reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Most people in Western countries, including the United States and Canada, received the COVID vaccine two years ago. However, there is a lack of discussion about the motives behind governments' push for vaccination. The speaker questions why governments forced people to take the vaccine and suggests that it reveals a lack of democracy and freedom in these countries. They highlight the case of Canada, where the prime minister attacked those who refused the vaccine. The speaker also discusses the trucker protests in Canada and the government's response, which involved invoking emergency powers and suppressing dissent. They emphasize the importance of open and honest discourse and the need for a more engaged and accountable government.

The speaker has 32 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, with senior positions at Pfizer, including vice president and worldwide head of research in allergic and respiratory diseases. Since 2020, the speaker claims to have been speaking out against the fraudulent pandemic and the intentionally dangerous injections. The speaker states that they have been censored and smeared as a result. The speaker suggests that censorship and smearing is the experience of people who try to convey truths that authorities want suppressed.

The speaker claims adverse events from the vaccine rollout were covered up and dismissed as rare and coincidental. They state that regulators approved the vaccines based on relative risk data (95%), which they describe as misleading, while the absolute risk reduction was only 0.84%, meaning 120 people had to be vaccinated to prevent one infection. The speaker alleges that Pfizer has 31 convictions, including withholding data, presenting false data, and bribing clinicians and regulators. They claim over 100 doctors have written to various health organizations, including the NHS and MHRA, about the vaccine program, but received only one response. The speaker concludes that science is dead because discussion, analysis, and debate are no longer allowed, and decisions are being made without scientific basis.

Behind the scenes communications from the BC Centre for Disease Control revealed that COVID-19 vaccines were 16 times more dangerous than flu shots for children. The data was manipulated before being released to the public, omitting comparisons to flu vaccines and downplaying serious adverse events. This lack of transparency raises concerns about health regulators withholding vital information from the public.

It is nearly impossible to publish data that goes against the national public health narrative, preventing doctors from finding solutions. The speaker has conducted clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies, including vaccine studies, and has brought vaccines and other drugs to market. Some drugs never made it to market because they killed people. Clinical trial guidelines ensure safe drugs, but these guidelines were not followed during the pandemic, affecting everyone. COVID should have been a time for doctors to unite, but interference with research occurred. Science evolves through experiments, skepticism, and an open mind. Challenging current knowledge must be allowed to move science forward, but what the speaker witnessed during the pandemic was not science.

Dr. Dimitri Dascalakis resigned as director of the National Center on Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, greeted by clapping from hundreds of colleagues and public health workers. He described leaving an environment where the CDC is treated as a tool to generate policies that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve public health. He recalled learning about Secretary Kennedy’s directive to change the childhood and adult immunization schedules for COVID-19 via Twitter, noting that CDC data supporting the decision were not provided. He said, seven months into the new administration, no CDC subject matter expert from his center had briefed the secretary, calling that situation extremely abnormal. He warned of eugenics rhetoric in the movement and referenced statements about beef tallow and avian flu, insisting this showed dangerous beliefs. He and colleagues raised red flags about dangerous developments in the country.

In the autumn of 2021, Hugo de Jonge publicly stated on TV that 80 percent of the corona patients in hospitals were unvaccinated. The speaker, who was conducting research at the time, had precise hospital data on all corona patients and personally asked each patient whether they were vaccinated. They found that the actual percentage in their hospital was 35 percent, a substantial discrepancy from the 80 percent figure. The speaker and a colleague published the data online from their study, which was permissible because they were conducting integral scientific research and intended to publish whatever the results showed. However, they encountered significant pushback, which was largely political in nature. The backlash did not come from colleagues denying the data’s accuracy; instead, it came from political actors and environments. The speaker notes that the pushback included responses from political circles and not from medical colleagues or other scientists who would challenge the data. A notable example mentioned was pressure from the Forum for Democracy, with the implication that the data or its dissemination could be affected by the party’s interests. The speaker recalls being questioned about whether they would be retweeted or supported by that forum, and expresses astonishment at the idea that they would need to adjust their scientific conclusions to align with a political party’s interests. The core point emphasized is the discrepancy between the widely cited 80 percent unvaccinated figure and the speaker’s observed 35 percent within their hospital, and the subsequent political pushback encountered when publishing and sharing those findings.

Before the COVID pandemic, Dr. Fauci, as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, provided millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund “dangerous gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, work described as the source of an unintentional lab leak that sparked the pandemic. On the final day as Director of National Intelligence, the speaker says they are releasing “never-before-seen communications and documents” intended to show how Fauci worked with “politicized career leadership” in the intelligence community to suppress the truth about his actions, the lab leak origins, and his role in directing U.S. funding for the research. The documents are said to demonstrate Fauci’s influence over and manipulation of intelligence community COVID-19 assessments and to show Fauci lied to Congress in 2024 by denying knowledge of or participation in discussions with intelligence officials about viral research. The speaker also states that multiple intelligence community whistleblowers provided testimony that they faced retaliation for challenging manipulation of intelligence regarding the virus’s origins. The speaker describes this as a “pattern of suppressing dissent, silencing critics, and burying the truth.” The speaker says Fauci’s close relationships with the intelligence community enabled him to occupy three roles that “shield[ed] him from scrutiny”: 1) Funding dangerous gain-of-function coronavirus research linked to big pharma and its pursuit of universal vaccines worth trillions of dollars. 2) Acting as a behind-the-scenes advisor, alongside hand-picked “experts,” to push the intelligence community to endorse a natural animal origin, framed as a way to hide Fauci-funded gain-of-function research using taxpayer dollars and to shift blame away from Fauci’s actions. 3) Serving as a “pandemic pundit,” publicly pushing “lies, disinformation, and censorship” across available platforms. According to “hundreds of reviewed emails” included in the release, the intelligence community “almost always incorporated Fauci’s recommendations.” The speaker says Fauci promoted a paper whose publication he helped prompt as legitimate information for intelligence community consideration. Senior analysts are described as praising Fauci as an “unbiased guide” to real coronavirus experts while ignoring experts who might dissent from Fauci’s narratives. The speaker further claims Fauci “blatantly lied” to Congress under oath during his 2024 testimony to the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, denying he spoke to any intelligence agency about COVID, and says the newly released correspondence directly contradicts that sworn testimony. The speaker reports whistleblowers described threats of retaliation, marginalization, and career setbacks for analysts who challenged Fauci’s conclusions. Examples provided include a contractor terminated days after coming forward to ODNI as a whistleblower, and managers telling advocates for the lab leak hypothesis or those expressing dissent that leadership would determine promotions. The speaker says senior leaders also attempted to undermine whistleblowers by removing anonymity required by the whistleblower process and insisting their managers or attorneys be present during ODNI meetings, described as creating an atmosphere of intimidation. The speaker concludes that the release is intended to provide transparency, truth, and accountability, citing “lies and censorship and coverups,” and describing the tactics used as part of a “deep state playbook.”

Speaker 0: It was January 2022 when a colleague of mine in the unit came to me saying, something's up. We've had a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year. And that's what got my curiosity piqued. Speaker 1: Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2: I have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 3: Doctors made extra money to push vaccines and they were given a billing code to do it. I have pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 2: They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved. They've distributed it to the province so the second it's approved, we can start jabbing ourselves with it. We can start jabbing pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4: Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, And then you don't. Speaker 0: I was suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials. Possible. They pushed on with this narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2: They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1: Our Canadian babies died, and the police are trying to cover it up to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it. Speaker 2: The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression. Speaker 4: If you don't want to get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk. Speaker 2: It started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public. Speaker 5: Canada has to shift their understanding of what the CBC is. It is a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 2: This is the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective, and they're still not investigating. Everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, our health agencies, how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.

Today, a person has been arrested and denied bail for allegedly causing the deaths of thousands in New Zealand due to a vaccine. The government is sending a message that they will go after anyone who tries to expose the truth about these vaccines. The problem lies in the lack of transparency regarding public health data, as the public is not entitled to know about the alleged harm caused by the vaccines. This situation has led to the release of record-level data to the public for the first time in history. This data, which is being hidden by every country and state, can now be analyzed using a well-known technique used by the UK.

"Your government doesn't censor those people as a way to do the best that it can." The speaker recalls being interviewed by a major newspaper and "I bring up doctor Peter McCullough every time" when asked "what evidence? What proof?" They argue that "the world's leading heart doctor" and "the most published heart doctor in the world was censored during COVID." They question whether "the government was just doing the best that it could under the circumstances," answering "Like, no." The speaker asserts that "The best a government that considers itself to be in a free nation does not go out of its way to censor world renowned scientists, doctors, the number one heart doctor in the world in doctor Peter McCullough, the most published ICU doctor the world in doctor Paul Merrick, the inventor of the technology itself, doctor Robert Malone." "Your government doesn't censor those people as a way to do the best that it can."

The speaker acknowledges the risks of their actions but believes that exposing the truth is worth it. They are prepared to face imprisonment and criticism. In another segment, an IT worker is accused of spreading misinformation about vaccine-related deaths. The worker appeared in court, and the health agency is working to recover the data and reassure the public about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. The worker allegedly shared cases of individuals who died after receiving the vaccine, citing cardiac arrest, brain bleeds, blood clots, and aneurysms as causes of death. The speaker emphasizes that they are not an expert but are willing to face criticism if it helps stop the misinformation.

The speaker criticizes the use of the term "conspiracy theory" as a way for politicians to avoid answering questions. They mention a United Nations program that encourages reporting conspiracy theories to editors, which they see as a form of bullying. The speaker, who has a PhD, emphasizes the importance of knowledge and documentation. They provide an example of the government's enrollment in a program called the known traveler digital ID program. The speaker believes that the government tries to make people feel embarrassed for questioning their actions. They mention Justin Trudeau's statement about resetting and reimagining the future after COVID, which some labeled as a conspiracy. The speaker is determined to save their country and inform Canadians about the government's plans. They are not concerned about being labeled a conspiracy theorist.

In the message described, Speaker 0 highlights a key claim: the CDC and FDA were fully aware of the masking phenomenon within their empirical Bayesian analysis. The speaker emphasizes that this awareness was part of the information being conveyed in a letter to Bobby Kennedy. The central issue raised is not about general safety signals, but about the timing of deaths relative to vaccination. The speaker notes a concern that began earlier, stating that back in October there were discussions with Mike Eden about these injections. The concern is tied to what was observed in the data, specifically that “early on in March and April” the data appeared to be "screaming at us" when looking at thousands of deaths. The speaker provides a concrete statistic: “forty six percent of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination than one or two days.” The speaker then updates the figure, saying that they are “up to almost thirty nine thousand deaths” in total, and adds that “Twenty four percent of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days.” The speaker asserts that this information “has been available month by month by month since about March, April 2021,” yet alleges that “the federal officials are still not acknowledging it.” Instead of acknowledging these signals, the speaker claims officials point to other metrics, stating they “go to these, you know, PRR, the proportional reporting ratios, or a more sophisticated” approach. The claim continues that when PRRs were showing safety signals, officials reacted as if, “oh, we're not using those. We're using empirical Bayesian analysis. They set the trigger.” In summary, the transcript presents a narrative in which the CDC and FDA are described as being aware of a masking phenomenon identified through empirical Bayesian analysis, with specific, alarming timing data linking a significant proportion of deaths to the day of vaccination or the following couple of days. The speaker contends this information has been publicly accessible on a monthly basis since early 2021, but accuses federal officials of not acknowledging it and of favoring a different analytic framework (PRR) or of claiming to use empirical Bayesian analysis after the fact, implying that the trigger for safety signals was set within that framework. The overall emphasis is on the alleged discrepancy between available data and official acknowledgment, as well as the choice of analytic methods used to interpret safety signals.

The chief medical officer of health and Alberta Health Services have stated on record that there is no material evidence to support the Public Health Act related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This lack of evidence undermines the scientific basis for the measures taken. I encourage everyone to request my court transcripts and related documents under the Freedom of Information Act; I have copies available. You can reach me on Instagram at real_patrick_king, TikTok as Canadian Patriot, or Twitter at Canadian Patriot 77. I face significant censorship online, with my accounts often being shut down. Much of my work, including investigations and travels related to major infrastructure projects, has been erased from the internet.

Speaker 0 notes a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 says their own government told them a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2 states they have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 1 says doctors made extra money to push vaccines and were given a billing code to do it, and she has pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 3 asserts they’ve purchased the vaccine that hasn’t been approved and distributed it to the provinces, so the second it’s approved they can start jabbing themselves and pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4 asks why vaccinations were necessary, noting that when going to the hospital for birth, you expect to go home, and then you don’t. Speaker 0 suspects criminal negligence by the government and public health officials. Speaker 2 agrees, saying “Possible.” Speaker 0 contends they pushed a narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 recalls wiretapping, harassment, and charges, and that they didn’t allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1 says Canadian babies died, and police are trying to cover it up by stopping detective Helen Graves from testifying about it. Speaker 3 comments that dominant individuals maintain subordinates’ place through constant aggression. Speaker 5 argues that choosing not to vaccinate is one thing, but being unable to fly or ride trains with vaccinated people and thus putting them at risk is another issue. Speaker 2 says CBC started with a story to implicate her and paint her in an uncomplimentary light to the public. Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of CBC, describing it as a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 3 declares this is the most significant health matter affecting children today, and they are still not investigating. Speaker 2 asserts that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, and how they work together and censored information; all of it ties to this one case, making it dangerous.

The speaker discusses examples of travesties that have eroded public trust, such as the case of detective Helen Bruce investigating COVID-related child deaths and facing disciplinary action. They also mention Dr. Kovind Kaur, a physician facing repercussions for speaking out on Twitter. These instances highlight a pattern of corruption and suppression within various regulatory bodies, undermining their intended purposes.

We broke the public's trust and shut down one side of the debate. We portrayed doctors and experts chosen by the CBC as competent and trustworthy, while labeling those who questioned the narrative as dangerous and spreading disinformation. This affected me personally as a journalist with solid contacts in the community. I heard stories of suffering and pain from people who were not being heard. Some were injured, some lost their jobs due to vaccination status, some were ostracized, and others were depressed over lockdowns and mandates. Parents agonized over whether to vaccinate their children. I carried the weight of their truth not being given a voice, which affected my well-being.

The speaker states that the CBC betrayed the public trust by shutting down one side of the debate, branding chosen experts as trustworthy while portraying others as spreaders of disinformation, regardless of their background. As a journalist, the speaker was contacted by people with stories of suffering, including the vaccine-injured, those who lost jobs due to vaccination status, families torn apart, depressed students, and parents agonizing over vaccinating their children. The speaker felt the burden of these untold stories and felt they had failed to give voice to their truth. The speaker witnessed the collapse of journalism and believes they were pushing propaganda, defined as one-sided information broadcast to influence opinion, or manipulative persuasion in service of an agenda.

Speaker 0 states that the committee now has over 8,000,000 pages of information. In the first tranche, they discovered that someone in the federal health agencies, through interagency communication, hid the signal and admitted there was a signal on myocarditis, but they hid it and didn’t warn the public or doctors. This is described as one instance of corruption and lies told by the CDC, with many more to be rolled out. He notes that they held their first hearing in permanent subcommittee investigation on that hiding of the signal myocarditis and that they have heard a lot of studies. He mentions that, as he has looked into science, it has been thoroughly corrupted, and he requests to enter a data sheet into the record, saying he has been publishing this chart since early 2021. He references being on talk radio shows where they get deplatformed due to censorship in the Biden administration. He then presents what he calls “the facts” about the VAERS system, which was touted in October 2020 as a great safety surveillance system on COVID. A few months later, they denigrated their own system. Despite this, VAERS shows that there have been 38,742 deaths reported on VAERS worldwide associated with the COVID vaccine. He specifies that 9,252 of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination within one or two days.

Senator Johnson obtained a large trove of FDA documents that were partially redacted and had been withheld from his investigation committee. His staff reviewed the material and quickly found the issue referenced in a clip: “masking,” described as an artifact that prevented the FDA from denying that adverse events were occurring. This masking problem was tied to a specific data analysis artifact uncovered by Bill Dumashell, formerly head biostatistician of a major corporation that performs this kind of data analysis. Dumashell had worked at the FDA with three others, and the transcript speaker says they were communicating with those individuals at the time. The transcript speaker explains that, after Tucker, who is described as a friend of the speaker, the senator’s staff discovered confirmation that Peter Marks (head of CBER) was made aware of the masking-related data analysis problem and suppressed the information. The speaker says Marks told the system developers, including Dumashell, how to overcome the masking issue, then shut Dumashell down and ignored information they uncovered when they corrected the error in the FDA’s data analysis systems. Speaker 0 asks whether there is direct evidence that Marks or others were coerced by CBER, Pfizer, Moderna, or others to keep the issue quiet, asserting that vaccine safety signals were swept aside and hidden from the American people. Speaker 1 responds that there is no “smoking gun” the speaker is aware of, while noting that such evidence could exist in archived, redacted, or withheld FDA emails. The speaker says the FDA asserts it disclosed everything relevant to the senator’s query but did not disclose many emails corresponding to communications between the speaker and the same team, which the senator allegedly detected almost immediately after the speaker began discussing the issue with him. The speaker adds that the emails may or may not be deleted, and that the speaker’s manuscript, “The Grift,” argues it was not necessary for there to be formal relationships. Instead, the speaker points to informal relationships, including a revolving door, stating that Marks took advantage of it by leaving government service at the FDA and then moving into an industry position afterward.

In this video, the speaker addresses the issue of misinformation and disinformation during the pandemic. They mention a person called Timothy Caulfield who blocked them. The speaker discusses a study by StatCan that found 96% of Canadians recognize misinformation, with over 90% getting their information online. They show the questionnaire used in the study and highlight the question about misleading COVID-19 information. The speaker questions Timothy's credibility, mentioning his connection to the Trudeau Foundation and receiving a grant to combat misinformation. They express concern about the influence of money and special interests in government statistics. The speaker concludes by sharing that Timothy blocked them despite presenting raw data.

100 Canadian children have died after receiving Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, but this information is being covered up. Many kids were mandated vaccines to play sports. No one is taking responsibility for these deaths, with Health Canada, public health officials, and medical organizations all denying any deaths from the vaccines. The speaker has reported on these deaths on social media, leading to attempts to shut down their accounts.

The chief medical officer of health and Alberta Health Services have stated there is no proof of the virus, indicating a lack of material evidence to support the Public Health Act during the COVID-19 pandemic. This absence of scientific backing raises questions about the measures taken against us. I encourage everyone to request my court transcripts under the Freedom of Information Act; I have copies available. You can reach me on Instagram at real_patrick_king, TikTok as Canadian Patriot, or Twitter at Canadian Patriot 77. I face significant censorship online, with my accounts often shut down. Much of my work, including investigations and travels related to significant projects and conferences, has been erased from the internet.