reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In a video discussion, Stefan Gardner argues that forensic evidence, particularly dust samples, will effectively end conspiracy theories about who fired the shot that killed Charlie Kirk. He contends that dust from the rocks on the roof will leave a unique signature that will be found on the killer’s clothes, the gun, and the shoes, making shoe tread and soil samples crucial to the investigation. Gardner also notes that dust and soil will be found on items connected to the killer’s lay-down on the roof and asserts that gun residue on the killer’s hands would be transferred to the steering wheel, making the killer’s car a major part of the evidence. Responding to this, another speaker, James Lee, mocks the idea that dust matching should come before bullet-to-gun matching, calling the discussion about dust a clownish distraction. The conversation emphasizes the broader expectation that trial evidence will concede to the narrative that the killer’s DNA and shoe dust will identify the perpetrator, while acknowledging public skepticism about the FBI’s presentation of evidence and the timing of disclosures. The speakers contrast the claimed forensic signatures with perceived gaps in the FBI’s narrative, arguing that the investigation will eventually reveal the gun, DNA, and other physical proof at trial. They anticipate that the evidence will demonstrate that the shooter’s shoes and vehicle contain trace material consistent with the crime scene and that the gun was used, but they express doubt about official explanations and the timing or availability of certain evidence, including video footage. A central theme is a critique of the FBI and their handling of the case: the speakers challenge the transparency of the investigation, suggesting that video footage and CCTV evidence should be released to restore public trust. They reference the demand for CCTV footage showing key actions: Tyler Robinson on campus, climbing onto the roof, taking the shot, and then fleeing. They assert there is video evidence of the shooting and question why it has not been released, noting claims that 3,000 people witnessed the incident live and that there is video evidence of planning and movement around the campus, including entrances and parking structures. The dialogue also touches on inconsistencies alleged in material evidence, such as a 30-06 round discussion, with the group arguing that even the smallest round would not plausibly produce the described wound at the distances claimed. They insist that standard investigative procedures would include sharing footage and autopsy details, and they demand transparency on the autopsy, CCTV, and video evidence from the crime scene. Overall, the speakers insist that the investigation should present complete video footage and corroborating evidence to verify the narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson and the murder of Charlie Kirk, labeling the current presentation as “slop.”

The video analyzes an alleged assassination attempt on Charlie Kirk, focusing on a "cell phone pistol" that can transform into a "three eighty ACP two shot Derringer pistol" with a hammerless firing system. The host questions whether Kirk wore a bulletproof vest, the shooter’s location, and whether a second weapon was used, citing a security professional with a campus of 5,700 students and about 300 cameras, with a VMS/NVR capable of storing 76 terabytes daily, debunking claims of only 1,500 cameras. The handgun is described as roughly the size of an iPhone 7, 5.5 inches long, 3 inches wide, 18.4 ounces, with a 3-inch barrel and two-shot capacity. The shooter’s proximity (about three yards) and a potential vest ricochet theory are discussed, along with CCTV footage calls and requests for viewers to film the campus and DM videos, asserting nothing is proven and asking to release footage to settle theories.

Speaker 0 claims to have explosive, verifiable information that can publicly challenge the Zionist-occupied Trump administration to deny it if untrue. They urge Kash Patel to deny the claim if it is false, noting that the information is highly relevant. They credit Mel, who they say was early with the reporting, and say they had heard rumors but sought verifiable proof before going on the limb to assert authenticity. The core assertion is that there were 12 Israeli cell phones on the ground at Utah Valley University on the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated. The speaker clarifies that these were not VPNs routed through Israel, but 12 personal cell phone accounts opened in Israel. They claim these accounts were on the ground at Utah Valley University on September 10, the day Charlie Kirk was shot. The speaker states that the NSA knows this, Kash Patel knows this, and people in the current administration know that too, and are desperate to keep the information from the public. They question why the administration would want to suppress the information and why it would spook those at the top, suggesting that if there is nothing to hide, there would be nothing to hide. To anticipate counterarguments, the speaker plays devil’s advocate, noting that perhaps the cell phones belonged to exchange students or Israelis touring UVU that day, or that 12 American students had Israeli-based cell phones after returning from a summer abroad and wished to keep them running in Utah. They acknowledge they do not know the answer and express a desire to know, emphasizing the need to uncover why this information is being concealed and who those 12 Israeli cell phones belonged to. Throughout, the speaker refrains from evaluating the claims’ truth and simply presents the asserted facts and questions, urging accountability and transparency regarding the supposed Israeli cell phone presence and its connection to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. They close by reiterating their dislike of secrets, especially when they pertain to the public figure’s death.

At UVU, a Turning Point USA event with Charlie Kirk, attendees are interviewed amid live streaming gear. The scene turns chaotic as shots ring out and the campus evacuates: "There has been a shooting," and "The active shooter Charlie Kirk has been shot." Eyewitnesses describe hearing the shot, seeing Charlie Kirk slump and blood "gushing out" from his neck; others say he was "shot in the neck" or "hit." Reports of a possible shooter on the roof and rapid police response follow: "there might be a guy on the roof," and "The police said it could have come from up on the roof." A photographer's footage and security updates circulate. Signs express diverse views: "free Palestine, love one another" and "don't legalize racism." Participants also caution, "We also don't condone Hamas" and "genocide's wrong on both sides."

"And just last night, the suspect was taken into custody at 10PM local time in less than thirty six hours, 30 three to be precise." "For thirty three hours, I was I was praying that that if this had to happen here, that it wouldn't be one of us." "This thing is not commercial at all. It is most likely a surveillance drone and someone was flying it over the campus for a particular reason." "The main suspect in Kirk's killing is now Tyler Robinson and he is in custody." "This translates to approximately one in 2,000,000,000." "The FBI agents didn't even bother to show him the photos of the shooter for twelve hours." "Yes. Yes. So when he's first spotted on campus, he has different clothing on," "Look folks, it's very easy to just believe whatever we're being told, but we cannot afford to do that anymore."

The video investigates whether Charlie Kirk was assassinated at close range with a 'cell phone pistol' that can transform into a 'three eighty ACP two shot Derringer pistol.' It notes the gun's size—'5.5 inches, 3 inches in width, weight 18.4 ounces'—small enough to conceal in the palm. The discussion covers whether Kirk wore a bulletproof vest, the shooter's location, and if a second weapon was used. A viewer claims CCTV footage on campus exists but is not released, urging release of footage showing the shooter on the roof and leaving the perimeter. A security professional estimates on a campus of about 5,700 students, with '300 cameras' and storage of '76 terabytes of data per day.' The speaker questions vest trajectory, mentions a white vest theory, a 'blue shirt' suspect, crowd reactions, and requests viewers to film the spot and DM videos. They call to release CCTV footage to settle theories.

Responding to Ryan Matta's three shooter video, the speaker narrows the theory to two shooters. At Utah Valley University, they point to the Woodbury Building, the Sparks Building, and an unnamed building as the sites involved. They describe 'the three shooter theory' claiming 'there is somebody on this building, this building, and on this building' and identify Woodbury as 'one clip of somebody on a roof' and Sparks as part of the scene. They discuss a shot from a corner near the parking lot, a run across the roof, and a trapdoor in the amphitheater area. They note the ROTC armory nearby '180 yards' from the corner and caution not to accuse. They argue the 'image of a person on this roof has been misconstrued' and that 'the extra shooter theory' is debunked, suggesting 'somebody on the roof' at multiple locations, visible from different angles as two videos.

"This is so much so." "Before we had a flag and we had" "it so it's positioned above the tent so it'd be in" "the camera made us move. What was that?" "Just a so much so." "It's too crowded." "It's just there's just so much." "As you can see, this new trajectory places a shooter on the roof of the Sorenson Center, and the shot would come at a much steeper down angle and a much larger angle off of the perpendicular, such that a bullet entering Charlie's neck would hit his spine and glance downward into his chest cavity, killing him instantly."

The speaker says they tracked down internal Utah Valley University documents showing the roof access point and the cameras. They cite the telecommunication distribution guide of 06/01/2022, noting updates and new cameras in specific areas. They discuss campus camera counts: "anytime a university has roughly over 30,000 students, you're looking at at least over 15, if not 1,800 cameras." Utah Valley has 45,000 students, so they say, "you would think that you would have roughly over 2,000," though "Grock" estimates 500 to 700. At the Watchatch campus, the document states: "A complete video surveillance system shall be provided... Cameras shall be fixed with ten eighty p HD IP cameras" with meeting date "08/06/2024." The speaker asks, "What is the FBI hiding?" and notes, "They have ten eighty p HD cameras that were surveilling this man" and, "If this is the guy... we should 100% have video surveillance of the man leaving the roof." This is their own internal document showing the roof access point and how the cameras were mounted at the university where Charlie Kirk was assassinated.

This footage proved very difficult to track down. Aaron also has a Chicago number. Neither of them are students of UVU. One of them said he was a student at BYU, which is Brigham Young University. The metadata begins at 12:22 and goes into 12:23, the very minute that Charlie gets shot. I watched him sprint back after taking the shot. I saw this with my own two eyes. the gun that the FBI found was not the gun that he saw. the assassin may have used a 10 or 20 round magazine only expecting to shoot once or twice.

"Utah Valley University telecommunication distribution guide of 06/01/2022." "An Arlington specific system will be provided with local recordings." "The CCTV system includes controls for visual monitoring of building perimeters." "All building entry points, exit points at select main buildings, thoroughfaced, elevator lobbies, and at select sensitive interior areas." "High megapixel cameras will monitor exterior areas, including the building's perimeter." "Fixed megapixel cameras will monitor designated locations inside the building." "Cameras will be installed in appropriately rated enclosures." "Signals from the cameras will be connected to a central switching, a multiplexing system with a minimum 21 inch video monitor for viewing." "All camera images will be digitally recorded by NVRs that are local area network accessible." "Additionally, cameras will be capable of being monitored and controlled at remote locations via the LAN." "Provide NVR with 50% spare channels." "Camera shall be fixed with ten eighty p HD IP cameras, and this is attached to a meeting date of 08/06/2024."

The speaker asserts: "starts within five seconds, maybe fifteen seconds tops of Charlie Kirk being assassinated" and "This is the CCTV footage we want." He asks, "why is it that you will not or you are refusing to release this video right here of fifteen seconds prior to Charlie Kirk or prior to what you did release?" He adds, "This dude is sprinting off the roof." He continues, "we went around the campus, and there's another camera." He notes there is "CCTV footage that literally shows the would have shown Tyler shooting at Charlie because the camera is literally right behind Charlie Kirk," and asks why that CCTV footage isn't released. He also asks, "What are on these CCTV cameras? Was there another shooter farther back that you don't wanna show us?" Finally, he asks, "What is this? This literally looks like a camera, a CCTV camera completely removed from the side of the building. Care to comment?"

Discussion centers on campus CCTV coverage and the shooting timeline. "There should be cameras everywhere. Every fucking where." They say "the only thing they show us is him running and jumping off the roof afterwards." Timestamps are debated: "the time stamp on him jumping off the roof is 12:23" and there was footage "two minutes before the shooting." They claim the perimeter is fully surveilled: "not one square inch of that outer perimeter ... wasn't on camera" and that footage would be "backed up to a cloud." A critique notes that "Columbine shooting in 1999" footage exceeds what was released. They ask why the full sequence wasn't released, seeking "videos of that, and we need heights, angles, and video of that to be able to see if indeed," and discuss alternate shot points at the "Woodbury Building" and the "Fugal Gateway Building." They plan to obtain more footage via a drive link.

This video queries whether Charlie Kirk was assassinated at close range with a a 'cell phone pistol,' a smartphone-like device that can 'transform into a three eighty ACP two shot Derringer pistol' with a 'hammerless firing system.' It covers whether Kirk wore a bulletproof vest and the shooter’s location, suggesting an elevated shooter on a roof and calling for CCTV footage to settle questions. The pistol is described as 'the exact length and width [the] exact same size as the iPhone seven,' with '5.5 inches' length, '3 inches' width, '18.4 ounces,' a 'three inch' barrel, and capacity for two shots. Trajectory debate includes a vest hit and ricochet possibilities; mention of a 'white vest' theory by Kyle Sarifan. A security professional subscriber notes '300 cameras' and '76 terabytes of data per day' in campus surveillance. The video calls for 'release the CCTV footage' and discusses crowd reactions and a second weapon.

This video asks: "The weapon you're looking at here on the screen is called a cell phone pistol." It details the device's size: "The exact length and width are the exact same size as the iPhone seven" and notes "It's only 18.4 ounces." It notes "The barrel itself. It can hold two shots." It cites security capacity: "There are about 300 cameras deployed across this campus," and counters that "you need 76 terabytes of data per day" to store CCTV. It demands "Show us this man getting out of the roof" and "Release the CCTV footage" to settle theories. It discusses "take a look at the trajectory of this" and debates vest possibilities, including references to "the white vest" idea. It adds, "I didn't see anybody move until after they seen Kirk fall," and concludes by urging readers to help verify CCTV and "put this shit to rest."

The speaker references a person who was removing memory cards from cameras about four minutes after what is described as the Charlie Kirk assassination, noting that something about the situation didn’t sit right. They mention Candace released a video showing how this person reacted, and that diligent investigation followed, including a campus visit to UVU to examine the events with a play-by-play analysis. The speaker says they will leave a link to that video but first shows a clip. In the clip, Speaker 1 describes the sequence: “He doesn't try to grab Charlie. He doesn't duck. His first reaction standing right here is to turn this way and start booking.” The person “starts booking back here,” and Speaker 1 notes that he sees the shot and that Charlie hasn’t even hit the ground yet. Charlie is described as being in a position where “Charlie’s like this,” and the person pivots to lean back. Security personnel respond by coming over, grabbing him, and pulling him to the ground. Meanwhile, Terrell Farnsworth “has already turned and begun running back here to climb up on that wall.” The speaker asks the audience to imagine there had just been a shooting, with chaos and people running. Charlie Kirk “was just shot,” and the wall is described as “almost as tall as I am.” The speaker asks the audience if they can see, confirming visibility. The analysis then focuses on the person’s actions: measuring “how much of a pain in the ass he climbed up right here and then threw that loose rock and just so he could get to his vantage point.” The speaker calls it out as an attempt to explain the sequence from the vantage point up the wall. The clip continues with the person producing a selfie video: “Oh, they shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie.” They refer to him as “Agent” and note his statements like “They shot Charlie. God help him.” The speaker says this behavior is a major red flag and cites it as the most troubling aspect. The running scene is described further: as the person runs out, he looks to his left and, in the footage, is seen climbing up, then reacting to the news that Charlie was shot. The voiceover emphasizes the emotional state (or lack thereof) as the footage shows the stampede of people and chaos. The speaker underscores that, to them, the absence of emotion on the person’s face during these events is “the biggest red flag of all.”

Speaker 0 says they downloaded nearly original footage from the incident and note that reuploads compress the file, referencing “the national file,” and aim to “disprove this or not.” Speaker 1 points to Charlie Kirk: “how many You see him right there? That’s him debating with somebody here right before he gets shot.” “He got shot from his right hand side on that side coming out here.” They discuss a rooftop shooter theory, noting walls, bleachers, and that “you got shot from rooftop.” They show a rooftop trajectory diagram: “count with me… flat surface one, flat surface two, and then flat surface three… almost up on four,” arguing the shooter would have a straight shot at Charlie. They claim “this is 100% the shot” and say “the mic… was the first entry wound” is incorrect; “there is no entry wound on the left side of his neck. He got hit on the right side.” They demand CCTV footage release from Turning Point, noting cameras and a cameraman, and urge campus footage to verify angles, mentioning trees “above the rooftop” and needing to see if the edge of the roof is visible. They conclude the shooter was on the highest point and that multiple cameras likely captured it.

This is their own internal document showing us the roof access point and exactly how the cameras were mounted at the university where Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Telecommunication distribution guide of 06/01/2022. CCTV system includes controls for visual monitoring of building perimeters. High megapixel cameras will monitor exterior areas, including the building's perimeter. Fixed megapixel cameras will monitor designated locations inside the building. Cameras will be installed in appropriately rated enclosures. Signals from the cameras will be connected to a central switching, a multiplexing system with a minimum 21 inch video monitor for viewing. All camera images will be digitally recorded by NVRs that are local area network accessible. Additionally, cameras will be capable of being monitored and controlled at remote locations via the LAN. Provide NVR with 50% spare channels. Camera shall be fixed with ten eighty p HD IP cameras, and this is attached to a meeting date of 08/06/2024.

- "I just tracked down the internal documents from Utah Valley University that shows the exact type of security cameras that were used, and we got a lot of questions." - "This is their own internal document showing us the roof access point and exactly how the cameras were mounted at the university where Charlie Kirk was assassinated." - "The Utah Valley University telecommunication distribution guide of 06/01/2022." - "A complete video surveillance system shall be provided." - "Cameras shall be fixed with ten eighty p HD IP cameras, and this is attached to a meeting date of 08/06/2024." - "There are ten eighty p HD cameras that were surveilling this man on probably multiple different locations throughout that campus."

I just tracked down the internal documents from Utah Valley University that shows the exact type of security cameras that were used, and we got a lot of questions. This is their own internal document showing us the roof access point and exactly how the cameras were mounted at the university where Charlie Kirk was assassinated. The Utah Valley University telecommunication distribution guide of 06/01/2022. Cameras shall be fixed with ten eighty p HD IP cameras, and this is attached to a meeting date of 08/06/2024. They have ten eighty p HD cameras that were surveilling this man on probably multiple different locations throughout that campus. So if this is the guy that they claim was on the roof, then we should 100% have video surveillance of the man leaving the roof.

Speaker 0 argues the Charlie Kirk story keeps getting weirder. They claim a random trans shooter was on the roof, took this shot, runs across into the rooftop, jumps down, somehow undetected because the FBI releases a video footage. Was this when he was walking into the building, then he must have already had planted the gun on the roof prior, and he somehow managed to walk back in the second time without the weapon. If he left with a weapon and hid it in the woods, why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving? They say he runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods. If you were running, you wouldn't carry the rifle with you. He wore an American flag shirt. The FBI with all their resources, that's the best photo? Didn’t we watch Criminal Minds? They claim BAU would rerender that image and get it pixel perfect. Face recognition software could redigitalize that kid's face with AI to pixel perfect; this is weird.

The speaker says they spent the night compiling “this timeline … from every media outlet … so we can understand what the media is telling us and what evidence we have to support that,” noting holes and missing pieces. Key points: 08:23 they see his gray Dodge Challenger driving past a home near the university; 08:29 Robinson arrives at the university campus in his gray Dodge Challenger, parks in the entrance area, and is captured on surveillance wearing “a plain maroon T shirt, light colored shorts, and a black hat with a white logo and a light colored shoes.” From 08:29 to 10:00, he’s “ghost” on campus for reconnaissance; 09:57 he’s seen walking back in a red maroon shirt; 11:49 he’s dressed in dark clothing, hobbling toward the campus; 11:52 he arrives on campus, moves through stairwells toward the Luce Center; 12:15 retrieves the rifle, a Maser model 98, 30 odd six bolt action with a scope from a drop point in a bush, and engraves the bullet casings with meme style messages: “fired casings, notice bulges, o w o, What’s this? Unfired. Hey, fascist. Catch arrows. Oh, Bella Chow. Bella Chow. Bella Chow.” He changes into dark clothes on the roof; 12:22, 12:33 he fires a single shot from the roof striking Kirk; he flees, discards the rifle, and changes back into maroon. Turning Point employees tamper with a crime scene; FBI arrives 12:39; 10:45 reward announced for information; 7,000 to 11,000 leads; by Sept 11–12, Robinson detained at home by US Marshals, FBI custody soon after. The narrator questions CCTV footage, Discord messages, and suggests the possibility of faked gait, inviting viewers to review footage and share.

Discussion centers on claims about the Charlie Kirk assassination, including a side shot. The presenter says "there's now a shooter on the roof" and an eyewitness states the shooter was "wearing tactical gear" and described "the exact type of weapon... a two two three round." A bystander video shows "somebody on the roof" and the eyewitness asserts the shooter was "highly trained, like a highly trained assassin" and that the footage's metadata "begins at 12:22 and goes into 12/23, the very minute that Charlie gets shot." The speaker adds the shooter "looked like a foreign agent" and "not jeans." Another claim: "the FBI's official story is false" with video of an "entry and exit wound," though another participant says "it's not blood splatter. That's literally his necklace getting snapped off and flying over the back of his neck." The discussion concludes with "Cash should resign."

We were able to track the movements of the shooter. Starting at 11:52AM, the subject arrived on campus shortly away from campus. We have tracked his movements onto the campus, through the stairwells, up to the roof, across the roof to a shooting location. After the shooting, we were able to track his movements as he moved to the other side of the building, jumped off of the building, and fled, off of the campus and into a neighborhood. We do have good video footage of this individual. We are not going release that at this time. If we are unsuccessful, we will reach out to you as the media, and we will push that publicly to help us identify them. We are exhausting every lead. We have every officer invested in this, every investigator, every local agency.

The speakers discuss campus CCTV coverage, insisting, "There should be cameras everywhere. Every fucking where." They critique the released footage, saying it "only shows the suspect running and jumping off the roof," and note a "15 minute gap" where he’s allegedly unseen, with cameras supposedly everywhere. They argue the CCTV would have captured him on multiple rooftops—specifically the Losey Center roof at about 12:41, with a jump at 12:23—and say the cops should have that footage. They question the 10 frames per second video and the storage needs, "'76 terabytes' mentioned by an expert." They explore an alternate theory involving the Woodbury Building and the FG Building, needing footage of both for angles and heights, and mention Candace's reporting could throw it out. They reference "two protesters on roofs," Uvalde-style CCTV quality, and a $200 payment to obtain additional footage, with a drive link to be shared.