reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A man confronts a congressman, questioning his prior support for Kilmar Braco Garcia, who has been charged with facilitating the transport of illegal immigrants. He asks if the congressman still supports Garcia and whether he believes Garcia is entitled to due process, given his alleged illegal status. The man repeatedly asks if Garcia entered the country legally and accuses the congressman of being made a fool. He references accusations that Garcia beat his wife and questions whether the congressman supports "illegal gangbangers" in Maryland. He asks the congressman to condemn human smuggling and accuses him of being a "fascist." He questions whether the congressman believes in due process and demands to know how Garcia was allowed into the United States. He asks if the congressman is retracting his support for Garcia. The man then asks if the congressman supports deporting criminal illegal immigrants, referencing Elon Musk. He presses the congressman on whether he supports removing criminal illegal immigrants from the country.

Donald Trump's house was raided by the FBI, while Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton faced no such action for similar accusations. The left is accused of using a radical district attorney to target Trump. The House Oversight Committee has found evidence of influence peddling and financial deception, but there is a lack of immediate action. The speaker calls for someone like John Adams, who defended British soldiers after the Boston Massacre, to uphold the rule of law. The focus shifts to Hunter Biden, comparing his alleged crimes to those of Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro's children. The audience is urged to take action.

The speaker asks about President Biden's conflicts of interest regarding sanctions on individuals who have done business with his family. They mention a report alleging that the First Son's company received $3,500,000 from a Russian woman. The speaker questions how Biden is navigating these conflicts and asks for an explanation of the $3,500,000. The other speaker responds by saying they have no confirmation of the report's accuracy and no further details. When asked about conflicts of interest, the speaker questions what those conflicts would be and points out that Biden has sanctioned more oligarchs than before, suggesting it is not a conflict of interest.

Speaker 0 is asked if President Biden accepted bribes and if he would comment on the arrest of the former president.

The IRS agents found evidence to investigate Joe Biden for financial crimes. Despite claims of no evidence linking Joe to Hunter Biden's businesses, the speaker believes it is untrue.

The speaker discusses the RICO statute and refers to the Biden family enterprise as a classic RICO case. They claim that the Biden family monetized Joe Biden's public office and sold it for personal gain. They mention incidents during the Obama administration and before Biden became vice president where individuals associated with the Bidens sold Joe's influence. The speaker argues that this constitutes a RICO case involving Hobbs Act extortion, bribery, and fraud. They criticize the double standard in investigating Trump and Biden. They mention Victor Shokin's testimony, which they believe corroborates the allegations against Biden. The speaker also highlights lies and distortions from the Biden camp and the media. They conclude by stating that evidence of wrongdoing exists and that Hunter Biden was indeed a subject of investigation.

Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of discrediting herself by focusing on trivial matters concerning Biden, such as his ice cream preference, instead of investigating Hunter Biden's alleged financial dealings with foreign entities. Speaker 1 claims Hunter Biden received millions from Moscow and significant payments from an energy company despite lacking relevant experience. Speaker 0 states that the Hunter Biden laptop story originated from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani and cannot be verified. Speaker 1 insists the laptop's existence is known and that it's crucial to investigate potential corruption involving Biden and foreign money from China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 also alleges Biden's brother profited in Iraq without prior experience. Speaker 1 asserts this is a major scandal that Speaker 0 is ignoring. Speaker 0 reiterates the laptop cannot be verified.

Hunter Biden's lawyers allegedly impersonated the House Ways and Means Committee to request the removal of evidence in his potential plea deal case. The lawyer for the committee had sought to file evidence against the deal. The judge threatened Hunter's lawyers with sanctions for this breach, which could potentially lead to disbarment. This incident highlights the desperation and unprofessionalism of Biden's team. The story is still unfolding.

During the interview, they discussed an email mentioning "10 held by H for the big guy." They inferred that the "big guy" referred to President Biden. The AUSA interjected and said she didn't want to ask about the "big guy" or dad, implying that Joe Biden may be involved in Hunter Biden's transactions.

The speaker challenges the idea that Hunter Biden committed a crime, stating it's not illegal to profit from one's last name. They then direct Chuck to the Marco Polo report, which they claim details potential crimes.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

The house investigations into the first family's international business dealings are ongoing. One committee is seeking an FBI file alleging that President Biden took bribes, while an IRS whistleblower claims there is a cover-up in the investigation. A recent Harvard Harris poll revealed that 53% of the public, including a fourth of Democrats, believe that Joe Biden was involved in an illegal influence peddling scheme with his son. There is evidence of the president interacting with associates from China, Mexico, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine. What do you say to the majority of Americans who believe the president is corrupt?

The Secret Service is paying $16,000 a month for Hunter Biden's security in Malibu. Hunter Biden is reportedly selling art to cover his $15,800 monthly rent. Concerns are raised about people buying his art to gain favor with the President, but the responsibility lies with Hunter Biden and his representatives. It is questioned whether Hunter Biden has stopped selling access to the White House, but that is for him to answer. Testimony suggests that Hunter Biden and Devin Archer tried to profit off the Biden brand, but no further details are provided.

Hunter Biden's lawyers allegedly impersonated the House Ways and Means Committee to request the removal of evidence in his potential plea deal case. The Republican Congress had wanted to file the evidence to undermine the deal. The judge threatened Hunter's lawyers with sanctions for this breach, which could potentially lead to disbarment. This incident showcases the desperation and unprofessionalism of Biden's team. The story is still unfolding.

Ron Rocha confronted George Bergès, accusing him of money laundering through his art gallery by selling Hunter Biden's paintings. Rocha claimed the sales were illegal, questioned the $500,000 price tags, and called Biden a "crackhead, not an artist." He demanded to know who was buying the paintings and what influence they had with the president, asking why the FBI hadn't investigated Bergès. Rocha repeatedly accused Bergès of laundering money and breaking the law, and asked why he felt he didn't have to answer to the people of New York City. Bergès alluded to police presence at Rocha's residence and criticized Rocha for not wearing a mask or having a "COVID ID," and called him a scumbag.

President Biden's denial of discussing businesses with Hunter Biden's associates is called a lie by the speaker. The investigation has allegedly uncovered evidence of Joe Biden's involvement in illegal business transactions. Examples include James Biden receiving a loan based on his last name and wiring money to Joe Biden, and an email mentioning "the big guy" receiving a 10% stake in a joint venture. The speaker also accuses Hunter Biden of not registering as a foreign agent despite his work with a Chinese energy company. The speaker calls for an impeachment investigation into President Biden's alleged corruption and pay-for-play tactics. They claim that the confusion surrounding Biden's business transactions was intentional to hide money from the American people and the IRS. The speaker questions if the president is compromised by foreign sources and suggests an impeachment inquiry is necessary to answer these questions.

In this video, the speaker expresses concern over a meeting between a New York attorney general and the Biden administration. They question why this meeting took place during an ongoing trial and suggest a connection to George Soros. The speaker is shocked and finds it unbelievable that the attorney general is coordinating with the Biden administration. They no longer believe innocent intentions behind the meeting.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of selling access to the president through his son's job at a gas company. Speaker 1 denies the claim and challenges Speaker 0 to do physical activities together. Speaker 1 defends his son, stating that no one has accused him of wrongdoing. Speaker 0 mentions hearing the accusation on MSNBC, but Speaker 1 disputes this. Speaker 1 criticizes Speaker 0's lack of backbone. Speaker 2 comments on Speaker 1's defensive and angry response, claiming that it reveals the real Joe Biden. Speaker 2 asserts that Joe Biden sent his son to peddle influence overseas, and when confronted, Joe Biden denies it, claiming that the mainstream media has not reported it.

In this video, the speaker discusses the controversial plea deal of Hunter Biden, son of President Biden. It is revealed that Hunter did not pay taxes of over $1.5 million in both 2017 and 2018, which appears to violate the Ashcroft memo. The speaker expresses disappointment in the plea deal, considering it a joke and a slap in the face to ordinary Americans. The investigations into bribery and money laundering allegations against Hunter and the president are still ongoing. On one side, left-leaning individuals defend the deal, while on the other side, there is anger and resentment. Journalist Catherine Harridge suggests that this plea agreement will be controversial, especially among Republicans. The speaker criticizes the double standard in the justice system, contrasting the treatment of Hunter Biden with that of a Trump-supporting grandmother who received prison time for a misdemeanor.

Hunter Biden's privilege and questionable actions are the focus here. The speaker criticizes President Biden and the media for not addressing Hunter's privilege, despite lecturing about privilege and injustice. Hunter's wealth and connections are attributed to his father, rather than his own abilities. The speaker also highlights the sleazy behavior surrounding Hunter and the Biden family, suggesting that it should concern fair-minded individuals. They argue that evidence shows President Biden was aware of and enabled Hunter's actions, benefiting from them. The speaker calls for justice and transparency, expressing concern about the compromised state of the US attorney investigating the matter.

Fauci and the media are criticized for their handling of the pandemic. The media refuses to admit any wrongdoing and sticks to their narrative. Real journalism has been replaced by propaganda in outlets like the New York Times, Washington Post, MSNBC, and CNN. The media ignores important stories like the Archer testimony, where President Biden's involvement in business dealings was discussed. Hunter Biden's questionable art sales are also mentioned. The conversation questions if the art sales were a form of money laundering.

Hunter Biden's alleged selling of access to his father, referred to as the "big guy," is the reason why we were interested in him. This raises concerns about a potentially compromised president in the White House. Americans should be worried about this situation.

The speaker expresses concern about election interference and accuses Biden and his associates of running a campaign to damage him. They criticize the corruption and bias in the legal system, specifically mentioning Mark Pomerantz and Colangelo. The speaker believes that the ongoing trials are unfair and politically motivated. They mention the raid on Mar-a-Lago and claim it is illegal. The speaker also discusses their financial situation, stating they have a lot of cash and a successful company. They express frustration with the judge and attorney general in New York and suggest that businesses may leave the state. The speaker concludes by saying they would be willing to testify in the trial if it proceeds.

Joe Biden is accused of taking cash from foreign countries frequently. The speaker suggests that an unannounced raid on Biden's homes would have been more effective than the one on Senator Menendez. They question whether three weeks' notice would be enough for Biden to clean out any incriminating evidence. The speaker claims that Biden only cares about enriching his own family, while they claim to care about enriching the listener's family.

Hunter Biden is back in the news as the DOJ claims a Romanian oligarch paid him to influence US policy while his father was VP. Documents reveal Hunter received $3,000,000 from Gabriel Papaviccu, a Romanian businessman facing a criminal investigation. Prosecutors allege Hunter concealed the nature of his work to protect President Biden. Papavicu is set to testify at Hunter's tax evasion trial in September. Republicans argue Hunter used his father's name for access.