TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The former FBI director found a hidden room in the Hoover Building containing documents and computer hard drives that James Comey and others concealed. The room was locked, and access was restricted to prevent discovery. The speaker's team is currently investigating the contents of the room. The speaker says people want them to make arrests, but the speaker wants to run a methodical investigation.

The speaker admits to reporting the attorney general to the FBI without evidence of any criminal activity. When questioned about this, the speaker avoids directly answering and instead emphasizes their "good faith belief" that a crime had occurred. They also claim to have not collected any evidence after making the complaint. The questioning becomes tense as the speaker is repeatedly asked if they had any evidence to support their claims, but they continue to evade a direct answer.

Attorney General Garland was questioned about overruling FBI agents in a raid on ex-President Trump's residence. He stated he approved the decision but did not make it. The senator cited a Washington Post article claiming FBI agents were against the raid. Garland denied discussing this with the White House and faced criticism for FBI leaks distancing themselves from his decisions. Garland deflected the accusations, questioning the motives behind the leaks. Senator Cotton's time for questioning expired. Translation: Attorney General Garland was questioned about his involvement in a raid on ex-President Trump's residence. He approved the decision but did not make it. The senator referenced a Washington Post article claiming FBI agents opposed the raid. Garland denied discussing this with the White House and faced criticism for FBI leaks distancing themselves from his decisions. Garland questioned the motives behind the leaks. Senator Cotton's time for questioning expired.

Speaker 0: Did you see evidence of collusion, coordination, conspiracy between Donald Trump and Russian state actors? Speaker 1: I saw information intelligence that was worthy of investigation by the bureau to determine whether or not such cooperation of conclusion was taking place. Speaker 0: That doesn't help us a lot. What was the nature of the information? Speaker 1: As I said, mister Gowdy, I think this committee now has access to the type of information that I'm alluding to here. It's classified and I'm happy to talk about it in classified session. Speaker 0: And that would have been directly between the candidate and Russian state actors? Speaker 1: That's not what I said. I'm not going to talk about any individual's But Speaker 0: that was my question.

New details have emerged about how the CIA under Obama targeted Trump and initiated the Russia hoax. It was previously believed that a tip from an Australian diplomat led to the FBI's investigation of Papadopoulos, but new reporting suggests that the CIA orchestrated the whole thing. Former CIA director John Brennan identified 26 Trump associates to be targeted by the Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance, and the FBI then deemed their interactions suspicious, launching the Russia collusion hoax. The alleged details of this operation are stored in a top-secret binder, which Trump has ordered to be declassified, but it may be missing. This is a serious allegation of illegal spying and election interference.

I sent a couple of FBI agents to the White House to interview Flynn. In a more organized administration, like Bush or Obama, you'd have to work through the White House counsel to get approvals. But I thought, let's just send them over. We called Flynn and said we were sending a couple of agents over and hoped he'd talk to them. He said sure. They interviewed him in a conference room at the White House situation room, and he lied to them, which he plead guilty to. I don't think he knew why they were coming over. We didn't tell him, just said we were sending a couple of agents to ask some questions and hoped he had a few minutes to talk. He said sure.

In this video, the speaker reflects on the current state of the White House and how it is difficult to imagine two FBI agents being in the situation room. The speaker admits to sending the agents, which may not have been possible in a more organized investigation or administration. Typically, the FBI would coordinate with the White House counsel for interviews with senior officials, involving discussions and approvals. However, the speaker decided to send a couple of agents without going through the usual process, considering it was early in the investigation.

I sent a couple of FBI agents to the White House to interview Flynn, something I probably wouldn't have done in a more organized administration like Bush or Obama, where there was a process to go through the White House counsel for approvals. Instead, we called Flynn and said we were sending a couple of agents over and hoped he would talk to them. Nobody else was present during the interview, which took place in a conference room at the White House situation room. He lied to the agents during the interview, which is what he pled guilty to. We didn't tell him what the agents were coming over for, only that they wanted to ask him some questions and if he had a few minutes to sit down and talk to them. He said, sure.

An individual sent two FBI agents to the White House to interview a senior official, Michael Flynn. This action bypassed typical protocols involving the White House counsel, which would have been followed in administrations like those of George W. Bush or Barack Obama. The speaker believed it was early enough in the administration to circumvent the usual process. A call was placed to Flynn, informing him that a couple of agents were being sent over to ask him some questions, to which Flynn agreed. The agents interviewed Flynn in a conference room at the White House Situation Room, and Flynn allegedly lied to them during the interview. He later pled guilty to this. Flynn was not informed about the specific purpose of the agents' visit beforehand.

The speaker discusses the FBI's investigation into a person accused of espionage. The FBI mistakenly believed that the person had left the country, but he was actually living in DC. Despite this, the FBI hired him and paid him over $200,000, even though they knew he was a Russian spy. The speaker also mentions another individual, Charles Dolan, who was a source for the false dossier used to spy on American citizens. Dolan and the Russian spy even met on a park bench, but the FBI refused to interview Dolan. The speaker criticizes the FBI's actions and highlights the problem of running investigations from headquarters instead of assigning a US attorney.

Speaker 0 states that sources claim Brennan used "reverse targeting" to entrap Trump advisors Carter Page and George Papadopoulos via Halper and Mifsud. Papadopoulos told former Australian ambassador Downer about Russian offers to help Trump. This appears to be how Russiagate started. Speaker 1 believes John Brennan is a dark figure. Speaker 1 was arrested in 2012 and charged with espionage for blowing the whistle on the sea ice torch program. Speaker 1 claims to have found memos where Brennan told Holder to charge him with espionage, even though Holder's people didn't think he committed it, and then to make him defend himself. The espionage charges were dropped after Speaker 1 went bankrupt from legal fees. Speaker 1 believes Brennan was responsible for the origin of Russiagate. Speaker 1 claims the FBI isn't capable of such operations, but the CIA and John Brennan are. Speaker 1 claims Brennan and his contemporaries devise operations to get from point A to point C, ruining people along the way, and discusses potential tactics.

Google informed the speaker of surveillance five years after the investigation began, but could not provide details. As a former national security prosecutor, the speaker believes all providers, telecoms, and banks were likely involved. Two individuals running the FBI and DOJ allegedly lied to the House Intelligence Committee and threatened them with investigation. One of those individuals, Rob Rosenstein, was exposed for signing a bogus Pfizer application. The speaker claims Chris Wray has repeatedly lied as FBI director. Gina Haspel, CIA director, was London station chief when Russia gate began, which the speaker describes as a barroom operation to record someone divulging information on Donald Trump.

The speaker was asked if they told someone that the Steele dossier was financed by his political opponents. The speaker responded that they didn't think they used the term "Steele dossier," but instead referred to "additional material." When asked if the person had a right to know the dossier was financed by political opponents, the speaker stated they didn't know. They added that informing the person of the financing was not necessary for their goal, which was to alert the person that they had this information.

The speaker questions the FBI's practice of tipping off the subject of a search warrant before it is executed. They inquire about the FBI's contact with the protective detail of individuals and the potential undermining of investigations. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of answers and accuses the FBI of a cover-up. Director Wray requests a 5-minute recess. The speaker acknowledges the frustration but explains that policies prevent discussing ongoing investigations. They mention that these policies were strengthened under the previous administration. The speaker concludes by stating that there is an obligation to call out corruption.

People are trying to say that the FBI is corrupt and that the Steele dossier is discredited, and that the investigation into Russian interference is based on nonsense. However, the Steele dossier was taken seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp. There is a big move to undermine the Mueller investigation by calling it names. The American people were attacked, and that can't happen again. It is unpatriotic to try to stop an investigation from going forward so we can make sure it doesn't happen again.

In a more structured administration, like those of George W. Bush or Barack Obama, sending FBI agents to the White House required navigating a formal process involving the White House counsel, discussions, and approvals. However, early on, I decided to send a couple of agents over to interview Flynn directly. We called Flynn, informed him that we were sending a couple of agents over and hoped he would speak with them. He agreed. The agents interviewed him in a White House conference room, and he lied to them, which led to his guilty plea. I don't think he knew the purpose of the interview. We simply told him that we were sending a couple of agents to ask him some questions and hoped he had a few minutes to speak with them. He agreed.

Speaker 0 states that sources have indicated Brennan used "reverse targeting" to entrap Trump advisors Carter Page and George Papadopoulos via Halper and Mifsud. Papadopoulos then told former Australian ambassador Downer about Russian offers to help Trump. This appears to be how Russiagate started. Speaker 1 believes John Brennan is a dark figure. Speaker 1 was arrested in 2012 and charged with espionage for blowing the whistle on the sea ice torch program. Speaker 1 claims to have found memos where Brennan told Holder to charge him with espionage, even after being advised against it. The espionage charges, carrying a potential death penalty, were later dropped after Speaker 1 went bankrupt from legal fees. Speaker 1 believes Brennan was responsible for the origin of Russiagate and that the CIA, under Brennan, devises operations to ruin people, cause suicides, or entrap individuals.

The speaker questions why the FBI paid Christopher Steele $1 million to verify a dossier on Trump and offered $3 million to Twitter to suppress a story on Hunter Biden. They express concern over the FBI's actions being politically motivated. The FBI director responds by explaining the payments to social media companies are for legal process costs. The speaker accuses the FBI of damaging its reputation and questions if the FBI requested financial institutions to provide customer data. The FBI director is unsure and the speaker presents an email from Bank of America as evidence.

Speaker 0: It's been a few days since you issued that resignation. You’ve been called weak by the president of the United States. You’ve been called a traitor by Lindsey Graham. You’ve been called an anti-Semite by Mitch McConnell, among others. Now there are reports that you’re under a leak investigation potentially accusing you of a felony that could put you in jail even though you now are raising your two boys. You’ve remarried, but you’re their sole biological parent still here. I ask you now whether this was worth it. Speaker 1: I think it most certainly was, Megan. I mean, the attacks against me are to be expected. The ad hominems from people like Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham at this point are fairly laughable. They don’t wanna discuss the issues. I wanna discuss the issues. As for the leak allegations, I’m not concerned because I know I did nothing wrong. Of course, I am concerned because we’ve all seen the FBI and the full way of the government come down on individuals who speak out. So that has me a little bit concerned, but I know the truth and the facts are on my side. So I think the important issues to address are what’s at hand, why we’re at war, and how we get out of the state that we’re in right now. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Your boys have already lost one parent. I mean, the thought of this government for which you’ve been working and the government for which you’ve sacrificed so much, actually trying to put you in jail over an alleged leak after the number of leaks we’ve seen go unpunished over the past ten years is truly outrageous, Joe. I mean, does it anger you? How does it make you feel? Speaker 1: You, you know, it it does anger me, but it it’s all just to be expected. I I knew this was going to happen. I I know their playbook. I think we’re all very familiar with their playbook. So, actually, the fact that they’re leaking these allegations so so they have to leak the allegations of an FBI investigation. If there truly was an FBI investigation, and who knows, maybe there will be, there would be a process and procedure for that. They would actually formally come to me. And if they were still collecting information, they most certainly wouldn’t leak it. So the fact that the FBI, DOJ, or really probably just partisans are leaking this this so-called investigation against me at a time when I’m going on and publicly speaking out against the course the administration is on, to me, that tells me everything that I need to know. I feel very confident in what I’m doing right now. I think I have a mission, and I think it is to do everything I can to stop this war. So to me, I kinda view everything else as a sideshow, and I just wanna stay focused on the mission.

I sent a couple of FBI agents to the White House to interview Flynn. In a more organized administration, like Bush or Obama, you'd have to work through the White House counsel to get approvals. But I thought it was early enough in the administration to just send them over. We called Flynn and said we were sending a couple of guys over and hoped he'd talk to them. He said, sure. Nobody else was there. They interviewed him in a conference room in the White House situation room, and he lied to them. That's what he pled guilty to. I don't think he knew why they were coming over. We just told him we were sending a couple of agents over to ask some questions and hoped he had a few minutes to sit down and talk to them. And he said, sure.

Under new leadership, the FBI is investigating a reported plan to infiltrate President Trump's first campaign. Back in 2015, under James Comey, the FBI allegedly launched a honeypot operation using two female undercover agents. A whistleblower claims this operation was separate from the Crossfire Hurricane investigation and lacked proper justification. According to reports, Comey directed the investigation without creating an official case file, raising concerns about potential misconduct. The inquiry is focused on identifying the undercover agents who reportedly infiltrated the Trump campaign at high levels. This is insane, the question is were they targeting Trump or his team? This is a problem that is not new, we need to find out if Comey was truly above board.

The FBI was accused of treason and illegal spying, but the truth is that all of that was nonsense. I was wrong about the FISA process being handled in a thoughtful and appropriate way; I was overconfident. The Steele reporting played a central and essential role in the decision to seek a FISA order, but the FBI didn't conclude that Steele's reporting was bunk after talking to a sub source. As director, I wasn't informed on the details of the investigation. The inspector general did not find misconduct by any FBI people, but mistakes, negligence, and oversight. One FBI lawyer doctored a document. The inspector general did not find political bias or illegal conduct, but significant mistakes. The American people were given false information about the FBI. It is honest, and flawed. It's unclear if there was gross incompetence, negligence, or intentionality.

The FBI was accused of treason, illegal spying, and a criminal conspiracy to unseat a president. All of that was nonsense. I was overconfident in the procedures that the FBI and Justice had built. The Steele reporting played a central and essential role in the decision to seek a FISA order. I don't believe the FBI concluded that Steele's reporting was bunk after talking to a sub source. As the director, you're not kept informed on the details of an investigation. The inspector general did not find misconduct by any FBI people. He found mistakes and negligent oversight. The inspector general found significant mistakes, and that is not something to sneeze at. The American people, especially your viewers, need to realize they were given false information about the FBI. It's honest, it is not political, it is flawed.

An individual sent two FBI agents to the White House to interview a senior official, Michael Flynn. This action bypassed typical protocols involving the White House counsel, which would have been followed in administrations like those of George W. Bush or Barack Obama. The speaker believed it was early enough in the administration to circumvent the usual process. A call was placed to Flynn, informing him that a couple of agents were being sent over to ask him some questions, to which Flynn agreed. The agents interviewed Flynn in a conference room at the White House Situation Room, and Flynn allegedly lied to them during the interview. Flynn pleaded guilty to this. Flynn was not informed about the specific purpose of the agents' visit beforehand.

I sent a couple of FBI agents to the White House to interview Flynn. This is something I probably wouldn't have done in a more organized administration, like under George W. Bush or Obama, where there was more process. Usually, the FBI would work through the White House counsel to get approvals. But I thought, let's just send them over. We called Flynn and said we were sending a couple of guys over and hoped he'd talk to them. He agreed, and they interviewed him in the White House situation room with no one else present. He lied to them during the interview, which is what he pled guilty to. We didn't tell him why they were coming, just that they wanted to ask some questions.