reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Two studies are described as disturbing. - Carman and colleagues conducted an animal study in which rats were injected with mRNA shots that destroyed 60% of their primordial follicles, the nonrenewable egg supply in women. The treatment also destroyed all other types of eggs, including those that spawn after the primordial version, effectively decimating the ovarian system. - Manichi and colleagues conducted a large human study, analyzing data from 1.3 million women. They compared vaccinated to unvaccinated women, finding that the vaccinated woman had 33% lower successful conception rates compared to the unvaccinated women. Thus, the information presented indicates fertility effects in both animal data and large human data sets. We do know that, yes, these are indeed fertility destroying injections.

They didn't see safety signals because they didn't want to see them and wouldn't report them. They lied about the vaccine staying in the arm, when they knew it wouldn't. They said the mRNA would dissolve in hours or days, but they knew it was modified RNA that stayed in the body with the spike protein. They continue to push this, despite evidence to the contrary. The science has been corrupted and the agencies have been corrupted, so they have no credibility.

There are four studies indicating significant lot variability in certain batches. Early 2021 batches appeared to be the most dangerous. Some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while others have almost none, essentially being "duds," possibly due to degraded mRNA or manufacturing issues. Some batches decimated people and may be contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids, mRNA, or even heavy metals. No batch appeared to be the same.

The speaker outlines a series of alarming claims regarding mRNA vaccination and female fertility. They state that in a study involving rats, mRNA-vaccinated subjects exhibited a 60% reduction in primordial (premortial) follicles. The speaker emphasizes that primordial follicles represent a finite resource with no regenerative capacity, noting that women are born with a limited number of these follicles. The implication drawn is that the mRNA shots can reach the ovaries and instruct the ovarian tissue to produce toxic spike protein. According to the speaker, the body's response to this production is to attack the spike protein, leading to tissue damage and destruction of eggs. The destruction of eggs is presented as irreversible, given that primordial follicles do not regenerate, which the speaker asserts has direct consequences for fertility. Further, the speaker cites human data indicating a 33% lower birth rate among vaccinated women, linking this observation to the ovarian damage described in the animal model. They combine these points to argue that a pattern of reduced reproductive capacity is occurring and that this pattern is supported by both the animal study and the human data referenced. The speaker portrays these findings as extraordinarily worrisome and asserts that regulators have failed to address the issue. They argue that regulatory inaction is contributing to what they describe as an ongoing decline in humanity’s fertility. The overarching message is a call for regulatory attention and intervention in response to what they characterize as significant risks to fertility associated with mRNA vaccination. In summary, the speaker claims: - Rats given mRNA vaccines showed a 60% reduction in primordial follicles. - Women are born with a finite, non-regenerating pool of these follicles. - mRNA vaccines purportedly reach the ovaries and cause production of toxic spike protein, provoking an immune attack that damages ovarian tissue and eggs. - This damage allegedly leads to a 33% lower birth rate in vaccinated women, as suggested by cited human data. - The combination of these factors is described as highly concerning and in need of regulatory action, warned against as contributing to a potential future decline in human fertility.

Fertility clinics report unusual issues with sperm and eggs of vaccinated individuals. A study shows an 80% miscarriage rate in women who received the Pfizer vaccine during pregnancy. Reports of menstrual cycle abnormalities, clotting, and even deaths in young girls are emerging. Concerns about potential long-term fertility effects are raised.

Before the emergency use authorization of the vaccines, significant concerns were already known. The Pfizer technical document revealed that these vaccines caused widespread distribution of the encoded protein in major tissues and were associated with inflammatory reactions due to lipid nanoparticles. It was understood that these nanoparticles could deliver RNA and DNA into cells, and the use of pseudo uridine was intended to enhance the immune response and prolong the product's effectiveness. However, critical investigations regarding potential shedding, reproductive toxicity, and the presence of contaminants were not conducted. These omissions are concerning, especially considering previous FDA regulations that recognized the risks of genotoxicity related to manufacturing processes.

Many labs, including Medicinal Genomics, found DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Regulators like the FDA and EMA admitted to this, but downplayed its significance. The SP 40 sequences omitted by Pfizer are crucial. DNA contamination can cause insertional mutagenesis, as stated in Moderna's patents. Regulatory agencies were deceived and failed to properly address the issue. This poses a serious risk that cannot be ignored.

Speaker claims COVID is a respiratory infection, but Pfizer documents show 'a three sixty degree obsessive focus on ruining human reproduction.' They say researchers studied 'ruining fallopian tubes, ruining ova, ruining placentas, ruining fetuses in utero, ruining the birth process, ruining lactation' and ask, 'Why is that?' They assert lipid nanoparticles 'traverse the placenta' and cause placental calcifications 'which prevent the baby from getting nutrients and oxygen.' They report babies born early because placentas cannot grow normally, and that 'placentas are flat.' They say lipid nanoparticles would go into the baby, 'degrading the Leydig cells and Sertoli cells of baby boys of vaccinated moms,' noting 'Sertoli cells and Leydig cells are the factories of masculinity.' An andrology report allegedly 'confirmed that the injection killed the ants and motility of sperm in men.' Pfizer allegedly warns not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women of childbearing age, 'two reliable forms of contraception.' They state 'two seventy women got pregnant in the study of vaccinated women' and 'two thirty four of them, the records of what happened to that pregnancy were lost,' and 'of the thirty six women who gave birth, over eighty percent of them lost their babies.'

We found that the FDA lied about a maternal rat study that was testing the safety of mandating a vaccine to pregnant women. In every litter, individual pups had horrible bone deformities. This signal was extremely prominent. Moderna submitted the rat study, as they were required to do. The FDA then lied about the study results by claiming there were no problems. It was a huge enterprise in lying.

Doctors administered untested gene therapy to infants, toddlers, and pregnant women, claiming it was safe. However, the mRNA jab was deemed the most dangerous medical product for pregnant individuals. Traditional medical principles were disregarded, including giving experimental drugs to pregnant patients and assuming any death or injury post-intervention was related. Regulatory authorities worldwide dismissed adverse events as unrelated until proven otherwise, leading to disastrous consequences.

The transcript presents a critical examination of Bill Gates, portraying him as transforming from a software magnate into a global health power broker whose wealth and influence have reshaped public health, vaccine development, and population policy. It argues that Gates’ philanthropic activities are not purely charitable but are deployed to extend control over health systems, global research agendas, and even the reproductive choices of people worldwide. Key claims and points are detailed across several strands: - Public image and power shift: Bill Gates is described as no longer a “public health expert” yet becoming a central figure in billions of lives, guiding medical actions and vaccine strategies. The program asserts that Gates’ reinvention through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been aided by a sophisticated public relations apparatus and by directing media coverage of global health issues. - Foundation scale and reach: The Gates Foundation is depicted as the world’s largest private foundation, with assets reported as tens of billions of dollars and a broad remit in global health, development, growth, and policy advocacy. Its influence extends to funding media outlets, think tanks, and reporting units across multiple outlets (BBC, NPR, Our World in Data, ABC, among others), creating what the program calls “tentacles” across global health. - Partnerships and funding of global health initiatives: Gates is credited with initiating and funding major global health vehicles, including: - Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, with seed funding and ongoing commitments that have shaped vaccination markets. - The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and other public-private partnerships that coordinate vaccine development and immunization programs. - Support for CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), the World Health Organization’s vaccine initiatives, and other pandemic preparedness efforts. - The World Health Organization’s funding profile, described as heavily dependent on Gates Foundation support, with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted as a non-medical doctor connected to Gates-backed initiatives. - The “Decade of Vaccines” and vaccine policy: Gates is credited with launching a decade-long vaccine initiative, including a pledge of billions of dollars to vaccine development and distribution. This is linked to the creation of a global vaccine action plan and to Gavi’s role in establishing vaccine markets. The narrative asserts that vaccines have been used to steer global health policy and to secure roles for private firms in public health decision-making. - Vaccine development concerns: The program raises concerns about the safety and speed of vaccine development, criticizing the eighteen-month timeline Gates advocates for a universal vaccine, and questioning the use of new technologies (DNA and mRNA platforms) and rapid deployment with limited testing. It highlights potential safety risks, including historical vaccine-associated disease enhancement and concerns about broad immunization in a short period. - Vaccine safety and regulation: It is claimed that vaccine safety at scale is hard to guarantee and that liability protections for vaccine makers and public health officials have been enacted (e.g., a U.S. declaration granting liability immunity for COVID-19 countermeasures), a point framed as enabling risk-bearing without accountability. - Population control framing: A central thread is the assertion that Gates seeks to reduce population growth through health improvements, vaccines, and reproductive health services. The transcript traces Gates’ interest in contraception and population issues to his family background and to Rockefeller-era eugenics historical contexts, arguing that discussions about fertility, contraceptive technologies, and demographic trends have long-term population implications. It cites specific Gates Foundation activities in reproductive health, including funding for innovative birth-control delivery methods, depot injections, implanted devices, and efforts to develop digital identity tied to health services as tools within a broader population-control framework. - Digital identity and biometric ID: The narrative emphasizes Gates’ involvement with biometric identification through Gavi and ID2020, noting partnerships with Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation, the Aadhaar system in India, and the World Bank’s ID4D initiative. It argues that vaccination programs, biometric identity, and cashless payments are being integrated into a comprehensive “population control grid,” enabling state and private actors to track, truncate, or deny access to services based on identity and health status. - Data, surveillance, and privacy concerns: The piece contends that the push for digital IDs, digital health records, and biometrics will erode privacy and enable broad government and corporate surveillance, linking health data to financial services, voting, housing, and welfare. It highlights projects involving digital certificates, immunity passports, and real-time health data collection via microneedle patches and barcode-like skin markers, suggesting these innovations could be used to control access to services. - Epstein connections and broader conspiracy context: The program references alleged connections between Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, including flight logs and involvement in philanthropic funding discussions, framing these ties as part of a broader pattern of influence. It also points to prior associations with notable figures (Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros) and critiques of Gates as aligning with a “population control” ideology. - The underlying motive and conclusion: Throughout, the narrative asserts that Gates’ wealth is being used not for charity alone but to build an overarching system of control—over health institutions, research funding, public policy, identification, and financial systems. It contrasts his public image as a generous philanthropist with alleged hidden agendas, suggesting that the real aim is to shape global governance and human behavior through vaccination, identification, and digital infrastructure. - Final framing and call to action: The closing sections urge viewers to recognize Gates’ influence as part of an ideology rather than a single person’s plan. It frames the situation as a broader movement that could continue beyond Gates personally, urging awareness and action to resist what the program deems a population-control regime embedded in global health and digital identity initiatives. In sum, the transcript portrays Bill Gates as a central figure driving a multifaceted, globally interconnected program—through the Gates Foundation, Gavi, CEPI, and related partnerships—that allegedly reconfigures vaccine policy, global health governance, reproductive health, biometric identification, and digital payments into a cohesive system of population control and surveillance, using philanthropy as a veneer for power and control.

Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, but reports showed adverse events and miscarriages. They denied a link between their vaccine and heart conditions, despite evidence. Pfizer claimed effectiveness against variants, but data showed otherwise. They also misled about transmission and censored criticism on social media. Pfizer avoided government oversight in vaccine development. Despite these issues, Pfizer successfully marketed their vaccine in Kansas. Multiple states are filing suits against Pfizer.

mRNA vaccinated rats experienced a 60% reduction in primordial follicles, which are essential for life and do not regenerate. mRNA shots are allegedly getting into the ovaries, instructing them to produce toxic spike protein. The body attacks this protein, resulting in tissue damage and egg destruction. This follicle damage allegedly leads to 33% lower birth rates in vaccinated women, as seen in human data. This combination of factors is considered worrisome and demands attention from regulators. It is claimed that humanity's fertility is being run off a cliff.

The Pfizer COVID vaccine was not tested for its ability to stop the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. The speaker acknowledges that they had to work quickly to understand the situation and move at the speed of science.

Four studies are cited as showing significant lot variability in the vaccine batches. The speaker notes that the variability is substantial across lots, with some batches from the early 2021 period appearing to be the most dangerous. They state that some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while other lots are linked to no adverse events at all, describing these as “duds.” According to the speaker, these problematic batches may result from several issues: the mRNA being degraded, or the cold-chain failure such as being left out of the refrigerator for too long, or problems in the manufacturing process that rendered the batch ineffective. The implication is that these dud batches were not manufactured properly. The speaker emphasizes that some of these batches had devastating effects on individuals. They further claim that these batches were probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from the manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, and even heavy metal contamination. The range of issues is described as broad, indicating multiple types of contamination or quality problems in different batches. The overall assertion is that not a single batch appears to be the same as another; there is clear heterogeneity across batches, with some batches causing major adverse events and others causing none.

Pfizer documents show an 80% miscarriage rate in pregnant women. 236 out of 270 records were lost. Babies in utero were exposed to the vaccine, leading to deaths. Breast milk was poisoned by vaccine components, causing convulsions and deaths. Newborns may have air sacs between lungs and chest walls, leading to respiratory distress. Pfizer knew about this issue 2 years prior.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which were later changed, possibly due to Pfizer altering the product or during transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The study also reveals a safety issue that both Pfizer and regulatory institutions should have addressed. Pfizer had already informed the European Medicines Agency (EMA) about the safety problem in August 2021. Our data from Sweden indicates that this is a European issue, not just a Danish one. We are concerned about long-term side effects and their potential links to cancer and increased mortality rates. The EMA should have taken action based on the data and informed the public. The vice-president of Pfizer's statement about building the plane while flying is apt, as we have shown that one wing has fallen off.

Pfizer's claim of 96% efficacy for their vaccine was questioned. The study and data were not independently verified, and Pfizer wanted to keep the data hidden for 75 years. The true effectiveness of the vaccine, based on absolute risk reduction, is less than 1%. More people died and were harmed in their trials compared to the placebo group. The vaccine's safety was questionable from the start, and it is not effective. Additionally, appropriate studies were not conducted for new variants.

Pfizer documents reveal an 80% miscarriage rate among pregnant women who received the vaccine. However, 236 out of 270 records of pregnant women were lost. The documents also show that Pfizer knew the vaccine was being transmitted to babies in utero, leading to their deaths. The vaccine was found to contaminate breast milk, causing convulsions and deaths. Additionally, the documents from two years prior indicated that newborns could experience respiratory distress due to air sacks between their lungs and chest walls. Despite this knowledge, babies were still being sent home and later returning with the same issue.

The evidence shows that out of 344 babies in a Pfizer trial, only 3 completed it, with reasons like hospitalization and death leading to discontinuation. Less than 1% of babies finished the trial, yet it's claimed to be safe. The speaker questions the safety of these injections, citing reports of babies experiencing symptoms similar to sudden infant death syndrome.

Pregnant women who received COVID-19 shots experienced concerning effects, according to maternal fetal medicine expert Dr. Against Thorpe. The shots quickly spread throughout the body, crossing barriers like the placenta and blood-brain barriers in both the mother and fetus. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots led to more adverse events in women of reproductive age. Data showed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and over twice the risk of negative fetal outcomes across six categories. Additionally, birth rates in several European countries dropped significantly after widespread COVID-19 vaccination. As a result, researchers are urging the immediate suspension of COVID-19 vaccination for individuals of childbearing and reproductive age.

We observed potential safety issues with coronavirus vaccines similar to past respiratory virus vaccines. In the 1960s, some children had adverse reactions, even deaths, due to immune enhancement when exposed to the virus after vaccination. This led to the abandonment of the RSV vaccine program for decades. The same immune pathology was seen in laboratory animals during coronavirus vaccine development, raising concerns about safety.

Pfizer documents show an 80% miscarriage rate among pregnant women, with 236 out of 270 records lost. Babies exposed to the vaccine in utero experienced transplacental exposure. The vaccine was found in breast milk, causing convulsions and deaths. Newborns were known to have air sacs between lungs and chest walls, leading to respiratory distress. Despite this, babies appeared fine initially but later returned due to air pocket issues.

Pfizer has been forced to release previously secret documents, including FDA approval packages, due to court orders and successful FOIA requests. These documents reveal that Pfizer tested different versions of their vaccine during preclinical and clinical trials, which goes against FDA guidance. The different versions included modified RNA, unmodified RNA, self-amplifying RNA, and Spike protein alone. Surprisingly, all these versions were tested under the same investigational new drug number, despite FDA guidance stating that multiple versions should have their own individual numbers. Additionally, the toxicity of the mRNA active ingredient in the COVID-19 vaccines was never studied. This raises concerns about the regulatory process and the lack of safety testing.

On COVID, there's a perception that credit isn't given where it's due. While the vaccines were developed quickly, they don't prevent infection or transmission and may have serious side effects. In hindsight, would anything be done differently? Studies on the vaccines are ongoing, and results will emerge over time. It's important to note that Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, but reports indicated that over half of the 458 pregnant women who received the vaccine experienced adverse events. The ongoing studies will help clarify these concerns.