reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the concept of transitioning from Human 1.0 to Human 2.0 through transhumanism, which involves merging humans with artificial intelligence. They express concerns about the proposed COVID-19 vaccine, stating that it is experimental and can potentially alter our DNA. The speaker questions the ownership of synthetic DNA and the potential loss of privacy and autonomy due to nanotechnology and artificial intelligence. They highlight the involvement of the military and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in vaccine development, expressing concerns about their motivations and past statements on population control. The speaker also raises concerns about gene drive research and the rush to produce the vaccine, emphasizing the lack of liability for vaccine manufacturers and the censorship of alternative treatments. They question the true motives behind the vaccine and its impact on global health.

The speaker claims the WHO intends to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations and treatments globally. They assert that all mRNA vaccines are dangerous and threaten life, regardless of the protein they encode. The speaker says the danger stems from the immune system's ability to recognize non-cells. They state the WHO is a privately funded organization, with Germany as the top financier and Bill Gates as the second. The speaker warns against vaccinating children, claiming mRNA vaccines change mankind, alter personality and brain function, weaken the heart, and cause severe bodily damage. They conclude that mRNA vaccines must be forbidden.

The speaker discusses a bill that proposes replacing the Department of Commerce with AI. According to the speaker, the bill stipulates that for the next ten years, no politician or governing body can stop AI or enforce laws regulating AI models, which the speaker believes equates to Silicon Valley controlling the government. The speaker claims this control extends to weather manipulation and the healthcare system, with the added provision that these companies cannot be sued. The speaker draws parallels to the Vaccine Protection Act of 1986 and the Telecommunication Act of 1996, suggesting a pattern of government actions that protect corporations from liability. The speaker concludes by expressing concern that these actions are setting the stage for AI to replace the government.

mRNA can modify DNA by replacing segments with synthetic versions, potentially making individuals patentable. Vaccinations have already begun, with nasal test swabs being used to deliver vaccines that could target the brain. As a doctor, I find this concerning. Masks are required over the mouth, supposedly to prevent the spread of COVID-19 through saliva. However, instead of swabbing the mouth, long Q-tips are inserted deep into the nasal cavity, which is close to the brain. There’s a thin bone plate separating the brain from the nasal sinuses, raising questions about the safety and purpose of these procedures.

All childhood vaccines will soon contain mRNA, making them gene therapies that alter genetics. The vaccines won't require reapproval or go through any additional processes. The focus is on integrating mRNA into every vaccine, which is concerning because it involves tinkering with genes. The speaker urges people to be cautious and not get any vaccines, emphasizing their strong opposition to it. The speaker believes that there is a significant amount of money involved in this shift towards gene therapies.

The speaker discusses concerns about mRNA vaccines altering DNA and making individuals patentable. They claim that nasal swabs used for COVID-19 testing could be a way to vaccinate and target the brain with nanoparticles. The speaker explains how swabs reaching the cribriform plate near the brain could potentially deposit substances.

Speaker 0 asserts that the IRS has been using AI to access American citizens' bank accounts without a search warrant or a crime claim, discovered by an undercover journalist. They claim the IRS has access to every person’s bank account, and that the agency has been working with the Department of Justice and has no problem going after the “little guy” to ensure taxes are paid. This is described as a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment. Speaker 0 and Jim Jordan sent a letter to the IRS demanding information about how AI is used and how civil rights are protected. Speaker 1 asks what the end game is and how to protect constitutional rights given the inevitability of AI, seeking ways to safeguard Americans. Speaker 0 responds that a new administration is needed in November, accusing the current administration of being lawless in terms of surveillance of the public, members of Congress, local officials, protesters, and voters. They claim the administration has “weaponized the government against us,” and that protections of the Bill of Rights—First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments—have been ignored. Speaker 0 states that one of the goals is to address this perceived weaponization and surveillance.

The speaker raises concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine, stating that it skipped animal testing and went straight to human testing. They mention that the animal tests were stopped because the animals were dying. The speaker believes that the American people are now being used as guinea pigs for this experimental vaccine. They express worry about businesses mandating the vaccine for employment despite the rising death count, which they feel is being ignored.

The speaker claims that nanoparticles in vaccines can be affected by radiation. They reference a 2017 publication by an Italian professor who allegedly tested 40 vaccines and found metal nanoparticles in them. The speaker states that in October 2001, they gave evidence about threats to people in Congress, mentioning nanoparticles and injections with peptides, but the military told them to stop talking about it. The speaker suggests that these nanoparticles can be modulated by frequency, targeting specific age groups with different batches of injections, potentially causing nosebleeds or deaths that could be falsely attributed to outbreaks like Ebola. They believe this technology poses a significant threat, allowing individuals to be targeted for serious illness or death.

The speaker points out that the COVID-19 vaccine was released to the public without undergoing animal testing, which is unusual, especially for children. The animal testing was initially started but stopped due to the animals dying. This means that the American people are essentially being used as test subjects. Despite the rising death count, businesses are considering making the experimental vaccine mandatory for employees, and this issue is being ignored.

The IRS has been using AI to access American citizens' bank accounts without warrants. They claim to have access to everyone's accounts and are willing to go after small taxpayers. Jim Jordan and I demanded answers from the IRS. We need a new administration to protect our civil rights from this lawless surveillance.

The speaker believes there is corruption at the FDA and HHS. They claim that social distancing was arbitrary and not based on science. Ivermectin, allegedly called "horse paste," has supposedly saved billions of lives, and budesonide also saved countless lives, but their use was prevented. The speaker asserts that the doctor-patient relationship is not protected legally, requiring doctors to get approval from insurance companies and regulators. House Bill 73 would allow doctors to innovate and make decisions to cure patients, while protecting hospital systems that don't adopt these protocols. The speaker criticizes mask mandates, claiming they were not based on science but on corruption. They state that people died because Fauci lied and bureaucrats were afraid to speak out due to lobbyists. House Bill 73 can eliminate interference between doctors and patients, protecting people at all levels and allowing doctors to decide what's best for their patients, as opposed to corrupt bureaucrats subject to lobby interests.

DNA companies are under scrutiny for potentially selling and weaponizing personal DNA information. It is claimed that a person's DNA and medical profile could be used to target them with a biological weapon. Concerns are raised about individuals willingly submitting their DNA to companies like 23 and Me, resulting in private companies owning and potentially selling that data. It is argued that open discussions are needed regarding the protection of healthcare and DNA information. The speaker asserts that adversaries could procure and collect this data to develop harmful systems.

A discussion centers on a new proposed law, HR 8250, which would require operating system providers to verify the age of any user of an operating system and for other purposes, covering Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, with open-source Linux considered in the debate. The claim is that this could serve as a Trojan horse to control people through a digital ID system, rather than being merely safety-focused. Speaker 1 references Catherine Austin Fitz, who says that if global elites deploy digital ID systems, they will control all aspects, including health freedoms and financial transactions. She argues that once financial transaction control is in place, all protections in health and food freedoms could be negated, and a 100% digital system with a digital ID and programmable money would allow authorities to dictate health decisions, vaccine status, gender-transition decisions for children, and other policies by turning off funds. Speaker 0 notes that Fitz is not hyperbolic and mentions Austin Steinbart, founder of the Quantum Party of America, who is joined by Speaker 0 to discuss the issue further. Speaker 2 (Austin Steinbart) asserts that the HR 8250 proposal is a disaster and goes beyond a digital ID concept by embedding age verification into the core of every device. He says the bill is six pages long and delegates enforcement to the FTC, creating ambiguity about whether biometrics, ID cards, or face scans would be used, leaving the mechanism up to the executive branch. He points out that the proposal could coordinate with companies like Apple (potentially via Face ID) and Microsoft to embed verification, while raising questions about how open-source Linux distributions would be forced to comply. He notes that Linux is open-source and typically users have root access, enabling workarounds or removal of such core files, and questions how a retrospective integration would work on devices like POS systems or hotel front-desk computers. Speaker 0 asks how the implementation would occur and whether the digital ID is the core objective beyond age verification. Speaker 2 confirms that the core goal is a universal digital ID across platforms, tying to privacy and cybersecurity concerns by requiring every service to interact with core OS files to verify age, with California already moving toward age verification that apps and websites would rely on. Speaker 0 links this to a broader move toward a central bank digital currency (CBDC) and a digital ID, quoting a sound bite from Catherine Austin Fitz about health identifiers affecting travel and other activities. Speaker 3 (a figure from the World Economic Forum) is cited, emphasizing tokenization of financial assets and the rapid rollout of a digital wallet and digitized currencies globally, with a critique that many countries are unprepared for such changes. Speaker 2 clarifies that blockchain or tokenization per se isn’t inherently bad, but concerns arise when centralized actors with anti-freedom aims design and control the system, shaping speech and policy. They discuss the potential benefits of tokenized assets in theory, while warning that centralized control could enable censorship and restricted financial activity. Speaker 0 ends by urging viewers to contact members of Congress to oppose HR 8250, urging them to “burn this thing down,” and thanks Speaker 2 for the analysis.

I am here today to address the WHO's plan to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations, including cancer treatment. It is important to understand that all mRNA vaccines, regardless of their purpose, pose a threat to life. The danger lies in the immune system's ability to recognize foreign substances. Even if the WHO supports it, we should not allow this. The WHO is funded by private entities like Bill Gates and Germany, who are pushing for mRNA vaccination. We must not let our children be vaccinated as it will alter their personality, change their brain, and weaken their heart. Injecting mRNA vaccines will cause severe damage to our bodies and should be prohibited.

The IRS is allegedly using AI to access Americans' bank accounts without warrants or claims of criminal activity. This was reportedly discovered by an undercover journalist who found the IRS claims access to everyone's bank accounts. The IRS is also allegedly working with the Department of Justice and targeting ordinary citizens to ensure tax compliance. Jim Jordan and Speaker 0 sent a letter to the IRS demanding information about their AI usage and civil rights protections. Speaker 0 claims the current administration has been lawless in its surveillance, targeting members of Congress, local officials, protesters, and voters, and weaponizing the government. Speaker 0 suggests a new administration is needed to protect constitutional rights.

The speaker asserts that everyone has had a “mark of the beast” since 2011 in relation to critical infrastructure at health level seven, specifically hospitals. They claim health and human services and CMS Medicare are handing out this mark in the form of a wearable. The speaker also describes this as interbody communication biometrics for DHS from several years ago. They state that this is not only a matter of health administration but spans business and government. They claim that Congress, throughout this year and last year, has been helping the police obtain updated drone services, with Sean Ryan bragging about them, along with others. The speaker contends that the general public is weaponized and kept uninformed about the fact that national security is under the skin and looking through people’s eyeballs in their own homes, and that it cannot be turned off and does not require a tower. The speaker explains that biosignals come from the human body, and that biophysics uses advanced signal processing to measure bioelectromagnetics, describing the measurement of signals coming off the human body in multiple ways.

The speaker describes a slow, methodic, and consistent plan that has evolved over time, linking vaccines and engineered materials to population control. They claim these technologies are designed to "feed" and sustain an AI state or institution, which they describe as an AI ecosystem or matrix that requires humanity’s bodies as fuel. Key points: - The vaccines and engineered materials are part of a broader strategy to control populations, while the ultimate goal is for these systems to feed on humanity’s energy. - The speaker emphasizes a spiritual dimension, framing the struggle as a war in the biological system. They assert that the battle centers on energy, specifically that DNA contains an infinite amount of energy and storage, which can be converted to control. - They describe the system as an elaborate, multilayered, cohesive operation that presents itself as infiltrators, vaccines, engineered viruses, and pathogens. Once these are in human systems, they set up shop as facilitators that enable an outside source to advance the AI ecosystem. - The claim is that AI and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are now fully run on AI digital data, harnessing human information and uploading it into AI clouds and data systems. Additional framing: - The “elixir” to feed the AI beast is humanity’s energy, and the various components used to alter or distort DNA and biology are part of a strategy to sustain that feed. - The overall narrative ties together biological interventions (vaccines, engineered materials, and pathogens) with the operation and expansion of an AI-driven, energetically consuming system, suggesting that the external AI infrastructure relies on human data and biology as its fuel. In summary, the speaker portrays a deliberate, slow-moving plan where vaccines and engineered materials are tools to population control and to seed a broader AI ecosystem that feeds on human energy, with DNA energy as a central resource, and where AI-enabled systems (including AI-enabled HHS operations) orchestrate this fusion of biology and digital control.

The speaker points out that the COVID-19 vaccine was released to the public without completing animal testing, which is unusual, especially for children. The animal testing was stopped because the animals were dying. This means that the American people are essentially being used as guinea pigs for this experimental vaccine. Despite the rising death count, businesses are considering making the vaccine mandatory for employees, which is concerning.

The Congresswoman states that the IRS has been using AI to access Americans’ bank accounts without a search warrant or any specific crime claim. An undercover journalist discovered that the IRS claims access to every person’s bank account, and that they have been working with the Department of Justice and that they have no problem targeting the “little guy” to ensure tax payments. She describes this as a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment and, with Jim Jordan, sent a letter to the IRS demanding information about how they are using AI and how they are protecting citizens’ civil rights. She then asks, what is the end game here? Acknowledging that the AI tools are hard to contain, she asks how American citizens and constitutional rights can be protected. In response, she argues that a new administration in November is needed because the current administration has been “absolutely lawless” in its surveillance of Americans, including members of Congress, local officials, protesters, and voters, and has weaponized the government against them. She says this administration has completely ignored the Bill of Rights, referencing the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, and states that one of the things we...

The speaker believes mRNA shots are a "festering wound" impacting everyone that cannot be ignored. The speaker urges the new administration to address the issue, citing 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline, 33 of which are self-amplifying. Self-amplifying means they are designed to replicate indefinitely, which the speaker finds "terrifying" because current mRNA shots already lack an "off switch." The speaker claims these self-amplifying shots are already in use in Japan, India, and the EU. The speaker believes the one in the US pipeline is for H1N1, so it may not be used unless there is an issue, but they are still experimenting with it.

I am here today to address the WHO's plan to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations, including cancer treatment. However, it is important to understand that all mRNA vaccines pose a threat to life, regardless of what they encode for. The danger lies in the immune system's ability to recognize non-similarity. Even though the WHO supports this, it should not be allowed. It is crucial to note that the WHO is funded by Bill Gates and German taxpayers, who are pushing for mRNA vaccination. This cannot be permitted as it will change mankind, altering our personality, brain, and weakening our hearts. Injected mRNA vaccines cause severe damage and must be prohibited.

The speaker discusses a bill that proposes replacing the Department of Commerce with AI. According to the speaker, the bill states that for the next ten years, no politician or governing body can stop AI or enforce laws regulating AI models, which the speaker believes equates to Silicon Valley controlling the government. The speaker claims the bill involves Silicon Valley manipulating the weather and entering the healthcare system to control it, with no legal recourse against these companies. The speaker draws parallels to the Vaccine Protection Act and the Telecommunication Act of 1996, suggesting a pattern of government actions that set the stage for AI to replace the government.

The speaker states that while messenger RNA (mRNA) can be used to produce missing proteins like insulin, using mRNA for vaccines is a failed and dangerous concept. They criticize the US government for not being honest about their involvement in mRNA research, specifically the Adept p three program, which aimed to use mRNA to end pandemics within 60 days.

For those familiar with the technology, it was clear from the start that certain projects were a "horrible idea," a sentiment now echoed by HHS Secretary Kennedy, who states they are not effective. The de-investment in 22 projects is just the beginning and will reunify the MAHA and MAGA movements. This action will benefit public health by preventing the implementation of this technology in people's bodies. While some funding, contracts, and research opportunities remain, the de-investment sends a clear message: this technology is not for human use.