TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

According to the latest report, US government data confirms a 143,233 percent increase in cancer cases due to COVID vaccination.

Speaker 0 reports that the largest oncologic safety assessment of the COVID shots was just published in OncoTarget, a major cancer journal. They say the article was hit with cyberattacks just before publication, preventing online posting, and that the FBI was contacted. The piece then appeared in PubMed, but is described as having gone down again after another cyberattack on the journal. The core findings, as claimed, are that the researchers collected all of the cancer evidence associated with the COVID shots and found over three hundred confirmed vaccine-related cancer cases documented in peer-reviewed literature. This number is described as not representing the total seen in real-world data, but rather the count of cases identified by scientists within peer-reviewed sources, thereby supporting the claim that the phenomenon is real. The cancers span every type imaginable, with lymphoma accounting for about forty percent of the cases. Two large population-level studies are highlighted, totaling about ten million people. These studies reportedly show a major increased risk of multiple cancers in vaccinated populations compared to unvaccinated populations, with up to seven types of cancers increased. A military dataset consisting of around 1.2 million people is cited, in which lymphoma was reported to have increased drastically in 2021 among military members who were mandated to receive the shots. The summary characterizes the paper as so damning that it is presented as evidence that these shots are carcinogenic, and attributes the cyberattacks and other online disruptions to efforts to suppress these findings. The speaker emphasizes the sequence of cyber warfare activity around publication, the breadth of cancer types reported, and the notable increases in cancer incidence in large vaccinated populations, including a significant rise in lymphoma within the military cohort.

A study comparing gene profiles of 800 healthy individuals to mRNA-injured individuals found severe genetic dysregulation in the latter. Seven of the injured individuals developed new-onset cancers within a year of mRNA injection, while three experienced cardiovascular or long vaccine syndrome. Gene expression comparisons revealed thousands of dysregulated gene expressions in the mRNA-injured, linked to mitochondrial failure and oncogenic activations. Cancer suppression genes were not being suppressed, and immune dysregulation was observed. The study claims to be the first to show long-term genetic disruptions in the vaccinated, indicating molecular chaos within cells. This may be the biological mechanism behind cardiovascular and carcinogenic issues seen in the vaccinated, possibly due to genomic integration of DNA plasmids from the manufacturing process. The speaker states that this is a landmark report and calls for further investigation into the effects on the population, noting that a large percentage of the global population received COVID vaccines.

The speaker claims mRNA injections have caused a "catastrophic" level of damage, citing excess deaths, permanent disabilities, and injuries. Worldwide deaths are estimated at around 17 million as of September 2023. In America, estimations for the first year of mRNA injection deaths range between 480,000 and 600,000, based on extrapolations from a recent preprint and VAERS data. The speaker asserts the shots are cardiotoxic and neurotoxic, linking them to myocarditis, cardiac arrests, coronary artery disease, and 86 neuropsychiatric adverse events. Vaccine spike protein has allegedly been found in the brains of stroke patients 17 months post-vaccination. The speaker states the shots induce blood clotting and damage the kidneys and gastrointestinal system. Furthermore, the speaker believes the shots are carcinogenic, with over 100 studies indicating 17 distinct mechanisms by which they may cause cancer.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

The speaker claims that this is not conspiracy theory and cites a BMJ publication by Retzaf Levy, which describes a process in vaccine development: vaccines were trialed under one formulation, but when the decision was made to deploy them globally, the process was changed and the product injected to the rest of the world. The speaker asserts that changing the process requires new trials, yet the EMA asked for an additional trial of 250 people after the process change, and that data was never delivered. This is described as a “bait and switch,” asserted as crucial for understanding why trial data is of zero consequence to what’s seen in the field, implying that real-world outcomes do not match trial data and that the numbers from trials are a caricature of field performance. The speaker claims Pfizer had early data indicating what would happen and acted on that by acquiring cancer companies: $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium is described as focused on blood cancers with the CD147 marker (CD Adaptor 147) on them, a marker claimed to be known to be involved in COVID. The implication is that Pfizer is building an investment portfolio in cancer companies that would benefit from the consequences the speaker alleges they caused. In summary, the vaccines on the market are said to be not the same formulation as what was tested in clinical trials, labeling this a “bait and switch” and a fraud, and asserting that vaccine effectiveness numbers are not reliable because the products differ from trial formulations and because those numbers decay over time. The speaker alleges significant DNA contamination, stating that 10 out of 11 studies have found this, with the remaining studies allegedly constrained by financial conflicts. The claim is that consensus among real studies supports DNA contamination, with several studies through peer review, which the speaker notes is difficult for those papers to pass through peer review. It is claimed that five peer-reviewed studies not originally examining contamination found DNA in blood and tissue upon sleuthing. The speaker asserts that cancer is on the rise and that several papers report cancer post-vaccination, including neoplasms at the site of injection. The claim is that this situation cannot be dismissed as coincidence and is described as “liability free” and often mandated. The speaker posits that this may be the largest carcinogenic hit to the human population, with vaccines on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women, stating that “this has gone absolutely off the rails.”

An alarming increase in aggressive colorectal cancers, termed "turbocancers," has been observed since the rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. This rise is evident across all age groups, with significant increases in younger patients. Despite various theories, such as lifestyle changes and delayed diagnoses due to lockdowns, these do not explain the sudden surge post-2021. The correlation between the vaccine rollout and the rise in cancer cases fulfills several epidemiological criteria for causation. Potential mechanisms include immune suppression and disruptions to tumor suppressor functions. Many healthcare professionals have noted similar patterns and expressed concerns about vaccine safety. There is a growing consensus that the vaccines may be linked to these aggressive cancer trends, prompting calls for an immediate halt to their promotion and distribution.

There's concern about increased cancer risk after Covid vaccines, noting lack of UK data comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated. A study from Italy reported increased incidence of cancers six months after Covid vaccinations. The source is Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal, peer reviewed. The paper states: "People that had vaccinated with at least one dose, their chances of getting colorectal cancer the hazard ratio was one point three four. In other words thirty four percent more likely to get it." This is at a six month follow-up. It also claims: "Breast cancer fifty four percent more likely to get breast cancer in the vaccinated group." "Bladder cancer sixty two percent more likely to get it than the unvaccinated group."

The speaker claims messenger RNA vaccines with the spike protein can induce cancer in multiple ways. They allege the presence of oncogene stimulants, specifically SV40 in the Pfizer vaccine, confirmed by multiple researchers. A paper from Wurzburg purportedly confirms this and shows the vaccines convert cells to cancer. The speaker asserts the spike protein and mRNA vaccines bind to major suppressor genes like P53, BRCA, and MSH, which normally suppress cancer. Mutations in these genes can lead to earlier onset of cancer. The speaker suggests these vaccines could cause the equivalent of mutations in these genes, leading to an explosion of colorectal cancers. They advocate for an immediate ban on these vaccines and accountability for those who oppose it.

A study from Japan suggests a potential link between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and increased cancer mortality. Researchers observed a statistically significant increase in age-adjusted mortality rates for all cancers and specific cancers, including ovarian, leukemia, prostate, lip oropharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers in 2022. This increase occurred after two-thirds of the Japanese population received a third or later dose of mRNA vaccines. The researchers state the increased mortality is not due to COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care during lockdowns, but potentially an effect of the vaccine. The study notes that several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination, discussing possible causal links between cancer and mRNA vaccines. The data reflects deaths from cancer, not necessarily new cases, potentially representing aggressive forms of cancer. Graphs were shown indicating excess mortality for breast, pancreatic, lip oropharyngeal, prostate, leukemia, ovarian, and all cancers.

The speaker discusses data from the VAERS database, highlighting a significant increase in cancer-related conditions following COVID vaccination compared to other vaccines. They mention the overexpression of PD L1, a molecule linked to cancer, post-vaccination. PD L1 can suppress immune response, potentially increasing cancer risk. The speaker emphasizes the concerning implications of this finding.

Two early population studies examining COVID-19 vaccines and cancer risk reported substantial increases in various cancers. The first study, conducted in Italy, followed about 300,000 individuals for roughly 30 months and found: - About a 23% increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations. - Increases of about 40% to 60% in hospitalizations for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, and for leukemia/lymphoma. A newer study from South Korea, encompassing over eight million people, examined cancer risks after vaccination and corroborated the Italian findings while expanding on them. It reported: - About a 26% increase in overall cancer risk. - Increases across six major cancer types, including gastric (stomach), thyroid, colorectal, and breast cancers, as well as other cancers described as very rare. The speakers characterize these results as an absolute disaster and claim that the data corroborate all experimental evidence. They state that these findings confirm that the vaccines have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. Further explanations offered include: - The datasets corroborate the observed cancer increases. - The authors suggest these increases can be explained by “gene expression chaos” documented in their other studies. - They also cite “genomic integration” seen in stage four cancer patients as part of the mechanism behind the observed cancer risks. The overall message presented is that there is a widespread, vaccine-associated rise in cancer incidence, supported by the Italian and Korean population data, and reinforced by their cited molecular and genomic observations. The speakers conclude that this situation is a disaster that must be acknowledged immediately.

- "Turbo cancer was framed by mainstream media as being basically a myth, but it's not anymore." - "Now it is in the scientific peer reviewed literature, an entire manuscript dedicated on COVID nineteen vaccine induced turbo cancer." - "Unusually aggressive cancers that kind of just like they start with a small tumor, they get the shot, and then they have like 50 tumors or this single tumor grows into a large mass and then they end up dying shortly thereafter." - "So these turbo cancers are usually seen in young individuals as outlined in that study." - "You don't see these cancers in these young individuals and there's so many different mechanisms biologically that the protein does indeed induce cancer." - "One is hyper inflammation makes the body primed for cancerous growths." - "One is genetic dysregulation, gene expression chaos." - "And another one is it literally suppresses tumor suppressor genes, p53 and BRCA, BRCA."

The speaker claims to have identified 13 mechanisms by which mRNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer, asserting that even one is sufficient to warrant an immediate ban. They attribute the rise in "turbo cancers" in young people to these vaccines, despite media outlets citing diet or environmental factors. The speaker alleges government censorship prevents open discussion about vaccine risks, with editors and producers reportedly discouraged from publishing anything that might undermine public confidence in vaccines. They argue the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, particularly for young people, and that statistical modeling supporting their use is flawed. The speaker highlights an article in the Mail on Sunday where they and James Royal asserted a causal link between the vaccines and cancer, citing cases of relapsed and new stage four cancers. They criticize the medical community for not routinely collecting patients' vaccine histories and dismissing any potential association. The speaker believes the risk of cancer increases exponentially with each vaccine dose.

Speaker 0: The very first two population studies that looked at COVID nineteen vaccines and cancer risk both found massive increases in multiple cancers. And these two studies, one of them is from Italy. One of them followed 300,000 Italians for about thirty months. That was the first one that found about twenty three percent increased risk of overall cancer hospitalizations. And they also found increases about forty to sixty percent increases in breast cancer hospitalizations, in colorectal cancer, as well as bladder cancer, and leukemia lymphoma. Now we have this new study that just came out that out of South Korea that looked at over eight million Koreans and looked at the cancer risks after vaccination there, and they corroborated the Italian data and even expanded on it. And they found about twenty six percent increase in overall cancer. But they also found increases across six major types of cancer including gastric, thyroid, colorectal, breast, all sorts of cancers were increased, very rare cancers. So this is an absolute disaster, and it corroborates all the experimental evidence. It's now confirmed that these shots have unleashed a turbo cancer epidemic. The datasets corroborate, and we can now explain it with the gene expression chaos we are seeing as documented in our other studies as well as the genomic integration we are seeing in stage four cancer patients. This is a disaster. This has to be acknowledged immediately.

The speaker claims to have identified 13 mechanisms by which mRNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer, asserting that even one is sufficient to warrant an immediate ban. They attribute the rise of "turbo cancers" in young people to the vaccines, despite media outlets citing diet or environmental factors. The speaker alleges government censorship prevents open discussion about vaccine risks, with editors and producers reportedly considering it a crime to undermine public confidence in them. They state the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, with benefits existing only in statistical models. They criticize COVID modeling for being consistently inaccurate and exaggerating the severity of the pandemic. The speaker highlights a Mail on Sunday article where they and James Royal argued that the vaccines cause cancer, citing relapsed cancers and new stage four cancers in healthy individuals. They conducted a survey revealing that they were the only doctor asking patients about their vaccine history, while other doctors deny any association between the vaccines and cancer.

"you were two to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the COVID vaccine than you were to be hospitalized with COVID." "what is more better described as a gene therapy than as a vaccine." "$500,000,000 worth of investments in the mRNA technology for vaccines." "mega analysis of all the data." "Hundreds of studies, peer reviewed studies showing the harms of the mRNA vaccine." "the side effects of this gene therapy was so enormous and progressive, it was difficult to fathom." "The millions of molecules of mRNA entering the cell is creating biochemical havoc." "It's disrupting protein metabolism." "It's interfering with tumor suppressor genes." "In other words, it may be a risk factor for cancer." "it's highly likely that the COVID vaccines have been a factor, a significant factor in the cancer of members of the royal family."

A scientist reports an increase in cancer cases worldwide after the rollout of experimental injections. CDC data confirms this trend, with a significant increase in cancer cases. The spike protein in these injections binds to the p53 gene, leading to cancer pathways opening up. There are numerous harmful effects caused by the spike protein, and the scientist is concerned about the lack of long-term safety studies for these products. The lipid nanoparticles in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, not intended for human or veterinary use, have been administered to over 5 billion people. The J&J vaccine, containing a carcinogenic substance, was quietly pulled from the market. The NIH is withholding information on cancer pathways and forced the retraction of a scientific paper. These injections also affect the immune system's ability to function properly, impacting cancer prevention. The scientist apologizes for those who received these injections without informed consent and urges action at the local level to stop further harm.

Speaker 0: Let's start with I had predicted, unfortunately, and I hate that I am right. I predicted before the vaccines were ever launched to the public that they would have a profound impact on the immune system. And as a result of that alone, would likely cause increased cancer rates just because of their immunological impact. So let's start, if you would, just by talking a little bit about what you are seeing in the data, in the numbers with regard to cancers, what kinds of cancers, those sorts of things. And then maybe we'll get into the weeds, you and I, about perhaps some of the pathology of that, why that might be, some theories for why we're seeing these numbers. Speaker 1: You know, Doctor. Kelly, I've been tracking these turbo cancers as they're being called, these very aggressive cancers that are showing up in young COVID vaccinated people. The youngest case I've reported is a 12 year old boy who had a Moderna vaccine and came down with, end stage brain cancer that killed him in less than a year. I'm seeing it in teenagers in university and college students who are mandated to take COVID vaccines. People in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties are coming down with stage four cancers. These cancers are presenting at a late stage, stage three, but usually stage four. These are lymphomas, leukemias, these are breast cancers, colon cancers, lung cancers, hepatobiliary cancers, testicular cancers in young men, ovarian cancers in women, kidney cancers, renal cell cancers, melanomas, skin cancers, and sarcomas as well. So these are the types of cancers that are showing up in a younger cohort than oncologists expect. They're showing up at a late stage. The tumors can grow very large. So some of these tumors are described as football sized, even watermelon sized, you know, these are ten, fifteen centimeter tumors, and they're very aggressive and and they really they spread very rapidly. Even when the surgeons are trying to get at them, trying to surgically excise them so that they could control the tumor, what they usually find after surgery is that the tumor has already spread. It's already spread to the lymph nodes, it's already spread to the lungs or the bones, very aggressive cancers, and really related to the COVID-nineteen vaccine specifically, and mRNA vaccines, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Speaker 0: One of the things, me just step back for a second, because one of the things that might not be known to our audience is that all cancers are not created equal with regard to the population that they hit. You know, for example, we not uncommonly and tragically see certain blood cancers in children leukemias, for example. It wouldn't be uncommon, to to see a brain tumor, brain cancers sometimes in young children. It would be extraordinarily uncommon to see a colon cancer in somebody before the fourth or fifth decade. Very uncommon to see a lung cancer before the fourth or fifth decade. Those sorts of things, extremely uncommon to see. So some of these cancers that we are seeing, and I think you're getting at that, things like these colon cancers, we are now seeing colon cancers in people in their late teens, twenties, and thirties. And again, as you said, very aggressive colon cancers. So it's not just that cancers per se, but it's seeing cancers in in groups of people in whom they'd never seen before. So let's in terms of just to put some magnitude on it. In terms of give us some sense of the magnitude versus what we would have considered to be the baseline numbers. Speaker 1: You know, it's very hard to get a sense of this because it's almost impossible to get good cancer data from from the governments. Know, Ed Dowd has talked about this, the difficulty of getting good data. You know, I've tried to get cancer data here in Canada from Statistics Canada, from the Canadian Cancer Society, and they are not reporting any data from 2021 or 2022. It seems they're holding this data back. And so I'm left with anecdotal evidence. When Ed Dowd, you know, he'll report from US insurance data that disability rates, in the working population, let's say, eighteen to sixty four, who abided by the COVID vaccine mandates, disability rates are 500% higher compared to the working population who dropped out of the workforce and didn't want to get the vaccines. Well, a big portion of those disabilities are these cancers, are these cancer diagnoses. And so, you know, I'm seeing an explosion of these cancers. I'm seeing it in doctors. I'm seeing it in nurses. I'm seeing it in other vaccine mandated professions. So all types of healthcare workers, I'm seeing it in teachers, I'm seeing it in police officers, firefighters, the military. You know, you see it in flight attendants, for example, you know, you had these airlines that wanted to have 100% vaccinated workforce. So really anywhere where there were very strict COVID vaccine mandates, that's where I'm seeing these explosions of these very aggressive cancers. And I can tell you, this year, '23, seems to be much worse. There's many more cases of these turbo cancers than in 2022 or 2021. The trend is upwards. The numbers are on the rise. You can see this on websites like GoFundMe. If you go on GoFundMe and you put stage four cancer and you can pick whatever cancer you want, you could put, you know, breast cancer, you could put lung cancer, colon cancer. Not only are you seeing the shocking ages, young ages of these individuals who are reporting their cancers and their fundraising because, you know, they lose their jobs when they're undergoing chemotherapy, for example, by you see just how many people are suffering are coming down from these cancers, especially in 2023. It's just unbelievable. It's a tsunami of cancer diagnosis.

This study looked at the population of South Korea and there were over 8,000,000 people who were vaccinated there and they drew from that population as well as several 100,000 who were not vaccinated for the comparison control group. They did a multivariate analysis where they found other variables associated with cancer and canceled those out. They eliminated any people who had had cancer or suspicion of cancer previously, so all these folks had never had cancer and they followed them for one full year from the time of their most recent injection or one full year from a picked reference date for the control group. What they found was quite astonishing because overall at twelve months, there was a substantially higher number of cancers found in the vaccinated group, and this comprised six different cancers that had a higher risk. You can see this on the forest plot that I’ll have up on screen, that this included thyroid cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer. All of those were elevated in the vaccinated group and the prostate and lung cancer were more than a fifty percent increase. This new technology is very risky and we can't say conclusively that it caused cancer, but certainly this is a very alarming finding and needs more research to back it up.

The speaker believes vaccines are causing cancer, with the risk increasing exponentially with each booster, because boosters suppress T cell response, which controls cancer. Experts claim messenger RNA is safe because we are exposed to it daily and it's easily disposed of, but the speaker argues that mRNA vaccines are stabilized to prevent disposal, which is the core problem. The speaker claims that mRNA can integrate and hack your genetic code, promoting oncogenes and down-regulating suppressor genes. They state that the UK and Australia have invested heavily in mRNA technology without proper oversight. The speaker advocates for ending this culture and improving population health.

Traveling the country, the speaker has heard anecdotes from physicians about unusual cancer cases following the rollout of boosters. In Florida, one physician reported seeing five kidney cancers in young patients in one month, whereas they usually see one per decade. A chief of oncology reported seeing five astrocytoma brain cancers in young patients after the booster rollout, when they usually see one per year. Another physician reported their 21-year-old son developed salivary gland cancer after getting a booster. The speaker claims these are not normal cancers, and they've heard of patients with stable cancer or who have been cancer-free for years developing stage four disease after getting vaccinated. Doctors in France and the UK have allegedly confirmed similar observations, and a family doctor from Ireland reported seeing the "weirdest cancers" after the shot rollout. The speaker concludes that these anecdotes suggest something is wrong.

Nicholas Holcher, an epidemiologist and foundation administrator at the McCullough Foundation, appears on the WiderWake Media Podcast to discuss what he calls harms from the mRNA COVID vaccines and to critique mainstream approaches to the pandemic and public health policy. - Vaccine definitions and mRNA technology - Pre-2000 definition: a vaccine is an injectable or oral product that introduces a killed part of a virus or an inactivated form to the body so that encountering a wild-type version would not infect or would cause a less severe illness. - He asserts that mRNA injections are not vaccines: they are a gene transfer platform using modified messenger RNA with long persistence in the body (via N1-methylpseudouridine), delivered in lipid nanoparticles. He claims these bubbles distribute systemically, including to the brain, heart, bone marrow, and reproductive system, and that they instruct cells to produce a spike protein, effectively turning organs into “toxic spike protein production factories.” He says this leads to autoimmune attack on those tissues and contributes to adverse events, including myocarditis, strokes, immune destruction, and “turbo cancers.” - History and purpose of mRNA in vaccines - According to Holcher, work on this technology existed for decades but animals testing showed high mortality or sterilization in ferrets and mice, preventing approval except under a declared global emergency. He contends the COVID-19 crisis enabled emergency use authorization across Western countries, with ulterior aims to inject the globe with mRNA technology. - Global impact and uptake - He estimates about 70% of the global population received at least one COVID-19 injection (mRNA or viral vector). He notes Eastern countries used non-mRNA platforms (e.g., AstraZeneca/J&J in some places; Sinovac elsewhere) but that uptake in the West was high. - Harms and evidence - Excess deaths: cites a study by Dennis Brancourt et al. estimating around 17 million deaths worldwide as a result of COVID injections (as of September 2023); he claims US deaths could be in the hundreds of thousands to millions. - Turbo cancers: cites multiple studies in 2023 showing increased risk of seven cancer types (colorectal, bladder, breast, thyroid, prostate, etc.) in vaccinated groups; cites a major cancer journal, OncoTarget, reporting hundreds of turbo cancer cases across 27 countries, with Pfizer contributing most cases. Holcher also mentions his own group’s work with Neo7 Bioscience documenting genomic integration of vaccine-derived mRNA in a stage IV bladder cancer patient (31-year-old woman) with a segment of mRNA found in circulating tumor DNA on chromosome 19; another study reported thousands of dysregulated genes in post-vaccine cancers, including p53, KRAS, and BRCA. - Definition of turbo cancer: per Merrick et al., rapid, aggressive tumor progression with sudden onset and early metastasis, often in younger individuals, and resistant to treatment. - Fertility, pregnancy, and autism - Fertility: cites studies suggesting fertility impacts, including Karaman et al. finding depletion of primordial follicles in rats after mRNA vaccination; Manichi et al. reporting 33% lower conception rates in vaccinated women in Denmark; a study indicating a ~20% drop in sperm concentration and motility with no recovery over five months. - Autism: asserts a large body of evidence linking vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders, citing a 136-study review with 107 studies finding positive associations between vaccines and neurodevelopmental issues, including autism, attributed to toxicity and immune system disruption, particularly in children with high vaccine exposure and reduced detox capacity (CYP450 impairment). - Other topics tied to vaccines and public response - The COVID-19 period and vaccine skepticism: claims the pandemic catalyzed a large anti-vaccine movement because people were compelled to take an experimental gene therapy product. - Sam Altman and gene editing: discusses Altman’s Preventive venture with the aim to reduce heritable diseases via in utero gene editing but warns of the path to designer babies and the potential for harm in early-iteration edits, citing prior CRISPR experiments on human embryos that produced deformed offspring or nonviable results. - AI, workers, and future society: predicts two-tier society with implanted or enhanced individuals and a replacement of human labor by robots and AI systems; discusses military and surveillance ambitions in gene editing and AI augmentation. - Mental health and digital life: references a randomized trial showing that turning off mobile Internet improved depression scores and well-being to an extent comparable to or greater than antidepressants. - World Health Organization (WHO): notes the US has pulled out of the WHO, arguing this is good for the US but potentially harmful for others still in the organization; expresses concerns about the pandemic treaty and ongoing global health governance, including vaccine passport-style surveillance. - FDA and public health policy: acknowledges some shifts (e.g., cutting doses from the childhood schedule) but argues the FDA remains compromised and too aligned with vaccine industry interests; criticizes the removal of a potential black box warning for vaccines and calls for more accountability. - Resources and contact - Holcher invites listeners to follow him on X (Twitter) at @nichulsher and to read their work on focalpoints.com and through McCullough’s network. Note: The transcript presents Holcher’s claims and interpretations about vaccines, turbo cancers, autism, fertility, and policy changes. The summary reproduces these points without endorsement or evaluation.

Speaker 0 argues that, when re-examining the data from the original study, the raw numbers reveal a different pattern than what the study’s modeling suggested. Specifically, they state that, in the raw proportions, every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group. This includes cancer, which the study reportedly treated as a control condition and claimed there was no difference for. According to Speaker 0, the study’s use of cancer as a control is at odds with the raw data they observed. They claim that there was a difference in cancer outcomes, contrary to the study’s implication of no difference. They emphasize that, with rare outcomes, the modeling employed in the original analysis is not very reliable, and as a result, the study did not perform any basic proportional analysis. Speaker 0 states that when they performed a basic proportional analysis themselves, cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. They mention that this result is “explained biologically” and assert that there is biological plausibility behind it. Key points: - Raw proportions show all 22 chronic disease categories higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. - The original study used cancer as a control and claimed no difference, which Speaker 0 disputes based on the raw data. - Modeling for rare outcomes is described as not very reliable. - A basic proportional analysis by Speaker 0 indicates cancer is 54% higher in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated. - A biological explanation or plausibility is asserted for the observed cancer difference in the vaccinated group.

The speaker explains that the messenger RNA in the shots is contaminated with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called s v 40. They mention that s v 40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. The speaker suggests that the shots promote cancer through s v 40 and inhibit our ability to fight cancer. They also mention that cancer rates are increasing. The speaker raises the question of how much of this is due to the vaccines.