reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The President told me to be more aggressive, so we sent out an email to all employees asking what they do. We got a partial response, so we're sending another email. Our goal isn't to be unfair. Employees can simply respond that their work is too sensitive to describe. We want to keep essential employees who do their jobs well. If a job isn't essential or done well, those people shouldn't be on the payroll. Those million employees who haven't responded are on the bubble. Maybe they don't exist, or we're paying people who don't exist. A lot could have happened. The prior administration wasted money.

You mentioned wanting to eliminate 600 NIH workers on day one and 2,200 from HHS. Which departments will you cut from? There are 200 political appointees that change with each administration. If you remove those, will you replace them with your appointees? President Biden changed 3,000 employees at HHS. As a potential top health official, will you commit to not firing federal employees working on food safety or cyber protection? There are 91,000 employees. So, will you ensure those working on food safety and cyber security keep their jobs? I commit not to fire anyone doing their job. Will this commitment be based on your opinion or political agenda? It will be based on my opinion. So, it seems those with differing views on vaccines may be at risk of losing their jobs.

The other side is complaining that nobody voted for Elon or any of my cabinet nominees. They say people are dying because of budget cuts and even allege illegal activity. But frankly, I don't care. If they're complaining, we must be over the target and doing something right. We're simply trying to restore the will of the people through the President. What we've found is a vast, unelected federal bureaucracy that is against the President and the cabinet. In DC, it's 92% Kamala. How can we live in a democracy if the President's will, representing the people, isn't implemented? We're witnessing the bureaucracy thrashing as we try to restore democracy and the will of the people.

As a policy advisor for the Treasury, I work on national security risks, monitoring investments into the US. Recently, Doge gained access to the Treasury to cut waste. I think we're an easy target, and there are people here who don't do much. My colleagues and I are worried about Doge and potential firings. What Elon is doing feels like government-sanctioned harassment. People here think it's not going to fire the right people, it's going to fire the wrong people. Many of us in my office are worried about being fired, especially the new hires. Some people care more about money than the country. I also feel that Doge shouldn't have access to the Treasury due to national security risks. No one knows what they want to do with the system. Giving people access to information creates vulnerabilities.

Brandon Wright, a platform services manager at the Department of Homeland Security, expresses his intention to defy orders from Secretary Kristi Noem. He explains that while secretaries can set priorities, they cannot dictate actions, and he plans to interpret directives in a way that aligns with his views. Wright mentions the challenges faced by his colleagues, particularly those at higher levels, who must navigate Noem's agenda. He also shares concerns about the administration's anti-trans stance, noting that his transgender colleagues are anxious about their future under Noem. Overall, Wright emphasizes the ability to filter and reinterpret orders to maintain stability within the department.

Secretaries can set departmental priorities but cannot dictate our actions. We ensure they don't interfere with our work. It's not personal; it's part of my role. The individual in charge lacks understanding of the Department of Homeland Security and wouldn't recognize its significance.

Brandon Wright, a platform services manager at the Department of Homeland Security, expresses his intention to defy Secretary Kristi Noem's orders, stating that while secretaries can set priorities, they cannot dictate actions. He emphasizes that there is significant room for interpretation of those priorities within the department. Wright describes the bureaucratic layers that filter directives, allowing him to navigate around Noem's agenda. He also shares concerns about the impact of Noem's conservative stance on his transgender colleagues, who are anxious about potential discrimination. Overall, Wright conveys a sense of disillusionment with the current leadership and the challenges faced by employees under Noem's administration.

The speaker, who works in the government, manages two federal agencies, the State Department and USAID. They discuss their role in protecting the networks of these agencies and promoting the president's priorities. They mention concerns about Joe Biden's mental fitness and the unpopularity of Kamala Harris, but acknowledge that these issues cannot be publicly addressed. The speaker also talks about their background in cybersecurity and their job overseeing responses to cyber incidents. They mention their meeting with Michelle Obama, who expressed no interest in running for office. The conversation ends with a discussion about the speaker's involvement with James O'Keefe and Project Veritas.

Brandon Wright, a platform services manager at the Department of Homeland Security, expresses his intention to defy Secretary Kristi Noem's orders. He believes that while secretaries can set priorities, they cannot dictate actions, and he plans to filter any directives he receives. Wright describes the bureaucratic process as layered, allowing for interpretation that can steer decisions away from Noem's agenda. He also shares concerns about the impact of Noem's conservative policies on his transgender colleagues, who are anxious about their job security. Overall, Wright conveys a sense of resistance to Noem's leadership and the challenges faced by his team in navigating her directives.

Hi, I'm James O'Keefe, an investigative reporter. I spoke with Byron, a White House adviser, who acknowledged that the deep state exists. He explained that bureaucracies often create commissions to delay action, which can hinder incoming leadership, citing RFK Jr. as a potential target for bureaucratic resistance. Byron mentioned that the bureaucracy should implement elected leaders' policies while also advising them. Our conversation revealed insights into how the bureaucracy operates, and I recorded it all. Byron seemed surprised but engaged. This highlights the importance of transparency in government, and we will continue to investigate and report on these matters.

I work at the Treasury, reviewing investments into the US for national security risks. Recently, Doge gained access to the Treasury to cut waste, but I think we're an easy target. People I know have worked for the government for years and don't do much. Doge shouldn't have access to the Treasury due to national security risks. It's weird because no one knows what they want to do with the system or why they need access to random people's tax information. Giving people this kind of access creates vulnerabilities. They could misuse the information or give it to another country. Elon's actions feel like government-sanctioned harassment. Everyone in my office is worried about getting fired. Some people care more about money than the country.

Brandon Wright, a platform services manager at the Department of Homeland Security, expresses his intent to defy orders from Secretary Kristi Noem. He believes that while secretaries can set departmental priorities, they cannot dictate actions, and he plans to filter her directives. Wright describes the challenges faced by his colleagues, particularly those at higher GS levels, who must navigate Noem's agenda. He criticizes her leadership, claiming she lacks understanding of her role and the department. Additionally, he notes concerns among his transgender colleagues regarding the administration's stance on LGBTQ issues. Wright emphasizes the importance of budget stability for their operations, indicating that budget cuts would severely impact their work.

Brandon Wright, a platform services manager at the Department of Homeland Security, expresses his intent to defy orders from Secretary Kristi Noem. He believes that while secretaries can set priorities, they cannot dictate actions, and he plans to filter her directives. Wright describes the bureaucratic process as akin to a septic tank, where orders are filtered through layers before reaching him. He also shares concerns about the impact of Noem's conservative policies on his transgender colleagues, who feel threatened by her appointment. Wright emphasizes that the real power lies with permanent staff, who will interpret priorities in ways that align with their views.

I see myself as a technologist focused on creating technologies that improve the world. My "tech support" shirt reflects my role in providing technology support to the president. It's crucial because executive orders, though sensible and beneficial for the country, often aren't implemented effectively. For instance, the president issued an executive order to stop using taxpayer money for luxury hotels for illegal immigrants, which is a waste of resources. Despite the order, this practice continued. My team intervened, pointing out the violation of the presidential executive order and demanding its termination. A primary function of the "Doers team" is ensuring that presidential executive orders are actually enforced.

Mister Secretary, considering the immigration situation over the past four years and the resulting national dialogue, do you think you would have approached things differently? Yes, it's important to recognize that in any large organization, including government, there are varying opinions on policies and operational measures. These differing views are expressed, decisions are made, and then everyone works together towards the common goal. Are you implying that your personal views on handling immigration differed from your superiors'? I prefer not to discuss the internal decision-making process. However, it’s a common reality that diverse opinions exist when many people are involved in making decisions.

If we didn't have our current protections, there would be a lot of problems. We'd essentially be a sanctuary program. I oversee a team that develops professional development for teachers in adult education programs, including ESL and citizenship classes. Luckily, we've strategically managed to keep status questions out of our federal statute by maneuvering around problematic bill additions. Conversations now have to be taken offline due to increased surveillance. We've moved to using Signal, an encrypted messaging app, for secure communications. Elon Musk's "Doge team" has taken over the secretary's floor, monitoring our computers and calls. People are leaving in droves and getting paid to do nothing, so if you find me in Mexico, that's why.

I work for the Treasury, reviewing investments into the US for national security risks. Recently, Doge gained access to the Treasury to cut waste, but people are resisting. They're an easy target because there are people who don't do much, and we should be getting rid of them. What Elon is doing feels like government-sanctioned harassment, and everyone in my office is worried about being fired. No one knows what Doge wants to do with the system or why they need access to certain information. When you give people access, it creates vulnerabilities. They could take that information and give it to someone they shouldn't. There's a class of people in this country who care more about money, and Elon is showing that what he cares about is money.

Brandon Wright, a platform services manager at the Department of Homeland Security, expresses his intention to defy orders from Secretary Kristi Noem. He believes that while secretaries can set priorities, they cannot dictate actions. Wright discusses how he and his colleagues can interpret and filter directives, likening it to a septic tank that processes information through various layers. He also shares concerns about Noem's conservative stance, particularly regarding LGBTQ colleagues, who are anxious about her appointment. Wright emphasizes that the real power lies with career civil servants, who can navigate and reinterpret the directives from political appointees.

Brandon Wright, a platform services manager at the Department of Homeland Security, expresses his intent to defy Secretary Kristi Noem's orders, stating that while secretaries can set priorities, they cannot dictate actions. He believes that the true power lies with permanent staff who can interpret and filter directives. Wright criticizes Noem, claiming she lacks understanding of her role and has appointed individuals who oppose the department's interests. He also highlights concerns among his transgender colleagues regarding Noem's conservative stance. Overall, he emphasizes the ability to navigate and reinterpret directives to maintain stability within the department.

Brandon Wright, a platform services manager at the Department of Homeland Security, expresses his intent to defy Secretary Kristi Noem's orders, stating that while secretaries can set priorities, they cannot dictate actions. He emphasizes that he and his colleagues will interpret these priorities in their own way. Wright describes the challenges faced by his team, particularly those at higher GS levels, who must navigate the demands of leadership while managing their own agendas. He also mentions concerns among his transgender colleagues regarding Noem's conservative stance. Overall, he conveys a sense of frustration with the current administration and its impact on the department's operations.

If we were seen as a sanctuary program, especially one using federal dollars, we'd face a lot of problems. To avoid scrutiny, we strategically omit status inquiries from our federal statutes by subtly influencing bill language in congress. Now, with the new efficiency team's surveillance, communication has moved offline to encrypted apps like Signal, even though we're not supposed to conduct business there. They've installed software to track keystrokes and monitor our calls. If I end up on leave, I'm headed to the beach, taxpayer money well spent! Many in administrative roles are already leaving since we can't do much anyway. If I'm in Mexico, don't worry about it.

The speaker, who works in the executive office of the White House, manages two federal agencies and is responsible for protecting the networks and information of the government. They discuss the challenges of their job, including the state department's big ego and the popularity of Kamala Harris. They also express concerns about Joe Biden's mental fitness, but acknowledge that it cannot be publicly addressed. The speaker mentions a meeting with Michelle Obama, who emphatically stated she would never run for office. The video ends with a discussion about the speaker's meeting with James O'Keefe and the perception it creates.

The speaker states that while secretaries can set priorities for the department, they cannot dictate actions. The speaker claims "we don't let them get out of our way" and argues that this is their job. The speaker asserts that the Secretary of Homeland Security is unaware of the department's activities.

I'm James O'Keefe, and I caught a White House advisor, Byron, on hidden camera discussing the "deep state." People joke about it, but it’s real to some degree. One way the bureaucracy slows things down is by creating commissions to study issues, which can delay progress for years. I also recorded him saying the bureaucracy could crush incoming leadership, like RFK Jr. Byron admitted the bureaucracy exists and should implement the policies of elected leaders while also advising them. He said he advises on research and development policy. To all the bureaucrats in Washington, you're on notice. Speak openly, or we'll record you. We're going to be recording you en masse.

The speaker discusses internal resistance to RFK Jr.’s policies and the idea that “deep staters” have been entrenched in government. They mention being forwarded an anecdote from a “good career employee.” They point to the FDA, noting that when Marty Makary came in, he had only about 10 political appointees he could choose. Jay Bhattacharya at the NIH allegedly had one political appointee. The speaker claims that every government employee is a “deep stater” who has been there a long time and that an email from a good employee circulates a CIA manual called How to Be a Bad Bureaucrat and Subvert an Institution from Within. The email supposedly asserts that 90% of employees at HHS, which has 70,000 employees, are talking in lunchrooms about the manual and telling each other that their job is to save America and save science from the agenda of President Trump and RFK Jr. The speaker asserts this reflects how people think across major departments and asks how to get rid of them, suggesting firing them as a solution, and mentions SIOP in this context. The CDC is presented as a case study of failure, described as a public health disaster in its COVID-19 response. The speaker alleges that the CDC’s guidance on school lockdowns copied directly from a teacher union document with which they were aligned, reproducing paragraphs from the teacher’s union advocating for two years of school shutdowns. It is claimed that the CDC also said that cloth masks were fine. The speaker says the CDC led the response and that the NIH funded the entire pandemic, including gain-of-function research, asserting that this constitutes “the creation of the pandemic.” In contrast, RFK Jr. is said to have fired three employees, and this action is described as national news. The overall narrative emphasizes a view of pervasive internal opposition within federal agencies, a controversial and sweeping critique of the CDC, NIH, and HHS responses to the pandemic, and a framing of RFK Jr.’s personnel decisions as transformative and newsworthy.