TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Between 9:11 PM and 9:32 PM on CNN, there were significant vote swings in the election. Joe Biden started with 706,000 votes and dropped to 300,000, while Trump went from 371,000 to 292,000. Biden then increased to 871,000, while Trump had a sudden increase to 413,000 before dropping again. These fluctuations raise questions about how votes can decrease and why there were so many errors. The video highlights a 19,000 vote switch in Pennsylvania and questions the number of errors across the country and who is responsible for them.

The speaker claims that real-time Edison data reveals election data manipulation. According to the speaker, Seidl receives raw election data directly from election officials in at least nine states. The speaker alleges that an additive process should show more votes, not deletions, in each interval report. However, a video of Edison reports allegedly shows pauses, oscillation, and deletions in total, in-person, and mail-in votes. The speaker claims this is the algorithm trying to figure out the math problem. The speaker points to North Carolina and Georgia counties as examples, noting Seidl directly contracts with Georgia. The speaker then plays a clip of someone discussing estimated vote percentages dropping, suggesting the reported results are not actual results. The speaker questions the calling of races with razor-thin margins, particularly Arizona, based on projections and alleged impossible data anomalies. The speaker asserts that historically, those counting votes called races, but now machines and news outlets do, deterring challenges.

The speaker questions the statistical possibility of a sudden increase in votes for Biden without any votes for Trump. They argue that even in the bluest city, there should be some votes for the other party. They also mention that the increase in votes occurred around 4:30 in the morning. The speaker then discusses the sudden halt in vote counting in Nevada, which they find inexplicable and illogical. They question why counting would be stopped in the middle of the day and suggest that it doesn't make sense to shut everyone down.

Joe Biden's vote count seems implausible, as he supposedly received 15 million more votes than Barack Obama, yet we didn't gain net House seats after losing the presidency. We also lost 19 out of 20 bellwether races. There are claims of fraudulent ballots from non-existent voters, which raises questions about the integrity of the election process. Trump announced his lead in Philadelphia late at night, but counting was allegedly stopped, only to resume early the next morning, resulting in a shift in the vote count. This situation has led to suspicions about the counting process and transparency during the election.

Around 80-90% of the votes seemed to be going to Joe Biden, which made me increasingly uneasy as the day went on. Every time I saw another batch of votes, it was all for Biden. This seemed statistically impossible to me.

The speaker highlights statistical irregularities in the election results, pointing out multiple batches where Biden received all the votes and Trump received none. They assert that this is a statistical impossibility and challenge the media to stop denying the evidence of election fraud. The speaker emphasizes that the incorrect information has been publicly available for months and urges the Secretary of State to acknowledge it.

In the early hours of November 4, 2020, Joe Biden received major vote spikes in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, putting him in the lead. These spikes occurred during a 5-hour window when counting reportedly had stopped. The updates in question did not follow typical patterns and were particularly extreme. For example, in Michigan, Biden received 141,258 votes compared to Trump's 5,968 votes in a single update. A similar situation occurred in Wisconsin, where Biden went from trailing by over 100,000 votes to taking the lead with a single update. In Georgia, Biden received 136,155 votes while Trump only received 29,115 votes in another update. These spikes were larger than the margin of victory in all three states. Critics argue that these spikes were human errors, but there is no evidence to support this claim.

Biden consistently received high numbers of votes while Trump received none, which the speaker deems statistically impossible. They claim that the Secretary of State should be aware of this incorrect information, as it has been publicly available for months. The speaker challenges the media and anyone who denies the existence of election fraud, stating that there is evidence and those who claim otherwise are lying.

There were 138,000 votes that came in all at once, and they all went to Biden, which is statistically improbable. In any election, even in the most Democratic areas, you'd expect some votes for the opposing candidate. This situation raises concerns about the counting process, especially since it appears this spike occurred around 4:30 AM. Additionally, Nevada has unexpectedly stopped counting votes during the day, which is illogical and raises further questions about the transparency of the process. It’s unusual for counting to halt when there should still be workers tallying votes.

The speaker discusses irregularities in the voting data in Esther County and Lehigh County. In Esther County, there are decreases in both absentee and election day votes, which is unusual. Trump loses a significant number of votes in both categories. In Lehigh County, Trump initially receives over 66,000 votes, which are then taken away and later restored through incremental updates. However, the updates do not match the exact amount that was removed. The speaker questions why these irregularities are occurring and what is the explanation behind them.

During the election night, there were significant vote swings observed on CNN between Joe Biden and Trump. Biden's votes fluctuated drastically, raising questions about the accuracy of the counting process. The speaker questions the legitimacy of such errors and the impact they may have had on the election results nationwide. The concern is raised about the responsibility for these errors and the potential impact on the outcome.

On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.

In this video, the speaker discusses a statistical anomaly in a race where ballots were sorted into groups of 200. Out of 61 groups, 58 favored Biden by 90% or more, while 3 favored Trump by the same margin. This suggests that someone or a group of people may have manipulated the ballots, resulting in a significant imbalance in favor of one candidate over the other in a race that was supposed to be evenly split.

The speakers discuss irregularities in a sudden surge of 138,000 votes, all for Biden, in the early hours of the morning. They question the statistical possibility of this happening and express concern over the sudden halt in vote counting in Nevada. The abrupt stoppage is deemed illogical and raises suspicions about the integrity of the process.

Between 9:11 PM and 9:32 PM on CNN, there were significant vote swings during the election. Joe Biden's votes dropped from 706,000 to 517,000, then increased to 871,000 and dropped again to 495,000. Meanwhile, Trump's votes went from 371,000 to 413,000 and then down to 292,000. The speaker questions how votes can decrease when they should only be added. They highlight the possibility of errors, mentioning a 19,000 vote switch in Pennsylvania and questioning the number of errors nationwide and who is accountable for them.

- Speaker 0 asserts that mail-in ballots are corrupt and that a Republican-led effort will end mail-in ballots, including drafting an executive order by “the best lawyers in the country.” They claim the U.S. is nearly the only country using mail-in ballots and cite “massive fraud all over the place,” arguing that secure, paper-ballot elections with watermarking would produce faster results (claims that paper ballots provide results the same night, whereas machines allegedly take two weeks). - The conversation references a specific election night anomaly: a block of 138,000 votes (Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 confirm “138,000” votes) all reportedly voting for Biden with no Trump votes in that segment, described as inexplicable and not consistent with expected linear reporting. They note the timing as around 04:30–06:30 in the morning and suggest the results should not be linear given numerous counters reporting across states. They also complain that Nevada stopped counting mid-day, calling it inexplicable and illogical. - Speaker 4 claims a counting software glitch caused a 6,000-vote swing in a county, where ballots counted for Democrats were miscalculated for Republicans; she states that 47 counties use the same software. - Speaker 5 demonstrates concerns about voting-machine security: he shows how a bad actor could gain full admin access in under two minutes by opening a device, removing the card reader, and bypassing error messages, implying easy manipulation of tabulation in 18 states using the machine. - Speaker 6 describes observed ballot processing irregularities: a ballot-stuffing environment where ballots are stamped and filled in rapidly at the top of tickets, with security oversight present but gaps noted in workflow. - Speaker 7 discusses absentee/mail-in ballots with suspicions about sequence numbers: numbers appeared almost sequential, suggesting they could not be from mailed-in ballots, as mailed ballots typically arrive at different numbers; they note there was no date on envelopes and that some details would not be in poll books or the system, alleging irregularities in how ballots were handled. - Speaker 8 reports ongoing theft of duplicate ballots: a table for duplicates existed, but ballots were copied and redistributed at various tables, with duplicates not fully processed and ballots stashed under boxes; the speaker claims this occurred throughout the night. - Speaker 9 recounts a local media denial of fraud at the TCF center, contrasted with video obtained later showing a van delivering ballots after hours; she describes escort cars, a back-and-forth of ballots, and suggests the presence of unobserved ballots and a lack of witnesses during tabulation. She notes that the video was shared publicly and led to the suspension of a social-media account. - Speaker 10 provides a timeline from October 21, detailing a driver delivering mail-in ballots from New York to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and then to Lancaster, with the driver faced hours of waiting, lack of slips, and unclear purpose for moving the load; the driver states that this was the only time he transported mail-in ballots and expresses a belief in the importance of honest elections for Americans.

Joe Biden could not have received more votes than Barack Obama, and it’s improbable that we lost the presidency while gaining 12 House seats. We didn’t win 19 out of 20 bellwether races and still lose. There were fraudulent ballots created for non-existent voters, which is why envelopes were discarded. Trump announced he was leading by 800,000 votes in Philadelphia, insisting they wouldn’t be blocked from counting. There was confusion when it was suggested counting would stop for the night, but when counting resumed the next morning, the results changed, indicating a shift in the outcome.

At the beginning of the chart, there is a spike in loaded votes on Election Day, indicating an anomaly in the reporting. This spike is seen as a prime indicator of fraudulent voting. In a 90-minute period, there were 337,000 votes added, with a total of around 570,000 spikes representing votes for Biden and a little over 3,200 for Trump.

The speaker is alarmed by events in the 2020 US presidential election, drawing parallels to the 2013 Venezuelan election where Smartmatic software allegedly changed votes. Vote counting abruptly stopped in five states using Dominion software while Donald Trump was ahead. During the night, vote reporting went offline, and when it resumed, there was a significant shift favoring Joe Biden. According to the speaker, votes in 27 or 28 states counted by Dominion are sent outside the US to Germany and Spain, where Smartmatic, a company founded in Venezuela in 2005 to fix elections, does the counting. Smartmatic has a history of election interference in Venezuela and Argentina, and allegedly botched an election in Chicago. The speaker claims Smartmatic stopped vote counting and subtly switched votes, around 10 per district, which was discovered in Antrim County.

The speaker discusses the statistical improbability of a sudden surge of 138,000 votes all going to Biden without any representation for Trump. They question the legitimacy of this occurrence and the linear movement of the votes. They also mention that Nevada has suddenly stopped counting, which is inexplicable and raises suspicions. The speaker expresses confusion and disbelief at the decision to halt the counting process. The conversation then shifts to new information from Wisconsin, where Biden is now ahead by 11,381 votes. The speaker raises questions about the source of these votes and what it means for the overall situation.

There were significant vote swings on election night between 9:11 PM and 9:32 PM. Joe Biden's votes fluctuated dramatically, dropping from 700,000 to 517,000, then rising to 871,000, while Trump's votes increased from 371,000 to 413,000 before plummeting to 292,000. This raises questions about how votes can decrease when they should only increase. While human and machine errors can occur, the scale of these discrepancies—like a 300,000 vote swing—seems excessive. In Pennsylvania, a 19,000 vote switch was noted, but many similar instances across the country prompt concerns about the integrity of the election process. How many errors are acceptable, and who is responsible for these discrepancies?

Around 80-90% of the votes seemed to be going to Joe Biden, which made me increasingly uneasy as the day went on. Every time I saw another batch of votes, it was all for Biden. This seemed statistically impossible to me.

The speaker discusses how the vote total may have been altered through the HAMMER program and ScoreCard software, affecting the election outcome. They mention a computer glitch in Michigan that favored President Trump, suggesting similar issues in other states. They question the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden, deeming it statistically improbable.

This video presents evidence of alleged widespread fraud in the November 2020 election. It highlights statistical anomalies in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, where Joe Biden received major vote spikes in the early hours of November 4th. These spikes occurred during a 5-hour window when counting had reportedly stopped. The video also discusses eyewitness and video evidence, including a poll worker in Georgia seen handling absentee ballots after counting was supposed to have ended. It raises concerns about Dominion Voting Systems and their alleged vulnerabilities to hacking and manipulation. The video concludes by urging viewers to share the evidence and demand election reform.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.