reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Did you hear the question about the senator running for reelection in 2026? I apologize; it seems you need a moment. Is there another question? Please feel free to ask.

The speaker was asked what office they were elected to and if they needed support. The speaker responded that they are not the one to ask and that the person should speak with a man. The speaker then stated that they speak to over a million people.

A reporter asked if the senator's relationship with the president had deteriorated to the point where the senator would refuse to support any presidential initiatives. The senator responded by calling the question "stupid" and "dumb." The senator stated that as a United States Senator from Arizona, recently reelected, they would not block everything due to personal disagreement.

Speaker 0 is asked if he accepted bribes and if he would comment on the arrest of the former president.

Joe Biden was seen speaking in Pennsylvania and the speaker wondered why he didn't run for office. They believe that Joe Biden would have received more support and love if he had run.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1, Scott, what he believes Mitch McConnell's legacy will be, presuming Scott might run for Senate to replace him. Speaker 0 notes that people often run for office after publishing a book. Speaker 1 jokes that writing a book is the fastest way to get rich, then Speaker 0 says that writing books doesn't make you rich. Speaker 1 clarifies that McConnell is up in '26.

Senator, how are you feeling after that call? Are you considering running for reelection in 2026? I apologize; it seems you need a moment to gather your thoughts.

In the exchange, Speaker 0 recounts feedback from “real Chicagoans,” describing them as mostly Black and Brown, and claims they tell him that the other person does not seem to know the difference between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens. He asserts that these individuals feel the other person is siding with illegal aliens over their communities. He then pivots to a direct line of questioning. The real question, as Speaker 0 presents it, concerns a violent incident: “An illegal alien from Nicaragua grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her.” He presses for a direct response about what would have happened “if that had been your wife, Stacy.” He stages the hypothetical to elicit a clear stance from Speaker 1 on how to respond to such a crime and its immigration context. Speaker 1, however, interrupts to steer the conversation away from the loaded scenario. He repeatedly signals a move on, indicating a preference not to engage with the hypothetical or to answer the pointed ethical dilemma on the spot. The back-and-forth centers on the tactic of addressing the question versus avoiding it, with Speaker 0 insisting on a straightforward answer “as a man, not as mayor, but as a man.” The exchange escalates as Speaker 0 urges Speaker 1 to provide a simple yes or no and to address the issue directly, effectively challenging Speaker 1 to commit to a position regarding ICE and deportation in light of the described crime. Speaker 1 responds by again stating to move on, resisting the direct yes/no framework. Throughout, Speaker 0 persists in pressing for a candid, personal response to the hypothetical crime and its immigration implications, while Speaker 1 maintains a boundary about continuing the discussion in that moment. Ultimately, Speaker 1 declines to answer the specific deportation question in the moment, and Speaker 0 reaffirms the demand for a direct personal answer. The segment ends with Speaker 1 thanking the audience and moving on, leaving the explicit yes-or-no question unresolved in this exchange.

The speaker questions a senator's qualifications to vote against Pete Hegseth, given the senator allegedly lied about their own military service. The speaker directly asks the senator if they would like to answer the question.

Speaker 0 speculates on the possibility of not having a 2024 election due to unforeseen events, referred to as black swans. He acknowledges that he doesn't know how this would happen, but suggests that such an event could occur.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they will run for president again. Speaker 1 responds that they are 83 years old and unsure if the American people would be enthusiastic about someone who is 100. Speaker 0 notes that Speaker 1 is only a couple of years older than Biden.

Speaker 0 is asked if they wish they had a third term. They respond by saying they would be fine with having a stand-in who would wear an earpiece and deliver their lines while they stay in their basement. Speaker 2 interrupts and tells everyone to ignore the person in the earpiece. Speaker 3 mentions something about getting Republicans elected. Speaker 4 says the person speaking is not recognized. Speaker 5 reminds everyone not to engage in personal attacks. Speaker 1 repeats their earlier statement about having a stand-in and being fine with it.

Speaker 0 announces their plan to run for reelection in 2026. They acknowledge a question about their candidacy and apologize for needing a moment to gather their thoughts.

When asked about concerns regarding his age and whether he should run again, the speaker dismisses the importance of his age and says it doesn't register with him. He believes people will judge him based on his performance in the race, and he respects their scrutiny. He also mentions that he took a hard look at the issue before deciding to run.

Speaker 0 mentions feeling like a dog catcher and going to formation for president twice. Speaker 1 interrupts, wanting to discuss Jeffrey Epstein, but Speaker 0 refuses, saying they are walking and feeling sad about it.

The speaker asks the senator if they heard the question about running for reelection in 2026. The speaker apologizes and asks if anyone else has a question.

Speaker 0 is asked if they will be running for reelection in 2026. They apologize for not hearing the question properly and ask for someone else to speak up with a different question.

Speaker 0 is asked if they will be running for reelection in 2026. They apologize for the interruption and ask for another question.

The speaker is asking people who they are excited to vote for in the 2024 election. Many people responded that they would vote for Donald Trump. Some people said they would vote for Nikki Haley, and others said they would vote for Governor DeSantis. One person said they were in the middle and would vote for either Trump or DeSantis. Another person said they were pumped up but felt like we need a break from elections.

Speaker is asked if they agree with congressional Republicans' call for resignation, but does not respond when pressed by the speaker of the house.

Speaker 1 questions the legitimacy of the 2020 election and refuses to concede in 2022. They accuse an Arizona official of election fraud and defamation. When confronted, Speaker 1 deflects, claiming they are in the middle of a lawsuit. They deny responsibility for inciting violence and criticize the interviewer for lack of understanding. Speaker 1 refuses to commit to conceding if they lose in November. The interview ends with Speaker 1 dismissing the interviewer.

I have many questions, but I won’t start with them to avoid trouble. What’s your message for the voters on Super Tuesday? Thank you. I want to encourage people to make informed decisions. Thank you all for being here.

A vote for Biden is a vote for President Biden and Vice President Harris, according to Speaker 1. They are a ticket called Biden Harris. Speaker 1 states they were elected and intend to be reelected, as does the president. When asked if Speaker 1 could tell the American public if there ever is a problem, Speaker 1 responded, "Of course, if necessary, but there's no need for that."

The speaker was asked if they would have done anything differently than President Biden during the past 4 years. The speaker responded that there is one thing that comes to mind. They added that they have been a part of most of the decisions that have had impact.

Speaker 0 asks what you are here to talk about, says “Thank you very much,” and asks, “Any votes in the prime minister?”