TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker, who has been on the farm for three and a half months, aims to connect Canadian and South African farmers to discuss how South Africa avoided culling ostriches despite similar policies and past outbreaks. South Africa now exempts ostriches from culling, unlike Canada, where they're treated as poultry. The speaker believes culling all ostriches won't stop avian flu in chickens and is present to protect the birds. The speaker claims the RCMP are monitoring the farm, and they fear the Canadian Security establishment wants to remove the camp and media coverage to avoid scrutiny of the CFIA's stamping out policy. They state the birds haven't been tested, so there's no proof of infection. The speaker mentions Robert Kennedy has voiced his opposition to the culling. Transporting the birds to the US might offer protection, but the Canadian government and CFIA would likely oppose it. The speaker questions why the CFIA can move supposedly contaminated culled birds to a municipal dump, but not allow testing to prove infection. The speaker asserts the farmer would voluntarily cull infected birds.

Karen at the Ostrich Farm says that CFIA has approved the killing of their ostriches in one to four days. These birds are their pets, and they have spent years petting and walking amongst them. The ostriches are happy and healthy. She is asking for help to save these animals. She pleads for people to come to the farm at 301 Landfill Road to surround it and prevent the killing of the ostriches. Jump is supposed to be ready for the bodies. She believes that if people come together, they can make a change and stop this from happening.

The speaker recalls a trip to the United Kingdom to sing to millions at what was described as “the largest free speech festival in history,” where “voices were unbound” and it was a beacon of hope amid silenced truth. Back home, he describes a scene of “such a heavy police presence at this ostrich farm” with “30 or 40 police cruisers” and “aerial drones hovering over the property,” contrasting it with concerns about domestic fentanyl labs, drug dealers, and “pedophiles and rapists and murderers that are walking free on cash free bail.” He critiques policies like MAID and urges healing, saying “Solutions are right here at the doorstep.” He cites the Canadian Citizens Care Alliance, with “over 700 scientific and health care professionals,” and the SMAC subcommittee of “approximately 30 of the nation’s top scientific minds and doctors.” They will “cover all costs to have these birds thoroughly tested,” aiming to move forward together.

There's been people asking about the eggs. So the family has no idea. So these birds probably are laying eggs. What are what is the CFIA doing with the eggs? And unfortunately, the family does not know. They got no way to track this stuff. These guys come in here and and just take over the place. Don't let anybody know what they're doing. They put up all these walls of secrecy to ensure that nobody can see what's going on, and then they wonder why everybody's freaking out. It'd be easy enough for the CFIA to make a statement. It'd be easy enough for the police to make a statement. It'd be easy enough for anybody that knows anything about this to make a statement, but they wanna keep all the public in the in the dark.

The Supreme Court has delayed a planned execution of nearly 400 ostriches in British Columbia after an avian flu outbreak. In a briefing about the case, ostrich farmer Elwood Coburn discussed the situation and his birds, including Bessie. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency says the ostriches need to be destroyed, and they allege that Coburn hasn’t been taking good care of the birds. Coburn responded, “How dare they? What’s this country coming to if a man can’t keep to himself and raise 400 ostriches?” He added that he wouldn’t stand by with his head in the sand to see if IA has these birds worried sick, referencing the agency’s concerns. He also noted Thanksgiving was recently and claimed the ostriches were upset, barely touching their turkey. The discussion touched on national attention, with some famous American politicians getting involved. Robert Kennedy Jr. has asked for the birds to be studied, not killed. Dr. Oz offered to re home the birds on his Florida ranch. The exchange included light remarks about Florida and the politicians’ interventions, but the central issue remained the government’s plan to destroy the birds. The court order states that since the outbreak began, some 70 ostriches have died, and didn’t another ostrich die just last week? Coburn asserted that there are 399 healthy ostriches remaining, saying, “we still have three ninety nine healthy ostriches.” He elaborated, “That’s three ninety eight birds who have nothing wrong with them. There’s three ninety seven birds with a right to live.” He warned that if the government has their way, there won’t be three ninety six birds left. He insisted, “They wanna kill all 395 birds while I plan to save all 394 of them.” The scene conveyed Coburn’s determination to protect as many birds as possible amid the outbreak and the regulatory pressure to cull the flock. In summary, the case centers on a delayed execution of hundreds of ostriches due to avian flu, with the CFIA advocating destruction and Coburn arguing for the preservation of the majority of his flock. Political figures have weighed in on whether the birds should be studied or rehomed, while the outbreak has already claimed some birds, prompting a contentious debate over the fate of the rest.

"The world is watching, and this is one of the babies. Who is it? Carrie. I got Carrie here. I mean, they have an obligation in a civil society." "Right? We don't suffer. It's in humane once again. Absolutely." "And the reason for her injury is because of the drones flying around and distressing the noise." "Injured before the drones. She was injured during those two helicopters, broke all the rules, flying over here in the dark with articulated searchlights. That's when they started running." "They went through the fences. Not the fence." "We don't even know if any of them got out that day." "What was her signs of dehydration? Very dehydrated. Skin tender. While she's drinking." "I've been appointed as the farm vet. And so are you guys. Sorry for that."

The speaker references 'Of hostages before engaging in what many see as as a animal cruelty.' They say, 'I can't imagine, this is absolutely astonishing to me, that an animal welfare issue in Canada has garnered the attention of MAGA type billionaires in The United States, which makes me sympathize with the ostriches less.' They conclude, 'But that doesn't matter. What'.

There's a hen in there that is suffering She's dehydrated. They will not allow any of us to treat her, to tube her and give her electrolytes. Their people will only do it and they're not doing it right. They've never done it. So this hen is suffering and it's a major problem. The communication between we have an interim stay and to be able not be able to have any right and handle our animals is absolutely absolutely insane. and, let's talk about that these animals, it's not their fault. It's not anybody's fault and we definitely shouldn't be being punished, but these animals are being punished. We're being punished and, we have some hay coming in, getting police escorted in right now. Again, your taxpayer dollars hard at work.

"They've obviously developed some type of natural immunity because they're not clinically sick." "The worry is the virus can mutate, become even more pathogenic, cause much more disease." "Their solution? Just kill them all, wipe it out." "But it's now in the wild bird population." "How is it that you know we can wipe out all these big healthy birds on a farm and somehow think we're going to control that disease?" "Destroy the birds, you destroy the science." "Cruelty to animals, it violates the criminal code of Canada." "Couldn't the ostriches just been quarantined where they are, it's a very isolated spot, repeatedly tested for the avian flu?" "Why can there not be some type of flexibility?" "Risk science it's here. Too bad all your birds are gonna die." "In my opinion, yeah there really could have been and should have been and should be."

Speaker announces intrusion with, "Open the door. They're coming in." and "Loving citizen." They describe the scene as "It's weird working here" and state, "I think they're trying to get them out in the pen, but they're feeding them." They warn, "This is a stain on Canadian history if this goes forth" and ask, "What has this country come to now?" They emphasize care, noting, "These are animals that have lived for two hundred and fifty one days without illness, have been taken care of." They add, "We've been out here since January 22, our first convoy out here." They question, "Don't you let them test the animals? Why don't you let them test the animals?" and assert, "You're not even a government organization." They close with a call: "Please share this out and make people aware of what is going on."

The speakers recount watching authorities move in at Universal Ostrich Farm and being stunned because they themselves are not Universal Ostrich Farm. Upon arrival, the state set up a camp for operational logistics—building roads and securing a safe position to enable access and logistical success—and soon after a warrant was posted on the door, which they could not access right away; it took days before they could view it. They explain the warrant as a search-and-seizure order written to the aunt and her business partner, not to the parents, and it identifies Universal Ostrich Farm’s “secondary quarantine property,” which they insist is not Universal Ostrich Farm. Because of this, they must challenge the warrant in court while watching events unfold via multiple livestreams on phones, computers, and a TV. They describe people attempting to enter and police trucks driving onto the property, conveying a sense of confusion about what was happening. When asked about jurisdiction, they clarify that the RCMP are enforcing a warrant applied for by the CFIA, and that the warrant is based on the Health of Animals Act rather than criminal wrongdoing. They say they now have the document and are reviewing it with lawyers; the CFIA issued the warrant, the RCMP enforce it, and the order could extend beyond October 22. They emphasize that the process is slow and contested, with many legal hurdles to navigate. They depict the property layout as a slivered triangular tract extending to the highway, explaining that the expansion of access and new driveways was intended to provide logistical access from the highway and local roads to avoid protesters and to facilitate routine movement, such as transporting hay bales. They acknowledge that the situation involves a tense balance between security and access, and they describe some of the equipment and measures used to control movement, including how shifts are managed and where supplies are brought in, with a side remark about roadworks and security considerations. On the timeline, they state the quarantine for the birds began in December by coordinates, not as the earlier designation, and that the “secondary quarantine property” label appeared when the seizure occurred, with an extension in September signaling a protracted dispute. They frame the Supreme Court application as the primary objective due to the urgency for the animals’ lives. They recount an incident where entry was restricted: family members could enter with ID after a checkpoint delay, while friends were barred; a Rebel News interview occurred around midday, followed by a directive instructing them to text the CFIA and to email for written permission to enter—otherwise potential arrest for protecting their animals. They note a temporary exemption allowing sleep inside, but that dogs were later banned, a change they found troubling. They describe the fence and police presence behind it as a jarring sight but emphasize the human element: the aunt and cousin are described as kind, and the speakers advocate for informing the police about the CFIA while seeking constructive dialogue. They close with a wish for the situation to resolve and a sense of uncertainty about what lies ahead, expressing hope that it will work out.

See what happens when all the police drones are flying so low. Fuck off. Go away. The police drones are flying so low. They're putting our birds through fences. You wanna talk humane? Here's our here's our girl. She just went through a fence, got stuck. She's don't know if she can get up. They're causing these animals to kill themselves. They're going through fences. They're hitting fence posts because their drones are flying solo. Do you see this? This is life. This is this is humane. These are healthy animals that are suffering

The speaker warns that farmers who protected animals for 35 years face action on private property, insisting, "We are not a commercial poultry facility. We are not poultry." They claim the animals deserve to be fed by their hands as they face euthanization and life eradication, with "Decades of life" being put into dumpsters and "Decades of life is gonna fall to their knees" within 24–48 hours if people do not act. They call for "true leadership" in Canada and urge, "This is our time." They plead for help to save the animals, emphasizing they are not sick or tested. They recount being mocked by RCMP officers and demand removal of a constable from their property, deeming the situation unethical and asking to be remembered.

The speaker declares the event described as “one of the biggest crimes in Canadian history,” claiming that on November 6 the Canadian Food Inspection Agency waged war on the speaker’s family and their farm. The attack took place in a peaceful valley inhabited by over 300 animals described as “prehistoric sentient beings” who had names, personalities, and had been part of the family for decades; the speaker emphasizes that these animals were integral to the family’s identity. The speaker asserts that none of these animals were ever tested, and specifically notes that “not one of those ostriches” were tested, yet they were gunned down “in the middle of the night,” described with strong language as being done by “cowards.” The assertion repeats that “not one of those animals had ever been tested.” The speaker then challenges the listener, asking how such an action could occur and how a family or a country could recover from a massacre that is described as barbaric. The rhetoric emphasizes an urgent grievance that life was treated as if it did not matter and that heartbeats no longer held meaning. The speaker expresses that, as a result, it feels as though there has been a loss of meaning for what life means and what life is. Key claims include: the incident as a major crime in Canadian history; a targeted action against the speaker’s family and their farm by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency; the presence of over 300 named, personable animals considered part of the family identity; the animals’ innocence in terms of testing; the killing of ostriches by nighttime action described as cowardly; and the broader emotional and existential impact—questions about how to move forward after what is described as a massacre and the sense that life’s value has been eroded.

An urgent plea for help is issued: 'Help us. Please help us.' The speaker says, 'These animals are suffering.' They describe the scene as dire, noting, 'Right now, our birds are killing themselves. They're hitting fences.' The situation is labeled 'inhumane,' and the call for assistance is repeated: 'We need help now.' A directive follows: 'We need everybody to call the RCMP.' 'We need help.' They reference the Humane Society: 'The Humane Society, our animals are hitting fences.' They reiterate, 'They're killing themselves.' The speaker concludes with a report of injuries: 'We have animals flipping over fences, breaking legs.' The speaker emphasizes immediate danger.

Katie and Carrie discuss the mass culling of 400 ostriches at Universal Ostrich Farms in British Columbia, which is set to occur by February 1st due to alleged avian flu. Katie, the owner's daughter, explains the farm's history and their shift from meat production to focusing on the ostriches' natural immunity. Carrie, the litigation manager, highlights the lack of accountability in the government's actions and the questionable testing methods used to declare the birds infected. They express outrage over the expectation that the family must euthanize their healthy animals and the absurdity of the situation, emphasizing the need for public awareness and legal action to protect the ostriches and challenge government overreach. They encourage support through their website, saveourostriches.com, to help fund their legal battle.

"Did you know the last time they went to court, the CFIA get to submit 139 pages of documented evidence while the farm was allowed zero? Did you know that? That's our justice system. Interesting." "So if you're if you're enforcing the justice system that isn't just, does that make that just?" "I don't know. Maybe. Well, you could say no. I'm just gonna listen to my boss because he's got where I got. I got a lot of respect for him." "He's gone through the mill. He made it through. Most people don't. So he's cream of the crop. He's kinda like what you aspire to." "Intention. Comes down to why why you want what you want. You're a mercury healthy bird. Stop killing sick chicken. You're a mercury healthy." "My name is Jim Kerr. I represent the good people of this country who say"

You are expecting what the outcome is. I will. What what was need to put CFIA exactly where they need to be put in check. This organization feels that they are greater than the Supreme Court of Canada, that they are still positioning the birds and putting them in the position to be killed immediately. The Supreme Court has not decided what is happening, we are on a stay order. and yet they, I just get a phone call that they've got a whole bunch of birds herded in a little circle right in the kill pen waiting. This is, it's animal cruelty, it's anguish to the families, this is terrorism and this is such disrespect to our Canadian government of justice that this company thinks they're better than the Supreme Court of Canada now. Amen.

Speaker from Universal Ostrich Farms says, "The Canadian Food Inspection Agency lied to us." They were in pens and "all we were asking to do was to humanely feed our animals while they prepare." They stressed, "We were not there to obstruct. We just wanted to feed our animals so that they got fed properly." After awaiting confirmation, they were told they could feed, then police surrounded the farm and arrested them. They describe "psychological warfare and tyranny and overreach, you name it" and say they were taken to a YRB lot, handcuffed, and separated by two plastic chairs. They were given a personal cell phone to call their lawyer and had ostrich poop on their feet. They claim, "these animals are infected," but they say "they have antibodies" and cite a firewall. They thank supporters and send a message to family.

Someone states they are passionate after 34 years of caring for animals that live to 75 and have names. They ask that "Connor," "Ethan," and "Lulu" not be shot. They acknowledge there's a policy in place, but argue it's time for a change, suggesting a report indicating every bird looks healthy. Another person responds that going against the entire industry is not their decision, and that changing to a non-eradication approach requires a national conversation with the CFIA and the Canadian government. When asked how long it would take for an ostrich to die from sickness, the response is hours to days, depending on the disease. Someone counters that there have been no avian flu deaths on the farm in eight days. Another person states that the challenge is control versus eradication, because one diagnosis puts the entire population at risk, mandating destruction.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the war in agriculture, focusing on what they allege is horrendous treatment by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) of Universal Ostrich Farms. They recount a live farm feed from the previous night in which Katie, a friend of Speaker 0, appears distraught as she pleads with the CFIA to stop killing her birds. They claim that hundreds of bullets were fired at the birds, according to eyewitnesses, and estimate that perhaps 100 birds remain. They assert that the CFIA has been culling the herd already and had foreknowledge of a Supreme Court ruling, implying the CFIA acted to eliminate birds without accountability. The speakers state that the RCMP stood by and did nothing, including when the farm formally filed charges. They describe alleged collusion among CFIA, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and the government, accusing them of harassment, lassoing, chasing, and injecting the birds for five weeks. The speakers argue that the birds must be tested to prove the CFIA acted for political reasons rather than for health, science, public protection, wildlife protection, or disease prevention. They echo Joe Warmington of the Toronto Sun in insisting on testing the birds and determining how many remain to prevent a cover-up. They emphasize that the cover-up cannot start now and reject any expectation that it will. They describe Katie as distraught, weeping, and appealing for mercy while watching her ostriches be shot throughout the night, characterizing Canada’s CFIA as analogous to the NKVD, Stalin’s secret police, in contrast to other historical comparisons used in the discussion. The discussion includes live audio elements and commentary about sound from the kill area, with uncertainty about why shots sound distant or off to the left. They reference a prior night’s events and plan to provide more footage and details about the shootings. They state their position that the CFIA’s actions are political and not health-related, and they insist on continued testing and transparency regarding the number of birds remaining. The conversation frames the events as part of a broader “war on agriculture,” asserting that the cover-up and lack of accountability are central concerns. Katie’s interview from the prior day is described as distressing, with the host noting the emotional toll of the situation on her.

Spirit is dead. She died and probably in extreme pain, dehydration, and suffered. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, you've been caught, and I want you to know you've been caught on camera, and this is on you. The death of that bird, our family.

The speaker describes ongoing resistance to “their science” and the continuing conflict surrounding the issue. He states the birds are hurting each other and, right now, are on the verge of killing themselves, smashing into posts and fences, and are bloody terrified. He cites the Animal Health and Safety Act, saying its purpose is to protect the welfare of these birds in the process until they are called. He also reiterates basic care requirements, noting that the birds must be fed, watered, and cared for. The message emphasizes welfare obligations for the birds during the process amid disagreement about the science.

The speaker rails against what they call state-funded propaganda from Canada, focusing on a CBC piece and a two-minute segment from This Hour Has Twenty Two Minutes about an ostrich crisis in Edgewood, British Columbia. They describe the CBC as a crown corporation funded by taxpayers and labeled it “state funded propaganda.” The core topic is a farm in Edgewood with about 400 ostriches that have been on the farm for over 35 years. After ostrich testing related to antibodies in eggs and yolk during COVID, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) ordered the kill of all ostriches on the farm, including the healthy birds, citing an avian flu outbreak. The speaker explains that in December 2024 two ostriches were tested by the CFIA with anal swab PCR; the results allegedly indicated avian flu (H5N1) in those two carcasses. The farm challenged the CFIA decision in federal court, and by May the court found the CFIA’s decision not inherently unreasonable and allowed the kill order to stand. The farm appealed to the Court of Appeal in Ottawa, and by August the appellate court upheld that the birds should be killed, despite eight months of healthy birds on the farm. The farm then pursued a Supreme Court of Canada route, with an interim protective order preventing slaughter while the Supreme Court considers whether to hear the case; if they do not hear it, the protective order lapses and the CFIA may proceed with slaughter. A standoff has persisted for about a month, with the CFIA constructing kill pens and the RCMP providing armored protection to the CFIA. The farm asserts that about 100 ostriches are missing and that one ostrich died under CFIA custody from dehydration and neglect, named Spirit. The speaker claims the CFIA did not administer electrolytes and that the ostrich died, alleging mistreatment by CFIA personnel who refused to provide proper care. The speaker notes that journalists, protestors, and the RCMP are present at the site, and that the CFIA has refused to provide a proper count of the remaining birds. They accuse the CFIA of misleadingly portraying the situation in BC as an ongoing outbreak and claim the birds have been healthy for nearly a year and have not been retested since December 2024, except for the two dead birds tested. They allege that the only testing occurred on dead carcasses and suggest potential false positives due to testing methods. They criticize the segment for omitting key timeline details about the outbreak and for implying the birds are sick, which the speaker contends is false. The speaker mentions external figures like Robert Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Oz showing interest in the birds, and notes blows against Florida as part of the propaganda framing. Throughout, the speaker asserts that the birds are healthy, the CFIA is withholding retesting, and the CBC piece is an example of manufacturing consent and disinformation. They urge viewers to unsubscribe or resist the show, claim the segment is insidious, and argue that the real issue is government control and alignment with global health agreements rather than animal illness. The confrontation concludes with a call to share the video and to recognize the broadcast as propaganda, while ending with personal promotional remarks about health, sunlight, and Florida.

The speakers describe an eerily devastated site with extensive property damage and a semi-dismantled kill pen in the background, suggesting blood, carnage, and possible biohazard concerns. They note that the perpetrators “drove all around it and left,” then disappeared, leaving behind an impression of what happened. Speaker 1 observes enormous bales—much larger than typical hay bales—stacked on the property, describing them as about a foot to four feet high. They remark that birds are landing inside the area and pecking at whatever is there. They reference video from the day with dead ostriches still present, noting flocks of birds arriving, implying concern about the bird flu. The speakers recount that “they drove all around in the killing fields” and “kicking up hay as they left,” describing the act as tearing down their operations and leaving in a dismissive manner after terrorizing the family for a long period and slaughtering many birds. They mention “a thousand rounds” fired by marksmen that night, and state that this had “nothing to do with avian flu,” asserting that those shots were unrelated to the flu. Speaker 0 points to a pickup they saw stuck and seized in the area, with windows left open, illustrating the chaos and mess left behind. They emphasize the long duration of distress endured: “eleven months of hell, over six weeks or something like that of having this occupied land,” with RCMP provoking people and CFIA marksmen shooting, followed by the aftermath. Speaker 1 echoes the mess, suggesting it would have been easier to stack the birds or manage them differently, rather than creating the visible wreckage. They reiterate the claim that if the situation is labeled a biohazard, wild birds are currently seen around the area. They observe birds flying over the site, including a duck, indicating ongoing wildlife presence. Both speakers conclude by questioning the process: with an anonymous tip or accusation triggering CFIA involvement, suspicion alone seems to trigger actions that lead to destruction of holdings. They assert that CFIA will come in, destroy everything, and leave scorched earth, killing all animals, presenting this as the outcome. They end with the statement that this is Canada, folks.