reSee.it - Related Video Feed

One speaker recounts that he did not like Bibi Netanyahu, describing Netanyahu as a destructive force and saying he was appalled by what was happening in Gaza, and that Netanyahu was using the United States to prosecute wars for the benefit of his country, which he called shameful and embarrassing and bad for the United States, a view he resented. He also notes that he didn’t hate Netanyahu. After that speech, there was a sharp backlash against Charlie Kirk and, to a lesser extent, the speaker, with Kirk having about $100 million in donors and being heavily dependent on them because his project was nonprofit. They went after him and tormented him, while a small, very intense group offended by the speech tormented Charlie Kirk until the day he died.

They say Charlie Kirk was offered an infusion of $150,000,000 by Israel to shield for Israel harder; Turning Point USA has a budget of $140,000,000. Israel allegedly aimed to make Kirk 'more pro Israel' and back regime change in Iran and 'ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza.' Kirk refused the money. Netanyahu then invited him to Jerusalem for a 'reeducation tour' and the Holocaust museum—the burned babies, the beheaded babies; he refused that as well. They offered to bribe him and reeducate him, and he refused both. Two, Bill Ackman hosted this event at his house in the Hamptons where, according to supporters, pro-Israel mouthpieces berated and screamed at him for not supporting Israel enough; Kirk's friends say he felt scared and possibly blackmailed. Well, he's dead now, so he can't tell us what really went down; all we know is the alleged feelings of those present, not his perspective.

Speaker rejects the claim that 'Israel was behind Charlie Kirk's assassination,' calling it 'ridiculous' and noting Kirk 'was supported by pro Israel Jewish patrons until the day that he died' while he 'defended the administration's cover up of the Epstein files' and 'defended the administration's bombing of Iran.' He says Kirk remained in support for Israel. He says Netanyahu offered money, which Kirk refused, and claims Bill Ackman hosted an event with 'Israeli mouthpieces' Seth Dillon and Josh Hammer; Kirk reportedly refused a trip to Israel. When the FBI could not locate the alleged gunman, Ackman offered a '$1,000,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Charlie Kirk's assassin,' to be paid to 'the alleged killer's father' Tyler Robinson, 'a Mormon father' who allegedly turned in his gay son dating a tranny who killed Charlie Kirk. He calls this 'a bit suspicious' and says it requires careful scrutiny.

Charlie mentioned Tucker and Candace forty eight hours earlier as they were trying to control who he's allowed to speak to. He was worried that Israel was infringing upon speech in America; "I have text messages to that effect." He was genuinely pro Israel; "there was nothing. there was not payment that was coming in." Toward the end, he was "over it towards the end because of Jewish behavior". Less than forty eight hours before he died, "Charlie announces that he has no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause because of Jewish donors and their behavior living up to these stereotypes." We never said "Israel killed Charlie Kirk." "I am uncomfortable with how many lies people that support Israel have been telling in the wake of his death."

I was shocked and sickened by the reaction of the ghoulish and really repulsive reaction of the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, to Charlie's death. He basically made it all about him and redirected the grief toward support for his project. "Benjamin Netanyahu is not the same as the nation of Israel at all." "BB's defenders, on the Internet will call me a liar or a kook, but that's a fact." "what he said was completely untrue." "Charlie didn't hate Jews. He loved Jews. He loved the state of Israel. He loved going there." "He did not like Bibi Netanyahu, and he said that to me many times." "He felt that Bibi Netanyahu was a very destructive force." "He was resentful that he believed Netanyahu was using The United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country." "Shortly after that speech, there was a very intense attack on Charlie; he had $100,000,000 worth of donors." "Two days before he died, he lost a $2,000,000 donation because he had publicly pledged to bring me to the next Turning Point Conference in December." "They put out a flyer basically saying that I was going to be at this event giving a speech."

Netanyahu immediately weighed in with prayers about Charlie Kirk just minutes after he was killed. It was eerie. His body was still warm, and Netanyahu was beginning to claim Charlie Kirk's legacy. "Israel requires American Christian, mostly conservative men to fight the war of Armageddon that Netanyahu wants against Iran." Kirk, a conservative asset, was moving away from Netanyahu and privately despised him under Zionist donor pressure. The Grey Zone exposed a secret Hamptons influencer summit. Candace Owens later revealed more. Netanyahu released a video: "I did not kill Charlie Kirk. I never accused him of killing Charlie Kirk." The talk covers DEI funding via the Tikva Fund and a push to buy TikTok to suppress Palestine content, led by Larry Ellison’s network. Antifa designated as a terrorist organization; media consolidation and regional tensions involving Turkey, Syria, Qatar; Egypt’s red line on Gaza, Rafah.

I was shocked and sickened by the ghoulish and really repulsive reaction of the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, to Charlie's death, basically made it all about him and his country, redirecting the grief toward support for his projects. Charlie Kirk did not hate Jews. "Charlie didn't hate Jews. He loved Jews." He did not like Bibi Netanyahu, and he felt that B. Netanyahu was a very destructive force; "he was above all resentful that he believed Netanyahu was using The United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for The United States, and he resented it." After that speech, there was an intense attack on Charlie; "He had $100,000,000 worth of donors." Two days before he died, he lost a $2,000,000 donation because he had publicly pledged to bring me to the next Turning Point conference in December. The American Jewish Committee called Charlie Kirk an anti Semite and "dangerous." He was not an anti Semite. He was the opposite, and he was a great lover of people and a purveyor of peace. Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee was out there demanding that Charlie Kirk take me off the roster, pull me off stage, because I had said things that BB didn't like or that he didn't like or whatever. This is a trend.

Max Blumenthal and Anya Perimpil report that Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu's offer to arrange an infusion of Zionist money into Turning Point USA, America's largest conservative youth group, according to a longtime friend speaking on the condition of anonymity. The source told the Grey Zone that Kirk believed Netanyahu was trying to cow him into silence as he publicly questioned Israel's influence in Washington. In the weeks before his September 10 assassination, Kirk loathed the Israeli leader, calling him a "bully," the source said. He was disgusted by what he saw inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu allegedly sought to dictate the president's decisions and weaponize assets like Miriam Adelson to keep the White House under its thumb. Kirk warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel's behalf: "Charlie was the only person who did that," the source said, recalling Trump's response. By the following month, he faced a sustained private campaign of intimidation by Netanyahu's allies, described as Jewish leaders and stakeholders who "he was afraid of them."

Did Israel kill Charlie Kirk? The alleged shooter is now in custody, turned in by his own father. This speculation about Israel being behind Charlie Kirk's assassination came across as absurd to many people. Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil revealed Kirk was beginning to break ranks with the Zionists; he was questioning Israel. Was Charlie Kirk's assassination just a lone gunman? Or was it a violent coup by Israel to gain control over TPUSA? Turning Point USA received tons of financial support from Zionist donors including the David Horowitz Foundation. He repaid his backers over the years by unleashing a relentless fire hose of anti Palestinian and Islamophobic diatribes. Kirk rejected Netanyahu's offer to infuse Zionist money into TPUSA. Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader regarding him as a bully. Netanyahu tweeted prayers for Kirk minutes after news of the shooting broke.

This segment recounts escalating pressure on Charlie Kirk over Israel debates. A speaker says: "I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian." Kirk says his "moral character is now being put into question" and "I am a bad person if I do this." The piece notes threats to pull funding and that he faced pressure about inviting people, asking "How could Charlie allow these debates about Israel to take place?" It describes a "duress situation" at the Hamptons, with Bill Ackman allegedly pressuring Kirk as Beebe Netanyahu offered "an intervention" and funding. "We just need you to come to Israel and we can make this better" and "We just need you to come to Auschwitz and take a picture." Kirk reportedly "denied that funding" and "Charlie said no to Bebe." Beebe's timing is claimed: "less than twenty four hours after Charlie Kirk was shot."

Speaker 0 outlines 'the brilliance of Candace Owens' and says she 'literally smoking them out' with a video claim: 'forty eight hours prior to Charlie's death, Charlie Kirk notified Turning Point USA Jewish donors and a rabbi that he had no choice but to completely abandon the pro Israel cause outright.' The narrative cites a '$150,000,000 offer from Benjamin Netanyahu' to Turning Point USA 'to shield for Israel harder, and in particular to support regime change in Iran and to support their ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza.' Kirk allegedly refused. They allege Bree Lynn Hollyhan appeared on Fox News and that Turning Point is 'rebranding as our new Charlie Kirk' with 'ultra mega.' They declare 'Charlie did not die pro Israel.' The piece ends with 'Checkmate motherfuckers.'

The video presents a narrative in which Charlie Kirk, a Turning Point USA figure, was allegedly close to publicly exposing evidence connecting Israeli operatives to a child trafficking network spanning from Washington DC to Tel Aviv. Two days after this supposed revelation, Kirk died in what the source describes as a public execution meant as a warning to others who might pursue similar disclosures. The source, a longtime TPUSA donor who claims to be close to Kirk, says Kirk’s shift in stance on Israel in his final months provoked direct threats from powerful Jewish donors and even Netanyahu’s US security network. The claim extends to an alleged betrayal by Kirk’s own wife, who is accused of being an Israeli agent tied to trafficking operations, and whose existence supposedly compelled Kirk to be silenced. In the unfolding narrative, Kirk had begun pursuing broader truths beyond politics, speaking with whistleblowers and dissidents such as Karleen Georgescu, a former UN executive director whose Romanian presidential victory is described as having been stolen by a global machine. Kirk allegedly described this machine as the “hidden architecture”—global institutions filled with predators and puppets who trade influence and innocence for currency. He sought to reveal these networks and the mechanisms of blackmail and vice that supposedly keep the system intact, while recognizing the personal risks involved. The transcript recounts a group-chat exchange in which Kirk reportedly lamented losing a major Jewish donor and contemplated inviting others, with comments about Jewish donors and pro-Israel influence. The mainstream media is characterized as having attacked the story as fake and gaslighted the public, though Turning Point USA reportedly confirmed the messages as real, noting that Kirk had already spoken publicly about them. A speaker linked to the broadcast alleges that Jewish donors are deeply involved in funding radical open-border and neoliberal cultural policies, arguing that the influence extends through colleges, nonprofits, movies, and Hollywood. The narrative frames Kirk’s inquiry as a pursuit of root causes in global corruption, tracing money and networks behind trafficking, with allegations that Israel plays a central role in trafficking in various regions, including Ukraine. The claim is made that Israeli leadership viewed Kirk as a liability and potentially a threat to Israel’s future, with a suggestion that a future Republican president not fully aligned with Israel could not be allowed to emerge. Witnesses within Turning Point USA are described as knowing the truth or possessing evidence, and Kirk is portrayed as preparing an internal audit and breaking away from a pro-Israel stance in his final weeks, which allegedly heightened the danger to him. A speaker recounts that Kirk believed files, including Epstein-related documents, could reveal connections between trafficking, blackmail, and political control, and that if Trump released all the files without redactions, the power structure could collapse. The narrative also connects Erica Kirk (Erica Kuruk in the text) to alleged ties with a Romanian trafficking hub and to data-relating activities involving TPUSA user data and Israel. Additional sections discuss VPNs and data security, alleging that several popular VPNs are owned by an Israeli company with ties to intelligence units and surveillance technology, culminating in a promotional segment for vp.net, claiming it offers verifiable cryptographic privacy and supports an open-source privacy network. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes a worldview of elites wielding power through information and data, urging viewers to subscribe and participate in the channel’s communities for uncensored content.

“Epstein's probably not like a Mossad agent or something, but Epstein clearly had contact with Israeli intelligence and American intelligence and French intelligence, but the only one you're not allowed to talk about is Israeli intelligence.” He says he told Charlie Kirk to “Go all the way… Do it,” and that conversation may have hit a mic and exists on a server. He describes the “ghoulish and really repulsive reaction” of Benjamin Netanyahu to Charlie's death, saying he tried to redirect grief toward his project and that “Benjamin Netanyahu is not the same as the nation of Israel at all.” He claims “BB's defenders on the internet will call me a liar or a kook, but that's a fact.” He states Charlie “did not hate Jews. He loved Jews. He had tons of friends who were Jews. He loved the state of Israel. He loved going there. He did not like Bibi Netanyahu.” He notes Charlie “had $100,000,000 worth of donors,” and that “Two days before he died, he lost a $2,000,000 donation” after pledging to bring him to Turning Point. The American Jewish Committee called Charlie “an anti Semite” and “dangerous,” which he denies. He references pressure from Seth Dillon to pull him off stage and warns that “There are many liars out there… Bibi Netanyahu, number one among them, shamefully, who are trying to distort the truth, a truth that I know and can prove.”

From Israel's perspective, "Charlie Kirk is the pro Zionist guy. He is the pro Israel guy." The speaker notes that without context it wouldn’t make sense to claim Israel would kill him, but asks what if they were listening and he was in communications with people saying, "hey. I think I'm gonna go this direction and they knew his intentions or saw this pattern." They describe "this pro Zionist guy with this incredibly powerful platform that they built, by the way, that Charlie has, thanks to them," and warn that if "he's gonna take what they gave him and turn it against them" it "could literally destroy Israel because the youth is people they're most concerned about." Charlie "is the dude when it comes to Israel." "We can't let him turn" and if he starts to turn and "we take him out before he ever really genuinely turns, and then he's the Zionist martyr"—blame on the Palestinian—could "unify the right" and silence critics. The speaker concedes: "I Israel was never my top suspect" but now thinks "it's not unreasonable" and that "it's in their wheelhouse." It shows how much they needed Charlie Kirk—"nobody's gonna be defending them anymore" and "their reputation is in the toilet."

The transcript presents a sensational narrative centered on Charlie Kirk, Turning Point USA, and a wide-ranging conspiracy alleging Israeli influence, child trafficking networks, and elite manipulation across politics, media, and technology. Key points include: - Charlie Kirk allegedly planned to publish evidence linking Israeli operatives to a child trafficking network spanning Washington DC to Tel Aviv. Two days later, he allegedly died in what is claimed to be a public execution, a warning to others who might investigate. A longtime TPUSA donor and close associate claims Kirk’s final months involved direct threats from powerful Jewish donors and even Netanyahu’s US security network after a dramatic shift on Israel in his final period. - The source, now fearing for his own life, asserts Kirk’s discovery that his wife was allegedly working as an Israeli agent tied to trafficking operations triggered the decision to silence him. The video asserts Kirk had started conversations with whistleblowers and dissidents (including Karleen Georgescu, a former UN executive director) about “the hidden architecture” of power—networks, blackmail, and a corrupt system. - In internal communications, Kirk is described as losing a major Jewish donor and contemplating inviting Candace (likely Candace Owens), with comments about Jewish donors being pressured and about leaving the pro-Israel cause. The video says mainstream media attacked the story, but Turning Point USA later confirmed the messages as real. - A speaker contends that Jewish donors have funded radical open border policies and cultural institutions, and that the corruption extends beyond colleges to nonprofits and Hollywood, urging listeners to draw a line. - The narrative broadens to assert Kirk was investigating global corruption, tracing money and networks behind child trafficking. It claims hundreds of thousands of victims are taken globally, including in Ukraine, and that Kirk demanded answers from Netanyahu, leading to him becoming a liability to Israel. It’s claimed that a future Republican president who asked questions about Israel’s role in trafficking networks in Washington, DC, Hollywood, and Europe could not be tolerated. - Three whistleblowers claim, off the record, that Charlie Kirk anticipated being killed the day before his death, and one donor describes Charlie saying he would be killed. A Turning Point USA donor and a white-knight figure are cited as corroborating this, with calls for others to come forward. - Whistleblowers inside TPUSA say there were more than three people who knew the truth and held evidence. Charlie was preparing an internal audit over financial irregularities and moving away from the pro-Israel narrative, with the trafficking findings seen as the decisive factor in sealing his fate. A donor recounts that Kirk’s wife’s past surfaced as part of the alleged network. - The video links Erica Koch’s past to Romanian trafficking allegations, noting ties between her, a NATO-connected base, and trafficking claims. It mentions her thanking a colonel involved in Romanian trafficking allegations and connects various Romanian organizations and US military ties to alleged child trafficking. - A broader claim is made that elites are waging war via information and data, alleging Israel’s influence extends to VPNs. The narrative asserts Cape Technologies owns several major VPNs (ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, Private Internet Access) and that its leadership includes former Israeli intelligence personnel, with Pegasus and other surveillance tools connected to the Cape ecosystem. - The promo content promotes vp.net as a private, cryptographic, open-source, independently audited VPN alternative, arguing it protects privacy and funds an open-source network. The video concludes by urging viewers to subscribe, share, and join the locals community for uncensored content.

“‘When they say they have a right to exist, they're saying we have a right to control American society to secure our existence.’ If the youth are being lost, this poses an existential problem to Israel. If the youth in the right wing of America becomes indifferent to Israel, they are truly alone. They have lost China, Russia, the whole Muslim world, Europe, Africa, Latin America—who do they got? It's just us. America’s support is conditioned upon the Republican constituency in America. If it were up to Democrats or Zoomers, they wouldn't support Israel; it's Republican boomers that are keeping it together. Do you think that's why Netanyahu offered Charlie Kirk a $150,000,000 to support Israel? The money ‘would probably come from America’ and be dispensed by Jewish American billionaires; ‘He would double their money.’ Charlie Kirk, the bag man for the GOP, who has a personal relationship with Trump, would overnight become a very rich man… a kingmaker. He declined; ‘Now he's dead.’”

Epstein clearly had contact with Israeli intelligence and American intelligence and French intelligence, but the only one you're not allowed to talk about is Israeli intelligence. "Go all the way." He calls Netanyahu's reaction to Charlie Kirk's death a "ghoulish and really repulsive reaction." He says, "Charlie didn't hate Jews. He loved Jews. He had tons of friends who were Jews. He loved the state of Israel. He loved going there." He asserts, "Charlie did not like Bibi Netanyahu" and was "appalled by what was happening in Gaza" and "resentful that he believed Netanyahu was using The United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for The United States." He notes donors, including that "two days before he died, he lost a $2,000,000 donation." He mentions the American Jewish Committee calling him "an anti Semite" and "dangerous," which he says "He was not an anti Semite. He was the opposite, and he was not dangerous." He concludes, "There are many liars out there... Bibi Netanyahu, number one among them, shamefully, who are trying to distort the truth, a truth that I know and can prove." "I don't know who murdered Charlie."

After his September 12 report on pressure from pro-Israel forces and Netanyahu’s network, a tumultuous August Hamptons meeting convened by Bill Ackman allegedly pressured Charlie Kirk to adopt a pro-Israel line. Kirk was summoned with an array of young conservative influencers to set a pro-Israel tone and was hammered for allowing critics like Megan Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and Dave Smith to appear at events. Ackman threatened funding and travel to Israel; Kirk refused both. Netanyahu later disclosed a letter, and Beebe said Kirk was offered assistance. A staged intervention by Ackman occurred as Kirk’s views shifted; he denied accepting money or traveling. Tucker Carlson questioned Ackman’s money on stage, and Kirk faced intense pressure with texts and threats. Seth Dillon and others present did not go on record; calls for Turning Point USA to release audio of Kirk’s remarks.

This video opens with questions about whether 'Israel killed Charlie Kirk,' noting the shooter is in custody and that speculation spread online, with Netanyahu denying it. It cites Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil claiming Kirk was 'beginning to break ranks with the Zionists. He was questioning Israel.' The core question posed is: 'Was Charlie Kirk's assassination just the act of a lone gunman? Or was it a violent coup by Israel to gain control over the most influential conservative organization in America.' The piece argues Zionist donors pressured Kirk, who led Turning Point USA—'over 3,500 chapters nationwide'—and had been funded by figures like the David Horowitz Foundation. It describes Kirk's evolving stance: at times he toed the Israeli line during Gaza, but questioned Israeli government actions; private intimidation by Zionist allies; Netanyahu rejected but offered funding; and 'Cui bono'—there is evidence to believe that Israel and the Zionists do. It notes Shapiro's subsequent campus tour.

Charlie Kirk was offered an infusion of $150,000,000 by Israel. Netanyahu offered Turning Point USA $150,000,000 for one purpose only, to shill for Israel harder. Turning Point USA has a budget of $140,000,000 and is pro-Israel. Israel offered him a $150,000,000 to be more pro Israel than they were, to be harder in their support for Israel, and in particular, to support regime change in Iran and to support their ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza. Charlie Kirk refused the money. I have confirmed that from four people I trust. Candice Owens, a friend of Charlie Kirk, and Max Blumenthal, who purports to have a source, corroborate. After Kirk refused, Netanyahu asked him to visit Jerusalem for a 'reeducation tour,' including the Holocaust Museum, the burned babies, the beheaded babies, and more; he refused that as well. They offered to bribe him and to reeducate him; he refused both offers.

Speaker alleges that “within forty eight hours before Charlie passed away, his top Jewish donors were pulling funding from him, demanding that Charlie take their name off of the building that they had donated to Turning Point. And then once Charlie was killed, they said, never mind, put it back on the building.” He says Charlie had “alluded to a tremendous loss of money coming in” and that “more people are going to come out with information. This is all inevitable.” The speaker notes Beebe's PR blitz: “Beebe recently was on a PR blitz despite the fact that he was fighting this ninety six thousand front war because Israel didn't do nothing,” listing podcasts and asking, “Anybody find it weird you didn't do Charlie Kirk show?” Tomey is cited: “Charlie was implied that Charlie was penning love letters to him in May. I just love you so much.” He calls a “hostile takeover” and says after Charlie's death, supporters claim “the energy is Charlie died for Israel,” which is “literally untrue, and we're not going to allow it.” Okay? It's just not true.

Charlie Kirk was offered an infusion of $150,000,000 by Israel to double Turning Point USA's budget; Turning Point USA has an annual budget of a $140,000,000. Netanyahu offered Turning Point $150,000,000 for one purpose and one purpose only, to shill for Israel harder. Israel offered him a $150,000,000 to be more pro Israel than they already were, to be harder in their support for Israel, and in particular, to support regime change in Iran and to support their ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza. Charlie Kirk refused the money. I have independently confirmed this by four people in the know; Candice Owens, a friend of Charlie Kirk; Max Blumenthal who purports to have a source. After Kirk refused, Netanyahu asked if he would come visit Jerusalem and give him the reeducation tour, the Holocaust Museum, the burned babies, the beheaded babies, the one Elon Musk took, the one our speaker of the house took; he refused that as well. They offered to bribe him. They tried to reeducate him. He refused both offers.

Charlie Kirk's perspective on Israel was not starting to shift. It had shifted entirely. Israel knew that. Turning Point USA knew that because Charlie was explicit. He wrote of his deep love for Israel. About forty eight hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Charlie was done. He said it explicitly that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors. Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself? And then did he, just forty eight hours later, conveniently catch a bullet to the throat before our on stage reunion could happen?

Claim: Charlie Kirk was offered an infusion of $150,000,000 by Israel to double Turning Point USA's budget (TPUSA annual budget $140,000,000). The offer was 'for one purpose and one purpose only to shill for Israel harder,' specifically to 'support regime change in Iran and to support their ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza.' Kirk allegedly refused the money. Four trusted sources—Candice Owens and Max Blumenthal among them—report the offer, with others independently confirming. After the rejection, Netanyahu allegedly asked him to visit Jerusalem for a 'reeducation tour,' including 'the Holocaust Museum, the burned babies, the beheaded babies,' 'the one that Elon Musk took, the one that our speaker of the house took,' anyone that's ever criticized Israel has been subjected to; Kirk refused that as well. They offered to bribe him. They tried to reeducate him. He refused both offers.

I’m going to state this, and I’m going to challenge Turning Point USA executives to issue a very clean statement saying that I am lying if this is not true. About forty eight hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro Israel cause outright. Charlie was done. He said it explicitly that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors. Did he express that? Did he also express that he wanted to bring me, Candace Owens, back because he was standing up for himself? Just forty eight hours later, a bullet to the throat. Charlie did not die pro Israel. He did not die for Israel. He did not martyr himself as a friend of Israel. The truth is going to win.