TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Health care insurance rates under the Affordable Care Act in Connecticut are going up by 16.8%. This is the highest number in years and it's gonna mean that there are a lot of families in Connecticut who now won't be able to afford health insurance who are now gonna be uninsured. These rates are going up because Donald Trump chose to push your rates up. They wrote a bill, Republicans and Donald Trump earlier this year, that slashed the support that goes to families who buy Affordable Care Act plans. in Connecticut, that's about a quarter of a million people. So you just need to know that these rates didn't need to go up by this much. Donald Trump is choosing for you to pay more on health care. The richest Americans are gonna get a $270,000 tax cut out of this bill. You need to understand that these massive rate increases in Connecticut are due to Donald Trump's policies.

This congress is allegedly intent on passing a heartless budget that would result in the largest cut in Medicaid in American history to partially pay for tax cuts for Donald Trump's billionaire best friends. Medicaid is described as a lifeline that this Republican majority is trying to rip away from millions of Americans. The speakers claim they will not let them get away with policies that are a matter of life and death to their constituents. They are allegedly here to fight for those who voted against the president, those who didn't vote, and those who voted for the president but dislike what they are seeing. Republicans in congress and this administration purportedly only care about billionaires that fund their campaigns and are willing to hurt everyone to help the wealthiest. The power of the people is allegedly greater than the people in power.

Democrats lack the power to shut down the government; the party controlling the House, Senate, and White House governs. Democrats can stop bad bills that strip programs from Americans, including veterans, air safety, and food safety. They also aim to prevent a slush fund for Elon Musk and Donald Trump, which could lead to cuts in Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security by decimating programs and services. The House, under Hakim Jeffries, voted almost unanimously against the legislation. The Senate Democrats have leverage to reject handing over tools and a slush fund to Elon Musk and Donald Trump.

Congresswoman Kat Kamak speaks from off the House floor about Democrats’ discharge petition to extend three years of Obamacare subsidies. She notes that the fight is happening on the House floor, with Jason Smith, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, railing as the petition moves forward. She presents several statistics and claims: only 7% of Americans are on Obamacare programs that receive subsidies. Of that 7%, 40% of people registered are fraudulent, described as duplicative and not supposed to be in the program. She also claims that people making over $600,000 are receiving subsidies for their ACA plans. She argues that these subsidies do not go to individuals directly but to big insurance companies. She cites that these companies are making 237% profits as of last year. Based on that, she questions why the government would send $400,000,000,000 to an insurance company to lower premiums for people making $600,000, stating it “makes no sense.” Kamak asserts the need to fix health care, not to throw money at a one-size-fits-all program that only addresses 7% of the population. She contends there should be a program that addresses 100% of the needs of Americans today. Her proposed approach emphasizes lowering premiums while increasing care, advocating for true health care rather than sick care and a focus on prevention rather than maintenance. She opposes subsidizing wealthy CEOs and insurance companies that are already earning high profits and alleging that denials are up while care is down. The message concludes with a commitment to continue the fight “to the very, very bitter end,” signaling a partisan battle over the future of Obamacare subsidies and health care policy. Stay tuned for more updates.

The Democrats complain that nobody voted for Elon or my cabinet nominees and claim people are dying because of budget cuts while also calling my actions illegal. Their reaction shows we must be over the target and doing something right. We're trying to restore the will of the people through the president. There's a vast, unelected federal bureaucracy implacably opposed to the president and the cabinet. Consider that DC voting is 92% for Kamala. If the president's will, representing the people, isn't implemented, then the will of the people isn't being implemented. We're not living in a democracy, but a bureaucracy. What you're seeing is the bureaucracy resisting as we try to restore democracy and the will of the people.

Republicans' nihilism has brought the country to the brink of a government shutdown at midnight unless Congress acts. Democrats offered to fund the government for another month, but Republicans rejected this because Donald Trump wants full control over government spending. The choice is between proceeding with the bill or risking a shutdown, which would give Trump more power. While the Republican bill is deeply partisan and doesn't address many needs, allowing Trump to take more power via a shutdown is worse. No one wants a shutdown. Members who oppose the CR want Republicans to take their responsibilities more seriously and negotiate spending bills that address the needs of the American people. The Republican party is the party of Trump, and allowing him to take more power via a shutdown is a worse option than passing the CR.

Politicians have long promised to eliminate the discrepancy between drug prices in the U.S. and Europe. This was a key issue for Bernie Sanders, but previous leaders haven't acted on it. Politicians make these promises knowing they likely won't have to fulfill them. The reason is that Congress is heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. There is at least one pharmaceutical lobbyist for every congressman, senator, and Supreme Court member.

The Democrats' potential government shutdown to block the current administration's actions is a serious consideration. We're facing a constitutional crisis due to illegal actions, and I won't support funding that allows this lawlessness to continue. A shutdown is a last resort, but necessary if they won't govern responsibly. The globalist system is collapsing, and the current administration is dismantling its institutions and philosophies. This is a revolution, a new power structure, and while I don't agree with everything, this is largely what I would do to counter a depopulation plan. The left is disintegrating; they're losing elections and panicking. The public is awakening. Democrats are plotting to shut down the government, not just spending bills, but through sabotage. This isn't about fighting over who steals the most; it's about dismantling corrupt systems. My platform, Infowars, is under attack. Lawfare and attempts to shut us down have caused financial issues. Support us by purchasing products from AlexJonesStore.com; it could be your last chance.

Speaker 0: All your great videos from Air Force One. But tell the American people, from your perspective, you got a view none of us did, what is it that we didn't get to see about that trip that you got to experience when it relates to president Trump? Speaker 1: It's actually very surreal because a lot of people said that president Trump couldn't get this done. Couldn't get it done. MAGA knew deep down that if anybody could get this deal done with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Marco Rubio and that great team that it would be president Trump. And we're on the plane going out. We all knew this was a historical moment. There was a great sense of pride on the plane, know, checking in on the president up in his office. You know, just he does so much reading and consuming of information. He knew how real the moment was too. Then when we entered out into the Middle East and you had the f sixteens escorting the plane in, which has happened before, but it was just it was a great feeling that the president of The United States, the leader of the free world, Donald j Trump, was there on a mission that he wanted to complete, you know, that he talked about and talked about and talked about. And everybody said, no. No. No. And he ended the war. And it it's absolutely incredible. You know, millions of lives saved amongst all these wars being ended. 20 hostages coming home. Just think about it. If if president Trump was not in office, this would still be going on. Speaker 0: It was historic for sure. There's no doubt about it. You were announced last weekend as the head of PPO, presidential personnel. So for the American people, maybe give them a sense of what this job actually entails, what you do, and why it is so important to the American people, so important to national security, and really the future of the country. Speaker 1: It it was an honor for the president to ask me to take this, additional job on. PPO is responsible, for vetting, interviewing, and bringing in candidates, political appointees to all of these agencies throughout the government. And something that we really wanna keep an eye on, which has been done, is, you know, bringing people with the values of the president that want to complete his agenda, making America great again, America first policies. I work very closely with all of the cabinet members, or I will be working very closely. So the communication you have with the cabinet members is very important in staffing up their agencies with political appointees. PPO also oversees ambassador appointments all around the world. So we have those to fulfill. We're also responsible for US Marshals and fulfilling those obligations all around the country. Work very closely with the DOJ on that front. So as I said, I'm learning every day that passes. I'm a quick learner, and I've hit the ground running. Speaker 0: As it relates to The Middle East, since we just talked about that, obviously, people are really excited about what happened there, and they wanna see more forward progress. Do you come in on that? What is it that you're gonna be able to do from this office to help implement phase two? Speaker 1: It's a great question and and things that actually came up yesterday in a couple of meetings. So that's my learning process. But we will need to fulfill, special envoys that are that are gonna be out there as well as oversight of the rebuilding of Gaza, and there'll be commissions that will be created in which we'll assist in. And with that, I would work with secretary of state Marco Rubio, Steve Witkoff, who is just such a great, great, great man. Love the guy. As well as, you know, Jared is very involved in getting this done as well. So it's really a team effort, and I'm willing to put forth the office with anything we can assist with in in getting the job done and fulfilling obligations out there to to support their mission in in completing each phase. Speaker 0: Well, something else that this administration has been very successful at doing is a crime crackdown. What else are you involved with from PPO that can help, you know, facilitate more of this crime crackdown all across the country? I imagine you guys have a role in that too. Speaker 1: We do. We do with fulfilling judgeships, within districts. US marshals, like I mentioned earlier, the US marshals are absolutely, incredible in what they do. And it's just getting leadership in each district, within each community, county, and state, throughout the country. So we'll fulfill all of that. And we'll we'll work with all entities. It is a team effort, and you see it every day. It's an atmosphere of where everybody wants to work together. I tell you behind the scenes in these cabinet meetings and in these meetings that take place in the Oval, everybody's on the same page marching in unison to deliver the president's, you know, agenda and and his goals in making Washington DC safe again, in making Memphis safe again, Chicago. How can these guys like Chicago how could they not want to make Chicago safe again? I'll understand it for the life of me. How these people do not want to work with this administration. And I'm talking Pritzker, and I'm talking Newsome. How and why? Speaker 0: Yeah. And it's it's sad because it's hurting the residents of their cities and states. So, Dan, as we sit here in Washington DC right now, the government is still shut down. What do you make of the priorities of the Democrat party? Speaker 1: It makes absolutely zero sense. There are more issues and problems in in this world, and they decide to fight to give illegal immigrants health insurance, and they're keeping the entire government closed down. And and I joke and I say, what? The government's closed down? For the past two weeks, this White House and other agencies were getting things done. We're marching forward. Look what just happened in The Middle East. You wouldn't even known the government was closed down. To close down the government, they are losing on this, the likes of which I was gonna say they've never lost before, but they've lost a lot before. So, they're just not on message. They don't know what they're doing. Zero leadership. Zero leadership. I I think they're truly embarrassing themselves. Absolutely embarrassing themselves. Speaker 0: I know we talked very early on in this administration about the difference between president Trump the first term, because you were here for the entirety of that, and the second term. How is he day to day now? Where do you see him overall? And I feel like the sky's the limit for this president and this administration. Speaker 1: The differences are absolutely incredible. We're not being attacked every day or investigated every day. The head games they played, they wanted to silence us. They ultimately wanted to put us all away for life. Then when he announced for the presidency, and we went full steam ahead. We worked in courtrooms behind the scenes. We're putting out truth social posts. We're campaigning. We're turning his press conferences in at the conclusion of a court hearing. Butler, Pennsylvania, we talked about last time, changed everything. Literally changed everything. It was from that point forward where I knew that he would be the forty seventh president of The United States. And then he just brought on a great team of people when we won the presidency. I mean, it is all surreal. I don't have time to even sit back and think about it and think about what we've been through and what we've done and what we've achieved. There will never be a president Trump ever, ever, ever again. He's changing history for the better. He's fighting every day for your children, your grandchildren, your great grandchildren, my family. That's why I do what I do. We could go out tomorrow and make millions of dollars. I I instead take a government salary to fight for the American people every day, and that's everybody in this administration. All for president Trump because they adore and they love the guy, and they love the American people. They're patriots, And that's why we're here. We're on a mission. We're on a mission to deliver for everybody out there. And we're gonna continue this mission. And we're gonna fight hard each and every day no matter what hit pieces come our way, no matter who tries to take us down, we're gonna fight, fight, fight.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a written proposal regarding extending Biden-era COVID subsidies under the ACA. Speaker 0 asks if there is a proposal in writing they can read. Speaker 1 confirms there is a simple proposal: two sentences to be added to any proposal that would extend the ACA benefits for one year. He says this would be the right thing to do and could be put into Leader Thune’s open-government proposal, as it “doesn't need a vote. It can't be blocked by anybody.” He notes that the current IAC fix would be without income caps, meaning people who earn very high incomes would continue to receive subsidies, and says they would negotiate once the credits are extended, which he claims the other side previously refused to do. Speaker 0 questions whether, for one year, people making millions of dollars would still receive the COVID-era subsidies. Speaker 1 responds by saying the senator from Ohio “ignores that 99% of people” and asserts the goal is not to hurt ordinary people but to address the difficulties faced by those paying thousands of dollars more. He says they are willing to fix what was proposed in negotiation, but without hurting everyday people, and asserts he yields the floor. Speaker 0 asks for clarification of what was heard from the minority leader, to recap for those who missed it. Speaker 1 summarizes: the minority leader acknowledged there is no written proposal from Democrats for people to review; he acknowledged that his plan would allow millionaires to receive Biden-era COVID subsidies, with “no income caps.” Speaker 0 indicates he would have asked further questions if the minority leader had remained, including whether he would continue $0 premiums and whether the funds would go directly to insurance companies. Speaker 1 asserts additional points for emphasis: this money “does not go to people on Obamacare,” it is “a check written from the federal government to the wealthiest insurance companies on the planet,” and the plan would preserve subsidies for millionaires, provide $0 premiums that are alleged to have “enormous levels of fraud,” and “enrich insurance companies even more.”

"We have to realize the democrats, their whole argument is we are going to shut down the government unless you give a trillion dollars for medical benefits for illegal aliens." "And they're saying that unless you give that money to those legal aliens, unless you give those benefits to those illegal aliens, we are going to shut down the people's government." "It's such a stark contrast between two parties priorities." "We want to put the government to work for the American people first." "We're not gonna be taken hostage by the Democrats' desperate desire to give your tax money to illegal aliens." "We're just not gonna do it."

The panic in DC stems from the fact that we're cutting off the funding to politicians who prioritize personal financial gain over the American people. Elon Musk is being targeted because he's cutting off their lifeline. There is no reason why federal employees should get rich off their service. They're not screaming about other billionaires, they're screaming about Elon because he's hitting them where it hurts. Their reaction shows we've hit their Achilles' heel, and we will continue to hit them. We will address why our children are not educated, why they have an increase in ADHD, why our borders aren't safe, and why we have a fentanyl crisis. Elon is triggering insecurity because they're worried about us looking at exactly what they've done and how much they've made. And that is now stopping.

I'm committed to making America healthier than other countries. Will you guarantee the same healthcare coverage that other major countries provide? Corruption isn't just in federal agencies; it's in Congress too. Many members here, including you, accept millions from the pharmaceutical industry to protect their interests. I ran for president and received millions in contributions, but none came from pharmaceutical executives or PACs. My support comes from workers, not corporate interests. You were the largest recipient of pharmaceutical donations in 2020. No, I received support from workers across the country, not from corporations. You still haven't answered the last question.

The speaker argues that the Obama and Biden administrations created and extended health-insurance subsidies, not to help individuals, but to fuel a cash pipeline to insurance companies. They claim that the policy began as a temporary expansion of subsidies in 2021, intended to help voters in 2022 and 2024, but now that the election is over, the subsidies will expire in 2025 and premiums will surge. Key points emphasized: - Premiums are currently subsidized: if a typical premium is $600 a month, the speaker says people pay $400 and the government sends $200 to insurance companies, effectively providing $24 billion a year in free money to big insurers. - In 2025, the discounts are said to disappear, causing the bill to revert to $600 or higher. The claim is that Democrats allowed this to happen and knowingly prepared for the premium spike. - The subsidies were expanded temporarily in 2021, but the speaker asserts they were not meant to help voters indefinitely; after the election, the impact is that premiums will rise. - The core assertion is that this is not primarily about health care, but about a cash flow to insurance companies. The speaker contends insurers lobby for subsidies and donate to keep them coming, and when subsidies expire, blame shifts to the other side while insurers profit. - The speaker claims Trump did not create this; Obama did, and Biden extended it only until after the election. The current gridlock is described as political theater because the real election has ended and the dispute is between insurance companies and the general public. - Democrats are portrayed as fighting for their next campaign donation checks from major insurers (UnitedHealthcare, Pfizer, Blue Cross) and for donor interests rather than for individuals. - The speaker asserts that people will experience rising premiums in 2025 and will beg for relief, while they blame the opposing party. A contrast is drawn between government spending that is criticized (e.g., $6 billion for Ukraine) and the claim of $24 billion per year for insurance companies. - The concluding message is that the money is not for you; you are the hostage and the insurers are the kidnappers. The claim remains that each party will let this happen again, and thus, neither Democrats nor Republicans work for the people. - The speaker urges viewers to stop voting for either side and to share the message if they are sick of it.

Day two of the "Democrat shutdown." 44 Senate Democrats voted to reject the "completely nonpartisan, completely clean, very simple 24 page continuing resolution" the House passed two weeks ago, instead of keeping the government open for seven weeks. Republicans say they moved in good faith: 12 appropriations bills passed by committees, the Senate and House have acted, and a conference committee finalized. With a September 30 deadline, the clean CR would allow more time for negotiations. Democrats filed a counter proposal described as a "wild list of partisan priorities," including "a half a billion dollars to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting" and removing the "rural hospital fund," while "repealing the health provisions of the one big beautiful bill," "ending Obamacare funding for noncitizens," and "Medicaid funding for those improperly granted asylum and parole." They claim at least "$200,000,000,000" would go to illegal aliens. They urge Americans to call their senators to open the government now, blaming Schumer for the shutdown.

Big food, big pharma, big chemicals get super wealthy. Right? What is the product of health care? It's a healthy body. If we take The US population and compare it to the world, we're at the very bottom when it comes to health, yet we spend the most for health care. Over $4,100,000,000,000 every single year.

Do Democrats wanna prioritize the health care of illegal aliens over a government shutdown? Because if the government does shut down, Americans will be able furlough. We're not prioritizing. What we're doing is saying simply we wanna keep the government open, and we wanna work with the Republicans and have a bipartisan agreement to keep this government open, and health care is at the top of our agenda. But are Democrats demanding health care for illegal aliens? Democrats are demanding health care for everybody. We want to save lives. We wanna make sure that health care is available to those who would die but having the help of their government. So you're good with the government shutdown even if it means giving health care to people who aren't American citizens? We want to save health care for all people.

The transcript centers on a critique of Democrats and the healthcare industry, framing the Capitol Hill hearing as evidence of a coordinated effort to undermine President Trump’s health care agenda. It asserts that Democrats and “the big insurance companies” are “combining forces to sabotage president Trump on Capitol Hill,” and claims this is exemplified by coverage and clips available on the speaker’s website and social media. Key points highlighted: - Democrats, Obamacare architects, and the pharmaceutical/insurance cartel are alleged to be “working in lockstep to block president Trump’s patient first health care agenda.” - Ahead of the hearing, the speaker says Loomer Unleashed warned how the proceedings would unfold, asserting that corporate health care executives aligned with Democrats against President Trump, Congressional Republicans, and the American people. - The speaker claims Democrats deployed Obama operatives—people featured on Barack Obama’s White House website—as “experts” on health care, alongside anti-Trump radical left activists who allegedly pretended to be health care experts, to blame Republicans for the health care crisis without addressing Obamacare’s effects. - Congressional Republicans, specifically Jason Smith and Randy Feenstra, are quoted as arguing that Democrats want to cast blame elsewhere because they do not accept responsibility for Obamacare, which the speakers say was always going to be a disaster. - A clip from Speaker 1 describes the hearing as “the first of more to come examining the entire health care sector.” The stated purpose is to question some of the largest health insurers about why costs are rising and how health care can be made more affordable for all Americans, asserting that Democrats in the majority previously ignored this issue. - The speaker claims that Americans are still struggling to afford basic care, with premiums “exploding” and patients being delayed and denied care “every day.” - The hearing is said to have shown that, instead of demanding accountability, a senior Democrat reassured CEOs with the statement, “it’s not your fault,” implying the Democrats’ recognition that costs rose under Obamacare. - The claim is reiterated that, after fifteen years of a Democrat-created health system under Obamacare, prices have “only gone up, not down.” The speaker indicates there is extensive video and article coverage of the hearing available online, including numerous clips and a summary article that highlights these points. The overall narrative portrays Obamacare as a disaster, accusing Democrats of avoidance of responsibility and of manipulating the hearing to deflect blame away from policy outcomes.