reSee.it - Related Video Feed

An Airbnb host was offered $10,000 a month by a county and state to house illegal aliens in a rental property. The host is considering the offer, as the property normally rents for $1800-$2500 long-term or makes $5000-$6000 a month on Airbnb. The host questions where the money is coming from and why it's not being used to house citizens. They are curious if other areas are doing this and if it's an investment opportunity. The host replied that they would do it if paid $240,000 for two years upfront, and the county/state is considering it. The host states that even if the house burned down, they would make the value of the house back.

The speaker recounts personally observing alarming EBT receipts while working at a grocery store, citing one instance of $13,000 spent on EBT food and $29,000 on EBT cash. The speaker expresses frustration, questioning how individuals receiving assistance can afford to dress very well while Americans struggle to afford necessities like work boots. The speaker views this as a serious problem.

Speaker 0 recounts inspecting a lady's house. She said, 'I've had my voucher for fifty years. I made sure that I got my daughter on a voucher. I made sure I got my granddaughter on a voucher. I couldn't get my son on a voucher so I told them that he had asthma. You can't prove asthma or migraines.' She told me because she was telling me a way to scam the system. 'When I pull up, I pull up in a 2013 Toyota Camry. There's usually a Lexus or BMW sitting in their yard. I look poor.' She said many people tell her stuff to get money from the government, but 'y'all keep on thinking I don't know it.' And since every one of you are gonna ask me, yes, I reported it. 'But if your caseworker likes you, you are pretty untouchable here. Like, they will give you ideas and help you do it.'

Speaker 0 insists Speaker 1 is not allowed to get a job because it will negatively impact Speaker 0's Section 8 benefits and link card. Speaker 1 questions how they are supposed to be successful in life if they can't work and must remain broke to receive Section 8. Speaker 0 states the government can help them and they don't need to work. Speaker 1 argues their friends have jobs and nice houses. Speaker 0 reiterates that if Speaker 1 gets a job, it will affect Speaker 0's Section 8. Speaker 1 suggests getting their own Section 8, but Speaker 0 warns it will be a difficult process. Speaker 0 advises Speaker 1 to get on Section 8, find an apartment, get a link card, and not work, because the government is there to help.

A person went to a secret migrant shelter in Massachusetts and was allegedly reported to the police. The speaker claims the shelter spends $100,000 per month on Lyft rides for illegal immigrants. According to the ex-director of the shelter, the shelter has contracts with Uber and Lyft and pays them directly, even for trips to Boston or New Hampshire. The ex-director estimates Uber and Lyft costs totaled $1,200,000 a year. The speaker also claims the shelter charges taxpayers for empty rooms at $180 a night, and also bills for meals in those rooms. The ex-director alleges there is a tremendous amount of waste and/or fraud. The speaker claims to have exposed millions more in fraud and will post another video if they gain 500 followers.

These individuals discuss stories of people squatting in houses, exploiting legal loopholes to stay rent-free. They share anecdotes of squatters taking advantage of laws that protect tenants, causing homeowners to struggle with eviction processes and legal battles. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by property owners and the lengths some individuals go to in order to exploit the system.

Prosecutors have identified billions in Medicaid fraud across 14 programs, and researchers have now found a fifteenth area: assisted living. In Minnesota, the assisted living program is expanding faster than other programs, with payments rising 10 to 15 times as fast. Data on area facilities show Minneapolis has 169, Saint Paul has 83 (population 307,000), Brooklyn Center has 106 (pop. ~30,000), and Brooklyn Park has 181 (pop. ~84,000), highlighting a higher concentration of facilities in smaller cities. The assisted living facility in question is housed in what appears to be a single-family home, yet it bills itself as an assisted living facility and receives substantial state funding. The facility is owned by Gandhi Mohammad, now Gandhi Abdi Qadai, through his LLC, and his wife runs the assisted living services. The state continues to pay while he awaits trial. The report notes that this man was indicted in the Feeding Our Future scam, which involved false billing, and asks why he is still receiving state funds through these facilities. Speakers discuss whether Feeding Our Future indictments should trigger a cross-check to prevent individuals involved in that scheme from receiving other state funds. One speaker asks, “Do you know the Feeding Our Future scandal?” and notes the lack of awareness among people being interviewed. It is stated that the man who owns the building was indicted in Feeding Our Future, and that his shell company was used to purchase a new assisted living facility property, with his wife operating the service provider side. The facility received over 2,300,000 in state money last year, and a Minnesota reformer article claims the person has been paid 49,000,000 since 2016. The interviewees question how it is possible that someone indicted in Feeding Our Future is still collecting checks from the state through these assisted living centers run by his wife. State Representative Kristen Robbins, chair of the House Fraud and Oversight Committee, expresses concern that basic due diligence was not performed to cross-check Feeding Our Future defendants against other state funding. The parties reached out to the man and his wife but have not heard back. They also contacted the Department of Human Services, which stated that they cannot cut funding from this person because he is “simply a landlord,” with his wife running the service provider arm of the facilities. The department’s position is described as passing the buck.

A serial squatter in Washington state has avoided eviction three times with taxpayer money from a nonprofit. The squatter owes almost $90,000 in unpaid rent and the homeowner has spent $30,000 in legal fees trying to remove him. The nonprofit receives $4.6 million annually from the state to support its staff. The homeowner is frustrated as he is losing money on the property despite the rental income.

Speaker 0: Massive fraud is going on here in the state of Minnesota, especially in Minneapolis. Explain to me what's going on with the day cares. Speaker 1: One of the things I've noticed is there’s an exceptional number of childcare centers set up mostly in Minneapolis, but also in Saint Paul. I wondered how many kids are there in the Twin Cities. I visited facilities near my office and saw there aren’t any kids there. I’d go to another one and there aren’t any kids there either. I spoke with someone outside who said, “We’re all full,” yet when I looked inside the door was open and there was a couch and a table with a couple chairs and no kids. I asked if the kids were outside playing or what kind of place this was, and the staffer said, “You go,” and followed me down the street to my car. That made me think something was going on, and this was maybe five years ago. Speaker 1: This fraud is so massive. When the dust settles on this, it’s going to be found to be the largest fraud in the history of the country and probably the world. The ones I’ve gotten data on average about $2,500,000 a year, and a lot of them will say they have anywhere from 80 to 120 children. Speaker 1: I’ve been to literally 40 or 50 of these childcare centers, and there never has been a single child at any one of them ever. Morning, afternoon, evening. Some say they’re open till 10:00 at night. I go there in the morning, I go there in the afternoon, I go there at 9:00 at night. Nobody. There are no kids there ever.

The speaker asserts that the core reason many people are upset about food stamp and SNAP benefit programs is not the policy itself but the practice of selling food stamps for cash. They claim that a large number of individuals in New York and other states are buying and selling their food stamps at corner stores and delis, effectively exchanging the benefits for cash. The speaker provides concrete-sounding examples to illustrate the scale of this activity, saying that people are obtaining around $7,000 in food stamps and selling them for cash, or receiving about $4,000 in food stamps and taking roughly $1,000 in cash in exchange. They emphasize that this selling is happening “everywhere,” suggesting it is widespread and not confined to a single area. The speaker also notes that those involved will not admit to selling their food stamps, but insists that it is happening. The overall message is that the dissatisfaction with the SNAP program, in the speaker’s view, stems from the illicit resale of benefits rather than the program’s intent or structure, and that these practices are pervasive across various locations. The speaker foregrounds the belief that the practice is common enough to explain the anger and protests, and they present the assertion as an observed phenomenon rather than a hypothetical concern. The emphasis remains on the alleged pattern of selling SNAP benefits for cash, the amounts involved, and the universality of the practice, coupled with the expectation that the participants would deny it publicly. The speaker’s rhetoric centers on the perception of widespread resale activity and its role in fueling controversy around food stamp benefits.

A man who has worked with the homeless for 25 years claims there are no homeless Haitians in his town because they all got vouchers. He says the homeless in the community are not who people think they are, and squatting isn't the issue. He states many are veterans and invites people to contact him to see the situation firsthand. He says the homeless don't want toothpaste and peanut butter sandwiches; they want solutions to their displacement. He claims to personally know someone who lost their house after 7 years because the landlord asked them to move out temporarily for remodeling, then tripled the rent upon their return. He attributes this to money.

A local government is offering $15,000 to house non-citizens in my Airbnb, potentially on a monthly basis. While $15,000 is a significant amount, I have concerns about the arrangement, such as the number of people involved and the risk of property damage. I've received previous offers ranging from $10,000 to $12,000, and the prospect of earning $180,000 in a year is tempting. However, I've never received such offers for helping veterans or the homeless. Although it's challenging to turn down this money, I’m hesitant to proceed given the circumstances. My mortgage is only $1,400, which adds to my dilemma.

We found 10,000 people using the same Social Security number. They are brought in illegally and given a number to pay taxes. Companies hire them across various plants and factories, all using the same number. The IRS only checks if there's an employer associated with the number, validating it. These individuals then use the number to obtain driver's licenses, leading to voter suppression. The government ignores this issue and these individuals don't pay taxes, as companies deduct them. The government has a $1.7 trillion slush fund, generating $100 million in interest monthly. This information is unsettling, revealing a corrupt system benefiting everyone involved.

The speaker argues that the real reason many people are upset about food stamps and SNAP benefits is because people are selling their food stamps. They claim this selling is happening widely in New York and other states, with individuals going to corner stores or delis to trade their benefits for cash. The speaker provides specific figures to illustrate the practice: some people are reportedly selling $7,000 worth of food stamps for cash, while others might have $4,000 in food stamps and take around $1,000 in cash in exchange. The speaker emphasizes that this phenomenon is occurring "everywhere." They assert that the public is angry for this reason, and they insist that people will never admit to selling their food stamps, but the selling is happening.

The speaker says the fraudsters complain the loudest and with fake righteous indignation, and that is a tell. They describe these people as crazy. They point to examples like the $2,000,000,000 to Stacey Abrams’ NGO that basically didn’t exist and suddenly gets $2,000,000,000 awarded from the federal government. She asks, why? and notes that there are many such cases like that.

The discussion centers on alleged fraud in Maine’s elder care sector, framed as Somalian/African fraud in a state considered very white. Steve Robinson, editor in chief of the Maine Wire, and John Featherston, a Maine Wire columnist, assert that immigrant workers—many with limited English and little health-care experience—are involved in schemes that steal taxpayer dollars by billing for care that is often neglected or nonexistent. Robinson distinguishes multiple fraudulent operations: some home care agencies are essentially PO boxes that submit invoices to the Department of Health and Human Services; others are residential care facilities operating as homes where real adults are present but care is understaffed and substandard, with employees overworked and sometimes asleep on the job. A Department of Health and Human Services inspector general report is cited: in 2023, Maine improperly billed $46,000,000 in Medicaid payments to the federal government in one program (Section 28), and the state is seeking to claw back that money. John Featherston notes visits to the Portland area where they toured home health care centers during business hours and found no staff present. Mustafa Alamedy, described as a 25-year-old Maynard resident, reportedly billed over a million dollars from 2021 to 2024 with an audit error rate around 70%. The hosts recount visiting multiple home health care facilities, often finding no employees or furniture, indicating non-operational sites despite billing activity. A confrontation arises when a caller accuses the Maine Wire of propaganda and targets Somalis and immigrants. Steve Robinson responds by detailing alleged ties to Gateway Community Services, a organization accused of systemic Medicaid fraud over five and a half years by a former employee and under investigation by Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the state of Maine. Safiya Khalid, a former employee associated with Gateway, is named as making such accusations in the broadcast; her brother Mohammad Khalid runs another business from the same office complex. Robinson suggests Khalid should be sleepless at night if implicated in the fraud scheme, given ongoing investigations. The Portland-area investigation is reiterated: there are three home health care facilities inside a building, yet during daytime hours no one appears to be working, and there is no furniture or desktops visible. Governor Janet Mills is questioned about the $45,000,000+ in fraud findings, with the Maine Wire asserting that Mills’ administration did not actively support investigations into Gateway Community Services. They claim Mills’ attorney general later provided limited support and funding to Gateway with opioid settlement money after the outlet’s reporting, saying real investigation only gained traction after national media exposure. The discussion closes with praise for the Maine Wire’s reporting, urging continued local investigative journalism to draw national attention. The guests are Steve Robinson and John Featherston.

Someone is allegedly going to be arrested for stealing 400,000 social security numbers and personal information from the Social Security database. This information was reportedly being sold to enable people to steal money from Social Security. The fraud is allegedly connected to illegal immigrants and voter fraud, as Social Security is the main way identification is established in the United States. Compromising the Social Security system can purportedly allow non-citizens to register to vote and obtain benefits. The speaker claims Democrats are using parts of the government to provide financial incentives for illegal immigrants to come to and remain in the United States, citing Social Security disability, Medicare, unemployment, and IRS refunds without income. FEMA funds meant for Americans in distress from natural disasters were allegedly diverted to pay for luxury hotels in New York for illegal immigrants, who are purportedly still there.

The speaker argues that much of the backlash against SNAP benefits stems from people selling their food stamps. They claim that in New York and other states, individuals go to corner stores or delis to sell their food stamps for cash. The speaker states that some people receive around $7,000 in food stamps and sell them for cash, while others get about $4,000 in food stamps and take roughly $1,000 in cash. They emphasize that this selling is happening “everywhere.” The speaker also notes that people who sell food stamps will never admit to doing so, but asserts that it is happening.

The speaker states that the woman who owns the building housing a child care service recently opened a restaurant there as well. This same woman previously ran Samala Child Care, which was rated in 2015 for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars and had its license revoked. The speaker notes that under a different variation of her name, she also operates the Hu Yu Child Care Center. The speaker then claims that a Google search for the Hu Hu You Child Care Center yields a video featuring the mayor of Minneapolis. In that video, the mayor is playing very loudly Somali music and is wearing a shirt that shows pride in Nicolette Street. The speaker asserts that he is very proud of his community and all of the fraud that they have all committed together.

A woman says she is being forced out of her apartment by Venezuelan illegals. She lives in a small city and claims her landlord receives government checks for housing them. There are approximately 10 people living in a 4-bedroom apartment. She lists several complaints the new tenants have made against her, including her son walking too heavily, her dog scratching the floor, her smoking, her grandfather standing shirtless by the window, her use of the back entry, her phone conversations, and her friend's child running in the house. She says the tenants roast guinea pigs outside, causing smoke damage and odor. She also says their dog is unsupervised, defecates in the driveway, and runs into the building. She believes the tenants are trying to get her evicted so their family and friends can move in. She says her landlord is siding with them to keep receiving the government checks. As a single mother, she doesn't know how she will afford to move. She is considering leaving and may ask for financial assistance.

We found 10,000 people sharing the same Social Security number for work. Employers give undocumented workers the number to deduct taxes. The IRS ignores the mismatch and validates it if there's an employer. This helps undocumented workers get driver's licenses and vote. They don't pay taxes, companies do. The government holds a $1.7 trillion slush fund. This dark money generates $100 million in interest monthly. The system benefits both parties.

The speaker believes too many people are "sucking off the government." They work with Section 8 tenants who fall behind on rent but then file taxes and receive a rebate. These tenants also receive SNAP benefits, reduced or free rent, and Social Security benefits, which the speaker claims have been perverted from their original purpose due to politicians buying votes. The speaker alleges that many of these individuals are able-bodied, can work, but choose not to, while the federal government pays for a majority of their living expenses.

The speakers claim to have discovered widespread fraud within the Social Security system while mapping it to understand where the fraud was. They found that the number of non-citizens receiving Social Security numbers has increased from 270,000 in 2021 to 2,100,000 in 2024. They allege that under the current administration, illegal immigrants can enter the country and apply for work authorization and receive Social Security numbers without an interview or ID. They claim the system defaults to maximum inclusion and minimum collection for these individuals, with many already receiving Medicaid. They sampled voter registration records and found instances of this population registered and voting, which have been referred for prosecution. They assert that human traffickers have made $13-15 billion due to these incentives, exploiting people and leading to a human tragedy, including the trafficking of children. They allege that people become indentured servants to pay off debts to traffickers, creating a system of exploitation.

I'm seeing a lot of unfairness in South Florida. Long-time residents, some who arrived from Cuba 45 years ago, retire on Social Security payments of $800-$1000 a month after working their entire lives. Yet, new arrivals from Cuba, sometimes just months in the country, receive $1500 monthly in benefits as refugees, even if they're young and able-bodied. I've seen cases where these refugees then make multiple trips back to Cuba. They receive extensive government assistance, including Medicaid, food stamps, and healthcare. It's frustrating to see people who've contributed decades to this country receive less than someone who recently arrived and is seemingly taking advantage of the system. This situation is common and deeply unjust.

A landlord met with a prospective tenant with a $2,000 housing voucher. The tenant said she makes $5,000 a month tax-free caring for elderly/special needs people, and has a five-bedroom voucher due to having many kids. She also mentioned housing the kids in the basement to use the upstairs rooms for her care business. The landlord believes this is an example of people scamming the system, making money while appearing unemployed to collect vouchers. The landlord claims that out of twelve Section 8 tenants, ten were likely running some kind of scam. The landlord reports suspected fraud and believes voucher fraud should be a jailable offense because people who need vouchers are being taken advantage of.