me off stage because I had said things that BB didn't like or that he didn't like or whatever. Shocking that someone whose whole persona is wrapped up in the idea that we all get to speak and if you don't like it, make a more compelling case. That that person and many others like him were advocating for me getting pulled off the stage because they don't like what I'm saying. This is a trend and one that we should be really concerned about.

I'm a free speech absolutist, yet my account was suspended and my verification removed. Subscribers can no longer support my work because Elon Musk disagrees with my statements. I didn't dox anyone; I shared publicly available FEC records. My intention was to warn the Trump administration about a significant issue that could lead to impeachment if the Democrats regain control and frame it as big tech buying influence. This is a serious concern that needs attention, especially since the MAGA base is reacting strongly to it.