reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers discuss perceived effects of boosters on people, focusing on observable changes in the eyes. The first speaker contends that boosters “have really changed a lot of people,” and claims that the difference is evident in their eyes. They describe a stark contrast between people who have not received boosters, whose eyes they say are “bright as can be,” and people who have received boosters, whose eyes “look different” and appear “off” when looked at directly. The speaker adds that boosters would “turn off the brain.” They reference a claim from 2016 about an injection that could “turn off your spiritual sense,” said to have been tested in The Middle East, suggesting such testing relates to the regional invasions there, and implying that the aim was to suppress spiritual sensitivity in booster recipients. The second speaker identifies the project by name, naming it FunVax, described as “the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.” The stated effect of FunVax is to convert a fanatic into a normal person, with the implication that this would produce major effects in The Middle East. The dialogue links the booster concept to the project, portraying FunVax as a means to reduce religious fundamentalism by altering cognitive or spiritual tendencies, and frames the Middle East as the region where such a transformation could have significant impact.

This video suggests that the increase in psychosis and schizophrenia in the United States and Europe may be linked to the rise of cats. The speaker believes that these mental disorders are caused by infectious agents, specifically toxoplasma gondii carried by cats. They express confidence in the overwhelming evidence supporting the idea that schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are biological diseases.

It is claimed that the environment signals genes, and the end product of an experience in the environment is an emotion. The question is posed: can you signal the gene ahead of the environment by embracing an elevated emotion? Research was reportedly conducted on this. 7,500 different gene expressions were measured in a group of people attending an advanced event for four days.

Stress does crummy things to your brain: it makes you less empathic, less tolerant, and less willing to take somebody else’s perspective, narrowing your tunnel of concerns; in a stressed world, people are crummier to each other on the average. The anterior cingulate cortex is the brain region where you feel someone else’s pain; in a brain scan, when you watch a loved one have their finger poked, the painometer brain regions have nothing to say because nobody's touching your fingertip, but the anterior cingulate activates, and neurons there can’t tell the difference between your pain and someone else’s. Typically, people suffering from major depression, this part of the brain is overactive. When stressed, people become less generous, more likely to cheat in an economic game, and their moral compass goes out the window, narrowing concern to people who look like me and pray like me and eat like me.

The transcript describes a Yale University study conducted at the CI supercenter nine months before a COVID-19 vaccine was available. In July 2020, four months before any vaccine was announced and nine months before public rollout, Yale tested multiple messaging strategies to influence willingness to vaccinate once a vaccine existed. The study involved about 4,000 participants and used random assignment to different messages, including a control condition about bird feeding. The messages tested were: - Baseline control: a passage on the cost and benefits of bird feeding. - Vaccine safety baseline: three-fifths of the sample received a message about the effectiveness and safety of vaccines, using the words “Safe and effective, safe and effective, safe and effective.” - Personal freedom: one fifteenth of the sample received a message about how COVID-19 is limiting personal freedom and how vaccination would help preserve it. - Economic freedom: one fifteenth received a message about how COVID-19 is limiting economic freedom and how vaccination would help preserve it. - Self-interest: one fifteenth received a message that vaccination is the best way to prevent illness for oneself, stressing personal health. - Community interest: one fifteenth emphasized the dangers to loved ones and encouraged vaccination to protect them. - Economic benefit: one fifteenth described how COVID-19 is wreaking havoc on the economy and that vaccination would strengthen the economy. - Guilt: one fifteenth were shown a message about the danger COVID-19 presents to health of family and community, asking them to imagine the guilt if they don’t get vaccinated and spread the disease. - Embarrassment: a variation asking participants to imagine the embarrassment if they don’t get vaccinated and spread the disease. - Anger: a message aiming to stir anger about not getting vaccinated. - Trust in science: a message promoting vaccination as backed by science, even though no vaccine existed yet. - Brave/hero framing: one fifteenth described frontline workers as brave and implied those who choose not to vaccinate are not. The transcript notes this as part of testing how different emotional or value-based framings (interventions) might influence vaccine uptake, with strong negative language and profanity directed at the concept and institutions involved. It characterizes the effort as exploring which emotions—guilt, embarrassment, anger, trust in science, bravery—could best persuade compliance, even before a vaccine existed. The speaker also comments that this reflects a nexus between universities, behavioral modification, and psychological operations, and includes inflammatory asides about Yale’s connections and motives.

It also brings sensory information, particularly from vision and hearing, into our brain. So it is relevant to our whole perspective of reality. And we see very significant shifts in the activity of this thalamus in people who have had these experiences versus people who have not had these experiences. So part of my speculation is that there's something that happens that kind of opens up a new way of thinking. So what we found was when we scanned their brain before and after this retreat, that their brain had become more sensitive to the effects of serotonin and dopamine. Dopamine, serotonin are probably things that people have heard of. And that's very important because dopamine is often referred to as the feel good molecule. It makes us feel happy, it makes us feel euphoric if there's enough of it.

Individuals with high levels of the BMAT 2 gene are religious fanatics, while those with low levels are not. Vaccinating against this gene could potentially eliminate extremist behavior. Brain scans show religious fanatics have increased activity in the theory of mind region, while non-religious individuals show disgust. The proposed project, Fund Vax, aims to develop a vaccine to combat religious fundamentalism using respiratory viruses like flu. The data supports the project's potential success.

Scientists have discovered that the experiences of temporal lobe epileptic patients may be similar to what happens in all our brains. Dr. Michael Persinger has developed a device that can stimulate the temporal lobes and induce religious experiences. By manipulating magnetic fields, he can create a feeling of a sensed presence, as if someone else is in the room. He believes that naturally occurring electromagnetic fields could also generate these experiences, explaining supernatural encounters like ghosts. Dr. Persinger's research suggests that most spiritual and religious experiences can be explained by the effect of electromagnetic fields on the temporal lobes. However, not everyone is susceptible to these experiences, as seen in an experiment with atheist Professor Richard Dawkins. Despite some skepticism, Dr. Persinger's research has established a link between the temporal lobes and spiritual experiences.

The data presented supports the proposed concept. The idea is not to perform CT scans or fMRIs on individuals in remote areas of Afghanistan. The plan involves immunizing against the VMAT2 gene, which can transform a fanatic into a normal person. This is expected to have significant effects in the Middle East. The current tests have used flu and rhinoviruses, which are believed to be a satisfactory method to expose a large portion of the population. The success of this approach is highly anticipated.

I presented to the CIA back in 2005 about religious fundamentalists and a potential way to address their behavior. Our hypothesis is that fanatical people have an overexpression of the VMAT2 gene. We believe that by vaccinating against this gene, we could eliminate their behavior. The research showed a comparison between individuals with strong religious beliefs and those without, noting the VMAT2 gene expression difference.

In this video, the speakers discuss the relationship between religious fanaticism and the expression of the VMAT2 gene. They present evidence that individuals who are religious fanatics have high levels of VMAT2 gene expression, while those who are not particularly religious have lower levels. The speakers suggest that by vaccinating fanatical individuals against this gene, it may eliminate their extreme behavior. They also show brain scans of two individuals with different levels of VMAT2 expression to support their hypothesis. Overall, the video explores the connection between religious fanaticism and gene expression.

In this video, the speaker discusses a hypothesis about religious fanatics and the VMAT2 gene. They suggest that by vaccinating individuals with high levels of this gene, it could potentially eliminate fanatical behavior. The speaker presents brain scan data showing that religious fanatics have increased activity in the theory of mind region, while non-religious individuals show activity in the disgust region when reading religious texts. They propose using respiratory viruses to distribute the vaccine widely. The project is called FundVax, and the speaker believes it has great promise.

The mRNA vaccine delivers spike proteins to all cells, including the brain, shutting down the mental immune system. This was known since 2007 and was enhanced for efficiency. Fauci's labs were involved in gain of function research. The spike protein increases brain inflammation, leading to a new social operating system being introduced to society. This system aims to erase the previous one, ultimately impacting human population levels.

An individual's brain activity was observed when reading religious texts. In one person, the right middle frontal gyrus associated with theory of mind lit up, while in another person, the anterior insula associated with disgust lit up. The VMAT two gene could potentially immunize against this brain activity and turn a fanatic into a normal person, which could have significant effects in the Middle East. The plan is to use respiratory viruses like flu to expose the majority of the population, as most people have already been exposed to these viruses. The project is called FUNVAX, which stands for the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.

Rudolf Steiner predicted the elimination of conscience through vaccines. A leaked video discusses suppressing the "god gene" with vaccines to control religious behavior. The video's creator claims it's a hoax, but the technology exists. Deleting the VMAT 2 gene leads to health issues and diseases like schizophrenia and Parkinson's. Pharma and the government may be using this to reduce humanity. VMAT 2 deletion causes fear, psychiatric disorders, cancer, and accelerated aging. Though cutting off connection to God is unlikely, the consequences are severe.

On the left, we have religious fundamentalists with high expression of the VMAT2 gene, while on the right, we have non-religious individuals with reduced expression of the gene. The hypothesis is that by vaccinating the fanatics against this gene, we can eliminate their extreme behavior. Brain scans show that when religious texts are read, the fanatics' brain lights up in the area associated with theory of mind, while the non-religious individuals' brain lights up in the area associated with disgust. This supports the idea that the VMAT2 gene plays a role in religious fanaticism.

- The discussion opens with a critique of how public health authorities in the United States and much of the media discouraged experimentation with COVID-19 treatments, instead pushing vaccination and portraying other approaches as dangerous. The hosts ask why treatments were sidelined and treated as heretical to question. - Speaker 1 explains that the core idea was to stamp out “vaccine hesitation,” which he frames not as a purely scientific issue but as a form of heresy. He notes a broad literature on vaccine hesitancy and contrasts it with the perception of the vaccine as a liberating savior. He points to a Vatican €20 silver coin (2022) commemorating the COVID-19 vaccine, described by Vatican catalogs as “a boy prepares to receive the Eucharist,” which the speakers interpret as an overlay of religious iconography with vaccination imagery. They also reference Diego Rivera’s mural in Detroit, interpreted as depicting the vaccine as a Eucharist, and a South African church banner reading “even the blood of Christ cannot protect you, get vaccinated,” highlighting what they see as provocative uses of religious symbolism to promote vaccination. - They claim that the Biden administration’s COVID Vaccine Corps distributed billions of dollars to major sports leagues (NFL, MLB) and that many mainline churches reportedly received money to push vaccination, with many clergy not opposing the push. The implication is that monetary incentives influenced public figures and organizations to advocate for vaccines, contributing to a climate in which questioning orthodoxy was difficult. - The speakers discuss the social dynamics around vaccine “heresy,” using Aaron Rodgers’ experience with isolation and shaming in the NFL and Novak Djokovic’s experiences in Australia to illustrate how prominent individuals who questioned or fell outside the orthodoxy faced punitive pressure. They compare this to a Reformation-era conflict over doctrinal correctness and describe a psychology of stigmatizing dissent as a tool to enforce conformity. - They argue the imperative driving institutions was the belief that the vaccine was the central, non-negotiable public-health objective, seemingly above other medical considerations. The central question they raise is why vaccines became the sole priority, seemingly overriding a broader, more nuanced evaluation of medical options and individual risk. - The conversation shifts to epistemology and the nature of science. Speaker 1 suggests medicine often relies on orthodoxies and presuppositions, rather than purely empirical processes. He recounts a Kantian view that interpretation depends on preexisting categories, and he uses this to argue that medical decision-making can be constrained by established doctrines, which may obscure questions about optimization and safety. - They recount the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and discuss Sara Sotomayor’s dissent, which argued that liability exposure is a key incentive for safety and improvement in vaccine development. They argue that the current system creates minimal liability for manufacturers, reducing the incentive to optimize safety, and they use this to question how the system encourages continuous safety improvements. - The hosts recount the early-treatment movement led by Peter McCullough and others, including a Senate hearing organized by Ron Johnson in November 2020 to discuss early-treatment options with FDA-approved drugs like hydroxychloroquine. They criticize what they describe as aggressive pushback against such approaches, noting that McCullough faced professional sanctions and lawsuits despite presenting peer-reviewed literature. - They return to the concept of orthodoxy and dogma, arguing that the medical establishment often suppresses dissent, citing YouTube removing a McCullough interview and the broader pattern of silencing challenge to the vaccine narrative. They stress that the social and institutional systems prize conformity and punish those who deviate, creating a climate of distrust toward official health bodies. - The discussion broadens into metaphysical and philosophical territory, with references to the Grand Inquisitor from Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. They propose that elites—whether religious, political, or scientific—tend to prefer “taking care” of people through control rather than preserving individual responsibility and free will. The Grand Inquisitor tale is used to illustrate a recurring human temptation: to replace personal liberty with a protected, paternalistic order. - They discuss messenger RNA (mRNA) technology as a central manifestation of Promethean or Luciferian intellect—humans attempting to “read and write in the language of God.” They describe the scientific arc from transcription and translation to mRNA vaccines, noting Francis Collins’s The Language of God and the idea of humans “coding life.” They caution that mRNA vaccines involve injecting genetic material and point to the symbolic and ritual power of vaccination as a form of modern sacrament. - The speakers emphasize that the mRNA approach represents both a profound scientific achievement and a source of deep concern. They discuss fertility signals and potential adverse effects, including myocarditis in young people, and cite the July 2021 NEJM case study as highlighting safety concerns for myocarditis in adolescent males. They reference the FDA deliberative-committee discussions, noting that some influential voices publicly questioned the risk-benefit calculus for young people, yet faced pressure or dismissal within the orthodox framework. - They describe post-hoc investigations and testimonies suggesting that adverse events (like myocarditis) might have been downplayed or obscured, and they assert that public trust in health institutions has eroded as a result. They mention ongoing debates about whether vaccine-induced changes might affect future generations, referencing studies about transcripts of mRNA in cancer cells and liver cells, and they stress the need for independent scrutiny by scientists not “entranced” by the vaccine program. - The dialogue returns to the broader human condition: a tension between curiosity and restraint, knowledge and humility. They return to Dostoevsky’s moral questions about free will, responsibility, and the limits of human knowledge, concluding that scientific hubris can lead to dangerous consequences when it overrides open inquiry and accountability. - In closing, while the guests reflect on past missteps and the need for integrity in medicine, they underscore the ongoing questions about how evidence is interpreted, how dissent is treated, and how society balances scientific progress with humility, transparency, and respect for individual judgment.

The speaker discusses a hypothesis that religious fanatics have an overexpression of the BMAT2 gene, which can be eliminated through vaccination. They present brain scan data showing different brain activity in religious and non-religious individuals when reading religious texts. The proposed project, called FUNVACS, aims to develop a vaccine for religious fundamentalism. The speaker suggests using respiratory viruses like the flu to disperse the vaccine. The video then transitions to a different speaker who makes various claims about Bill Gates, vaccines, and conspiracy theories involving child pedophilia. They urge viewers to wake up and unite against big pharma, big tech, big censorship, and big government.

In this video, the speaker talks about the criticism they receive online for sharing conspiracy theories. They mention reading patents and provide examples such as a patent from 2000 about manipulating the central nervous system and a patent from 2013 that controls brain state through electromagnetic patterns. They also mention a patent from 2014 that induces desired brain states through music files and a patent from 2002 that remotely transmits sound into targeted consciousness. The speaker highlights that the United States Air Force is the original assignee of one of these patents and questions whether the government would use such patents on its people.

The speaker says that changes in personality and depression are very real and have been identified as resulting from the spike protein attacking and destroying the endocrine system. Hormones produced by glands in the endocrine system are responsible for emotions and feelings. An Italian pathologist, Nirvanis, reported in a newspaper that in all the brains he investigated, the pineal gland was completely destroyed in vaccinated people. The speaker concludes that the spike protein is dangerous for the endocrine system, causing changes in personality.

The speaker discusses a theory that COVID-19 vaccines are being administered through nasal swab tests, targeting the brain. They explain how the swabs can potentially deposit nanoparticles into the brain through the cribriform plate, leading to vaccination and implantation. The speaker expresses disbelief and labels the concept as disturbing and only conceivable by psychopaths.

Various organs and tissues were harvested from fetuses, including the pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, heart, and possibly the tongue. The speaker acknowledges objections to the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines, but cites a document from the Catholic Church stating that individuals should still receive vaccines regardless. When asked about valid religious objections to vaccines, the speaker denies their existence and expresses disdain for religious beliefs, claiming that vaccination is always under attack by religious zealots. The speaker confirms being an atheist and acknowledges that some religious beliefs are inherently unprovable.

"So when things are very intense, when things hit us, we have a profound sense of joy, a profound sense of awe, love, whatever we feel, our limbic system turns on." "we've seen this in our brain scans that these areas of the brain become very active." "People know that this is the spiritual experience that I had, and this is my everyday life, and there is a difference between them." "not only does it help us feel our emotions, but it also writes things into our memory banks." "Not only did it feel real in the moment, but it gets written into your brain, it gets written into your memories, it transforms your beliefs." "So it changes everything about you." "And that's also part of what we have noticed with these experiences about how they are truly transformative in a person's life."

There are still people who believe in things like a flat Earth and reject vaccinations. The speaker suggests that there may be a gene for superstition, hearsay, and magical thinking, which may have been beneficial in the past. However, there is no gene for science, which is based on reproducible and testable evidence. The speaker believes that even in 1000 years, there will still be flat earthers and vaccine skeptics. Dealing with these beliefs is a constant struggle because they may be part of our genetic makeup.

In this video, the speaker discusses a hypothesis about religious fanatics and the VMAT2 gene. They suggest that by vaccinating individuals with high levels of this gene, it may eliminate fanatical behavior. The speaker presents brain scan data showing that religious fanatics have increased activity in the theory of mind region, while non-religious individuals show activity in the disgust region when reading religious texts. They propose using respiratory viruses to distribute the vaccine and believe it will be successful. The project is called FundVax, and the speaker believes it has great promise.