reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Once born, there are no guarantees for a long life, but risk benefit ratios exist for all decisions. The speaker believes that for most people, the risk benefit ratio favors staying away from vaccines and drugs, getting good sunlight, using food as medicine, and having good nutrition and hydration. Dehydration impairs the body's electricity, as does a lack of minerals. Humans are electric beings, and interruptions to this electricity hinder the immune system. People make choices, such as needing two incomes, but could simplify their lifestyles. The speaker lived in a tent for a year and a half and would bring children along. Nothing, except potential imprisonment, would make the speaker take a vaccine. If someone is going to jail, they might be vaccinated against their will.

Speaker 0: Vaccines date back to 1626 poisoning the people. Okay? Poisoning the people since 1626. This is not new. They're not like, oh, we got some new stuff, and it's not the snake venom or anything else. It's just poison is what it is. They've been poisoning the people since 1626 with vaccines. So no child, no adult, no grandma, no grandpa, no mother, no nothing needs any shots, whether it be tetanus, whether it be rabies, whether it be anything. You do not need to put any shots into your animal, your grandma, your father, your mother, your children. That's it. It's straight poison. And there's a great picture from 1885, and it says, vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. There is money in the side effects. That's it. That is all vaccines. Money in the side effects for the pharmaceutical companies to poison the people and just keep making money off of them. You go back into the nineteen hundreds and doctors used to claim there were no cases of cancer in an unvaccinated person. How about the Amish? The Amish don't put a single vaccine into their body, And you notice that the Amish look pretty darn healthy. Well, altogether. Why? They're not injecting themselves with poison. It makes no sense. So there's all these cultures who didn't use this garbage. And then as they now become like modernized and they start putting this garbage into them their body, then all of a sudden, people start coming down with all the same illnesses. I got autoimmune, lupus. I got allergies. I got this. I got that. Right? Right? All those things. Where do you think they're all stemming from? They get you as you're young because you don't have the ability to consent. Right? Tell that tell the doctor to take the needle and stick it in themselves. Give themselves their own boosters and vaccines. You don't need to do that. And I think people need to stand the ground with that because there has never been a single vaccine that has ever helped helped anybody.

Injecting animal matter, live viruses, toxins, formaldehyde, and aluminum does not promote health and is not a holistic practice. There is nothing biochemically or medically necessary in a vaccine, and it does not fortify us. Vitamin D, vitamin C, good nutrition, hand washing, and sleep fortify us. These factors contributed to the decrease in mortality of supposed vaccine-preventable diseases before vaccines were invented. Mortality for diseases like measles and whooping cough was down almost one hundred percent before vaccines came on the scene in the developed world.

Speaker 0 states: He took 69 vaccines, probably more doses than anyone in the room, and cannot be labeled an anti-vaxxer. If given what he knows today and had the choice, he would not take those 69 vaccines. He would rely on the McCullough Foundation report, which now summarizes 12 studies, showing a healthy child born today remains healthier if they take no vaccines whatsoever. He notes that he and his kids were healthy.

The speaker believes all vaccines are suspect. As an emergency medicine physician, the speaker thought vaccines only contained a dead or attenuated virus and saline. In September 2000, after reading a package insert and researching vaccines, the speaker was mortified to learn that a child receiving all scheduled vaccines gets almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, almost 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 chemicals. The speaker states that this is why vaccines have never been proven safe, and vaccination is like injecting foreign matter into a baby.

Hydrogen supplementation is treated as something to stay away from. Speaker 0 says that there is nothing else needed beyond what they previously discussed: health is supported by the right food, the right light exposure, and the right local habitat. Speaker 0 argues that artificial or “artifactual” remedies cannot replace these foundations and describes such approaches as “big business,” stating that it is not one’s business. Speaker 1 brings up water hydrogen and tablets added to water. Speaker 0 responds that they would not consume hydrogen products for personal health and would tell others not to “mess with it.” Speaker 0 says they would explain why someone should avoid it, because people do not know the deuterium proteome ratio of what is generated with these methods. As long as that ratio is not clear, Speaker 0 advises not to put the generated substances into one’s mouth.

The speaker explains that the body has a natural ability to heal itself if given the right conditions. They argue that the body requires 90 essential nutrients, including minerals, vitamins, amino acids, and fatty acids, in order to function properly. However, modern agricultural methods and the overuse of pesticides have led to a decrease in the nutritional content of food. As a result, the body's reserves are depleted, leading to various health issues. The speaker criticizes allopathic medicine for focusing on managing symptoms with drugs rather than addressing the root cause. They claim that this approach often leads to a cycle of worsening health, multiple medications, and eventually, death. The speaker concludes by criticizing the medical system for failing patients and suggests that alternative holistic approaches may be more effective.

In 1985, millennials received a few vaccines. Today, children may receive up to 70 shots by age 18, including 27 before age 2, and up to 6 shots in one visit. The speaker asks if these shots are producing healthier kids, and claims the data says no. The speaker suggests that asking questions about the vaccine schedule is discouraged. Some parents who question the schedule may be reported to Child Protection Services or dismissed from their pediatrician's office. The speaker asserts that parents are being held hostage and did not sign up to co-parent with the government.

Speaker 0 asserts that there is no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule and labels themselves an anti-vaxxer because no vaccine has been properly tested for safety. They state that, in the book Vax Facts, you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and that this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. They acknowledge that death from the vaccine is still a death and “super rare,” but claim you are much more likely to die from the vaccine. They ask which do you want: a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease, noting that for many of these diseases, the risk is zero.

The speaker states they will never consult a doctor about general health again, believing doctors are ignorant and only prescribe medication. They claim doctors don't understand human biology and only focus on prescribing medicine for every ailment, leading to multiple medications with numerous side effects. The speaker reports being previously prescribed medication for thyroid issues, high cholesterol, and high blood pressure. They are now on no medication, and their blood work is better than ever. The speaker feels significantly improved and believes they saved their own life.

Speaker 0 argues that there are multiple studies showing that a healthy child born today is healthier if they go without any vaccines. He cites that ten percent of Medicaid recipients in Florida had no Medicaid visits for vaccines and suggests that the parents likely opted out of taking vaccines, noting that those were the healthiest children. He references Paul Thomas, who examined five thousand patients in his pediatric practice and states that the kids who took no vaccines were the healthiest. He also mentions studies in the Amish and others, asserting that it is clear in the modern day that going natural—meaning no vaccines whatsoever—in a healthy child, the child is healthier.

The speaker argues that vaccines should be administered in smaller doses over several years: "when you go for the shot, you do it over a five time period. Take it over five times or four times, but you take it in smaller doses and you spread it out over a period of years." They describe the process as "they pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies, it's a disgrace" and say, "they pump it looks like they're pumping into a horse." They claim, "you have a little child, little fragile child, and you get a a vat of 80 different vaccines, I guess, 80 different blends, and they pump it in." The speaker further states, "ideally, a woman won't take Tylenol." And suggests, "instead of one visit where they pump the baby, load it up with stuff. You'll do it over a period of four times or five times."

The speaker claims that no childhood vaccine has ever undergone a safety trial using a double-blind, placebo-based study. They assert that this type of study, involving a saline injection as a placebo, is the only way to determine the safety of a pharmaceutical product. Furthermore, the speaker states that there has never been a study comparing the health outcomes of children who receive the full schedule of 72 (or potentially up to 90) vaccines to those who receive none. Because of the lack of safety studies and comparative data, the speaker chooses not to inject themselves or their children with vaccines. They want evidence that vaccines are safe and make people healthier.

Speaker 0 asserts that the era of vaccines is over. Vaccinating has been done since the seventeen hundreds, back when bloodletting was state of the art medicine. They didn’t even have a theory of viruses and bacteria back then; they just had crude practices. That technology has failed. It has been revealed to cause catastrophic harms in the population. The treatment for bacteria is antibiotics, and the treatment for viruses should be antivirals. Vaccines have no place in medicine going forward. That’s where we’re gonna get to. That’s what the data actually show us right now. It’s just gonna be a lot of hard fighting between now and arriving at what the data is already showing us right now.

The speaker claims colored vaccines are dangerous, with no clinical benefit and over 10,000,000 deaths worldwide. They suggest avoiding vaccination altogether, citing studies showing unvaccinated kids are healthier. They criticize censorship by the government and medical boards, leading to job loss and license revocation for speaking out against the narrative. The medical journals are also deemed corrupt. Speaker 1 mentions not every batch causes harm, as they themselves took a few shots without issue.

The speaker states they used to believe inoculations were an elegant, minimal intervention with large benefits. They now consider injecting anything into tissue with a hypodermic needle a radical intervention. They argue that comparing mercury in shots to mercury in tuna is a game of smoke and mirrors because there shouldn't be mercury in tuna, the amount in tuna isn't trivial, and there's a huge difference between ingesting mercury and injecting it. The body doesn't have mechanisms to deal with injected mercury, so the consequences are arbitrary. While they still believe vaccination is potentially valuable, they do not trust the mechanisms that generate or test these products for effectiveness or safety.

The speaker discusses the negative effects of vaccines and the harmful substances present in our environment. They emphasize the importance of taking certain vitamins and minerals to counteract these toxins, such as vitamin C, vitamin A, beta carotene, liquid B vitamins, vitamin E, and omega oils. They also advise against consuming sugar and processed foods, suggesting instead to opt for herbal teas and small protein meals. The speaker urges listeners to avoid pharmaceutical pills and seek natural remedies. Overall, they highlight the need to take proactive measures to protect our health in the face of harmful substances.

Health cannot come through a needle or pharmaceuticals; symptom-free with drugs is not health. Health is an inside-out phenomenon requiring a healthy gut, adequate nutrition, sleep, and sunshine. Children need exercise and do not need to be vaccinated. The speaker questions trusting pediatricians with one's child, wondering how people reached that point.

The speaker cites the World Council for Health, stating that parents are urged to adopt a "common sense, safer to wait approach," which means deferring on the childhood vaccine schedule. The speaker asserts that five studies in the modern day show that "children who take no vaccines, none" are born healthy and remain healthier than children who receive vaccines. The claims include lower rates of food allergies and peanut allergies, attributed to the peanut excipients in vaccines. Additional cited outcomes for unvaccinated children include lower rates of asthma, allergic dermatitis, and a reduced need for tympanostomy tubes. The speaker also claims lower rates of attention deficit disorder, Asperger’s disease, and lower rates of autism spectrum disorder "by a mile." The overall assertion is that "massive excessive vaccination is likely harming our children today."

The speaker urges listeners to ask themselves whether their symptoms or diagnosed conditions, and the prescription drugs they take, are truly caused by drug deficiency. They question the idea that conditions like high blood pressure, migraines, diabetes, or heart disease are due to a lack of the drugs themselves. The speaker makes several pointed claims about specific medications: - Lisinopril: described as snake venom in a tablet from a viper in Brazil (Jarocas Viper) since 1981, and asserts that the listener may be swallowing dried snake venom to lower blood pressure, even though the doctor may not have explained it this way. - Xarelto: said to be prescribed for atrial fibrillation by a cardiologist. - Imitrex: noted as something people inject for migraines. They challenge the notion that symptoms are caused by deficiencies in these drugs or by the body lacking them. They ask whether the body is deficient in acetaminophen (and by extension Advil) or Tylenol to cause fever, arguing that none of these claims are true. They assert that these are man-made chemicals and drugs and that none of us are deficient in them. The speaker then presents a contrasting view: every single disease and every single symptom is a clear sign that you are specifically nutrient deficient. They contend that when the nutrients are put back into the body—“the nutrients back in that God gave you and put in the earth”—the earth’s supply to the human body aligns with how God designed it, providing everything that’s for the benefit of man. The overall message emphasizes a shift from relying on drugs to restoring nutrients from natural sources as the body’s path to health.

Speaker 0 says that if they wanted to destroy everyone’s health, they would make people pay extra for food not sprayed with disease-causing chemicals, dump toxins into the water that everyone drinks, and invest heavily in making and marketing hormone-disrupting perfumes, makeup, skincare, and shampoos. They would get both kids and adults to spend hours each day sitting at desks staring at screens under artificial light, convince people that the sun is harmful so they avoid it entirely or cover themselves with chemicals, and persuade people that their symptoms are lifelong with a pill as the solution. They would normalize stress, glorify burnout, and make rest feel lazy, while also making all of this seem completely normal. They add that anyone who questions it would be labeled crazy or a conspiracy theorist, and they ask if they missed anything.

Speaker 0 argues that getting the vaccine for pertussis (whooping cough) makes it more likely to contract the disease than if one does not get the vaccine, claiming it increases lifetime risk of pertussis multiple times. They state that the most damning evidence is the comparison of death risk: from pertussis, the death risk is “less than two million,” whereas from the vaccine, the death risk is “more than one in seventy six thousand.” They interpret this as “30 times more likely that the vaccine will kill you than the disease.” Based on this information, Speaker 0 states that they would not risk their baby’s life with a “dangerous product” and prefer natural approaches to immune protection. They claim there are things that can be done naturally to boost a child’s immune system so they can fight off any infection, not just pertussis, and not just whooping cough, but everything. They describe a preference for “natural immunity,” calling it the innate, god-given immunity and the bodies and immune systems as “beautiful, amazing” compared to relying on a product they describe as unsafe and lacking safety testing. In sum, Speaker 0 presents a comparison of disease risk versus vaccine risk, emphasizing that death from the vaccine is framed as significantly higher than death from the disease, and they advocate foregoing vaccination in favor of natural immunity.

The speaker references a study linked in a functional nurse program about an autopsy on a four-month-old baby boy who died of SIDS, noting that the aluminum content in the baby's brain was far higher than expected and asking where that aluminum comes from. They discuss the hepatitis B vaccine in relation to newborns, and claim that babies receive many injections—by six years old “they go to the doctor so many times they get like 70 shots” and that all of these have aluminum, asserting that “90 and it’s toxic.” The speaker asserts a belief that humans are born with everything they need, emphasizing sunshine, healthy water, and food, and stating that fasting can help heal the body, while claiming that injecting babies with toxins is never the right or healthy choice. They state that babies are dying at an exponential rate from mothers getting the COVID vaccine, alleging that spike proteins cause clots and disruption, and that childhood shots contain neurotoxins, leading to the claim that every doctor visit poisons babies more. The speaker also notes that a recent release stated vaccines don’t cause autism, asserting that claim was never based on any evidence.

The speaker argues they “wouldn’t take the flu shot,” citing findings they attribute to Cochrane and BMJ. They claim people who take the flu shot are protected against the specific flu strain, but are “four point four times more likely to get a non-flu infection.” They say people who receive the shot often become sick afterward, but not with flu; instead they receive an illness “indistinguishable from the flu” due to “pathogenic priming,” which they describe as injuring the immune system and making a person more likely to get a non-flu viral upper respiratory infection. The speaker also claims the Pentagon published a story “by Wolf” (January of this year), stating that the flu shot primes people for coronavirus as well as flu. They describe a placebo group and a vaccine group in a military readiness effort to see whether the flu shot could prevent coronavirus. According to the speaker, the results showed people who received the flu shot were “thirty-six percent more likely to get coronavirus,” and they say this finding is supported by “six other major studies” that similarly conclude people who get the flu shot are more likely to get coronavirus. They further claim that longevity in the elderly has worsened since flu shots were mandated for elderly people, saying those people’s life expectancy has “dramatically gone down as the flu shot proliferated,” and they cite Cochrane as saying to look at these longevity trends. The speaker also discusses COVID-era deaths, saying that during the COVID crisis those who died tended to be people who had received flu shots—such as nursing home residents and first responders—calling these observations and stating “there’s no science” on the pattern. In response to Alan, the speaker says they do not understand the implications of Alan’s position. They argue that if Alan’s claims were right, it should follow that the flu shot should be illegal, and they begin: “You said it’s criminal to-”.

German summary: Speaker 0 äußert eine ganz konkrete, sehr gewagte These: "ich sage offen, dass ich von Impfungen bei Kindern unter 3 Jahren abrate." Speaker 1 fordert, das Buch zu lesen, das "so geschrieben ist, dass sogar Oberstufenschüler es verstehen", und sagt: "Wenn ein Arzt das liest und das nicht versteht, dann soll er seinen Titel an die Wand hängen." Er behauptet, Impfstoffe seien "lebensgefährlich" und die "größte Gefahr der Menschheit." Begründung: klassische Impfstoffe enthalten Zusatzstoffe wie Aluminiumsalze, die "Gift" seien und in die Blutbahn gelangen; der Unterschied zwischen Injektion und Verzehr sei entscheidend; in Muskeln injizierte Substanzen gelangen in die Blutbahn. Bei Kleinkindern sei die Konzentration nach einer Impfung mit Diphtherie, Tetanus, Patusis "unglaublich hoch." Er schlägt vor, "wartet wenigstens die 3 Jahre ab." Lebendimpfstoffe hält er für problematisch; "niemand hat's wirklich gezeigt, dass die Viren harmlos sind." Er verweist auf Polio, Tollwut und Tetanus und behauptet, "für keinen Impfung ... echte Wirksamkeit nachgewiesen worden" außer Tollwut und Tetanus. English translation: Speaker 0 asserts a very concrete, very bold thesis: "I openly say that I advise against vaccinations for children under 3." Speaker 1 urges reading the book, which is "written in a way that even high school students can understand," and says: "If a doctor reads it and does not understand it, then he should hang his title on the wall." He claims vaccines are "life-threatening" and the "greatest danger to humanity." Reasoning: classical vaccines contain additives such as aluminum salts, which are "poison" and reach the bloodstream; the difference between injection and ingestion is crucial; substances injected into muscle reach the bloodstream. In toddlers, the concentration after a vaccination with Diphtherie, Tetanus, Patusis is "incredibly high." He suggests "wait at least 3 years." He regards live vaccines as problematic; "no one has shown that the viruses are harmless." He references polio, rabies, and tetanus, and claims "for no vaccine has real efficacy been demonstrated" except for rabies and tetanus.