reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 argues that the United States lacks full sovereignty because an intentional “supranational architecture” created in the last 10 years surrounding World War II remains in place above the nation. They claim this architecture “came into play before world war ii ever ended,” and say their belief—supported by “real documents” they include in a book—is that World War III and much of what is happening now was planned before the end of World War II. Speaker 1 traces this to the Dulles brothers—“three americans,” including “two wall street lawyer brothers from Sullivan and Cromwell, known as the Dulles brothers,” and another Wall Street lawyer, McKittrick, who ran the Bank of International Settlements during World War II. They further claim that architects from the EU (Europe, including Germany), the city of London, and multiple banking institutions helped create a supranational architecture and supranational intelligence agency architecture that has “worked for it ever since,” with the people of the United States “pay[ing] for it all since World War II.” They also say that “these 18 months near the end of World War II ended the sovereignty of the United States of America,” and that the country is still “stuck in that today.” Speaker 0 expands the claim to other countries, saying the end of World War II also ended Japan’s sovereignty, that Japan has been occupied “even to this day,” and that the U.S. dictates terms including that Japan must “buy U.S. treasuries” and “float the dollar no matter what happens to your economy.” Speaker 0 also cites Taiwan as another example and asks how these impacts extend to the rest of the world. Speaker 1 answers by stating “Switzerland was not neutral,” and says that World War I “seems to me to have been a false flag.” They reference Smedley Butler’s post–World War I warning that “all wars are banker's wars” from the book *War is a Racket*, and claim that endless war for profit became an “operating manual” for a “supranational architecture” they call an “international banking cartel” and its global public-private partners. Speaker 1 links this to the creation of the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), describing it as set up for reparations after World War I, but claiming that BIS “refunded Hitler's army.” They say the Dulles brothers, particularly John Foster Dulles, worked for international banks and represented relationships between Nazi Germany and the United States, including Standard Oil of New Jersey and IG Farben, and helped rebuild Germany’s military after World War I to allow for World War II. Speaker 1 further claims that BIS served as a meeting point during World War II among “Nazi bankers” and “American bankers,” including the city of London and German bankers, while a continent was “pillaged” and “60 million people” were affected. They say Switzerland conducted “business as usual,” taking in money from the Nazis that was taken from Czechoslovakia and elsewhere into BIS. They also claim that Alan Dulles ran the OSS out of Switzerland “hand-in-hand with the Nazi bankers and the Nazi intelligence people” and that the “Bank of England” created the post–World War II international financial architecture that “fed off of the same families” associated with the Federal Reserve under Wilson.

The transcript argues that Alan Dulles is the man behind the CIA and is Swiss by descent, from the patrician Male Prevot family of Geneva, with ties to the Male family and the Geneva patrician circles. It insists the CIA and OSS were run by the Male Prevot family and that they let only Swisses in on all key positions, claiming that the Geneva headquarters were controlled by this Swiss network. It states that in 1921 Dulles was posted to Bern, Switzerland by his uncle Secretary Lansing, becoming chief of intelligence at the American legation, where he was met by cousins from the Male family. The transcript asserts that Petit Dahl (Dulles’s relative) had married Julia Male Prevot, linking the Privost and Mallet families as powerful in international politics and finance, holding hereditary seats in Geneva’s Council of Two Hundred. This group, along with British royals, allegedly formed a joint committee of spymasters for the aristocracy dating back to the eighteenth century. The Male Prevot are also claimed to have injected the Scottish Rite of Masonry into the United States. By the mid-1920s, Dulles is said to have become the first secretary of the American embassy in Berlin and to have been a director of Schroderbank, which allegedly handled Hitler’s personal funds. The narrative emphasizes that these Swiss connections span from Geneva to Basel and Tessin, arguing they are a distinct group that controlled key positions in the U.S. and Europe. The transcript also contends that during the war a British ambassador to Switzerland named Victor Male was from the same family as the CIA “Dolls.” It claims Alain (Alan) Dulles, a lawyer, worked at the US embassy in Bern in 1917 and befriended Vladimir Lenin, who spent years in Switzerland before the Red Terror. It asserts that during World War II Dulles lived at Herngasse 23 in Bern as the Swiss Director of the OSS, surrounding himself with Nazi officials and facilitating the transfer of Nazis to the United States through OSS connections and Operation Paperclip. It claims Dulles represented IG Farben in America and worked for Schroderbank, describing him as Swiss rather than American, and asserts that Swiss people financed the Nazis and became filthy rich through these operations. The piece alleges a million Swiss Americans in the U.S. and that Octagon (a supposed group) dominates the Pentagon. It contends that after the war Dulles became the first civilian director of the CIA (1953–1961) under Eisenhower, with Swiss sleeper agents in top posts, and that his brother John Foster Dulles became Secretary of State. The transcript concludes that Kennedy eventually fired Alan Dulles, who allegedly remained involved in cover-ups via the Warren Commission, and that “the Huns” took over the White House and key intelligence positions. Speaker 1 echoes the conspiracy framing by calling for down with Octagon and Swiss banks, accusing them of robbing the poor, financing Adolf Hitler, and waging wars, and demanding freedom for the world and opposition to Swiss influence.

The speaker discusses why Youssef Mullins was attacked by the media, which is described as being owned by “the tiny hats.” They refer to a “secret holocaust by Youssef Mullins” and say Mullins explained something interesting. The claim is that at the beginning of World War II, the Poles were attacked, and the attackers were said to be the Germans, but the speaker asserts that it was the Tiny Hats who did the attacking. They allege that 10,000 Poles were shot and that the Germans were blamed, but the Tiny Hats were responsible. The speaker says diaries and notes were found showing this to be true, and that the trials revealed the Germans had to admit fault even though they didn’t do it. They also claim that the Soviets admitted that they did it in front of the US government. The speaker contends this context explains why Eustace Mullins (mentioned as Youssef Mullins) was attacked when considering all the work he did. They add that the gas chambers were “make believe,” and that Mullins presented all of this in front of Congress and won.

- Speaker 0 expresses humility before the Knights of Malta, describing the order as ancient and its history as a calling that prompts gratitude rather than pride. - Speaker 1 asserts that the Vatican is the “most serious evil organization on the face of the earth” and connects the Knights of Malta to the founders of the CIA in America, noting that six founders were Catholics and members of the Knights of Malta; he claims that banking families and institutions in the U.S. (Bank of America, Union Bank in California) were started and are run by Knights of Malta, Catholic Masons, and that European rulers rule by “divine right” granted by the Pope. - Speaker 2 expands on this by describing the Pope as representing God, and claims the Pope designates certain families to rule in France, Germany, and Britain, with the Pope’s authority underpinning “divine right.” - Speaker 2 notes Archbishop Edward Cardinal Egan of New York as a knight of Malta heading all three tongues of the Knights of Malta in the United States, overseen by Jesuits of Fordham University, mentioning Avery Cardinal Dulles (son of John Foster Dulles) as a knight of Malta who, as a Jesuit, allegedly oversaw Cardinal Egan in a conspiracy to bring down the World Trade Center and bomb the Pentagon, with George J. Tennant as a central figure who allegedly received the presidential Medal of Freedom. - Speaker 3 claims the deep state is above governments, consisting of the Rothschilds and the Vatican (including both the Black Pope and the White Pope) as well as Chabad Jews, using Freemasons and the Knights of Malta as fixers, with World Banks as their managers. - Speaker 4 describes the Knights of Malta as a Christian Masonic degree emphasizing Christian virtues, noting their diplomatic immunity and the ability to import/export goods without customs, and that they cannot be arrested or charged by law enforcement. - Speaker 5 supports this, saying members carry diplomatic passports, and that the order began as citizens of the United States of America. - Speaker 6 discusses the Templars creating banking and usury, contrasting with other claims about Jewish bankers, and asserts the Rothschilds are “keepers of the Vatican treasury,” wearing Maltese crosses, and that Rome needed Jewish bankers to be the bankers, with the Maltese cross as a symbol tied to the Vatican and Rome. - Speaker 7 points to Epstein in a claimed image bowing before Pope John Paul II, describing the Maltese cross as an insignia of a knight of the Catholic Church and tying it to Nazi-era symbols; they also connect Adolf Hitler to Jesuit influence and the funding of the Third Reich, naming Franz von Papen as a knight of Malta. - Speaker 8 references the Rothschilds again, the Vatican’s connection to World War II and the Jesuits, and asserts that the Third Reich and Holocaust were birthed by Rome and the Jesuits; mentions the connection between Napoleon’s campaigns and Jesuit guidance, and alleges the Knights of Malta, Teutonic Knights, and other Catholic orders influenced 20th-century events. - Speaker 9 claims the papacy is a military operation, with archbishops and cardinals as military officers under the Jesuit general and the papal guard; notes that the FCC leadership includes a Knight of Malta on the board and that Jesuit influence pervades U.S. institutions. - Speaker 11 asserts that P2 Freemasonry is tied to Opus Dei and the Knights of Malta, describes P2 as promoting right-wing death squads and drug cartels, and alleges Vatican CIA involvement, with the Vatican owning the Watergate Hotel and the CIA conducting dirty work there to remove Nixon. - Speaker 12 and others interject on love and marriage while reinforcing the overarching conspiracy framework, including references to the Knights of Malta, the Jesuits, the Crown, and various symbols linked to Catholic power, while claiming decades of hidden influence over global events.

The speaker claims to have extensive knowledge about secret societies like Freemasonry, the Rosaei cruise side, Knights Malta, Golden Dawn, Tempelli, Horto, Orientalis, and the Order of Saint John of Jerusalem. They argue that these organizations are subversive and have played a role in the destruction of nations. The speaker also mentions that many Jews are not members of these organizations and that the mysteries and knowledge originated in the Middle East. They criticize Freemasonry for practicing pagan rituals and claim that it is a religion separate from Christianity. The speaker expresses frustration with the public's acceptance of deception and manipulation by these organizations.

Speaker 0: 6,000,000 number used lot many times before World War two by, like, newspapers. Is that true? I've seen that mentioned quite a bit with that being used. Speaker 1: If you wanna read up all on this, it's volume six of the Holocaust Hangposts here. It's the first Holocaust. Talks about all the many times that, particularly, New York Times was good at it, as I call it, the New York Times because it's owned and run by Jews. They were propagating the 6,000,000 number, and they were using first, the term Holocaust already during the czarist time in Russia before the first world war. 6,000,000 Jews are threatened. 6,000,000 Jews are dying. They're threatened by a holocaust. It goes into the first world war after the first world war with the Bolshevik revolution, the New York Times, the Jewish community in The United States to a large degree supporting the Bolshevist revolution, which was mainly a a Jewish supported revolution. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: then you if that revolution collapses, the Jews are facing countrywide pogroms that would potentially wipe them out. So they knew it's either the the Bolshevik, revolution succeeds or we're gonna have a holocaust. And they were talking about that, in this context. When you support the Jews, 6,000,000 are about to die and so forth. It goes on. There is a straight line going from the eighteen eighties into the second world war Killing final five. 6,000,000 Jews are dying or threatened or being killed. So it's nothing new. The area, Russia, Poland, Germany has changed. The the villain, the czar, the white anti Bolshevik civil war people, or then Hitler and his acronies. Speaker 0: So what you’re saying is that— Speaker 1: So the ingredients to the story have changed, but not the story in general.

- Speaker 0, John, announces: “A Muslim shooter out of Bondi Beach is apprehended by another Muslim. Could it be a false flag? Of course not. That would be crazy.” He hands off to Jessica. - Jessica reports: “The shooting took place at a Hanukkah celebration on Sunday, leaving 15 people dead. However, there was one lucky chosen person who survived not only October 7, but also a bullet grazing his head.” - Speaker 2 (unnamed in this excerpt) says: “I survived October 7. I lived in Israel the last thirteen years. We came here only two weeks ago to work with a Jewish community to fight anti Semitism, to fight this bloodthirsty, ravaging hatred. That’s why you’re here. That’s why I’m here.” - Speaker 3 quips: “Wow, who bandages a wound without cleaning it?” Speaker 4 replies: “Nobody, but it’s better theatrics that way after all. He is the chosen victim.” - Inside the hospital, Speaker 3 describes the chosen victim being treated for a bullet to the head, “turns out it’s just stage blood, corn syrup. You guys actually fell for that? Ridiculous. Oy, Ve, please don’t air this.” - Speaker 3 then identifies the “chosen victim” as “the president of the Australian Jewish Council and moved there two weeks ago.” Another speaker, Speaker 4, retorts: “Thanks, Ching Chong. I’m pretty sure Satan told him this would happen.” - The discussion continues with insinuations: “Right. Perfect way to take their guns too.” “I’m like 90% sure he was in the IDF.” “Every single time.” - Speaker 5 argues: “Your call for a Palestinian state pures full fuel on the antisemitic fire. It rewards Hamas terrorism. It emboldens those who menace Australian Jews and encourages the Jew hatred now stalking your streets. Antisemitism is a cancer.” - Speaker 3 responds: “Thanks, Satan. Blame the sand people. Am I right? Exactly. Let's all just forget about the fake weapons of mass destruction and genocide you committed.” - Speaker 5 adds: “This is the punishment that God gave us. We killed the Jews. We got instead of the Jews that were very good for us, we got these Muslim refugees from all over the world who destroying us, and the Christians cannot even celebrate Christmas now.” - Speaker 4 comments: “Holy victim. I don’t really trust people who only talk about what happened to them.” Speaker 3 counters: “But never what they did to anyone else. Right? That’s called accountability.” - Speaker 0 interjects: “Seriously, let's start with the 60,000,000 Christians in Russia they slaughtered.” Speaker 3: “Don’t get me started about the Rothschilds and nine eleven.” Speaker 4 supplies: “Let’s see what our investigation team thinks.” - Speaker 4 notes: “So official story says investigators found an ISIS flag in his car, which makes you think, why do they never attack Israel? Eric Warsaw, break it down for us. Israel actually admitted to funding and giving small arms to ISIS affiliated groups, and people still refused to see his controlled opposition.” - Speaker 3 asks: “What do you think of what happened today?” Speaker 4 responds: “Absolute tragedy, but I saw that Navid Akram was trending in Israel just days before.” - Speaker 2 signs off with thanks, and Speaker 3 introduces: “And this is the hero who risked everything, but the media refuses to talk about it. His name is Ahmed El Ahmed, which is obviously very sandy, so let's go ahead and change subjects.”

The speaker claims that a powerful, worldwide fraternal order, Freemasonry, operates behind governments and monetary systems. This order, they say, was instrumental in founding the United States, as evidenced by Masonic symbols like the pyramid on the dollar bill and Pennsylvania's role as the "keystone state." The speaker alleges that the International Red Cross is a Masonic organization, and that Hollywood promotes violence for a reason. They question the origins of AIDS and suggest biological warfare experiments. The speaker asserts that the government gets what it pays for in education, and that mass media and entertainment are used to distract people from thinking. The speaker identifies groups like the Bohemian Society and Skull and Bones as part of America's secret establishment, connected by bloodlines to European aristocracies. They claim John F. Kennedy was assassinated for disrupting this power structure. The speaker discusses the Illuminati, founded by Adam Weishaupt and financed by the Rothschilds, and its plan for a "New World Order," symbolized on the dollar bill. They connect this to historical revolutions and figures like Hitler and Prometheus. The speaker alleges that NATO changed its fatigue colors in anticipation of a war in a tan-colored region. They claim international bankers financed Hitler and the communist revolution. They state that the government allows drugs and illegal immigration to enter the country. The speaker also connects Freemasonry to various symbols, organizations, and historical events, including the Olympic torch, university alumni, and religious garb. They criticize the Democratic Party and claim that politicians are controlled by secret societies. They also allege that Ronald Reagan visited a Nazi SS cemetery as a signal to secret societies.

Speaker 0 describes symbols allegedly connected to the Teutonic Knights and pharaonic associations: in the middle of the war on 03/01/1940, Deutch Ritter Ardens, the Teutonic cross, and a “healing day” phrase tied to final solutions; claims Hitler forbade the order of the Teutonic Knights in 1938, though a picture from 1940 supposedly shows the same with a black cross; asserts the Nazis called themselves Das Haerenfalk or the master race, and that this “master race” concept actually targets the Teutonic Order rather than being purely German in origin. He states the phrase is mis-translated but that Hitler and others meant the Teutonic Order. Speaker 1 discusses Ulmer Schacht (Hjalmar Schacht), Hitler’s Reichsbank president (1933–1939) and economics minister (1934–1937). He notes Schacht’s prominent role in implementing Nazi policies and his nickname “the old wizard.” He claims Schacht, a known Freemason, joined the Masonic Johannes Lodge Urania for immortality in 1908 and cites Schacht’s autobiography Confessions of the Old Wizard to support Freemasonry in his family background, including his father’s Freemasonry and connections to American lodges and Enlightenment-era Masonic notables. Speaker 0 repeats a claim that Adolf Switler (Hitler) was a liar and that the Teutonic Order was outlawed in 1938, with reestablishment in 1945; he contrasts what he saw in 1940 with the idea that the Teutonic Knights and the Nazis share symbols (black cross) and that the Nazis believed in the “master race,” asserting this is not truly German in origin but tied to the Teutonic Order. He asserts that what the Nazis meant by “master race” was the Teutonic Order. Speaker 2 says “and here is the proof.” Speaker 3 mentions a Templars bank in German in Palestine before the State of Israel, showing a flag tied to the Templars; claims the bank of the Templars existed in the region that is now Israel. Speaker 4 mentions several Templar-related myths: Knights Templar had one of the largest fleets; skull and bones as a symbol on Templar graves; after the Pope and King of France destroyed the Templars, their fleet supposedly escaped and became pirates; asks why pirates were called “brotherhood” and links the skull and crossbones to the Russell Trust at Yale ( Skull and Bones), naming George Bush as a member. He asserts Yale’s Skull and Bones tomb decorations were Nazi-like (Maltese crosses, swastikas) and claims lodge numbers (322) tie to Nazism; alleges control by German secret societies such as the Illuminati, OTO, and Thule, and accuses Bush of CIA involvement since his college days, as a Skull and Bones member. Speaker 0 ties Isis to the SS and Freemasonry as “pharaonic Freemasonry” unrelated to European white supremacy, labeling it occult. Speaker 5 notes the OASS (Order of the Ancient and Secret) was founded by Knights of Malta members, describing it as a Roman secret society of Freemasons with deep European roots; connects Knights Templars to international bankers in Switzerland, claiming Switzerland avoids war because the Templars “call home.” He laments public unawareness of Nazism’s symbols in institutions, including hospitals and government buildings. Speaker 0 explains the hexagon as headshed and the six-point diagram representing those who give orders; octagon as the executional Nazi Templar army’s “universal blue army,” with eight representing the octagon and the base in Switzerland, not the eighth letter; asserts Nazism is an organization against the white race, citing the murder of non-Jewish Germans and Germans in camps, and claims 18 and 88 numerology (Adolf Hitler and Heil Hitler) feed mystical powers to a dark pharaonic organization, the Octagon of the Nazi Templars, while SS stands for Isis, implying occult invocation.

Speaker 0 says Western European populations support what he calls a “suicidal war on Russia through Ukraine” because elites in Zelensky’s Ukraine use corruption to maintain control over their population, rather than protecting countries from Russia or the Soviet Union. He adds that the elites aim to protect societies from becoming democratic. Speaker 1 agrees and frames the pattern as one where leaders who prioritize national interest are eliminated. He cites Libya as an example, saying Muammar Gaddafi cared about Libyans and Africans, but was assassinated for defying the central banking system and relying on gold with his own oil. He then says Venezuela today follows a similar pattern, where becoming nationalist and enriching one’s people leads to being killed or overthrown. Speaker 1 describes the mechanism as “Gladio networks” and intelligence agencies deploying operations against leaders. He recounts the Congo in the early 1960s after independence from Belgium, when Patrice Lumumba was elected prime minister. He says Lumumba approached the United States with a proposal to give the uranium that had been allocated to Belgium, but to use the portion going to Belgium to enrich Congolese people. He states that President Dwight D. Eisenhower would not meet with Lumumba and that Vice President Richard Nixon would not meet with him; Lumumba instead met with the secretary of state, who told him that he could not cut out Belgium and that Congo would receive the same arrangement as before, providing essentially nothing for building schools and hospitals. Speaker 1 says Lumumba then refused the deal, and that the Soviet Union would have been interested in uranium. Speaker 1 concludes that Lumumba was murdered by Operation Gladio elements controlled by Otto Skorzeny, described as Nazi, under Reinhard Gehlen’s German intelligence, the BND. He ends by saying that any prime minister or president who “stands up for their country” is targeted by an “international syndicate” seeking to control the world’s resources.

Speaker 3 argues that America can’t be “saved” if groups control major TV networks (CBS, NBC, Fox, and ABC) and control newspapers, asking how anything can be done if that control exists. Speaker 2 responds dismissively, calling the effort hopeless and addressing the claim by a “Federal agent,” then stating “clearly, the Jews control the media and they control me,” while also discussing “whole levels of propaganda and film you have to go through.” Speaker 2 says it is public knowledge that George Bush Senior is the third cousin of Queen Elizabeth and that they “are worth trillions,” but that “we hear that they’re worth nothing,” instead promoting “this nice family from Texas.” Speaker 0 asks whether they still talk. Speaker 2 says they meet routinely and that they met earlier this year in France at the Bilderberg Conference. Speaker 1 contrasts this with George making “the big stink when he kissed Queen Elizabeth on the face.” Speaker 3 then claims “Jews don’t control the media,” while also insisting that every Jew he knows is in television, producing shows, and stating, “I think your manager is a Jew, isn’t he?” Speaker 0 suggests an example like Aaron Spelling. Speaker 3 continues by saying the television industry is filled with “very wealthy Jewish guys,” claiming they “pretty much [are] controlling the media.” Speaker 2 says he checked a “Forbes 500 list of richest people” and they are “not” the case he supports, adding that “maybe two or three” television producers are Jews. Speaker 3 disagrees, stating there are many television producers and “I know so many Jewish guys that are television producers,” again asking whether that suggests Jews controlling the media. Speaker 2 shifts to history, saying that 600 years ago in England or France there were “pogroms,” describing them as having “purges,” and saying, “Now we know.” Speaker 0 asks about pronunciation (“Pogrom. Pogroms?”), and Speaker 2 acknowledges the pronunciation (“It’s pronounced pogrom.”). The exchange ends with Speaker 0 asking, “Isn’t that the ultimate form of control?” and Speaker 2 replying, “Scholarly,” then offering to answer Speaker 0’s question if they want.

The speaker asserts that “The Bush regime was front for the Vatican” and that “The most important enemy this country has today, people will never understand it, but the biggest enemy that this nation today has is the Vatican.” They question the origin of the nation’s founders, asking, “What do you think the founding fathers … where did they come from?” and answer, “they came from Europe.” The speaker traces history back to “twenty five hundred years Rome under the Caesars of Rome,” stating that “after the fall of the Caesars in the fourth century and with the coming of the Vatican in the fifth century,” Europe has been dominated for that same span. The claim is then made that “All of Europe has been dominated for over two thousand five hundred years by Rome and Europe has dominated the world for two thousand five hundred years.” The speaker urges listeners to “start looking at the Holy father, and you better start finding out the connection between the Vatican and the Nazi party of Adolf,” tying the Vatican to broader historical influence and power. The overarching assertion is that “The Bush regime was front for the Vatican,” and that the Vatican represents “the most important enemy this country has today.”

The “myth of the Holocaust” is described as being interpreted in a way that gives “the tiny hats” permission to maintain “international murder squads” and “assassins all across the world,” including against “the enemies of the tiny hats.” The transcript frames this as a claim about how this interpretation is used to justify actions taken globally, not limited by any particular set of targets, and it includes the idea of striking beyond the immediate group’s opponents. The speaker also states that “Who else do they use?” and answers that “they use this,” followed by the claim that they “use the intelligence,” and then “use these three-letter agencies against the people.” The “three-letter agencies” are presented as tools used to carry out this overall pattern, and the transcript emphasizes that the intelligence apparatus and those agencies are used “against the people.” Another central point in the transcript is that “the tiny hats treat the American goyim like their cattle.” This is presented as a specific example of how the speaker characterizes the treatment of Americans (“American goyim”) by the “tiny hats,” portraying it as dehumanizing and exploitative, and using the “cattle” comparison to describe the relationship. The speaker then adds a reported instance from military experience: “Marines soon found this out in Lebanon.” In that Lebanon scenario, the transcript claims that “the tiny hat soldiers routinely threaten them” and “offensively cut them off.” This is used as concrete supporting detail within the narrative, indicating that the behavior described earlier is said to have been observed in that location by Marines. Finally, the speaker suggests a direction for further work: “Something to kind of look into for books, you know?” This is presented as an encouragement to investigate these themes and events in written form, tying the earlier claims—about the Holocaust myth interpretation, international murder squads and assassins, use of intelligence and three-letter agencies, treatment of American goyim, and the reported Lebanon experience involving Marines—into a subject matter that the speaker suggests could be explored in books.

Speaker 0 argues that antisemitic violence and persecution have occurred in multiple places—“to the Jews,” in Spain, Germany, and that it “is happening” now and “going to happen in America”—unless “these people” begin “behaving,” claiming “they may be they have a death wish” and asserting this has been a problem “for centuries.” Speaker 1 responds by saying that, through the Bible, Jews have functioned as “God’s timepiece,” judged across generations and also used while keeping their identity. He claims the Bible distinguishes between two groups: one associated with “the remnant of God’s people” (which he says will be Jewish people) and another described as “the synagogue of Satan.” He states that in “the latter days” (which he says is “a thousand years,” as others call it), those in “the synagogue of Satan” are “energized by a supernatural power called the devil.” Speaker 1 adds that he believes this group has “a strange brilliance” and are “smart,” and that, in his view, they are “not inspired.” He says Hitler “didn’t” and references that this group had “a stranglehold on Germany,” including on “the banking of Germany” and “the media,” and that “this stranglehold has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain.” Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 then discuss political labeling and ideological constraints. Speaker 1 says people view “you” as conservative and claims that if one “leans a little bit” toward “the sociological thing,” the result is that “the whole thing will be closed” off, while stating he does not care how conservative someone is. He says he is “more conservative than you are,” but that he must “lean a little bit.” He describes meeting friends connected to the New York Times and people like Mr. Rosenthal, saying he knows some Jews are friendly to him because they know he is friendly to Israel, but they do not know “how I really feel” about what he says they are doing to the country. He concludes that he has “no power” to handle them, but would “stand up” if “under proper circumstances.”

Speaker 0: Get up to a certain level in the Masons that you're qualified to go into the Shriners, which I guess is really the height of the whole thing. And then you talked about the distinctive headgear that they wear, the fez, and which we've seen all these circuses, at parades, they come down the street on their motorcycles wearing their fez. Tell us first of all, is the Shriners and what is the significance of that fez? Speaker 1: Well you'll see the men in the shrine parades, the shrine circus wearing their red fez. In order to be a shriner, have to reach the highest degrees of Freemasonry, either the thirty second degree of the Scottish Rite or thirteenth degree of the York Rite, and then you're allowed to go into the shrine. Sadly, many Christians have gone into this, which is hard to understand because in order to be a shriner, in the initiation, every shriner takes a blood oath of allegiance to Allah as his God and Mohammed as his prophet. Speaker 0: Are you kidding me? Speaker 1: No. In light of nineeleven, you have to wonder how can any Christian take a blood oath of allegiance when God absolutely forbids that in the 10 commandments. Speaker 0: Yet they're not even allowed to pray in the name of Jesus at the lodge, are they? Speaker 1: No. But you swear allegiance that Allah is your God, Muhammad is your prophet. You are then given this red fez with the Islamic sword encrusted in jewels on the front of it. You will see men wearing this and people say, Why do they wear the red fez? It is because if you study history, during the seventh and eighth century as the Muslims swept across North Africa, they came to Fez, Morocco. Speaker 1: And in Fez, Morocco, there was a large community of Christians and Mohammed had ordered the slaughter of all the infidels, meaning Christians who would not bow down to Allah and Mohammed as the prophet. The Muslims went in with the Islamic sword and therein Fez slaughtered thousands of Christians. Then they took their Fez hats and they dipped it in the blood of Christians, glorying in the defeat of Christianity. That's why the Fez's are red, representing the blood of Christians defeated by the Islamic sword which they have encrusted in jewels on the front. There are Christians who walk around wearing this hat and Dave, to be honest, it's an abomination in the eyes of God. Speaker 2: Your political leaders are not only Masons, but some of them are secretly Muslim. They've taken a blood oath to Allah as their one and only God and Mohammed as his messenger, So they don't mind using their power and their influence to advance Islam's agenda. Speaker 3: Islam has contributed a lot to America. In the middle of the supreme court is in the rotunda is a statue or bust of the prophet Mohammed showing the respect that American law and jurisprudence has for the revealer of the Koran. Many of American presidents are masons and shriners who got to the thirty third degree and study the Koran in secret and have the star and crescent on their face. Malik. So Islam is at the basis of Western and American civilization.

The speaker dismisses the claim that Hitler was trying to get rid of the Rothschilds, stating that Hitler himself was a Rothschild. They argue that Hitler and the Nazis were set up and supported by the international banking community and crony capitalists, including those in America. They mention connections such as the Young Plan, funded by General Electric and JPMorgan, which led to the downfall of the German banking system and the rise of Hitler. They also discuss the Bank for International Settlements and the Milner Group's involvement. The speaker concludes that Hitler was not against the banking oligarchy and that the idea is Neo-Nazi propaganda.

The speaker argues that the Vatican is the most serious evil organization today. They claim that the Knights of Malta are connected to the six men who founded the CIA in America, asserting that those six founders were Catholics and members of the Knights of Malta. The speaker then asserts that in the United States banking sector, prominent institutions such as Bank of America and Union Bank in California were founded by people who are “knights of Malta, Catholic Masonry,” and that the individuals who currently run the banking establishment are also knights of Malta. They claim that all the kings and rulers in Europe are ruled by the divine right, described as the divine right of kings. The speaker asks, what represents the divine to grant the king the right? The pope. According to the speaker, the pope appoints certain families to be over the French, and the pope appoints certain people to be over the Germans and over the British. This leads to the assertion that, by divine right, the pope represents God and designates which families are holy and should rule, thereby granting them the authority to rule by divine right. The underlying implication is that these papal appointments and the concept of divine right legitimize centralized or hereditary rule across Europe, linking religious authority directly to political power.

During 03/01/1940, Speaker 0 points to “Deutch Ritter Ardens” and says it shows the cross of the Teutonic knights, linking it to a Swiss organization “from the church of the Black Cross.” Speaker 0 also describes additional symbols as coming from “the pharaohs,” including a seventh element labeled “Heis Heiltach,” and connects “Heil” to “the healing day.” Speaker 0 claims this process relates to “the final solution” and “healing,” and ties it to a Knight Stemplar slogan meaning “to help defend and heal.” Speaker 1 discusses Ulmer Schacht’s role with Hitler in the 1930s, stating he was president of the Reichsbank (1933–1939) and minister of economics (1934–1937), and that he implemented prominent policies for Hitler. Speaker 1 says Schacht was a Freemason, joining the Masonic Johannes Lodge Urania in 1908. Speaker 1 quotes Schacht’s autobiography, Confessions of the Old Wizard, asserting Schacht’s family connections to Freemasonry and describing his father and his great grandfather as Masonic figures. Speaker 0 says “Adolf Switler was just a damn Swiss liar,” referencing Wikipedia’s claim that the Teutonic order was outlawed by Adolf Hitler in 1938 and reestablished in 1945, and argues 1945 allowed it to continue “openly.” Speaker 0 also claims Hitler forbade Freemasons in 1938 while Hitler’s banker “Jamerschaft” and 33-degree Mason individuals had no problems in the Reich. Speaker 0 claims Nazis’ use of “Das Haerenfalk” (“master race”) was meant to refer to the Teutonic Order, asserting that “we are from the Teutonic Knights.” Speaker 3 describes a “Templars bank” in German located in Palestine during World War II before the state of Israel, and points to a flag said to come from the Templars. Speaker 4 claims the Knights Templars had one of the largest fleets, used skull-and-bones symbolism, and after being destroyed by the Pope and the King of France, the fleet escaped and became pirates. Speaker 4 connects piracy and “brotherhood” to a network of skull-and-bones references, including the Russell Trust at Yale University, and says George Bush is a member of the Knights Templar. Speaker 5 adds that Yale’s “skull and bones” secret fraternity was raided by Christian students, found Nazi-like decor (maltese crosses, swastikas), and links lodge number “322” to a German lodge. Speaker 5 claims control by German secret societies including the Illuminati and the OTO and the Thule, and asserts George Bush’s CIA membership, initiation details, and a symbolism tied to “the temple of Isis.” Speaker 6 says the OASS was founded by men who were members of the Knights of Malta, describing it as a Roman secret society of powerful Freemasons operating for “hundreds of years,” and links it to the Knights Templars and international banking in Switzerland, claiming Switzerland stays out of wars. Speaker 6 further claims symbols appear across hospitals, government buildings, and offices, and that most of the American public does not know where it came from. Speaker 0 concludes by asserting a code system linking hexagon/political pharaoh wings, square-and-compass forming a six-point diagram, six as ordering, octagon as the executional military wing of “Nazi Templars army” and “universal blue army,” and an interpretation of “8 pillars” as octagon. Speaker 0 claims “Nazism has nothing to do with protecting the white race,” asserting Hitler murdered 1,000,000 non-Jewish Germans in concentration camps and that 3.5 million Germans “passed time” there. Speaker 0 also ties “18” and “88” codes to feeding “mystical powers” to a “pharaonic organization” called “Octogon,” and ends by asserting “SS” means “Isis” and “Isis is calling you so you can die.”

"In 1943, the communists will use the word Nazis, fascist, and antisemitic in order to push the public mind to make them believe something by using repetition." "Germany was arresting all the bankers because they were charging so much interest that they were destroying the country." "60,000,000 Germans died." "after World War two, all these generals in America actually realized they fought the wrong enemy. The enemy is within." "Even general Patton said we should have fought with the fascist against the communist, otherwise, our country will degrade." "There's also another part that was left out of the story." "Yes."

The speaker claims the Swiss Guard represents the Knights Templar guarding the Pope, who is the "boss of Rome." They allege that the British flag, the Union Jack, is visible from above the Vatican, indicating a double cross by British banking fraternities and the Knights Templar. The speaker connects Switzerland to the Knights Templar Cross, which they say is the origin of organizations like the American Red Cross. They state the Red Cross is a Masonic Knights Templar organization that operates behind enemy lines and is, in fact, the enemy.

The speaker asserts that today the most serious evil organization on the face of the earth is the Vatican. The argument then centers on the Knights of Malta, claiming that the six men who founded the CIA in America were all Catholics and members of the Knights of Malta. The speaker further contends that when examining banking fraternities in America, such as the Bank of America and Union Bank in California, the founders and current leaders of these banks, who are running the banking establishment today, are all Knights of Malta, described as Catholic Masonry. From there, the talk expands to a broader claim about European governance, stating that all the kings and rulers in Europe ruled by the divine right, referred to as the divine right of kings. The speaker then questions what represents divine to grant the king the right to rule, answering that the pope holds that role. The pope, according to the claim, appoints certain families to be over the French, and the pope appoints certain people to be over the Germans and over the British. The concept of divine right is then tied directly to the pope, with the assertion that the pope represents God. Because the pope represents God, he is said to be able to declare that a particular family is holy and should rule. Consequently, the speaker argues, this church authority could then claim that they rule by divine right. The overall narrative connects the Vatican, the Knights of Malta, and Catholic Masonry to influential administrative and governmental power structures, including the founding of the CIA and the leadership of major banks, and frames this as evidence of a global governance dynamic justified by divine right under papal authority.

Speaker 0: Get up to a certain level in the Masons that you're qualified to go into the Shriners, which I guess is really the height of the whole thing. And then you talked about the distinctive headgear that they wear, the fez, and which we've seen all these circuses, at parades, they come down the street on their motorcycles wearing their fez. Tell us first of all, is the Shriners and what is the significance of that fez? Speaker 1: Well you'll see the men in the shrine parades, the shrine circus wearing their red fez. In order to be a shriner, have to reach the highest degrees of Freemasonry, either the thirty second degree of the Scottish Rite or thirteenth degree of the York Rite, and then you're allowed to go into the shrine. Sadly, many Christians have gone into this, which is hard to understand because in order to be a shriner, in the initiation, every shriner takes a blood oath of allegiance to Allah as his God and Mohammed as his prophet. Speaker 0: Are you kidding me? Speaker 1: No. In light of nineeleven, you have to wonder how can any Christian take a blood oath of allegiance when God absolutely forbids that in the 10 commandments. Speaker 0: Yet they're not even allowed to pray in the name of Jesus at the lodge, are they? Speaker 1: No. But you swear allegiance that Allah is your God, Muhammad is your prophet. You are then given this red fez with the Islamic sword encrusted in jewels on the front of it. You will see men wearing this and people say, Why do they wear the red fez? It is because if you study history, during the seventh and eighth century as the Muslims swept across North Africa, they came to Fez, Morocco. Speaker 1: And in Fez, Morocco, there was a large community of Christians and Mohammed had ordered the slaughter of all the infidels, meaning Christians who would not bow down to Allah and Mohammed as the prophet. The Muslims went in with the Islamic sword and therein Fez slaughtered thousands of Christians. Then they took their Fez hats and they dipped it in the blood of Christians, glorying in the defeat of Christianity. That's why the Fez's are red, representing the blood of Christians defeated by the Islamic sword which they have encrusted in jewels on the front. There are Christians who walk around wearing this hat and Dave, to be honest, it's an abomination in the eyes of God. Speaker 2: Your political leaders are not only Masons, but some of them are secretly Muslim. They've taken a blood oath to Allah as their one and only God and Mohammed as his messenger, So they don't mind using their power and their influence to advance Islam's agenda. Speaker 3: Islam has contributed a lot to America. In the middle of the supreme court is in the rotunda is a statue or bust of the prophet Mohammed showing the respect that American law and jurisprudence has for the revealer of the Koran. Many of American presidents are masons and shriners who got to the thirty third degree and study the Koran in secret and have the star and crescent on their face. Malik. So Islam is at the basis of Western and American civilization.

Speaker 0 asserts that Jews want to exterminate the European race. He names Richard Kudenhova Kalerghi as “the father of the European Union” and claims he was funded by Jewish bankers Rothschild and Warburg. He cites a book said to be written by Kalerghi, Prektisser I De alismus, in 1925, in which the Jews are described as a master race who can only assume world rule by weakening the European race. The means to weakening, according to the claim, would be to dissolve all European nations, destroy their cultural heritage and national traditions, and replace them with the European Union. The speaker alleges that Jews would invite Africans, Middle Easterners, and Asians to dilute the blood of Europeans through miscegenation to the point where they become a degenerate mixed race. He states that at that point these people would no longer have any sense of nationhood, and that the ancient Jewish messianic prophecies of world rule from Jerusalem would be fulfilled with Jews maintaining their nationhood and national status. He connects this to Nikolai’s writings from 1917 and claims it has manifested recently with the invasion of immigrants from Africa, the Middle East, and Asia into Europe, America, and Australia. The speaker concludes that they are deliberately setting about to genocide the white race and destroy all sense of nationhood, national heritage, and national culture in each of our nations.

The speakers discuss white supremacy and Holocaust narratives, challenging mainstream beliefs and asserting controversial claims. They say the Holocaust benefited Jews and world Jewry, but targeted “Hoaxers. Germany.” They question why Americans fund Holocaust museums, restitution, memorial councils, and support for Israel and world Jewry, noting “there are basically zero” organizations to support “founding stock white European Americans.” They claim the founding documents—the Constitution and Declaration of Independence—were overwhelmingly signed by white Europeans, and debate whether Freemasonry’s founders were Kabbalist Jews; one speaker asserts they were not, while another contends Freemasonry was created in 1843 funded by the Rothschilds to subvert Freemasonry and rewrite the narrative around founding fathers like George Washington, Ben Franklin, James Madison, and Van Buren. The dialogue then shifts to B’nai B’rith, with one speaker alleging it infiltrated Freemasonry in 1843, started by German Jews in New York, and that B’nai B’rith now runs over 5,000 Masonic lodges, schools, and facilities used for human trafficking, with Charlotte, South Carolina as their headquarters. They claim Khobod Lubovich is a rival “massive movement,” possibly more powerful than the Vatican, and assert they run the Vatican. One participant identifies as anti-supremacist but discusses white ethno-nationalist aims, asking why a white country or white state would be unacceptable. They discuss post-World War II persecution of Germans and cite Theodore Kaufman’s book Germany Must Perish as an example of an intent to wipe out the race. They reference WWII casualty figures, stating “over 11,000,000” Germans were killed and “Goy” casualties were “over 80,000,000,” emphasizing that whites—Brits, French, Russians, and Slavs—were killed as well. The conversation alleges Jews use strategies to incite Whites to fight among themselves, referencing World War I’s “brother wars,” and claims LGBTQ influences and vaccines (COVID) are used to reduce white birth rates and fertility. They discuss white Christians as “the biggest servants and soldiers” of these forces, citing John Hagee as an example of Christian Zionism being problematic. Overall, the speakers present a conspiratorial view: Jews and Jewish-led movements infiltrate and control Western institutions, aiming to subjugate or eradicate white Europeans, while white factions are blamed for resisting or complying with these forces. They highlight perceived contradictions in anti-racist or anti-immigrant stances and reiterate a desire for white ethno-nationalist sovereignty.

The speaker argues that the Ukraine war is a distraction from a major event four days earlier, on 02/20/2022, involving a huge financial scandal in Switzerland connected to Putin’s circle and Swiss banks. The scandal is described as Swiss secrets (Suisse Secret in French), the largest leak from a major Swiss bank, Credit Suisse, revealing details on more than 30,000 clients and over $100,000,000,000. The Suddeutsche Zeitung reported that secret data had been obtained over a year via a secure digital mailbox. The speaker notes the timing as four days before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 02/24/2022 and claims this scandal was the trigger for the war. The speaker alleges that “every war gets organized and decided out of Switzerland,” and cites prior videos about the “beast of the Alps” and the Knights Templars. He links Putin, the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, and Zelensky to Switzerland, asserting that important decisions are made there. He claims that on 02/24/2020 there was supposed to be a live broadcast about Credit Suisse and Swiss secrets by the Germans and their Zupeitsche Zeitung and the OCCRP, but the Ukraine war started and the discussion disappeared. The transcript lists a wide array of figures connected to the Swiss secrets list: dictators, aristocrats, drug lords, mafia bosses, and Putin pals. Notable named individuals include Alyaksay Aleksin (Belarusian businessman associated with Lukashenko, sanctioned in 2021), Alexander Lukashenko, Haji Saifula Khan Bangash, a minister of finance, and numerous others described as aristocrats, oligarchs, or corrupt. The list comprises 30,000 people, with names spanning Abdelaziz Bouteflika, King Abdullah of Jordan, Queen Rania, Abdul Khalim Khadom (Syrian official and Assad loyalist), Luis Carlos de Leon (aristocrat), former Ukrainian prime minister Lazarenko, various generals and intelligence officials from Egypt, Pakistan, Armenia, and other regions, as well as figures from South Africa and Rhodesia. The speaker emphasizes that these individuals allegedly channel money through Credit Suisse, and that many are connected to Putin, Lukashenko, and allied regimes. He asserts that many of these people, and their networks, are linked to the Wagner private military company (PMC) and that the list aligns with countries where Wagner has been active. The speaker claims that the Swiss secrets scandal is tied to global money flows and sanctions evasion, noting connections to the Paradise Papers (2017), Pandora Papers, and the Panama Papers, and argues that Swiss markets help pay for Russia’s war via oil, gas, and commodity trading. He asserts that commodities like oil, gas, and wheat are central to the instability and potential financial crisis. The narrator asserts that the money moved to Switzerland by wealthy Russians, to avoid sanctions, enabled the private banking industry and that the war in Ukraine was staged to distract from the scandal and to facilitate wealth transfers to safer locations. The closing stance asserts that Switzerland is the base of all evil, the cross of the Swiss flag symbolizes a door to wealth, and that the media, global elite, and oligarchs use distraction to cover the Swiss secrets scandal and the transfer of wealth while innocent Europeans suffer from the war. The speaker concludes that the war is a distraction and thanks Switzerland for making it possible, implying a broad conspiracy about finance, war, and power.