reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A man confronts a congressman, questioning his prior support for Kilmar Braco Garcia, who has been charged with facilitating the transport of illegal immigrants. He asks if the congressman still supports Garcia and whether he believes Garcia is entitled to due process, given his alleged illegal status. The man repeatedly asks if Garcia entered the country legally and accuses the congressman of being made a fool. He references accusations that Garcia beat his wife and questions whether the congressman supports "illegal gangbangers" in Maryland. He asks the congressman to condemn human smuggling and accuses him of being a "fascist." He questions whether the congressman believes in due process and demands to know how Garcia was allowed into the United States. He asks if the congressman is retracting his support for Garcia. The man then asks if the congressman supports deporting criminal illegal immigrants, referencing Elon Musk. He presses the congressman on whether he supports removing criminal illegal immigrants from the country.

Donald Trump's house was raided by the FBI, while Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton faced no such action for similar accusations. The left is accused of using a radical district attorney to target Trump. The House Oversight Committee has found evidence of influence peddling and financial deception, but there is a lack of immediate action. The speaker calls for someone like John Adams, who defended British soldiers after the Boston Massacre, to uphold the rule of law. The focus shifts to Hunter Biden, comparing his alleged crimes to those of Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro's children. The audience is urged to take action.

The speaker asks about President Biden's conflicts of interest regarding sanctions on individuals who have done business with his family. They mention a report alleging that the First Son's company received $3,500,000 from a Russian woman. The speaker questions how Biden is navigating these conflicts and asks for an explanation of the $3,500,000. The other speaker responds by saying they have no confirmation of the report's accuracy and no further details. When asked about conflicts of interest, the speaker questions what those conflicts would be and points out that Biden has sanctioned more oligarchs than before, suggesting it is not a conflict of interest.

Speaker 0 is asked if President Biden accepted bribes and if he would comment on the arrest of the former president.

The IRS agents found evidence to investigate Joe Biden for financial crimes. Despite claims of no evidence linking Joe to Hunter Biden's businesses, the speaker believes it is untrue.

The House investigations into the First Family's international business dealings have seen several developments. One committee is seeking an FBI file alleging President Biden took bribes, while an IRS whistleblower claims there's a cover-up in the investigation. Additionally, a recent Harvard epi on Harris poll revealed that 53% of the public, including a quarter of Democrats, believe that Joe Biden was involved in an illegal influence peddling scheme with his FBI connections. There is evidence of the president's interactions with associates from China, Mexico, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine. What would you say to the majority of Americans who believe the president is corrupt? FBI.

The speaker discusses the RICO statute and refers to the Biden family enterprise as a classic RICO case. They claim that the Biden family monetized Joe Biden's public office and sold it for personal gain. They mention incidents during the Obama administration and before Biden became vice president where individuals associated with the Bidens sold Joe's influence. The speaker argues that this constitutes a RICO case involving Hobbs Act extortion, bribery, and fraud. They criticize the double standard in investigating Trump and Biden. They mention Victor Shokin's testimony, which they believe corroborates the allegations against Biden. The speaker also highlights lies and distortions from the Biden camp and the media. They conclude by stating that evidence of wrongdoing exists and that Hunter Biden was indeed a subject of investigation.

Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of discrediting herself by focusing on trivial matters concerning Biden, such as his ice cream preference, instead of investigating Hunter Biden's alleged financial dealings with foreign entities. Speaker 1 claims Hunter Biden received millions from Moscow and significant payments from an energy company despite lacking relevant experience. Speaker 0 states that the Hunter Biden laptop story originated from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani and cannot be verified. Speaker 1 insists the laptop's existence is known and that it's crucial to investigate potential corruption involving Biden and foreign money from China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 also alleges Biden's brother profited in Iraq without prior experience. Speaker 1 asserts this is a major scandal that Speaker 0 is ignoring. Speaker 0 reiterates the laptop cannot be verified.

Ron Rocha confronted George Bergès, accusing him of money laundering through his art gallery by selling Hunter Biden's paintings. Rocha claimed the sales, including one for $500,000, are illegal, questioned why the FBI hasn't investigated Bergès, and demanded to know the identities of the painting buyers and their influence with the president. Rocha stated Biden is a "crackhead, not an artist." He accused Bergès of breaking the law and questioned his right to not answer to the people of New York City. Bergès alluded to a prior police visit and criticized Rocha for not wearing a mask or having a "COVID ID," calling him a "scumbag" and telling staff not to serve him.

The speaker challenges the idea that Hunter Biden committed a crime, stating it's not illegal to profit from one's last name. They then direct Chuck to the Marco Polo report, which they claim details potential crimes.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

A man photographed on a motorcycle waving a Mexican flag amidst fires and police cars may not be from Mexico, according to GPS data from his phone. The individual has reportedly sent money to Venezuela. His phone's location data places him at Antifa, BLM, Pro-Palestine, and Pro-MOS protests, as well as three Kamala Harris rallies. He returns nightly to a $2,000,000 residence. The question is raised regarding the source of his funding.

Joe Biden was involved in meetings, dinners, and golf with Hunter Biden and his associates. He conditioned $1 billion in American tax money on firing a prosecutor linked to a company Hunter was on the board of, where he earned $1 million annually.

The house investigations into the first family's international business dealings are ongoing. One committee is seeking an FBI file alleging that President Biden took bribes, while an IRS whistleblower claims there is a cover-up in the investigation. A recent Harvard Harris poll revealed that 53% of the public, including a fourth of Democrats, believe that Joe Biden was involved in an illegal influence peddling scheme with his son. There is evidence of the president interacting with associates from China, Mexico, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine. What do you say to the majority of Americans who believe the president is corrupt?

The Secret Service is paying $16,000 a month for Hunter Biden's security in Malibu. Hunter Biden is reportedly selling art to cover his $15,800 monthly rent. Concerns are raised about people buying his art to gain favor with the President, but the responsibility lies with Hunter Biden and his representatives. It is questioned whether Hunter Biden has stopped selling access to the White House, but that is for him to answer. Testimony suggests that Hunter Biden and Devin Archer tried to profit off the Biden brand, but no further details are provided.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of discrediting themselves by avoiding questions about Biden's son and alleged corruption. Speaker 1 questions the validity of the Hunter Biden laptop story, sourced from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani. Speaker 0 insists it's a crucial issue to investigate Biden's alleged corruption involving China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 argues the story lacks verification. Speaker 0 counters by pointing out the laptop's existence and the Biden family's response. The conversation escalates as Speaker 0 emphasizes the significance of the scandal and Speaker 1 questions its validity.

The speaker discusses the analogy of a criminal ordering a hit and how it relates to the impeachment inquiry of Joe Biden. They claim that Joe Biden was involved in his family's business schemes in Romania while he was president. They mention that Biden delivered an anti-corruption speech in Romania and had discussions with the Romanian president about anti-corruption efforts. They also highlight that the Biden family received money from a corrupt Romanian oligarch through a company called Bladen Enterprises. They mention Hunter Biden's meetings with the US ambassador to Romania and the flow of over $1,000,000 to the Bidens.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of selling access to the president through his son's job at a gas company. Speaker 1 denies the claim and challenges Speaker 0 to do physical activities together. Speaker 1 defends his son, stating that no one has accused him of wrongdoing. Speaker 0 mentions hearing the accusation on MSNBC, but Speaker 1 disputes this. Speaker 1 criticizes Speaker 0's lack of backbone. Speaker 2 comments on Speaker 1's defensive and angry response, claiming that it reveals the real Joe Biden. Speaker 2 asserts that Joe Biden sent his son to peddle influence overseas, and when confronted, Joe Biden denies it, claiming that the mainstream media has not reported it.

Biden was questioned about why he put his dad on speakerphone during business meetings if his dad had no involvement in his business. The other person asked if Biden's dad called him, to which Biden confirmed. The person then questioned why Biden needed to talk to his dad during business meetings if he had nothing to do with the business. The conversation took a confrontational turn, with the other person calling Biden dangerous and suggesting that his lawyer advised him to handle the situation privately.

In this video, the speaker discusses the controversial plea deal of Hunter Biden, son of President Biden. It is revealed that Hunter did not pay taxes of over $1.5 million in both 2017 and 2018, which appears to violate the Ashcroft memo. The speaker expresses disappointment in the plea deal, considering it a joke and a slap in the face to ordinary Americans. The investigations into bribery and money laundering allegations against Hunter and the president are still ongoing. On one side, left-leaning individuals defend the deal, while on the other side, there is anger and resentment. Journalist Catherine Harridge suggests that this plea agreement will be controversial, especially among Republicans. The speaker criticizes the double standard in the justice system, contrasting the treatment of Hunter Biden with that of a Trump-supporting grandmother who received prison time for a misdemeanor.

Hunter Biden's privilege and questionable actions are the focus here. The speaker criticizes President Biden and the media for not addressing Hunter's privilege, despite lecturing about privilege and injustice. Hunter's wealth and connections are attributed to his father, rather than his own abilities. The speaker also highlights the sleazy behavior surrounding Hunter and the Biden family, suggesting that it should concern fair-minded individuals. They argue that evidence shows President Biden was aware of and enabled Hunter's actions, benefiting from them. The speaker calls for justice and transparency, expressing concern about the compromised state of the US attorney investigating the matter.

Fauci and the media are criticized for their handling of the pandemic. The media refuses to admit any wrongdoing and sticks to their narrative. Real journalism has been replaced by propaganda in outlets like the New York Times, Washington Post, MSNBC, and CNN. The media ignores important stories like the Archer testimony, where President Biden's involvement in business dealings was discussed. Hunter Biden's questionable art sales are also mentioned. The conversation questions if the art sales were a form of money laundering.

Hunter Biden's alleged selling of access to his father, referred to as the "big guy," is the reason why we were interested in him. This raises concerns about a potentially compromised president in the White House. Americans should be worried about this situation.

Joe Biden is accused of taking cash from foreign countries frequently. The speaker suggests that an unannounced raid on Biden's homes would have been more effective than the one on Senator Menendez. They question whether three weeks' notice would be enough for Biden to clean out any incriminating evidence. The speaker claims that Biden only cares about enriching his own family, while they claim to care about enriching the listener's family.

Hunter Biden is back in the news as the DOJ claims a Romanian oligarch paid him to influence US policy while his father was VP. Documents reveal Hunter received $3,000,000 from Gabriel Papaviccu, a Romanian businessman facing a criminal investigation. Prosecutors allege Hunter concealed the nature of his work to protect President Biden. Papavicu is set to testify at Hunter's tax evasion trial in September. Republicans argue Hunter used his father's name for access.