reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Stanley Woodward, nominated by Trump for associate attorney general, has made fifteen donations to Barack Obama and one to Act Blue. His wife, Kristen McGow, uses pronouns in her bio. The speaker questions how Woodward can fulfill the Trump administration's wishes, such as going after jihadists, anti-Semites, funders of Black Lives Matter and Antifa, those involved in election fraud, and universities not complying with DEI executive orders, given his and his wife's political affiliations. The speaker suggests Woodward's wife, a "Marxist, gender dysphoric wife," may influence him to impede the prosecution of Black Lives Matter and implement reparations, threatening divorce and gender transitioning hormones for their children if he doesn't comply. The speaker questions how DOJ employees can trust Woodward.

Thank God for James O'Keefe, he's done some interesting things over the years. It's amazing how many people open up when they think they're on a date with someone attractive. They'll admit to anything, like "Oh yeah, we did this because we hated Trump." These people need to learn to shut up. O'Keefe just released another video today about people trying to bypass the system to continue their work.

James O'Keefe reports on James Welch, an NIH genetic counselor, who appears to be manipulating language in research applications to circumvent government oversight, specifically from "Doge." Welch is allegedly advising researchers to replace terms like "women," "men," and "race" with alternatives like "adult girl," "XX," and "ancestry" to avoid grant cuts based on banned keywords. Welch claims that intramural research at NIH can "basically do anything" if they have the money. According to O'Keefe, an administration official stated there's no specific policy regarding racial preferences in health, suggesting Welch is creating an algorithm in his own mind. O'Keefe alleges this circumvents the will of President Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Welch expresses disdain for RFK Jr. and suggests replacing Trump's portrait with Putin's. He also mentions potential NIH job cuts and jokes about buying guns, stating, "they won't let me close enough to these people." O'Keefe calls for transparency and accountability within government institutions.

James O'Keefe reports on James Welch, an NIH genetic counselor, who appears to be manipulating language in research applications to circumvent government oversight, specifically from "Doge." Welch is allegedly coaching researchers to avoid using "banned words" like "women," "men," and "race" in grant applications, suggesting alternatives like "ancestry." Welch claims NIH intramural research can "basically do anything" if they have the money. According to O'Keefe, a senior administration official stated there's no specific policy regarding racial preferences in health, suggesting Welch is creating this algorithm in his own mind. O'Keefe alleges this circumvents the will of President Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Welch also expresses disdain for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., his boss, and suggests replacing Trump's portrait with Putin's. He mentions potential NIH job cuts and jokes about buying guns, stating "they won't let me close enough to these people." O'Keefe calls for transparency and accountability within government institutions.

Hi, I'm James O'Keefe, an investigative reporter. I want to discuss your views on the deep state. Can you elaborate? I'm not interested in this conversation. But you've already spoken on it, and I have it recorded. What is your role at the White House? I advise on research and development policy. Are we done here? Have a nice night. You too. Have a good evening, Byron. There he goes, shuffling along.

Doctor Moran, a senior advisor to Fauci, discussed deleting emails to avoid transparency, which goes against NIH policies. He also shared internal discussions with doctor Daszak and helped craft responses to FOIA releases, which is not in line with NIH guidelines. Doctor Tabak expressed concern over these actions. Moran is currently employed by NIH.

President Trump signed executive orders eliminating DEI programs, and federal offices are canceling DEI initiatives. Some people lost their jobs because they were hired exclusively to run DEI programs. However, similar cancellations occurred during Trump's previous presidency, and people worked around them by renaming DEI activities as multicultural activities or team building. Concerns arise about writing proposals with terms like "climate change" due to the administration's disbelief in it. A proposed solution is to replace "climate change" with terms like "natural hazards" to secure funding. Despite potential funding cuts, there's hope that space-related programs will remain funded due to Trump's interest in space exploration. Earth science programs may be defunded. People are trying to come up with alternative terms for climate change.

James O’Keefe and an undercover team report on the US Government Accountability Office (GAO). The GAO, historically tasked with overseeing government spending, is described as being in question by the undercover team. Speakers claim that administration actions have destroyed statistical agencies and data sources, but that they have stolen and backed up those data to preserve them. The team suggests this is in response to efforts to delete vaccine-related data, and that such actions could be aimed at undermining research on vaccines. Steve Putansu, a sixteen-year veteran at the GAO and a lecturer at American University, is presented as indicating that GAO is “stealing and preserving vaccine data that RFK and HHS has deleted,” a move described as potentially violating federal law. The narrative asserts that the GAO’s purpose is oversight and that its methods resemble a watchdog function, though the portrayal implies a more aggressive stance in protecting data. Within the dialogue, it is claimed that in some places there is resistance and that administration has destroyed statistical agencies and data sources. There is mention of “stolen and backed those things up,” with an implication that access to preserved data could be used to constrain or compel violations of law by others. The transcript notes that GAO faces political pushback, including threats of a 50% budget cut next year under the impoundment act, which defines as illegal the president’s withholding of funds congress has appropriated. GAO is said to have challenged spending changes as impoundment multiple times, prompting accusations of political targeting and leading to budget punishment. Legal experts are cited: Will Chamberlain, senior counsel at the Internet Accountability Project, is shown asserting that the director at GAO committed violations of three federal statutes. He describes this as a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for “intentionally accessing a computer without authorization or exceeding authorized access to obtain information from a US government department or agency.” He contends that the director is not a DHHS representative, and that taking information from HHS servers would constitute purloining information. Chamberlain also cites possible violations of 18 U.S.C. § 641 (theft of government property) and 18 U.S.C. § 2701 (unauthorized removal of public records). The report closes with a prompt for tips to the investigative team and a teaser about an upcoming undercover report. The segment emphasizes exposing alleged wrongdoing by government officials, framed as holding the corrupt elite accountable.

Doctor Moran, a senior advisor to Fauci, discussed deleting emails to avoid FOIA requests, which goes against NIH policies. He also mentioned avoiding "smoking guns" in emails. Moran shared internal discussions with Daszak and helped craft responses to FOIAs, actions not in line with NIH policies. Tabak expressed concern over these actions. Moran is still employed by NIH. The questions raised highlight potential transparency issues within the NIH. Translation: Doctor Moran, a senior advisor to Fauci, discussed deleting emails to avoid FOIA requests, which goes against NIH policies. He also mentioned avoiding "smoking guns" in emails. Moran shared internal discussions with Daszak and helped craft responses to FOIAs, actions not in line with NIH policies. Tabak expressed concern over these actions. Moran is still employed by NIH. The questions raised highlight potential transparency issues within the NIH.

An NIH genetic counselor, James Welch, was caught on hidden camera discussing strategies to manipulate language in research applications to circumvent government oversight, specifically from "Doge." Welch advises a principal investigator to change "race" to "ancestry" in a study on cortisol levels in black and white women, and to make race a secondary objective. He believes "Doge" is cutting grants for research using banned words like "women," "men," and "females." Welch claims intramural NIH research can "basically do whatever we approve" as long as they have the money. He expresses disdain for his boss, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and suggests replacing Trump's portrait with Putin's. Welch mentions potential NIH job cuts and jokes about being prepared with guns, stating his mother told him not to shoot anyone, but "they won't let me close enough to these people."

James O'Keefe reports on NIH genetic counselor James Welch, who appears to be manipulating language in research applications to circumvent government oversight, specifically from "Doge," which Welch claims is cutting grants for research with certain keywords like "women" and "females." Welch suggests using "ancestry" instead of "race" to avoid triggering an algorithm, despite a senior administration official stating there's no specific policy against racial preferences in health research. Welch also expresses disdain for his boss, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and suggests replacing Trump's portrait with Putin's. He mentions potential NIH job cuts and jokes about buying guns, stating he can't get close enough to certain people at work. O'Keefe calls for transparency and accountability within government institutions.

James O'Keefe claims that mass deportations will not occur until a certain problem is resolved. He mentions notification systems that alert people to avoid certain areas. O'Keefe believes that an individual in a video, along with their superiors and those who financially supported them, should be arrested, including Mackenzie Bezos. He intends to contact his network to initiate interviews. O'Keefe asserts that NGOs are thwarting the will of the American people and that this is antidemocratic and must be stopped.

The transcript documents an undercover interaction in which participants discuss race, journalism ethics, and the figure James O’Keefe. The scene centers on a group including Speaker 1, Speaker 3, Speaker 4, Speaker 6, and others, with repeated mentions of real or claimed identities and affiliations. Key points: - Jonathan Franklin is introduced as an adjunct professor at Georgetown University, a former NPR correspondent who “wrote about issues concerning race, culture, identity, and justice.” In the meeting, Franklin claimed to be a national CBS News correspondent, a detail the participants initially believed but later learned was false. - The group repeatedly uses racially charged terms, including “coon” and “selling out,” to describe public figures such as Clarence Thomas, Candace Owens, Herschel Walker, and Lawrence, with remarks about black public figures and alignment with white audiences. - A notable moment involves Franklin’s reluctance to speak openly. He is encouraged to say what he really thinks publicly, suggesting a conflict between journalistic restraint and personal candor. He muses that to reveal his true thoughts would require him to “stop being a journalist” and “exit news.” - The conversation reveals ongoing undercover journalism objectives. The participants discuss “watchdog gotcha” methods and the ethics of using hidden cameras, contrasting traditional journalism models (e.g., 60 Minutes, Mike Wallace) with contemporary practices. They debate how to expose individuals without compromising their own integrity. - The group discovers that Franklin does teach a Georgetown course on “sourcing and interviews technology” in the spring, with a scheduled class in January 2026, taught alongside others (Parker Lenay, John Fisk, etc.). Despite earlier claims, they confirm the teaching role and course details through Georgetown’s scheduling. - The dialogue includes a shift from discussing race and media ethics to identity deception. At one point, Franklin (or the person playing him) denies being James O’Keeffe, while another participant asserts, “I am James O’Keefe,” prompting confusion about identity. This culminates in an admission that Franklin’s identity was misrepresented by the others during the encounter. - The narrative frames the episode as a critique of bias in journalism. The speakers argue that objectivity is contested and that a journalist’s hidden biases can color reporting, especially when slurs or harmful stereotypes are used publicly by someone who holds a professorial or media position. - The segment concludes with a self-referential note on exposing truth and holding powerful figures accountable. The discussion emphasizes the public’s right to know the truth, including information about Georgetown’s faculty and the behavior observed during the encounter. - The document includes references to ongoing investigative activity, including future steps at Georgetown’s Dean’s Office and President’s Office. It also references the broader mission of O’Keefe Media Group and Citizen Journalism Foundation. Note: The transcript contains promotional material for a gold investment partnership, which has been omitted from this summary per the request to exclude promotional content.

O'Keefe Media Group reported on a secretly recorded meeting with the president of Florida Institute of Technology, John Niklow, concerning DEI and funding. Niklow allegedly changed wording to circumvent a presidential executive order and retain funding. Niklow reportedly obtained $7,000,000 in funding after a meeting with a state official, where he tweaked language related to climate change. The university president allegedly went against the deal made in that meeting. Niklow stated that changing words allows them to continue their work and avoid being targeted. Another professor, Julia Constopoulos, discussed renaming courses with Niklow. Niklow advised modifying branding or finding new funding sources. He also stated that the government isn't smart and is just searching the web for DEI courses. O'Keefe Media Group was asked to leave the premises and told to remain on the sidewalk. A cease and desist letter was sent to O'Keefe Media Group.

Federal offices are ending DEI programs due to President Trump's executive orders. State departments have already canceled DEI initiatives, but some suggest renaming DEI programs to circumvent the rules, such as using "multicultural activities" or "team building." Concerns arise about writing proposals with terms like "climate change" under the new administration, as they may not approve of such terms or provide funding. One workaround is to replace "climate change" with "natural hazards" in proposals to secure funding. While NASA may not lose funding as a whole due to Trump's interest in space, Earth science may be affected. There is a sense of depression and uncertainty, with concerns about potential funding cuts and the need to carefully adjust language in proposals.

An undercover video by O'Keefe Media Group features Raja Cholan from the NIH, who claims that COVID health initiatives were fabricated. He expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of vaccines, stating, "I don't even know if these vaccines stop you from getting COVID." Cholan also reveals that the six feet social distancing guideline lacked scientific backing and was "completely made up." He suggests that a Democrat in office would be better for the NIH, as they would face less scrutiny. The NIH has admitted to funding gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, contradicting previous statements by Dr. Fauci. Allegations of kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies related to COVID vaccines are also mentioned. More undercover videos from the NIH tapes series are expected.

The Chinese and us are both developing ethnic bioweapons, with labs in Ukraine collecting Russian and Chinese DNA to target people by race.

James O'Keefe confronts an NIH employee about a video where he allegedly discusses changing the word "race" to "ancestry." O'Keefe questions if this is deceitful and suggests ancestry isn't the same as race for clinical trials. The employee defends the change as scientifically accurate, claiming expertise. O'Keefe disputes this, accusing him of avoiding accountability. The employee states he believes in good science and protecting people. As the employee drives away in his Tesla, he claims O'Keefe doesn't care about people. O'Keefe finds this ironic and asserts his organization cares deeply about informing the public.

James O'Keefe confronts an NIH employee about a video where the employee discusses changing the word "race" to "ancestry" in a protocol. O'Keefe questions if this is deceitful and suggests ancestry isn't the same as race for medical trials. The employee denies lying and claims the change was for scientific accuracy, stating he is an expert. O'Keefe questions why he would change the words and accuses him of avoiding accountability. The employee drives away in his Tesla, claiming O'Keefe doesn't care about people. O'Keefe says he cares about people knowing what's going on in their government. He describes running after the employee in boat shoes, calling it an adventure.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the politicization of science and changes at the NIH. Over the last fifteen to twenty years, the NIH incorporated what Speaker 1 characterizes as political agendas rather than scientific agendas into its portfolio, with DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) being the most prominent example. A chunk of NIH funding went to projects focused on achieving social objectives rather than the health mission. Every NIH employee allegedly had to write a loyalty oath to DEI principles and was evaluated on devotion to the cause. Researchers inside and outside the NIH could access funds, with outside researchers more easily securing money if they promised to conduct DEI research, according to Speaker 1. Much of that research allegedly lacked a real scientific basis and was not science. Speaker 1 provides an example of projects they worked to deprioritize: a project asking whether structural racism is the root reason why African Americans have worse hypertension outcomes. The problem, they say, is that there is no way to test the hypothesis because, if structural racism is the cause, there is no workable control group to test the idea as true. They assert that such research did not translate into better health for anybody, including minority populations. They describe these projects as political agendas that do not belong in a science agency. The stated mission is to improve the health of everybody, including minority populations, but only if projects are clearly scientific, well defined, and have a real chance of improving health. Speaker 0 asks for clarification, summarizing that there were ideological or political projects receiving NIH funding. Speaker 1 confirms and adds another practice: when a good science project ended the year with leftover funds, program officers would approach researchers with leftover money and offer a “diversity supplement”—an add-on tied to DEI that was not actual science—to obtain extra funding. This, they claim, was a waste of taxpayer money with no real health benefit. They say they have since gotten rid of all of that.

Federal offices are ending DEI programs due to President Trump's executive orders, mirroring a previous instance where DEI was rebranded as "multicultural activities" or "team building" to circumvent restrictions. State departments have already canceled DEI initiatives. Concerns arise about writing proposals using terms like "climate change" due to potential disapproval from the administration, with suggestions to replace it with "natural hazards." This strategy was previously used to secure funding. While NASA's overall funding may remain intact due to Trump's interest in space, Earth science funding is expected to decrease. There is uncertainty and concern about the future, with some expressing a lack of hope for the coming year.

This memo from Health and Human Services, it's a warning: anyone who interferes with so-called gender affirming care will be targeted by the federal government, who will use its full power to achieve its political goals. The Biden administration is giving the green light to prosecutors to manipulate HIPAA. HIPAA is meant to protect patient privacy, but it's being used to protect billion-dollar hospital corporations. Federal agents from Health and Human Services showed up at my door, investigating a case about medical records and gave me a target letter. The U.S. Attorney's Office in Texas is investigating potential federal law violations, and I am a potential target in a criminal investigation. I knew everything was going to change.

I'm James O'Keefe, and I caught a White House advisor, Byron, on hidden camera discussing the "deep state." People joke about it, but it’s real to some degree. One way the bureaucracy slows things down is by creating commissions to study issues, which can delay progress for years. I also recorded him saying the bureaucracy could crush incoming leadership, like RFK Jr. Byron admitted the bureaucracy exists and should implement the policies of elected leaders while also advising them. He said he advises on research and development policy. To all the bureaucrats in Washington, you're on notice. Speak openly, or we'll record you. We're going to be recording you en masse.

The speaker discusses internal resistance to RFK Jr.’s policies and the idea that “deep staters” have been entrenched in government. They mention being forwarded an anecdote from a “good career employee.” They point to the FDA, noting that when Marty Makary came in, he had only about 10 political appointees he could choose. Jay Bhattacharya at the NIH allegedly had one political appointee. The speaker claims that every government employee is a “deep stater” who has been there a long time and that an email from a good employee circulates a CIA manual called How to Be a Bad Bureaucrat and Subvert an Institution from Within. The email supposedly asserts that 90% of employees at HHS, which has 70,000 employees, are talking in lunchrooms about the manual and telling each other that their job is to save America and save science from the agenda of President Trump and RFK Jr. The speaker asserts this reflects how people think across major departments and asks how to get rid of them, suggesting firing them as a solution, and mentions SIOP in this context. The CDC is presented as a case study of failure, described as a public health disaster in its COVID-19 response. The speaker alleges that the CDC’s guidance on school lockdowns copied directly from a teacher union document with which they were aligned, reproducing paragraphs from the teacher’s union advocating for two years of school shutdowns. It is claimed that the CDC also said that cloth masks were fine. The speaker says the CDC led the response and that the NIH funded the entire pandemic, including gain-of-function research, asserting that this constitutes “the creation of the pandemic.” In contrast, RFK Jr. is said to have fired three employees, and this action is described as national news. The overall narrative emphasizes a view of pervasive internal opposition within federal agencies, a controversial and sweeping critique of the CDC, NIH, and HHS responses to the pandemic, and a framing of RFK Jr.’s personnel decisions as transformative and newsworthy.